Do You Believe In Civil Rights?

[Conservative65]

Your argument centers around YOUR opinion and disagreement about how something authorized by the Constitution (military) is done not what the Constitution says. Invalid argument.

It is completely valid; as long as you can use it for the common Defense, we can use it for the general Welfare.

General welfare does not equal social welfare. Sorry, try again.

Yes, it does; why do you believe it doesn't?

It's not the mandated responsibility of one group, those you think have too much, to support and keep up another group, those you think have too little. Social welfare does that.

Why do you believe its the responsibility of those that do for themselves to support those that won't do for themselves?

yes, dear; that is what providing for the general welfare, means. Why do you believe it doesn't?

Only to those with incorrect views does it mean that. It's not my place to do for some freeloading piece of shit what he WON'T do for himself.

 

[danielpalos]

who is making the most money, under our form of Capitalism?

Those that provide things society considers valuable.

with what? how much of a work ethic from the Age of Iron, does the one percent, actually have?

Oh, another one that assumes if one isn't doing manual/physical labor they aren't working. That's OK. Those of us you don't consider doing work are the ones you are so jealous of based on what we have from it.

The fantastical right wing, seems to claim, that Only those of Capital worth have any worth under our form of Capitalism.

Social worth for free, means nothing to the right and is an "externality" to their markets and ideology.

If you can't provide yourself with financial stability and others are forced to do it for you, you are a drain on society.

Nope; it means we may need to employ, Yankee forms of ingenuity, to solve our current dilemma, in a market friendly manner that is compatible with our form of Capitalism.

It is termed and styled, promoting the general welfare.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Do you believe that civil rights needs more attention, or it already have had enough and it's time to move on?

Why/why not?

Tome.to move.on....people.need to.be United not trying to find scapegoats so a few people can make cash off of us.

 

[danielpalos]

who is making the most money, under our form of Capitalism?

Those that provide things society considers valuable.

with what? how much of a work ethic from the Age of Iron, does the one percent, actually have?

Oh, another one that assumes if one isn't doing manual/physical labor they aren't working. That's OK. Those of us you don't consider doing work are the ones you are so jealous of based on what we have from it.

The fantastical right wing, seems to claim, that Only those of Capital worth have any worth under our form of Capitalism.

Social worth for free, means nothing to the right and is an "externality" to their markets and ideology.

Since paying the bills involves financial worth not social worth, the claim is true.

thank you. the semi-religious right wing, should get a memo.

 

[danielpalos]

It's not the mandated responsibility of one group, those you think have too much, to support and keep up another group, those you think have too little. Social welfare does that.

Why do you believe its the responsibility of those that do for themselves to support those that won't do for themselves?

yes, dear; that is what providing for the general welfare, means. Why do you believe it doesn't?

Because I can read English.

What part don't you agree with?

Promote the general welfare, is also in our social Contract and federal Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

It is completely valid; as long as you can use it for the common Defense, we can use it for the general Welfare.

General welfare does not equal social welfare. Sorry, try again.

Yes, it does; why do you believe it doesn't?

It's not the mandated responsibility of one group, those you think have too much, to support and keep up another group, those you think have too little. Social welfare does that.

Why do you believe its the responsibility of those that do for themselves to support those that won't do for themselves?

yes, dear; that is what providing for the general welfare, means. Why do you believe it doesn't?

Only to those with incorrect views does it mean that. It's not my place to do for some freeloading piece of shit what he WON'T do for himself.

providing for the general welfare is a social Power delegated to our federal Congress, and a reason for the social Power to Tax the People to pay for social policy that provides for the general welfare.

 

[Conservative65]

It's not the mandated responsibility of one group, those you think have too much, to support and keep up another group, those you think have too little. Social welfare does that.

Why do you believe its the responsibility of those that do for themselves to support those that won't do for themselves?

yes, dear; that is what providing for the general welfare, means. Why do you believe it doesn't?

Because I can read English.

What part don't you agree with?

Promote the general welfare, is also in our social Contract and federal Constitution.

Food stamps, Medicaid, WIC, government housing, etc. aren't in it. Military is specifically.

 

[Conservative65]

General welfare does not equal social welfare. Sorry, try again.

Yes, it does; why do you believe it doesn't?

It's not the mandated responsibility of one group, those you think have too much, to support and keep up another group, those you think have too little. Social welfare does that.

Why do you believe its the responsibility of those that do for themselves to support those that won't do for themselves?

yes, dear; that is what providing for the general welfare, means. Why do you believe it doesn't?

Only to those with incorrect views does it mean that. It's not my place to do for some freeloading piece of shit what he WON'T do for himself.

providing for the general welfare is a social Power delegated to our federal Congress, and a reason for the social Power to Tax the People for social policy that provides for the general welfare.

Sorry, still don't see any of the program you say the federal government can do listed in the Constitution. I do, however, see words about the military.

 

[danielpalos]

Do you believe that civil rights needs more attention, or it already have had enough and it's time to move on?

Why/why not?

Tome.to move.on....people.need to.be United not trying to find scapegoats so a few people can make cash off of us.

who tries to do that? cheap capitalists?

 

[danielpalos]

It's not the mandated responsibility of one group, those you think have too much, to support and keep up another group, those you think have too little. Social welfare does that.

Why do you believe its the responsibility of those that do for themselves to support those that won't do for themselves?

yes, dear; that is what providing for the general welfare, means. Why do you believe it doesn't?

Because I can read English.

What part don't you agree with?

Promote the general welfare, is also in our social Contract and federal Constitution.

Food stamps, Medicaid, WIC, government housing, etc. aren't in it. Military is specifically.

our wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror, are not in it, either.

welfare for individuals provides for the general welfare of the People of our Republic.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, it does; why do you believe it doesn't?

It's not the mandated responsibility of one group, those you think have too much, to support and keep up another group, those you think have too little. Social welfare does that.

Why do you believe its the responsibility of those that do for themselves to support those that won't do for themselves?

yes, dear; that is what providing for the general welfare, means. Why do you believe it doesn't?

Only to those with incorrect views does it mean that. It's not my place to do for some freeloading piece of shit what he WON'T do for himself.

providing for the general welfare is a social Power delegated to our federal Congress, and a reason for the social Power to Tax the People for social policy that provides for the general welfare.

Sorry, still don't see any of the program you say the federal government can do listed in the Constitution. I do, however, see words about the military.

social programs are the "colonel general" welfare, not the General Welfare. is that simpler for that fascist, right wing?

 

[Conservative65]

It's not the mandated responsibility of one group, those you think have too much, to support and keep up another group, those you think have too little. Social welfare does that.

Why do you believe its the responsibility of those that do for themselves to support those that won't do for themselves?

yes, dear; that is what providing for the general welfare, means. Why do you believe it doesn't?

Only to those with incorrect views does it mean that. It's not my place to do for some freeloading piece of shit what he WON'T do for himself.

providing for the general welfare is a social Power delegated to our federal Congress, and a reason for the social Power to Tax the People for social policy that provides for the general welfare.

Sorry, still don't see any of the program you say the federal government can do listed in the Constitution. I do, however, see words about the military.

social programs are the "colonel general" welfare, not the General Welfare. is that simpler for that fascist, right wing?

That means they shouldn't exist. Guess you'll have to do for yourself or go without when you won't.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, it does; why do you believe it doesn't?

It's not the mandated responsibility of one group, those you think have too much, to support and keep up another group, those you think have too little. Social welfare does that.

Why do you believe its the responsibility of those that do for themselves to support those that won't do for themselves?

yes, dear; that is what providing for the general welfare, means. Why do you believe it doesn't?

Only to those with incorrect views does it mean that. It's not my place to do for some freeloading piece of shit what he WON'T do for himself.

providing for the general welfare is a social Power delegated to our federal Congress, and a reason for the social Power to Tax the People for social policy that provides for the general welfare.

Sorry, still don't see any of the program you say the federal government can do listed in the Constitution. I do, however, see words about the military.

wars on Crime, Drugs, Poverty, are unconstitutional for the military on US soil. we have the militia for that and the supremacy clause.

 

[danielpalos]

yes, dear; that is what providing for the general welfare, means. Why do you believe it doesn't?

Only to those with incorrect views does it mean that. It's not my place to do for some freeloading piece of shit what he WON'T do for himself.

providing for the general welfare is a social Power delegated to our federal Congress, and a reason for the social Power to Tax the People for social policy that provides for the general welfare.

Sorry, still don't see any of the program you say the federal government can do listed in the Constitution. I do, however, see words about the military.

social programs are the "colonel general" welfare, not the General Welfare. is that simpler for that fascist, right wing?

That means they shouldn't exist. Guess you'll have to do for yourself or go without when you won't.

that does not provide for the general welfare; providing for the general bad-fare, is not in our Constitution, either.

 

[danielpalos]

The fantastical right wing claims it is a "work or die" ethic from the Age of Iron, that is important.

Does that Only apply to the poor?

Do you only consider manual labor as work?

the right wing, seems to think so.

i believe in faithful execution of our own laws regarding the legal concept of employment at will, simply for the sake of public morals in the public sector.

 

[Conservative65]

Only to those with incorrect views does it mean that. It's not my place to do for some freeloading piece of shit what he WON'T do for himself.

providing for the general welfare is a social Power delegated to our federal Congress, and a reason for the social Power to Tax the People for social policy that provides for the general welfare.

Sorry, still don't see any of the program you say the federal government can do listed in the Constitution. I do, however, see words about the military.

social programs are the "colonel general" welfare, not the General Welfare. is that simpler for that fascist, right wing?

That means they shouldn't exist. Guess you'll have to do for yourself or go without when you won't.

that does not provide for the general welfare; providing for the general bad-fare, is not in our Constitution, either.

Providing for the military is. Don't like it. Tough shit. There isn't a damn thing you can do about it.

 

[danielpalos]

It's not the mandated responsibility of one group, those you think have too much, to support and keep up another group, those you think have too little. Social welfare does that.

Why do you believe its the responsibility of those that do for themselves to support those that won't do for themselves?

yes, dear; that is what providing for the general welfare, means. Why do you believe it doesn't?

Because I can read English.

Promoting the general Welfare is also, in our Constitution.

 

[Conservative65]

The fantastical right wing claims it is a "work or die" ethic from the Age of Iron, that is important.

Does that Only apply to the poor?

Do you only consider manual labor as work?

the right wing, seems to think so.

i believe in faithful execution of our own laws regarding the legal concept of employment at will, simply for the sake of public morals in the public sector.

I think anything that contributes is considered work whether it be physical, mental, or a combination of both.

 

[danielpalos]

providing for the general welfare is a social Power delegated to our federal Congress, and a reason for the social Power to Tax the People for social policy that provides for the general welfare.

Sorry, still don't see any of the program you say the federal government can do listed in the Constitution. I do, however, see words about the military.

social programs are the "colonel general" welfare, not the General Welfare. is that simpler for that fascist, right wing?

That means they shouldn't exist. Guess you'll have to do for yourself or go without when you won't.

that does not provide for the general welfare; providing for the general bad-fare, is not in our Constitution, either.

Providing for the military is. Don't like it. Tough shit. There isn't a damn thing you can do about it.

so is providing for the private forms of welfare as ordered by Congress for the general Welfare.

 

[Conservative65]

It's not the mandated responsibility of one group, those you think have too much, to support and keep up another group, those you think have too little. Social welfare does that.

Why do you believe its the responsibility of those that do for themselves to support those that won't do for themselves?

yes, dear; that is what providing for the general welfare, means. Why do you believe it doesn't?

Because I can read English.

Promoting the general Welfare is also, in our Constitution.

General welfare doesn't social welfare.

 

[danielpalos]

The fantastical right wing claims it is a "work or die" ethic from the Age of Iron, that is important.

Does that Only apply to the poor?

Do you only consider manual labor as work?

the right wing, seems to think so.

i believe in faithful execution of our own laws regarding the legal concept of employment at will, simply for the sake of public morals in the public sector.

I think anything that contributes is considered work whether it be physical, mental, or a combination of both.

then, unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed, should not be a problem for the right wing.