Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
Bathroom Bills and Religious Freedom Laws: Losing Battles for the GOP
Bathroom Bills and Religious Freedom Laws: Losing Battles for the GOP
If you can't control reality, just lie enough and the lie becomes truth...
Even Justice Ginsburg doesn't support males using females intimate facilities. But people far right of her stance DO support it? BULL + CRAP = BULLCRAP.
Ginsburg's own words:
Never in all my blogging days have I stumbled across a more blatant pile of
To me, this is a pre-emptive strike. A mouse setting off fire crackers around the feet of an elephant to be sure the elephant doesn't step on him and crush him to death.
It gets better, there's more. Diversions! Diversions! Diversions!!
I wonder how that ranking might change if the Brown's lawsuit becomes public and the reality of polygamy marriage steps up to the limelight? How many women, for example, currently doing the "it's all good, live and let live" dance on marriage equality would sit up in their chairs stunned at the idea that that also means polygamy? What? The legal precedent of gay marriage means W-H-A-T???!!
As for "most voters being in favor of transgender bathrooms"; this is the largest pile of bullcrap ever. Target got 1.2 million boycotters signing up to refuse to shop at their stores. And for every person willing to actually sign that petition, probably 10-100 more are doing that in spirit on the down low. Target lost $10 BILLION in value and had to spend an additional $20 million to build separate third single use bathrooms to fix their mistake; but they still won't deny deranged men the use of the women's rooms anyway!
Yep, this is a pile of bullcrap bigger than the Titanic. And it's a signal to the GOP of a weak scale, a very weak scale in the armor of the democratic party in general. A recent poll I did (but feel free to do your own, GOP strategists) says the American public identifies the "marriage equality/deranged men in women's rooms" movement with the democratic party. My poll said it was 78% thinking dems equal these movements. If the Browns of Nevada/Utah use the precedent of Obergefell to introduce polygamy marriage at this stage in the game?...the GOP stands to gain DROVES of women voters to their ranks. Maybe even for life.
How many stores have come close to being bankrupted by a boycott about organized fierce protests on "the economy, healthcare or terrorism"? Yep, that's some low-priority issue right there: men in women's showers/restrooms; the only one able to assemble one of the largest official boycotts in retail history.
Food for thought. Think: Target Boycott. There's your polling-results. 'nuff said. Target Stores Still Struggle With Men Using Women's Bathroom: $10 Billion + $20 Million Lost
Bathroom Bills and Religious Freedom Laws: Losing Battles for the GOP
If you can't control reality, just lie enough and the lie becomes truth...
Yeah, that's why 12 states are suing the Obama Administration and getting their first legal victory at the federal level with a stay on males using girls' bathrooms in schools; because "most people support transgender bathroom crap"
Even Justice Ginsburg doesn't support males using females intimate facilities. But people far right of her stance DO support it? BULL + CRAP = BULLCRAP.Ginsburg's own words:
So are most Americans to the right or left of Ginsburg politically?
Never in all my blogging days have I stumbled across a more blatant pile of
To me, this is a pre-emptive strike. A mouse setting off fire crackers around the feet of an elephant to be sure the elephant doesn't step on him and crush him to death.
It gets better, there's more. Diversions! Diversions! Diversions!!
I wonder how that ranking might change if the Brown's lawsuit becomes public and the reality of polygamy marriage steps up to the limelight? How many women, for example, currently doing the "it's all good, live and let live" dance on marriage equality would sit up in their chairs stunned at the idea that that also means polygamy? What? The legal precedent of gay marriage means W-H-A-T???!!
As for "most voters being in favor of transgender bathrooms"; this is the largest pile of bullcrap ever. Target got 1.2 million boycotters signing up to refuse to shop at their stores. And for every person willing to actually sign that petition, probably 10-100 more are doing that in spirit on the down low. Target lost $10 BILLION in value and had to spend an additional $20 million to build separate third single use bathrooms to fix their mistake; but they still won't deny deranged men the use of the women's rooms anyway!
Yep, this is a pile of bullcrap bigger than the Titanic. And it's a signal to the GOP of a weak scale, a very weak scale in the armor of the democratic party in general. A recent poll I did (but feel free to do your own, GOP strategists) says the American public identifies the "marriage equality/deranged men in women's rooms" movement with the democratic party. My poll said it was 78% thinking dems equal these movements. If the Browns of Nevada/Utah use the precedent of Obergefell to introduce polygamy marriage at this stage in the game?...the GOP stands to gain DROVES of women voters to their ranks. Maybe even for life.
How many stores have come close to being bankrupted by a boycott about organized fierce protests on "the economy, healthcare or terrorism"? Yep, that's some low-priority issue right there: men in women's showers/restrooms; the only one able to assemble one of the largest official boycotts in retail history.
Food for thought. Think: Target Boycott. There's your polling-results. 'nuff said. Target Stores Still Struggle With Men Using Women's Bathroom: $10 Billion + $20 Million Lost
Last edited:
