Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #61
US warns North Korea of increased isolation if threats escalate further
White House says US will not be intimidated by 'bellicose rhetoric' and is fully capable of defending itself and its allies
Ewen MacAskill in Washington
guardian.co.uk, Friday 29 March 2013 14.33 EDT
US warns North Korea of increased isolation if threats escalate further | World news | guardian.co.uk
The Korean War was sanctioned by the United Nations; therefore, the American Left had their hands tied. American Communists could not protest a military action against the spread of communism without criticizing the UN. The Vietnam War was not sanctioned by the United Nations; therefore; American Communists were free to bring defeat their own country.
NOTE: Americas loyal ally, the UK, did not fight with America in Vietnam. I always found that despicable. Communists were determined to destroy America just as Germany would have destroyed England in two wars, yet the Brits always behaved as though it was Americas duty to come to Englands aid while they were under no obligation to fight alongside America against its enemy. I should also point out that the Korean War, and the Vietnam War, were really hot battles in the Cold War against communism. Had the United Nations not sanctioned the Korean Police Action ONLY 5 YEARS AFTER THE END OF WWII I doubt if the UK would helped us there.
Now that Kim Jong-un is doing a lot more than saber-rattling let me quote President Truman on stopping Communist expansion in Korea:
We've got to stop the sons of bitches, no matter what, and that's all there is to it.
For many years I suggested asking every top Democrat the following:
Do you oppose the Korean War in hindsight?
If they answer Yes they admit that fighting against communism is what they oppose.
If they answer No. ask them why not? since both wars were fought for the same reason.
Thank you Kim Jong-un for making the question more important today than its ever been in the past.
This is where it gets interesting. Is the UNs stamp of approval still in effect should North Korea attack South Korea ?
If so, American Communists may not have to face the dilemma of demonstrating against the United Nations this time around because three traitors are perched at the top of government. Joe Biden, John Kerry, and Hussein. Biden and Kerry took an active part in betraying this country, and the men and women who were doing the fighting, during the Vietnam war. Hussein was born in 1961; so he was too young to do the things Biden and Kerry did, but there is no doubt as to where his loyalties lie.
Next question
Will Americas allies support us again? Answer: Possibly because of the nuclear bomb factor.
Also, Americans have seen damn few loyal Democrats in high office since Harry Truman stuck it to the Soviet Union in 1950. None in Husseins administration. Back in 1950 Communist China was not a member of the UN. Today, they have a seat on the Security Council. Guess how the Chicoms feel about Kim Jong-uns expansion plans.
Logically, North Koreas military planners must rely on three things:
1. China will back their play when push comes to shove.
2. American traitors will do everything in their power to portray a second Korean War as another Vietnam.
3. Most importantly, Kim Jong-un is counting on Hussein & Company to keep the United Nations out of it à la Vietnam. In short: Kim would not be poking the lion without Hussein & Company in power.
Incidentally, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is from South Korea. I dont know what Ban is doing behind the scenes, or how it plays into North Koreas plans.
On the bright side, no matter how it goes North Korea could trigger the UNs downfall. The majority of Americans already despise the UN. It wont take much to push it over the edge. And there would be no better example of poetic justice than to have it happen when UN-loving traitors are in charge.
Boy, you REALLY need to study history before you make a complete fool of yourself.
Too late!