Mustang
Gold Member
Simple question: yes or no?
In the Senate? Quite probably not.
In the court of public opinion? I think it's more likely than not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Simple question: yes or no?
Isn't the senate 50/50 with Harris the tie breaker? Oh yeah, I forgot the ten rinos...Yes, in the court of public opinion, in the senate no and it will cause a great rend in the party over people who know the truth and those that deny the truth.
The only one which matters is the Senate vote.
So, given that they'll fail (again), why bother? He's already been impeached. An acquittal will hardly harm Trump more...
But he was, nevertheless, found liable for their deaths and penalized. And that was an analogy anyway. In the case of Trump, nowhere is it written he cannot be censured for something for which he was acquitted in a Senate trial. And if the mentally ill ex-President and the GOP taught us anything these last 4 years, it's that, if it ain't written down, then it ain't a rule.What would stop them? One can be held liable for a crime, even if that person was acquitted of it at trial. Ask OJ.If the Senate found him not guilty of insurrection, then how could they pass a resolution barring him from office because of his participation in an insurrection. It seems to me the better course is to dismiss the impeachm
The crime he was charged with was murder in the first degree. He was found not guilty of that charge, and he was not tried for that crime a second time...
But he was, nevertheless, found liable for their deaths and penalized. And that was an analogy anyway. In the case of Trump, nowhere is it written he cannot be censured for something for which he was acquitted in a Senate trial. And if the mentally ill ex-President and the GOP taught us anything these last 4 years, it's that, if it ain't written down, then it ain't a rule.What would stop them? One can be held liable for a crime, even if that person was acquitted of it at trial. Ask OJ.If the Senate found him not guilty of insurrection, then how could they pass a resolution barring him from office because of his participation in an insurrection. It seems to me the better course is to dismiss the impeachm
The crime he was charged with was murder in the first degree. He was found not guilty of that charge, and he was not tried for that crime a second time...
Biden could openly call for Chinese assistance in the 2022 election. This is fine, now.
Biden could extort foreign leaders, using congressionally-approved arms shipments, for personal gain. This is fine, now.
Biden could call Secs of State and ask them to change State vote results in 2022. This is fine, now.
Biden could openly state, on national television, that he fired his FBI director for investigating his political allies. Despite Nixon losing the Presidency for exactly this (but only once the tape became public)... This is fine, now.
Do You Believe Trump Will Be Convicted?
Ah, and the whataboutism starts. You will have to peddle it to someone else. Not interested.But he was, nevertheless, found liable for their deaths and penalized. And that was an analogy anyway. In the case of Trump, nowhere is it written he cannot be censured for something for which he was acquitted in a Senate trial. And if the mentally ill ex-President and the GOP taught us anything these last 4 years, it's that, if it ain't written down, then it ain't a rule.What would stop them? One can be held liable for a crime, even if that person was acquitted of it at trial. Ask OJ.If the Senate found him not guilty of insurrection, then how could they pass a resolution barring him from office because of his participation in an insurrection. It seems to me the better course is to dismiss the impeachm
The crime he was charged with was murder in the first degree. He was found not guilty of that charge, and he was not tried for that crime a second time...
Biden could openly call for Chinese assistance in the 2022 election. This is fine, now.
Biden could extort foreign leaders, using congressionally-approved arms shipments, for personal gain. This is fine, now.
Biden could call Secs of State and ask them to change State vote results in 2022. This is fine, now.
Biden could openly state, on national television, that he fired his FBI director for investigating his political allies. Despite Nixon losing the Presidency for exactly this (but only once the tape became public)... This is fine, now.
You really have no appreciation for how stupid Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, etal are making democrats look, do you?
Take this back to the DNC leaders: Grow up. We have a Constitution and you're pissing on it.Do You Believe Trump Will Be Convicted?
Probably not - but the GOP will be!
Not how it works. If you say it is unconstitutional, then take it to court.Take this back to the DNC leaders: Grow up. We have a Constitution and you're pissing on it.Do You Believe Trump Will Be Convicted?
Probably not - but the GOP will be!
Thanks man.Isn't the senate 50/50 with Harris the tie breaker? Oh yeah, I forgot the ten rinos...Yes, in the court of public opinion, in the senate no and it will cause a great rend in the party over people who know the truth and those that deny the truth.
The only one which matters is the Senate vote.
So, given that they'll fail (again), why bother? He's already been impeached. An acquittal will hardly harm Trump more...
Yes, the Senate is 50/50 with Harris as the tie breaker.
To that point, it would appear as though you're frighteningly clueless about what it takes to convict someone in an impeachment trial.
Educate yourself and come back when you're smarter...
The resolution would pass. If Trump decided to run again, then it would end up in court.What would stop them? One can be held liable for a crime, even if that person was acquitted of it at trial. Ask OJ.If the Senate found him not guilty of insurrection, then how could they pass a resolution barring him from office because of his participation in an insurrection. It seems to me the better course is to dismiss the impeachm
Yep!The resolution would pass. If Trump decided to run again, then it would end up in court.What would stop them? One can be held liable for a crime, even if that person was acquitted of it at trial. Ask OJ.If the Senate found him not guilty of insurrection, then how could they pass a resolution barring him from office because of his participation in an insurrection. It seems to me the better course is to dismiss the impeachm