Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Militant atheists are the most annoying beings on this planet. Worse than Jehovah's Witnesses.If you are talking about God... it's not about reasoning, it's about surrendering. Which sometimes I do and sometimes I don't. Luckily for me he uses it all for good.
If we are talking about militant atheists... they can't be reasoned with. They are devoid of intellect and honesty.
Okay...You're using Saul Alinsky tactics, and who is Russian?Who is Alinsky ? Why would I listen to a Russian ?
www.britannica.com
No one is annoying as Jehovah's Witnesses; they actually believe they're doing good and their acts will gain them entrance and glory into the kingdom.Militant atheists are the most annoying beings on this planet. Worse than Jehovah's Witnesses.
Now agnostics are pretty laid back. They're not judging people and being dickheads.
Agnostics are like real people. Militant atheists? They are religious zealots of the most annoying kind.
Militant atheists are a tad more annoying to everyone.No one is annoying as Jehovah's Witnesses; they actually believe they're doing good and their acts will gain them entrance and glory into the kingdom.
The few atheists I know really don't get involved in religious propaganda at all. They seem to be living good lives, are good neighbors and mostly keep to themselves. But I'm sure there are some radical ones like every other group has.Militant atheists are a tad more annoying to everyone.
What's my choice?That is your choice.
Yet science only reveals that which it has the evidence to reveal as truth.......Science cannot present a truthful origin to the Universe..........Science cannot present a truthful origin to biological life. Men pretend to be working with science....but real science can be applied to project facts, what some call science today (theoretical science and cosmology) are nothing but Human philosophies pretending to be real science, as the first rules of applying science is it must be Observable, Reproducible and Consistent with each application of experimentation.I know, all religions are a bad joke. I don't know why anyone still supports them. Science doesn't come with any great cost, it simply serves us well.
You don't know the first thing about Christianity - or any other religion - if you believe it doesn't teach accountability.Yes, I like to inform people of their frivolous belief systems before they cause any more damage to said individuals. God is a cop-out for most people unwilling to take responsibility for their own actions.
Just the militant ones like you.The few atheists I know really don't get involved in religious propaganda at all. They seem to be living good lives, are good neighbors and mostly keep to themselves. But I'm sure there are some radical ones like every other group has.
Agreed. I'm tired of their robber bird game. Let's see how they like having their nest attacked for a change. I'm all in on it.Militant atheists are the most annoying beings on this planet. Worse than Jehovah's Witnesses.
Now agnostics are pretty laid back. They're not judging people and being dickheads.
Agnostics are like real people. Militant atheists? They are religious zealots of the most annoying kind.
What you chose.What's my choice?
Ironically, only believers fear god's wrath. Fear must be one of the tools church leaders used to keep the faithful in line.
Which is what?What you chose.
I believe he - and others like him - who habitually attack religion in general and Christianity in particular, intentionally take scripture out of context to confirm their biases because they are insecure with their choice. They need to tear down others to build themselves up. It's not a good look.That is patently false and illogical.
A believer does not need to fear God's wrath because believers are saved, forgiven, forever reconciled to God...
As it says in Romans 8:1
There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.
And I'll post 1 John 4:18 again, for the third time:
There is no fear in love, but perfect love drives out fear, because fear involves punishment, and the one who fears is not perfected in love.
I agree. But in this case, he didn't use a scripture… I had to comment because what he said was completely illogical.I believe he - and others like him - who habitually attack religion in general and Christianity in particular, intentionally take scripture out of context to confirm their biases because they are insecure with their choice. They need to tear down others to build themselves up. It's not a good look.
Science has proven how the Universe came into existence ; it's called the "Big Bang Theory ". You must have missed it in class, the theory was first suggested in the 1920's. You are asking why and how ? Neither science nor religion can answer those questions. If a GOD exists, it isn't giving us any answers either.Yet science only reveals that which it has the evidence to reveal as truth.......Science cannot present a truthful origin to the Universe..........Science cannot present a truthful origin to biological life. Men pretend to be working with science....but real science can be applied to project facts, what some call science today (theoretical science and cosmology) are nothing but Human philosophies pretending to be real science, as the first rules of applying science is it must be Observable, Reproducible and Consistent with each application of experimentation.
I believe in SCIENCE and the LAWS OF PHYSICS......I simply accept only APPLIED SCIENCE as truth, the rest is opinion, speculation, conjecture and assumptions. Theories are called theories for a reason........the lack of evidence to prove they are FACTS of SCIENCE.
Its impossible to have observed something from the past. The only method of calibrating truth would be RECORDED HISTORY.......which has been documented to be but thousands of years.
The majority of theoretical science is DOGMA......its based upon conjecture, assumption, and speculation (another word for GUESS). Its impossible to observe reality today and conclude the same conditions existed eon's ago.......but all the theories of Carbon Dating, Geology, and archaeology claim the universe has been static over eons and apply that which is observable today against that which is history. How can you accurately date and calibrate anything's age past recorded history.....you cannot.
When I am dead and buried and perhaps thousands of years from now someone might dig me up.........I hope they don't claim that I am as old as the dirt that I am buried in. Fossils are often dating like this, by the supposed age of the rock they are found in........and in a continuance of circular logic, the strata is dated by the fossils that are located within the dirt. And they declare they can prove this via radio carbon dating, as if the rate of decay in certain radio active elements has remained static over the eons........when its been proven that every inch of earth's surface at some point in its history has been UNDER WATER.
Thus the theory that claims that the rate of decay has been static over the eon's with certain radioactive elements, when in reality Applied Science proves that simple water leeching effects the rate of decay, the earth's magnetic field effect said decay.....etc. The universe is in a constant state of flux in exhausting energy.
One simple question? Have you or anyone ever witnessed the Birth of a STAR? If so, name one new star that has been born over the course of human history. Don't confuse the theory that some Nebula might be a star nursery. Show me a new star that never existed before out of the billions and trillions of stars that can be observed. You can demonstrate the death of a Star....but not the birth of a new star. The excuse? It takes 10 million years for a Nova to become a New Star......which is BS. With all the stars that are visible........and the fact that it could take billions of years for the light from said star to become observable........New stars should be popping up like popcorn. All you get is a "claim" that new stars are about to be born, again based upon conjecture, speculation and assumption, or this area of the Universe is filled with NEW STARS......what they then speculation on is the fact that they have just now noticed these stars and are calling them NEW STARS The question is how do you know that which is has never been observed? You cannot.
Actually ancient man knew 6,000 years before science knew that the universe was not created from pre-existing matter. Or did you not realize that all matter and energy was created at the Big Bang from nothing?Science has proven how the Universe came into existence ; it's called the "Big Bang Theory ". You must have missed it in class, the theory was first suggested in the 1920's. You are asking why and how ? Neither science nor religion can answer those questions. If a GOD exists, it isn't giving us any answers either.
That isn't really correct either.If a GOD exists, it isn't giving us any answers either.
It's interesting that you would say that given your posts about your near death experience. It seems to contradict what you said there.If a GOD exists
Years ago I reached it in and out of body experience. I was told that it was too early for me to go back. I didn't have the time or knowing to ask questions. The second time was about 15-20 years ago when I had a near-death experience. Then I asked a lot of questions.
