" Contemporary Natural Rites Theorists Deny Nature Of Implicit Freedoms "
* Anthropomorphic Personification Of Goad To Justify Public Policy Agenda *
So you prefer to live in anarchy, I guess. The strong will survive, the weak will die out until you alone live happily and contentedly in your world.
Prior to entering into a social civil contract for a collective state , individuals are subject to a moral relativism within nature - natural freedoms , by which free will may be supposed .
To improve ones opportunity for survival and for quality of life , individuals exchange natural freedoms for protections and endowments , according to a constitution , through retorts by a collective state as a greater individual .
The contemporary natural rites theorists continue to invoke gaod as its basis for self officiated principles upon which to implement its deontological traditions of moralism ( more all is them ) , while seeking daemon rat populism for democracy as tyranny by collective majority and against independence of the individual , without satisfying an enumerated rite of equal protection for negative liberties among individuals , that is constrainted for safety and security .
The natural rites theorist too often expects to bypass a criteria of proof for validity of its public policies , as its pundits seek to curtail natural freedoms that hue mammon is entitled to retain , as its pundits seek to avoid compliance with principles of non violence and of individualism , as its pundits seek to avoid compliance with the enumerated rite of us citizens for equal protection .
The theory of legal positivism challenges natural rites theory that rites are alienable and forwards perspectivism that relates no epistomological absolutes and not all perspectives are equally valid , which forwards consequentialism against dogmas of deonology maintained by natural rites theorists .
The principle of non violence defines violence as illegitimate aggression , where self defense against violence is legitimate aggression .
The principle of individualism defines violence as any illegitimate aggression against an individual , which deprives an individual of self ownership or of self determination , where self ownership entitles an individual to free roam , to free association and to progeny , and where self determination entitles an individual to private property and to willful intents through social civil contracts made valid by informed consent .
A valid perspective of us republic is that its espouses independence of the individual citizen , through equal protection of negative libeties among individuals , which is delimited by safety and or security .
Negative liberties represent protections , indiviudalism , independence .
Positive liberties represent endowments , collectivism , codependence .
