Dodgers Remove Gay 'Nun' Group From Pride Night

[Curried Goats]

Messin' with kids?

Are you accusing me of something?

 

[protectionist]

Where do they come from then? Are they created through magic?

Where do they come from then? Are they created through magic?

They are created by the homosexuals, not be nature.
Your post are devolving into very lame stupidity. So now you're saying that anything that exists, is from nature ? LOL
I have 30 paintings in a gallery. Nature did not create them. I did.
Get it ?

 

[Leo123]

Are you accusing me of something?

No, I just read what Marvin Martin wrote to you and your answer. Seemed a bit strange that's all. What did you mean?

Just stay away from the kids.

You said: "Or what little bitch? You'll do absolutely nothing about it?"

 

[Curried Goats]

They are created by the homosexuals, not be nature.

That's some perfect circular reasoning there guy.

Your post are devolving into very lame stupidity.

Mine isn't the one based on a logical fallacy.

So now you're saying that anything that exists, is from nature ? LOL

No. I'm saying anything not created by humans is natural and without purpose or intent. Humans create things with purpose and intent.

I have 30 paintings in a gallery. Nature did not create them. I did.

No shit. Who was arguing otherwise?

Get it ?

I get that you're stupid.

Humans have emotions but we didn't create emotions and we don't create attraction. We can decide whether or not to act on attraction but gay people are attracted to who they are attracted to due to a combination of their chemistry and brain function. We don't know exactly how attraction works but we can hook your brain up to an MRI, show you various images of men and women and clearly see from responses in your brain which of them you are attracted to. That's objective evidence right there morons.

 

[Curried Goats]

No, I just read what Marvin Martin wrote to you and your answer. Seemed a bit strange that's all. What did you mean?

It is isn't at all strange. Marvin likes to pretend he's a tough guy and cosplays about being some protector of children and in so doing likes to make accusations that occasionally get him suspended. I, finding this all amusing, encourage him because I have nothing to actually be ashamed about.

You said: "Or what little bitch? You'll do absolutely nothing about it?"

And he didn't respond because he's a cosplaying little bitch.

 

[protectionist]

What needs to be removed is the Dodgers, from major league baseball. Along with Bud Light, Target and Kohls from the public marketplace, in general, and with their sales all tanking drastically, it looks like they are removing themselves.

 

[protectionist]

That's some perfect circular reasoning there guy.

No it's just ordinary reasoning. Something that liberals seem to take pains trying to avoid.

 

[protectionist]

No. I'm saying anything not created by humans is natural and without purpose or intent. Humans create things with purpose and intent.

Exactly. Which is what LGBTs do > create non-natural sexual orientations with purpose and intent.

 

[protectionist]

Humans have emotions but we didn't create emotions and we don't create attraction. We can decide whether or not to act on attraction but gay people are attracted to who they are attracted to due to a combination of their chemistry and brain function. We don't know exactly how attraction works but we can hook your brain up to an MRI, show you various images of men and women and clearly see from responses in your brain which of them you are attracted to. That's objective evidence right there morons.

OK, so LGBTs are attracted to others of ther same sex. Gosh, what a revelation.
EARTH TO CG: what is being said is that this same sex attraction is what makes LGBTs the sex pervert fruitcakes that they are. Get it ?

 

[Curried Goats]

No it's just ordinary reasoning. Something that liberals seem to take pains trying to avoid.

It's not. Reasoning requires objective observations, not emotional recriminations.

Exactly. Which is what LGBTs do > create non-natural sexual orientations with purpose and intent.

If you want to argue homosexuals create homosexuality you're going to have to provide some objective evidence.

OK, so LGBTs are attracted to others of ther same sex. Gosh, what a revelation.

It seems like a revelation to you.

EARTH TO CG: what is being said is that this same sex attraction is what makes LGBTs the sex pervert fruitcakes that they are. Get it ?

I get that that is an ad hominem. You have no argument for homosexuality not being a part of their physiology as heterosexuality is for you and I and so you resort to name calling.

 

[protectionist]

It's not. Reasoning requires objective observations, not emotional recriminations.

It is ordinary reasoning, OBVIOUSLY based on objective observations (ie. body parts set up by nature for heterosexual sex, not homosexual sex)

 

[protectionist]

If you want to argue homosexuals create homosexuality you're going to have to provide some objective evidence.

I just did in the previous post, and all through this thread. Duh!

 

[protectionist]

It seems like a revelation to you.

Seem that way to you. LOL

 

[Curried Goats]

It is ordinary reasoning, OBVIOUSLY based on objective observations (ie. body parts set up by nature for heterosexual sex, not homosexual sex)

Procreation requires the joining of male and female gametes. Not all sex is intended for the purpose of procreation. The fact that we can see homosexual attraction in MRIs is objective evidence homosexuality is biologically natural.

 

[Leo123]

It's not. Reasoning requires objective observations, not emotional recriminations.

If you want to argue homosexuals create homosexuality you're going to have to provide some objective evidence.

It seems like a revelation to you.

I get that that is an ad hominem. You have no argument for homosexuality not being a part of their physiology as heterosexuality is for you and I and so you resort to name calling.

Human beings take a while to mature. During that time, the body changes drastically. Hormones dictate quite a lot especially in the pre teen and teen years. Before that, children are not particularly interested in sexual things. The society, influenced by nature, influences them to identify with their natal sexual organs. IOW, if you have a penis, you're male, if you have a vagina, you're female. Society then lays out roles for each sex and traditionally, they are expected to couple and procreate.

It is possible to interrupt that development by introducing same sex thoughts, ideas and images before the onset of hormonal flow and influence sexual desire toward homosexuality which is 180 degrees opposite of most of nature which, of course, promotes life and procreation. The sheer paucity of homosexuality in humans proves nature prefers heterosexuals.

That doesn't mean homosexuals are bad people it just means they are not well represented in the population.

 

[protectionist]

I get that that is an ad hominem. You have no argument for homosexuality not being a part of their physiology as heterosexuality is for you and I and so you resort to name calling.

I have stated the OBVIOUS argument repeatedly. If you refuse to accept the objective truth of it, not my problem.

As for the name calling, yeah, we could be better off without such ones as >> "dumb Bingo. , ..."little bitch",... "morons", ...."you dumb bitch. "..."you Dipshit"..."you clowns"..."
YUP!

 

[protectionist]

Procreation requires the joining of male and female gametes. Not all sex is intended for the purpose of procreation. The fact that we can see homosexual attraction in MRIs is objective evidence homosexuality is biologically natural.

Regardless of why sexual participants are participating in sex, it still remains that nature set sex up as a heterosexual thing, not LGBT.

LGBT is purely an unatural, manmade scenario, an abnormal one, a stupid one, and certainly nothing to take "pride" in. Hence the foolishess of the SHAME parades.

 

[Curried Goats]

Human beings take a while to mature. During that time, the body changes drastically. Hormones dictate quite a lot especially in the pre teen and teen years. Before that, children are not particularly interested in sexual things.

I don't know what this means specifically. I remember my first crush being in 3rd grade which is around age 7 - 8. Our relationships and understanding of them develop as we do but that development does start fairly early on.

The society, influenced by nature, influences them to identify with their natal sexual organs. IOW, if you have a penis, you're male, if you have a vagina, you're female.

That's not necessarily the case. There are the intersexed who may have mix matches physiologies.

Society then lays out roles for each sex and traditionally, they are expected to couple and procreate.

Societies and these roles that they create are what are artificial. What you expect from me is entirely subjective, not objective.

It is possible to interrupt that development by introducing same sex thoughts, ideas and images before the onset of hormonal flow and influence sexual desire toward homosexuality which is 180 degrees opposite of most of nature which, of course, promotes life and procreation.

It is possible, is not really an objective argument. You can break down and condition a person's psyche not just towards homosexuality but towards hetersexual incest, into sexual fantasies and behaviors that are violent, the question is whether or not this accounts for the majority or even a significant percentage of homosexuality and this isn't a rhetorical question, if this is your claim I'm asking for evidence.

The sheer paucity of homosexuality in humans proves nature prefers heterosexuals.

When you say nature prefers heterosexuals you are using a metaphore. Nature doesn't actually care because nature isn't a thing with a conscience. Naturally there's a much greater chance for heterosexuality than homosexuality but given enough tries we're still going to be left with millions and millions of homosexuals.

 

[Curried Goats]

I have stated the OBVIOUS argument repeatedly. If you refuse to accept the objective truth of it, not my problem.

I'm not asking for what you think is obvious, I'm asking for what you can provide as objective.

As for the name calling, yeah, we could be better off without such ones as >> "dumb Bingo. , ..."little bitch",... "morons", ...."you dumb bitch. "..."you Dipshit"..."you clowns"..."
YUP!

My arguments don't rest on name calling. I make an objective argument and then I call you names.

Regardless of why sexual participants are participating in sex, it still remains that nature set sex up as a heterosexual thing, not LGBT.

It did not. It set up procreation to require male and female gametes. Procreation and sex are not the same thing. Its natural for humans to desire sexual pleasure even if the goal isn't procreation. There's a whole porn industry that bares that truth.

LGBT is purely an unatural, manmade scenario, an abnormal one, a stupid one, and certainly nothing to take "pride" in. Hence the foolishess of the SHAME parades.

See. Your only evidence that homosexuality is unnatural are the mean names you call homosexuals. That's not very compelling evidence.

 

[protectionist]

I'm not asking for what you think is obvious, I'm asking for what you can provide as objective.

There is no need for you to ask that, when I have done just that numerous times in this thread. lol