Do you believe the official 911 story?

[eots]

why do you lie? there were literally tons of twisted and heated steel beams at the wtc ..that shit head... is forensic evidence.
what I think you mean is where are the test results that confirm you fantasy...

lol...and none of them where forensically tested to see exactly what temperatures they reached and the ones they did test showed temperatures below what was requied for failue

but they did fail and you have no forensic evidence proving anything other than heat and damage caused them to.
making your argument meaningless.

there is evidence of higher than predicted temperatures..NIST refers to them as anomalies and unexplained phenomena..lol

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-99CLdHWCc]Ground Zero ironworkers on 9/11 anomalies - YouTube[/ame]

 

[daws101]

lol...and none of them where forensically tested to see exactly what temperatures they reached and the ones they did test showed temperatures below what was requied for failue

but they did fail and you have no forensic evidence proving anything other than heat and damage caused them to.
making your argument meaningless.

there is evidence of higher than predicted temperatures..NIST refers to them as anomalies and unexplained phenomena..lol

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-99CLdHWCc]Ground Zero ironworkers on 9/11 anomalies - YouTube[/ame]

that not evidence, it's a story that cannot be validated , thanks for playing ....bahahahahahahaha!
again no mention of higher then expected temps...it's a good thing you don't have a job in media or language translation..

 

[Mr. Jones]

bullshit: The critical temperature for steel starts at 900°C for pure iron, then, as more carbon is added, the temperature falls to a minimum 724°C for eutectic steel (steel with only .83% by weight of carbon in it). As 2.1 % carbon (by mass) is approached, the critical temperature climbs back up, to 1130°C.

In the years since September 11, 2001 terrorist attack in New York City, engineers and other experts have been studying the collapse of the World Trade Center Twin Towers. By examining the collapse step-by-step, experts are learning how buildings fail, and discovering ways we can build stronger structures.


What Caused the Twin Towers to Fall?
1. Impact from the Terrorist Planes
When Boeing jets piloted by terrorists struck the Twin Towers, some 10,000 gallons (38 kiloliters) of jet fuel fed an enormous fireball. But, the impact of the planes and the burst of flames did not make the Towers collapse right away. Like most buildings, the Twin Towers had redundant design. The term redundant design means that when one system fails, another carries the load. Each of the Twin Towers had 244 columns around a central core that housed the elevators, stairwells, mechanical systems, and utilities. When some columns were damaged, others could still support the building.
2. Heat from the Fires
The sprinkler system was damaged by the impact of the planes. But even if the sprinklers had been working, they could not have maintained enough pressure to stop the fire. Fed by the remaining jet fuel, the heat became intense.

Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F. This is not hot enough to melt structural steel. However, engineers say that for the World Trade Center towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength. Steel will lose about half its strength at 1,200 degrees F. The steel will also become distorted when heat is not a uniform temperature.

3. Collapsing Floors
Most fires start in one area and then spread. The fire from the terrorist planes covered the area of an entire floor almost instantly. As the weakened floors began to collapse, they pancaked. This means that floors crashed down on floors with increasing weight and momentum, crushing each successive floor below. With the weight of the plunging floors building force, the exterior walls buckled.
Why the World Trade Center Twin Towers Fell

this is not forensic evidence of the temperatures required actually being reached so why do you pretend it is ?

why do you lie? there were literally tons of twisted and heated steel beams at the wtc ..that shit head... is forensic evidence.
what I think you mean is where are the test results that confirm you fantasy...

This coming from an asshole that has been arguing in another thread that the molten steel that was sighted by numerous witnesses including an original WTC engineer, was aluminum, and who sides with another deceitful and disingenuous asshole, that the mlten steel was probably from aluminum fucking car parts??? LOL!!!

Dawgshit is one of the worst lying trolls this message board has ever seen.
He tries so hard to defend the criminals that facilitated in the attacks and cover up, and
spins himself into a frenzy doing it, he gets caught in obvious lies..
This is a troll who didn't even know who or what the Bazant theory that NIST attached themselves to, even was!!!

So he finally admits there was indeed tons of STEEL wreckage. Gee I wonder why he didn't say there were tons of ALUMINUM wreckage to match his argument in the other thread????

 

[paulitician]

this is not forensic evidence of the temperatures required actually being reached so why do you pretend it is ?

why do you lie? there were literally tons of twisted and heated steel beams at the wtc ..that shit head... is forensic evidence.
what I think you mean is where are the test results that confirm you fantasy...

This coming from an asshole that has been arguing in another thread that the molten steel that was sighted by numerous witnesses including an original WTC engineer, was aluminum, and who sides with another deceitful and disingenuous asshole, that the mlten steel was probably from aluminum fucking car parts??? LOL!!!

Dawgshit is one of the worst lying trolls this message board has ever seen.
He tries so hard to defend the criminals that facilitated in the attacks and cover up, and
spins himself into a frenzy doing it, he gets caught in obvious lies..
This is a troll who didn't even know who or what the Bazant theory that NIST attached themselves to, even was!!!

So he finally admits there was indeed tons of STEEL wreckage. Gee I wonder why he didn't say there were tons of ALUMINUM wreckage to match his argument in the other thread????

He or she is a confused little weirdo. Too many Sock Puppet accounts. So many lies to keep track of. He or she just can't do it. It's a very pathetic situation.

 

[Mr. Jones]

We are not only demanding answers, we are demanding answers that can survive reasonable scrutiny. Because the government's claims regarding 9-11 up until now, cannot survive reasonable scrutiny, they must be rejected in favor of answers that can.
The evidence to support the claim that the OCT is false is irrefutable.
It can be physically observed and recreated. It can be mathematically proven, and independently verified via eyewitness accounts. The evidence to support the government's claim that fire destroyed all three buildings has no basis in reality, and the evidence they claim exists is only in the form of words.
There is no historical data to back their assertions,on the contrary, all historical data disproves them. No models have been able to physically reproduce the phenomena they describe because as expected, the laws of physics cannot be violated.
The government's refusal to first acknowledge evidence and witness testimony but to investigate and disprove the most logical cause for the collapse of the buildings by explosives is, in itself, highly suspect of a cover up.

The official account of 9-11 is a cover up plain and simple.
A cover up as a false story created to conceal the real story. For any cover up to succeed, the false story must be protected from information that undermines it. The trolls and shills in this thread try to do just that, but time after time get caught in lies and fail.
The evidence of which is in their own words.
If the conspirators are unable to do this, the cover up falls apart. Although all cover ups have elements of a false story, there are other things that play a supporting role, like the destruction of physical evidence, creating distractions to control people's attention, vilifying those who level accusations, etc. etc..
These supporting elements along with the false story serve one goal.... they keep you from seeing or considering anything that might reveal the truth.

These OCT kooks that are defending the lies seem to be doing so as an act of self defense. They stubbornly refuse to allow themselves and try to prevent others from seeing what actually so obvious, ..that the OCT and the government agencies including their employees are a part of the cover up...

The OCT defenders and shills, always attack the messenger. They try to assert that the claims of those who don't believe their conspiracy theory and point to reasons why they don't are "absurd" and not " credible"...
Now ask yourself an obvious question... Why would it be necessary to vilify a person making "absurd claims" backed with "no credible evidence?" Isn't that something reasonably intelligent people could determine by looking at the evidence themselves?
Do we really need or want, others to decide for us what we should and shouldn't take into consideration? In a "free" and "democratic society?" I don't fucking think so.

Folks should disregard the foolish statements and slanderous anti American, anti thinking
attitudes of the trolls that defend the OCT here and everywhere, and start to consider why is it that most Americans have never heard of the Northwoods document? Or about the real story behind the USS Maine, the Lusitania, the Gulf of Tonkin, the USS Liberty or the NeoCons' Project for A New American Century and their written visions of needing a "New Pearl Harbor?" Or the truth about Alqaeda and Osama Bin Laden and the Bin Laden's connections to the Bush family???
Because much of what Americans should know is being kept from them and out of the spotlight on purpose..
Either we keep condoning the exploitation of our country or we don't. Either we support the acts of liars, thieves, murderers and anti American tyrants or we don't. This is our country, not theirs. LOOK at the evidence, do some research and learn what it means and determine once and for all where YOU stand.

 

[SAYIT]

We are not only demanding answers, we are demanding answers that can survive reasonable scrutiny. Because the government's claims regarding 9-11 up until now, cannot survive reasonable scrutiny, they must be rejected in favor of answers that can.
The evidence to support the claim that the OCT is false is irrefutable.
It can be physically observed and recreated. It can be mathematically proven, and independently verified via eyewitness accounts. The evidence to support the government's claim that fire destroyed all three buildings has no basis in reality, and the evidence they claim exists is only in the form of words.
There is no historical data to back their assertions,on the contrary, all historical data disproves them. No models have been able to physically reproduce the phenomena they describe because as expected, the laws of physics cannot be violated.
The government's refusal to first acknowledge evidence and witness testimony but to investigate and disprove the most logical cause for the collapse of the buildings by explosives is, in itself, highly suspect of a cover up.

The official account of 9-11 is a cover up plain and simple.
A cover up as a false story created to conceal the real story. For any cover up to succeed, the false story must be protected from information that undermines it. The trolls and shills in this thread try to do just that, but time after time get caught in lies and fail.
The evidence of which is in their own words.
If the conspirators are unable to do this, the cover up falls apart. Although all cover ups have elements of a false story, there are other things that play a supporting role, like the destruction of physical evidence, creating distractions to control people's attention, vilifying those who level accusations, etc. etc..
These supporting elements along with the false story serve one goal.... they keep you from seeing or considering anything that might reveal the truth.

These OCT kooks that are defending the lies seem to be doing so as an act of self defense. They stubbornly refuse to allow themselves and try to prevent others from seeing what actually so obvious, ..that the OCT and the government agencies including their employees are a part of the cover up...

The OCT defenders and shills, always attack the messenger. They try to assert that the claims of those who don't believe their conspiracy theory and point to reasons why they don't are "absurd" and not " credible"...
Now ask yourself an obvious question... Why would it be necessary to vilify a person making "absurd claims" backed with "no credible evidence?" Isn't that something reasonably intelligent people could determine by looking at the evidence themselves?
Do we really need or want, others to decide for us what we should and shouldn't take into consideration? In a "free" and "democratic society?" I don't fucking think so.

Folks should disregard the foolish statements and slanderous anti American, anti thinking
attitudes of the trolls that defend the OCT here and everywhere, and start to consider why is it that most Americans have never heard of the Northwoods document? Or about the real story behind the USS Maine, the Lusitania, the Gulf of Tonkin, the USS Liberty or the NeoCons' Project for A New American Century and their written visions of needing a "New Pearl Harbor?" Or the truth about Alqaeda and Osama Bin Laden and the Bin Laden's connections to the Bush family???
Because much of what Americans should know is being kept from them and out of the spotlight on purpose..
Either we keep condoning the exploitation of our country or we don't. Either we support the acts of liars, thieves, murderers and anti American tyrants or we don't. This is our country, not theirs. LOOK at the evidence, do some research and learn what it means and determine once and for all where YOU stand.

Yo, Princess, your CT grows and grows like a Chia Pet ... just add water.
So now you have any number of US gov't agencies, our courts, our media, the planners and the perpetrators. Of course, as you add co-conspirators to the ever-growing number of peeps now included in your CT, the improbability that all would keep quiet (especially those who would have rigged the buildings for demo) makes your CT seem like ... uh ... like paranoid silliness.

 

[candycorn]

We are not only demanding answers, we are demanding answers that can survive reasonable scrutiny. Because the government's claims regarding 9-11 up until now, cannot survive reasonable scrutiny, they must be rejected in favor of answers that can.
The evidence to support the claim that the OCT is false is irrefutable.
It can be physically observed and recreated. It can be mathematically proven, and independently verified via eyewitness accounts. The evidence to support the government's claim that fire destroyed all three buildings has no basis in reality, and the evidence they claim exists is only in the form of words.
There is no historical data to back their assertions,on the contrary, all historical data disproves them. No models have been able to physically reproduce the phenomena they describe because as expected, the laws of physics cannot be violated.
The government's refusal to first acknowledge evidence and witness testimony but to investigate and disprove the most logical cause for the collapse of the buildings by explosives is, in itself, highly suspect of a cover up.

The official account of 9-11 is a cover up plain and simple.
A cover up as a false story created to conceal the real story. For any cover up to succeed, the false story must be protected from information that undermines it. The trolls and shills in this thread try to do just that, but time after time get caught in lies and fail.
The evidence of which is in their own words.
If the conspirators are unable to do this, the cover up falls apart. Although all cover ups have elements of a false story, there are other things that play a supporting role, like the destruction of physical evidence, creating distractions to control people's attention, vilifying those who level accusations, etc. etc..
These supporting elements along with the false story serve one goal.... they keep you from seeing or considering anything that might reveal the truth.

These OCT kooks that are defending the lies seem to be doing so as an act of self defense. They stubbornly refuse to allow themselves and try to prevent others from seeing what actually so obvious, ..that the OCT and the government agencies including their employees are a part of the cover up...

The OCT defenders and shills, always attack the messenger. They try to assert that the claims of those who don't believe their conspiracy theory and point to reasons why they don't are "absurd" and not " credible"...
Now ask yourself an obvious question... Why would it be necessary to vilify a person making "absurd claims" backed with "no credible evidence?" Isn't that something reasonably intelligent people could determine by looking at the evidence themselves?
Do we really need or want, others to decide for us what we should and shouldn't take into consideration? In a "free" and "democratic society?" I don't fucking think so.

Folks should disregard the foolish statements and slanderous anti American, anti thinking
attitudes of the trolls that defend the OCT here and everywhere, and start to consider why is it that most Americans have never heard of the Northwoods document? Or about the real story behind the USS Maine, the Lusitania, the Gulf of Tonkin, the USS Liberty or the NeoCons' Project for A New American Century and their written visions of needing a "New Pearl Harbor?" Or the truth about Alqaeda and Osama Bin Laden and the Bin Laden's connections to the Bush family???
Because much of what Americans should know is being kept from them and out of the spotlight on purpose..
Either we keep condoning the exploitation of our country or we don't. Either we support the acts of liars, thieves, murderers and anti American tyrants or we don't. This is our country, not theirs. LOOK at the evidence, do some research and learn what it means and determine once and for all where YOU stand.

Yo, Princess, your CT grows and grows like a Chia Pet ... just add water.
So now you have any number of US gov't agencies, our courts, our media, the planners and the perpetrators. Of course, as you add co-conspirators to the ever-growing number of peeps now included in your CT, the improbability that all would keep quiet (especially those who would have rigged the buildings for demo) makes your CT seem like ... uh ... like paranoid silliness.

Hell, they can't even explain how wreckage ended up on the Pentagon...it blows them out of the water right there. Dumbasses.

 

[eots]

We are not only demanding answers, we are demanding answers that can survive reasonable scrutiny. Because the government's claims regarding 9-11 up until now, cannot survive reasonable scrutiny, they must be rejected in favor of answers that can.
The evidence to support the claim that the OCT is false is irrefutable.
It can be physically observed and recreated. It can be mathematically proven, and independently verified via eyewitness accounts. The evidence to support the government's claim that fire destroyed all three buildings has no basis in reality, and the evidence they claim exists is only in the form of words.
There is no historical data to back their assertions,on the contrary, all historical data disproves them. No models have been able to physically reproduce the phenomena they describe because as expected, the laws of physics cannot be violated.
The government's refusal to first acknowledge evidence and witness testimony but to investigate and disprove the most logical cause for the collapse of the buildings by explosives is, in itself, highly suspect of a cover up.

The official account of 9-11 is a cover up plain and simple.
A cover up as a false story created to conceal the real story. For any cover up to succeed, the false story must be protected from information that undermines it. The trolls and shills in this thread try to do just that, but time after time get caught in lies and fail.
The evidence of which is in their own words.
If the conspirators are unable to do this, the cover up falls apart. Although all cover ups have elements of a false story, there are other things that play a supporting role, like the destruction of physical evidence, creating distractions to control people's attention, vilifying those who level accusations, etc. etc..
These supporting elements along with the false story serve one goal.... they keep you from seeing or considering anything that might reveal the truth.

These OCT kooks that are defending the lies seem to be doing so as an act of self defense. They stubbornly refuse to allow themselves and try to prevent others from seeing what actually so obvious, ..that the OCT and the government agencies including their employees are a part of the cover up...

The OCT defenders and shills, always attack the messenger. They try to assert that the claims of those who don't believe their conspiracy theory and point to reasons why they don't are "absurd" and not " credible"...
Now ask yourself an obvious question... Why would it be necessary to vilify a person making "absurd claims" backed with "no credible evidence?" Isn't that something reasonably intelligent people could determine by looking at the evidence themselves?
Do we really need or want, others to decide for us what we should and shouldn't take into consideration? In a "free" and "democratic society?" I don't fucking think so.

Folks should disregard the foolish statements and slanderous anti American, anti thinking
attitudes of the trolls that defend the OCT here and everywhere, and start to consider why is it that most Americans have never heard of the Northwoods document? Or about the real story behind the USS Maine, the Lusitania, the Gulf of Tonkin, the USS Liberty or the NeoCons' Project for A New American Century and their written visions of needing a "New Pearl Harbor?" Or the truth about Alqaeda and Osama Bin Laden and the Bin Laden's connections to the Bush family???
Because much of what Americans should know is being kept from them and out of the spotlight on purpose..
Either we keep condoning the exploitation of our country or we don't. Either we support the acts of liars, thieves, murderers and anti American tyrants or we don't. This is our country, not theirs. LOOK at the evidence, do some research and learn what it means and determine once and for all where YOU stand.

Yo, Princess, your CT grows and grows like a Chia Pet ... just add water.
So now you have any number of US gov't agencies, our courts, our media, the planners and the perpetrators. Of course, as you add co-conspirators to the ever-growing number of peeps now included in your CT, the improbability that all would keep quiet (especially those who would have rigged the buildings for demo) makes your CT seem like ... uh ... like paranoid silliness.

Hell, they can't even explain how wreckage ended up on the Pentagon...it blows them out of the water right there. Dumbasses.

not really interested in the pentagon ..there are without question some big holes in the pentagon story and evidence but it is the collapses of the towers and especially building 7 that really stand out as being a complete cover up of the actual cause

 

[eots]

We are not only demanding answers, we are demanding answers that can survive reasonable scrutiny. Because the government's claims regarding 9-11 up until now, cannot survive reasonable scrutiny, they must be rejected in favor of answers that can.
The evidence to support the claim that the OCT is false is irrefutable.
It can be physically observed and recreated. It can be mathematically proven, and independently verified via eyewitness accounts. The evidence to support the government's claim that fire destroyed all three buildings has no basis in reality, and the evidence they claim exists is only in the form of words.
There is no historical data to back their assertions,on the contrary, all historical data disproves them. No models have been able to physically reproduce the phenomena they describe because as expected, the laws of physics cannot be violated.
The government's refusal to first acknowledge evidence and witness testimony but to investigate and disprove the most logical cause for the collapse of the buildings by explosives is, in itself, highly suspect of a cover up.

The official account of 9-11 is a cover up plain and simple.
A cover up as a false story created to conceal the real story. For any cover up to succeed, the false story must be protected from information that undermines it. The trolls and shills in this thread try to do just that, but time after time get caught in lies and fail.
The evidence of which is in their own words.
If the conspirators are unable to do this, the cover up falls apart. Although all cover ups have elements of a false story, there are other things that play a supporting role, like the destruction of physical evidence, creating distractions to control people's attention, vilifying those who level accusations, etc. etc..
These supporting elements along with the false story serve one goal.... they keep you from seeing or considering anything that might reveal the truth.

These OCT kooks that are defending the lies seem to be doing so as an act of self defense. They stubbornly refuse to allow themselves and try to prevent others from seeing what actually so obvious, ..that the OCT and the government agencies including their employees are a part of the cover up...

The OCT defenders and shills, always attack the messenger. They try to assert that the claims of those who don't believe their conspiracy theory and point to reasons why they don't are "absurd" and not " credible"...
Now ask yourself an obvious question... Why would it be necessary to vilify a person making "absurd claims" backed with "no credible evidence?" Isn't that something reasonably intelligent people could determine by looking at the evidence themselves?
Do we really need or want, others to decide for us what we should and shouldn't take into consideration? In a "free" and "democratic society?" I don't fucking think so.

Folks should disregard the foolish statements and slanderous anti American, anti thinking
attitudes of the trolls that defend the OCT here and everywhere, and start to consider why is it that most Americans have never heard of the Northwoods document? Or about the real story behind the USS Maine, the Lusitania, the Gulf of Tonkin, the USS Liberty or the NeoCons' Project for A New American Century and their written visions of needing a "New Pearl Harbor?" Or the truth about Alqaeda and Osama Bin Laden and the Bin Laden's connections to the Bush family???
Because much of what Americans should know is being kept from them and out of the spotlight on purpose..
Either we keep condoning the exploitation of our country or we don't. Either we support the acts of liars, thieves, murderers and anti American tyrants or we don't. This is our country, not theirs. LOOK at the evidence, do some research and learn what it means and determine once and for all where YOU stand.

Yo, Princess, your CT grows and grows like a Chia Pet ... just add water.
So now you have any number of US gov't agencies, our courts, our media, the planners and the perpetrators. Of course, as you add co-conspirators to the ever-growing number of peeps now included in your CT, the improbability that all would keep quiet (especially those who would have rigged the buildings for demo) makes your CT seem like ... uh ... like paranoid silliness.

more blah blah blah...the silliness is the NIST report its conclusions and its method of determining these conclusions

 

[daws101]

this is not forensic evidence of the temperatures required actually being reached so why do you pretend it is ?

why do you lie? there were literally tons of twisted and heated steel beams at the wtc ..that shit head... is forensic evidence.
what I think you mean is where are the test results that confirm you fantasy...

This coming from an asshole that has been arguing in another thread that the molten steel that was sighted by numerous witnesses including an original WTC engineer, was aluminum, and who sides with another deceitful and disingenuous asshole, that the mlten steel was probably from aluminum fucking car parts??? LOL!!!

Dawgshit is one of the worst lying trolls this message board has ever seen.
He tries so hard to defend the criminals that facilitated in the attacks and cover up, and
spins himself into a frenzy doing it, he gets caught in obvious lies..
This is a troll who didn't even know who or what the Bazant theory that NIST attached themselves to, even was!!!

So he finally admits there was indeed tons of STEEL wreckage. Gee I wonder why he didn't say there were tons of ALUMINUM wreckage to match his argument in the other thread????

once again sister jones's lack of reading comprehension and acumen for misstatement really shines here!
he's still trying to sell his lack of proof that the Bazant theory is false and is epically failing to replace his inattention to what's been posted with deliberately false statements: here's another fine example of his stupidity:" there were literally tons of twisted and heated steel beams at the wtc"- ME

sister jones's reply: "So he finally admits there was indeed tons of STEEL wreckage"-sisterjones

ok! sister jones please provide corroborating evidence that I ever implied inferred or said there was no steel wreckage
to all non CTS
sister jones does not know the difference between a statement of fact and an admission of guilt .

 

[daws101]

Yo, Princess, your CT grows and grows like a Chia Pet ... just add water.
So now you have any number of US gov't agencies, our courts, our media, the planners and the perpetrators. Of course, as you add co-conspirators to the ever-growing number of peeps now included in your CT, the improbability that all would keep quiet (especially those who would have rigged the buildings for demo) makes your CT seem like ... uh ... like paranoid silliness.

Hell, they can't even explain how wreckage ended up on the Pentagon...it blows them out of the water right there. Dumbasses.

not really interested in the pentagon ..there are without question some big holes in the pentagon story and evidence but it is the collapses of the towers and especially building 7 that really stand out as being a complete cover up of the actual cause

only in your fantasy..
the reality is no one was killed there were no governmental secrets there and nothing that could not be replaced. wtc7 to people living in reality is no more tragic then an empty barn burning down..

 

[daws101]

We are not only demanding answers, we are demanding answers that can survive reasonable scrutiny. Because the government's claims regarding 9-11 up until now, cannot survive reasonable scrutiny, they must be rejected in favor of answers that can.
The evidence to support the claim that the OCT is false is irrefutable.
It can be physically observed and recreated. It can be mathematically proven, and independently verified via eyewitness accounts. The evidence to support the government's claim that fire destroyed all three buildings has no basis in reality, and the evidence they claim exists is only in the form of words.
There is no historical data to back their assertions,on the contrary, all historical data disproves them. No models have been able to physically reproduce the phenomena they describe because as expected, the laws of physics cannot be violated.
The government's refusal to first acknowledge evidence and witness testimony but to investigate and disprove the most logical cause for the collapse of the buildings by explosives is, in itself, highly suspect of a cover up.

The official account of 9-11 is a cover up plain and simple.
A cover up as a false story created to conceal the real story. For any cover up to succeed, the false story must be protected from information that undermines it. The trolls and shills in this thread try to do just that, but time after time get caught in lies and fail.
The evidence of which is in their own words.
If the conspirators are unable to do this, the cover up falls apart. Although all cover ups have elements of a false story, there are other things that play a supporting role, like the destruction of physical evidence, creating distractions to control people's attention, vilifying those who level accusations, etc. etc..
These supporting elements along with the false story serve one goal.... they keep you from seeing or considering anything that might reveal the truth.

These OCT kooks that are defending the lies seem to be doing so as an act of self defense. They stubbornly refuse to allow themselves and try to prevent others from seeing what actually so obvious, ..that the OCT and the government agencies including their employees are a part of the cover up...

The OCT defenders and shills, always attack the messenger. They try to assert that the claims of those who don't believe their conspiracy theory and point to reasons why they don't are "absurd" and not " credible"...
Now ask yourself an obvious question... Why would it be necessary to vilify a person making "absurd claims" backed with "no credible evidence?" Isn't that something reasonably intelligent people could determine by looking at the evidence themselves?
Do we really need or want, others to decide for us what we should and shouldn't take into consideration? In a "free" and "democratic society?" I don't fucking think so.

Folks should disregard the foolish statements and slanderous anti American, anti thinking
attitudes of the trolls that defend the OCT here and everywhere, and start to consider why is it that most Americans have never heard of the Northwoods document? Or about the real story behind the USS Maine, the Lusitania, the Gulf of Tonkin, the USS Liberty or the NeoCons' Project for A New American Century and their written visions of needing a "New Pearl Harbor?" Or the truth about Alqaeda and Osama Bin Laden and the Bin Laden's connections to the Bush family???
Because much of what Americans should know is being kept from them and out of the spotlight on purpose..
Either we keep condoning the exploitation of our country or we don't. Either we support the acts of liars, thieves, murderers and anti American tyrants or we don't. This is our country, not theirs. LOOK at the evidence, do some research and learn what it means and determine once and for all where YOU stand.

Yo, Princess, your CT grows and grows like a Chia Pet ... just add water.
So now you have any number of US gov't agencies, our courts, our media, the planners and the perpetrators. Of course, as you add co-conspirators to the ever-growing number of peeps now included in your CT, the improbability that all would keep quiet (especially those who would have rigged the buildings for demo) makes your CT seem like ... uh ... like paranoid silliness.

more blah blah blah...the silliness is the NIST report its conclusions and its method of determining these conclusions

 

[candycorn]

Hell, they can't even explain how wreckage ended up on the Pentagon...it blows them out of the water right there. Dumbasses.

not really interested in the pentagon ..there are without question some big holes in the pentagon story and evidence but it is the collapses of the towers and especially building 7 that really stand out as being a complete cover up of the actual cause

only in your fantasy..
the reality is no one was killed there were no governmental secrets there and nothing that could not be replaced. wtc7 to people living in reality is no more tragic then an empty barn burning down..

I guess they think that two groups of terrorists happened to plan their attacks independently of one another in NY an DC on the same day.

 

[eots]

not really interested in the pentagon ..there are without question some big holes in the pentagon story and evidence but it is the collapses of the towers and especially building 7 that really stand out as being a complete cover up of the actual cause

only in your fantasy..
the reality is no one was killed there were no governmental secrets there and nothing that could not be replaced. wtc7 to people living in reality is no more tragic then an empty barn burning down..

I guess they think that two groups of terrorists happened to plan their attacks independently of one another in NY an DC on the same day.

I think a massive steel framed building does not fall in secs from an office fire and the failure of a single column

 

[daws101]

only in your fantasy..
the reality is no one was killed there were no governmental secrets there and nothing that could not be replaced. wtc7 to people living in reality is no more tragic then an empty barn burning down..

I guess they think that two groups of terrorists happened to plan their attacks independently of one another in NY an DC on the same day.

I think a massive steel framed building does not fall in secs from an office fire and the failure of a single column

as always you'd be wrong... example:[ame=http://youtu.be/j-zczJXSxnw]Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse "Gallopin' Gertie" - YouTube[/ame]
they said kinda the same thing about this.

 

[candycorn]

I guess they think that two groups of terrorists happened to plan their attacks independently of one another in NY an DC on the same day.

I think a massive steel framed building does not fall in secs from an office fire and the failure of a single column

as always you'd be wrong... example:[ame=http://youtu.be/j-zczJXSxnw]Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse "Gallopin' Gertie" - YouTube[/ame]
they said kinda the same thing about this.

A building missing 18 floors is no longer stable...you'd think the "researchers" would know this.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

someone farted in here.

 

[daws101]

I think a massive steel framed building does not fall in secs from an office fire and the failure of a single column

as always you'd be wrong... example:[ame=http://youtu.be/j-zczJXSxnw]Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse "Gallopin' Gertie" - YouTube[/ame]
they said kinda the same thing about this.

A building missing 18 floors is no longer stable...you'd think the "researchers" would know this.

they would if they were actually researching instead of spewing specious half witticisms..

 

[daws101]

someone farted in here.

speaking of halfwits...

 

[LA RAM FAN]

two more farts in a row from you Dawgshit.