Do You Believe In Coincidences????

[B. Kidd]

The choice of Democrat voters:

Once again, thanks to Joey and the Dimm's brand: CHAOS AND WEAKNESS!

 

[rightwinger]

in the 1930s US Conservatives supported Hitlers Nazi Bund

Today, they call it MAGA and support Putin

Coincidence?

 

[PoliticalChic]

One of the earliest lessons intelligent folks learn is that reality is defined by actions, not words.

Biden and the lying Democrats can say whatever they wish, but the reality is that they are paying Putin $70 million a day.

"Biden Strongarms Democrats to Vote Against Russia Oil Ban​

So why was Biden jawboning Democratic senators, strongarming them to vote against one of the most devastating sanctions of all: banning the import of Russian oil into the U.S.?"

Biden Strongarms Democrats to Vote Against Russia Oil Ban

pjmedia.com

 

[MisterBeale]

Ukraine is a 'territorial ambition,' you dunce.

Hitler merely wanted 'lebensraum.'

So.....the OP remains 100% true, accurate and correct.


Now get lost.

Well? I guess that makes every prime minister of Israel that ever supported settlements in the Westbank comparable to Hitler?

Your rhetoric is absurd to the extreme.

 

[MisterBeale]

in the 1930s US Conservatives supported Hitlers Nazi bund

Today, they call it MAGA and support Putin

Coincidence?

Look at that PoliticalChic, you and rightwinger are on the same side. . .

. . hmmmm. . . what does that tell you?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Well? I guess that makes every prime minister of Israel that ever supported settlements in the Westbank comparable to Hitler?

Your rhetoric is absurd to the extreme.

Don't read it if you can't take the truth.

I told you to get lost.....

 

[rightwinger]

Look at that PoliticalChic, you and rightwinger are on the same side. . .

. . hmmmm. . . what does that tell you?

Political Chic is a well known Nazi Sympathizer

Today she has shifted her loyalty to Putin

 

[BWK]

By the strangest of accidents......well......consider this:

View attachment 611629
1. Both of the above .......under Democrat Presidents.




2. Neville Chamberlain, in full Arthur Neville Chamberlain, (born March 18, 1869, Birmingham, Warwickshire, England—died November 9, 1940, Heckfield, near Reading, Hampshire), prime minister of the United Kingdom from May 28, 1937, to May 10, 1940, whose name is identified with the policy of “appeasement” toward Adolf Hitler’s Germany in the period immediately preceding World War II.

Britannica.com





3. Democrat Franklin Roosevelt was hardly 1° of difference from either Chamberlain, or the current appeaser, Biden.

In 1938, American ambassador Hugh R. Wilson reported to FDR his conversations with Hitler: “Hitler then said that he had watched with interest the methods which you, Mr. President, have been attempting to adopt for the United States…. I added that you were very much interested in certain phases of the sociological effort, notably for the youth and workmen, which is being made in Germany…” cited in “Franklin D. Roosevelt and Foreign Affairs,” vol.2, p. 27.

The National Socialists hailed these ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:

1. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
2. And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
3. And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
4. The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”

4. When Chamberlain infamously gave in to Hitler's advances in Europe.....FDR was right there giving him a high-five:

At the Munich conference where Europe sold out Czechoslovakia, even though France had a treaty to go to war to preserve Czechoslovakia…..Chamberlain was about to appease Hitler….and FDR sent this message to Chamberlain:



"MUNICH MESSAGE FROM U.S. BARED; Roosevelt Sent Encouraging 'Good Man' to Chamberlain Day Before Conference

MUNICH MESSAGE FROM U.S. BARED; Roosevelt Sent Encouraging 'Good Man' to Chamberlain Day Before Conference (Published 1955)

Documents on US foreign relations in '38, pub by State Dept, include P Gilbert rept on Anschluss, noting strong Austrian support for move

mobile.nytimes.com

And the 1929 depression went down under who, while a Democrat president did what to bring us back, that took practically ten years?

 

[BWK]

in the 1930s US Conservatives supported Hitlers Nazi Bund

Today, they call it MAGA and support Putin

Coincidence?

Nope! Same animal.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And the 1929 depression went down under who, while a Democrat president did what to bring us back, that took practically ten years?

So you'd rather try to change the subject than admit the truth of the thread????


Sorry, you syphlitic idiot.......you just inadvertently admitted it.

 

[MisterBeale]

while a Democrat president did what to bring us back

FDR put Japanese Americans in concentration camps. . .

. . . and at the rate the establishment war propaganda is going?

It would not surprise me if the American establishment puts Russian Americans and anyone that supports them into FEMA camps. It certainly looks like both PoliticalChic and rightwinger would have no problem with that.

 

[BWK]

So you'd rather try to change the subject than admit the truth of the thread????


Sorry, you syphlitic idiot.......you just inadvertently admitted it.

I'm responding to your comparison. That is your subject isn't it? And I see no comparison. Roosevelt was dealing with a depression that a Republican caused. Hitler was dealing with his own propaganda and building his image during the same time period. To say Roosevelt was doing nothing is the big joke on you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

FDR put Japanese Americans in concentration camps. . .

. . . and at the rate the establishment war propaganda is going?

It would not surprise me if the American establishment puts Russian Americans and anyone that supports them into FEMA camps. It certainly looks like both PoliticalChic and rightwinger would have no problem with that.

You have devolved to nothing but a lying low-life.

Sad.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm responding to your comparison. That is your subject isn't it? And I see no comparison. Roosevelt was dealing with a depression that a Republican caused. Hitler was dealing with his own propaganda and building his image during the same time period. To say Roosevelt was doing nothing is the big joke on you.

Let's check: anything not acccurate and true, moron???


By the strangest of accidents......well......consider this:

1. Both of the above .......under Democrat Presidents.




2. Neville Chamberlain, in full Arthur Neville Chamberlain, (born March 18, 1869, Birmingham, Warwickshire, England—died November 9, 1940, Heckfield, near Reading, Hampshire), prime minister of the United Kingdom from May 28, 1937, to May 10, 1940, whose name is identified with the policy of “appeasement” toward Adolf Hitler’s Germany in the period immediately preceding World War II.

Britannica.com





3. Democrat Franklin Roosevelt was hardly 1° of difference from either Chamberlain, or the current appeaser, Biden.

In 1938, American ambassador Hugh R. Wilson reported to FDR his conversations with Hitler: “Hitler then said that he had watched with interest the methods which you, Mr. President, have been attempting to adopt for the United States…. I added that you were very much interested in certain phases of the sociological effort, notably for the youth and workmen, which is being made in Germany…” cited in “Franklin D. Roosevelt and Foreign Affairs,” vol.2, p. 27.

The National Socialists hailed these ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:

1. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
2. And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
3. And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
4. The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”

4. When Chamberlain infamously gave in to Hitler's advances in Europe.....FDR was right there giving him a high-five:

At the Munich conference where Europe sold out Czechoslovakia, even though France had a treaty to go to war to preserve Czechoslovakia…..Chamberlain was about to appease Hitler….and FDR sent this message to Chamberlain:



"MUNICH MESSAGE FROM U.S. BARED; Roosevelt Sent Encouraging 'Good Man' to Chamberlain Day Before Conference

MUNICH MESSAGE FROM U.S. BARED; Roosevelt Sent Encouraging 'Good Man' to Chamberlain Day Before Conference (Published 1955)​

Documents on US foreign relations in '38, pub by State Dept, include P Gilbert rept on Anschluss, noting strong Austrian support for move

mobile.nytimes.com

 

[MisterBeale]

Don't read it if you can't take the truth.

I told you to get lost.....

You want me to get lost, because you don't like me calling out your bullshit.

 

[BWK]

Let's check: anything not acccurate and true, moron???


By the strangest of accidents......well......consider this:

1. Both of the above .......under Democrat Presidents.




2. Neville Chamberlain, in full Arthur Neville Chamberlain, (born March 18, 1869, Birmingham, Warwickshire, England—died November 9, 1940, Heckfield, near Reading, Hampshire), prime minister of the United Kingdom from May 28, 1937, to May 10, 1940, whose name is identified with the policy of “appeasement” toward Adolf Hitler’s Germany in the period immediately preceding World War II.

Britannica.com





3. Democrat Franklin Roosevelt was hardly 1° of difference from either Chamberlain, or the current appeaser, Biden.

In 1938, American ambassador Hugh R. Wilson reported to FDR his conversations with Hitler: “Hitler then said that he had watched with interest the methods which you, Mr. President, have been attempting to adopt for the United States…. I added that you were very much interested in certain phases of the sociological effort, notably for the youth and workmen, which is being made in Germany…” cited in “Franklin D. Roosevelt and Foreign Affairs,” vol.2, p. 27.

The National Socialists hailed these ‘relief measures’ in ways you will recognize:

1. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): “Roosevelt’s Dictatorial Recovery Measures.”
2. And on January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’
3. And “[Roosevelt], too demands that collective good be put before individual self-interest. Many passages in his book ‘Looking Forward’ could have been written by a National Socialist….one can assume that he feels considerable affinity with the National Socialist philosophy.”
4. The paper also refers to “…the fictional appearance of democracy.”

4. When Chamberlain infamously gave in to Hitler's advances in Europe.....FDR was right there giving him a high-five:

At the Munich conference where Europe sold out Czechoslovakia, even though France had a treaty to go to war to preserve Czechoslovakia…..Chamberlain was about to appease Hitler….and FDR sent this message to Chamberlain:



"MUNICH MESSAGE FROM U.S. BARED; Roosevelt Sent Encouraging 'Good Man' to Chamberlain Day Before Conference

MUNICH MESSAGE FROM U.S. BARED; Roosevelt Sent Encouraging 'Good Man' to Chamberlain Day Before Conference (Published 1955)​

Documents on US foreign relations in '38, pub by State Dept, include P Gilbert rept on Anschluss, noting strong Austrian support for move

mobile.nytimes.com

Yea, FDR didn't impose vice grip type sanctions on Germany, Biden has on Russia. You forgot that part.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm responding to your comparison. That is your subject isn't it? And I see no comparison. Roosevelt was dealing with a depression that a Republican caused. Hitler was dealing with his own propaganda and building his image during the same time period. To say Roosevelt was doing nothing is the big joke on you.

You brought up a very different subject......but one I am ready to smash in your ugly kisser: Democrat FDR caused the Depression and doubled its length.

FDR policies doubled the length of the Great Depression​

https://reason.org › commentary › fdr-policies-doubled...
In fact, recent empirical evidence by UCLA economists Harold Cole and Lee Ohanian suggests that FDR's economic policy added 7 years to the Great ...
You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 10/31/21

FDR's policies prolonged Depression by 7 years, UCLA ...​

https://historynewsnetwork.org › article
"President Roosevelt believed that excessive competition was responsible for the Depression by reducing prices and wages, and by extension ...

UCLA Study Claims That FDR Extended the Great Depression ...​

https://wiserinvestor.com › Wiser Blog
UCLA Study Claims That FDR Extended the Great Depression for 7 Years. This is a major claim. Read here to decide for yourself. "President Roosevelt believed ...

FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the ...​

https://fee.org › articles › fdrs-folly-how-roosevelt-and-...
On May 6, 1939, Henry Morgenthau, Roosevelt's treasury secretary, confirmed the total failure of the New Deal to stop the Great Depression: “We ...

 

[MisterBeale]

You have devolved to nothing but a lying low-life.

Sad.

US gov’t knew NATO expansion to Ukraine would force Russia to intervene​

US gov't knew NATO expansion to Ukraine would force Russia to intervene - Geopolitical Economy Report

US Ambassador William Burns, now CIA director, admitted in 2008 embassy cable that NATO expansion to Ukraine crosses Russia's security "redlines" and could lead to violence which would force Moscow to intervene.

multipolarista.com

". . . Ukraine and Georgia’s NATO aspirations not only touch a raw nerve in Russia, they engender serious concerns about the consequences for stability in the region. Not only does Russia perceive encirclement, and efforts to undermine Russia’s influence in the region, but it also fears unpredictable and uncontrolled consequences which would seriously affect Russian security interests. Experts tell us that Russia is particularly worried that the strong divisions in Ukraine over NATO membership, with much of the ethnic-Russian community against membership, could lead to a major split, involving violence or at worst, civil war. In that eventuality, Russia would have to decide whether to intervene; a decision Russia does not want to have to face.. . .

Burns’ warnings came true just a few years later.. . ."

Cable: 08MOSCOW265_a

The CIA knew what it was doing. . . it wanted war, it was trying to trigger one, and it got one.

Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault​

The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin​

Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault

The liberal delusions that provoked Putin.

www.foreignaffairs.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

utYou want me to get lost, because you don't like me calling out your bullshit.

You have done nothing but destroyed any cachet you had in trying to assuage the pain I provided you in the last spanking.


You were wrong about the Budapest Memorandum, and respond with this juvenile attempt to argue against the irrefutable truth I post.

 

[PoliticalChic]

US gov’t knew NATO expansion to Ukraine would force Russia to intervene​

US gov't knew NATO expansion to Ukraine would force Russia to intervene - Geopolitical Economy Report

US Ambassador William Burns, now CIA director, admitted in 2008 embassy cable that NATO expansion to Ukraine crosses Russia's security "redlines" and could lead to violence which would force Moscow to intervene.

multipolarista.com

". . . Ukraine and Georgia’s NATO aspirations not only touch a raw nerve in Russia, they engender serious concerns about the consequences for stability in the region. Not only does Russia perceive encirclement, and efforts to undermine Russia’s influence in the region, but it also fears unpredictable and uncontrolled consequences which would seriously affect Russian security interests. Experts tell us that Russia is particularly worried that the strong divisions in Ukraine over NATO membership, with much of the ethnic-Russian community against membership, could lead to a major split, involving violence or at worst, civil war. In that eventuality, Russia would have to decide whether to intervene; a decision Russia does not want to have to face.. . .

Burns’ warnings came true just a few years later.. . ."

Cable: 08MOSCOW265_a

The CIA knew what it was doing. . . it wanted war, it was trying to trigger one, and it got one.

Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault​

The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin​

Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault

The liberal delusions that provoked Putin.

www.foreignaffairs.com

Let the record show that you endorse the slaughter of civilians when a nation is "upset."