Try to tell the commies that. They want us shooting muzzle-load muskets, if that.
that's fine, we can disagree. I don't think you need a bazooka or a tank, or should be allowed to buy either. I don't know why any non police or non military citizen needs a machine gun either. But I understand your slippery slope argument.
that's fine, we can disagree. I don't think you need a bazooka or a tank, or should be allowed to buy either. I don't know why any non police or non military citizen needs a machine gun either. But I understand your slippery slope argument.
Heller, as written by Scalia has a pretty good breakdown......,all bearable arms are allowed with the caveat that unusual, and dangerous are able to be limited....a bazooka, though bearable is unusual....and dangerous in that it is an area effect weapon......tanks are not bearable......
Civilian self defense rifles, like the AR-15, the civilian model of the AK-47 and other semi auto rifles are covered by the 2nd Amendment in that they are bearable and in common use.......
The problem? The anti gunners will not stop until all access to guns is banned or so limited to normal people that they are essentially banned....
that's fine, we can disagree. I don't think you need a bazooka or a tank, or should be allowed to buy either. I don't know why any non police or non military citizen needs a machine gun either. But I understand your slippery slope argument.
Heller, as written by Scalia has a pretty good breakdown......,all bearable arms are allowed with the caveat that unusual, and dangerous are able to be limited....a bazooka, though bearable is unusual....and dangerous in that it is an area effect weapon......tanks are not bearable......
Civilian self defense rifles, like the AR-15, the civilian model of the AK-47 and other semi auto rifles are covered by the 2nd Amendment in that they are bearable and in common use.......
The problem? The anti gunners will not stop until all access to guns is banned or so limited to normal people that they are essentially banned....
I am on your side, believe me. But I must take issue with your description of AR-15 and AK-47 as self defense weapons. A shotgun is a self defense weapon, A 38 special is a self defense weapon, a hammer is a self defense weapon. Those guns are assault weapons, designed to kill a lot of people in a very short period of time.
You hurt our argument when you mischaracterize certain guns.
An AR-15 is a lot easier for my 110 lb wife to use that a blow-your-*******-shoulder-off 12 gauge. It's also better than a handgun because a shouldered weapon is more accurate. The only weapon better than an AR-15 for home defense is an AR-15 pistol with subsonic rounds.
I don't have any semi-auto handguns in the house with self defence in mind.
Most wheel guns are double-action = semi-auto.
Yes, I do. It is why I personally, never take You seriously about this specific topic.
Why don't you prove it?
You clearly do not know what argumentum ad ignorantiam means. You're just using it because some idiot you listen to uses it.
Natural rights are secured in State Constitutions and available via Due Process.
Appeals to ignorance is All the right wing has; slackers claiming a hard work ethic from the Age of Iron, is important in modern times.
Nothing but appeal to Ignorance is all You have, right winger.
You don't even know what the **** that means, and you expect us to take you seriously?
I bet you take my guns seriously, don't you?
No one should take conservatives seriously because they’re consistently wrong on the issues – or they’re lying about the issues.
