Does Abortion Violate Non Aggression Principles ?

[Monk-Eye]

" Does Abortion Violate Non Aggression Principles ? "

* Hand Inn Clue Ding This *

Non-aggression principle - Wikipedia

Many supporters and opponents of abortion rights justify their position on NAP grounds. One important question to determine whether or not abortion is consistent with NAP is at what stage of development a fertilized human egg cell can be considered a human being with the status and rights attributed to personhood. Some supporters of NAP argue this occurs at the moment of conception. Others argue that since they believe the fetus lacks sentience until a certain stage of development, it does not qualify as a human being, and as such may be considered property of the mother. Opponents of abortion, on the other hand, state sentience is not a qualifying factor.

 

[Moonglow]

Not nearly as much as warfare or commerce.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

See my response here in your other thread.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Certainly Was A Thought "

* Easy Hint Myst Heir Bob Belay Lock *

See my response here in your other thread.

An appreciation of goaded compulsion includes a gratuity for offering useful innuendo .

Moonglow could let me know whether to add its post to the new thread or it is more than welcome to be reiterated in a multiple choice poll of this thread topic - Does Abortion Violate Non Aggression Principles ? .

This thread poll provides a single choice among radio buttons , while the other thread has multiple choice options , including conception , sentience , and viability .

Note that the onset of sentience and of viability are relatively coincident on a time line of faeiouytal development , however each represents a different ethical question : viability is constitutional , sentience is sympathetic .

 

[Bob Blaylock]

" Certainly Was A Thought "

* Easy Hint Myst Heir Bob Belay Lock *

See my response here in your other thread.

An appreciation of goaded compulsion includes a gratuity for offering useful innuendo .

Moonglow could let me know whether to add its post to the new thread or it is more than welcome to be reiterated in a multiple choice poll of this thread topic - Does Abortion Violate Non Aggression Principles ? .

This thread poll provides a single choice among radio buttons , while the other thread has multiple choice options , including conception , sentience , and viability .

Note that the onset of sentience and of viability are relatively coincident on a time line of faeiouytal development , however each represents a different ethical question : viability is constitutional , sentience is sympathetic .

[ATTACH=full]204845[/ATTACH]

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Would Boisterously Crying Foul Matter Against Obviation "

* Anonymous Links Arranging Four Interns Senate Hearings *

In U.S. Senate: Senators of the 115th Congress hearings , a candidate for supreme court justice will be expected to provide an assessment of relationship between the us 14th amendment and the following statement from Blackmun , whom wrote the majority opinion for Roe V. Wade , "Logically, of course, a legitimate state interest in this area need not stand or fall on acceptance of the belief that life begins at conception or at some other point prior to live birth."

By definition a state is obligated to reprise violations of law on behalf of its citizens and , upon the initial inception of a state , to none other .

It has long been ceded that modifying the us 14th amendment to stipulate that birth is not a requirement for citizenship is the only way around the blackmun conclusion in roe v wade , even as equal protection requires an criteria of birth as an equal requirement for inception into citizenship .

* Open References *

US 14th Amendment Establishes Negative Liberty of Individuals to Acquire Abortion

A Treatise of Legal Philosophy on Adequate Political Science Terms for Civics Pedagogy

A constitution should secure for its individual citizens an equal protection for negative liberties which do not violate non aggression principles .


* Inanity Of Response To Suggestions Inn Alleviating A Site Dysfunction *

" Does Abortion Violate Non Aggression Principles ? " is a different question from " Does Prohibiting Abortion Violate Non Aggression Principles ? " .

Clearly the former question queries whether allowing abortion qualifies as aggression against a faeiouy two us , while the latter question queries whether prohibiting abortion qualifies as aggression against the mother .

Why was such a simple element not understood and is it impossible to restore ?

That a " dull hard at the time " had moderator privileges and was incapable of discerning the simple distinction between the content of the two threads , the experience is compounded by an inability to identify moderators or to communicate with administrators of the forum .

An administrator has not replied through e-mail from site contact .

Alerts did no include a link to the moniker of the moderator issuing the thread deletion and the avatar is a " ? " which is ascribed to numerous users as a default .

@www.usmessageboard.com need not be responsible for the content of those which post on its site , however it seems that @www.usmessageboard.com would be concerned with site governance over its moderators and administrators who manage the integrity of content available through its site .


* Tales Stories Tails Boons *

Hanuman - Wikipedia

His theological origins in Hinduism are unclear. Alternate theories include him having ancient roots, being a non-Aryan deity who was Sanskritized by the Vedic Aryans, or that he is a fusion deity who emerged in literary works from folk Yaksha protector deities and theological symbolism.[10][11]:39–40

In later literature, he has been the patron god of martial arts such as wrestling, acrobatics, as well as meditation and diligent scholarship.[1] He symbolizes the human excellences of inner self-control, faith and service to a cause, hidden behind the first impressions of a being who looks like a monkey.[14][16][10]