Do Natural Rights Actually Exist?

[ding]

" Audacious Claims For Supremacist Dictum Because Goad Will Not Speak For Itself "

* Natural Rites Hubris Of Invoking Goad While Denying Nature *

Zone1 - Made In The Image Of Goad

" Made In The Image Of Goad " * Explanation Required * The hue mammon ape makes a claim that it is made in the image of goad , yet what are the implications of such a claim ?

www.usmessageboard.com

* Anthropocentric Flatulence *

Zone1 - Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ?

" Anthropocentic Psychosis : How Compelling And To Which Ends Are Its Impacts Within Hue Mammon Society ? " * Environmentalism Advocates Getting Ugly About Apex Predator Gluttony * An anthropocentric psychosis may be characterized as anthropocentrism which has become dysfunctional . *...

www.usmessageboard.com

* Ignorance Combined With Arrogance Makes For Political Science Nonsense *

Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments

" Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments " * Express Agreement Or Disagreement With These Premises * Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ? Does...

www.usmessageboard.com

God is self evident to much of God's creation.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Interpretation Of Phenomenology "

* Invoking Goad To Get Their Way *

God is self evident to much of God's creation.

Without a doubt , yearn goad is personified in yearn own image .

 

[ding]

" Interpretation Of Phenomenology "

* Invoking Goad To Get Their Way *

Without a doubt , yearn goad is personified in yearn own image .

If you remove all anthropomorphic content from your conception of God you remove all content of any kind. You are left with a God whose essence is unknowable and indescribable. Of what possible value is such a conception either to philosophy or religion?

 

[ding]

Do Natural Rights Actually Exist? If they do not then it's all intellectual bs. If they do, what are they? Can and do people who believe natural rights actually exist, agree on them -- what they are and are not?

Of course natural rights exist.

What are natural rights? Natural rights are effectively standards.

Why doesn't everyone agree on them? Subjectivity.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Laws are a social construct.

Yep. Both.

 

[ding]

Yep. Both.

So if laws were written legalizing pedophilia and slavery, minors and those enslaved would have no right to oppose it?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Natural Freedoms "

* Opportunity Can Be Alienated *

So if laws were written legalizing pedophilia and slavery, minors and those enslaved would have no right to oppose it?

This moniker does not aspire to such laws , however would those implementing such laws not have a rite to do so ?

 

[ding]

" Natural Freedoms "

* Opportunity Can Be Alienated *

This moniker does not aspire to such laws , however would those implementing such laws not have a rite to do so ?

They do not.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Invokes Goad Rather Than Suppositions More Valid "

* Absurdities Of Natural Rites Theorists *

They do not.

According to your theory , simply because something is possible it is inalienable .

Thus , according to your theory , yes they do and the rites to do so are inalienable .

 

[ding]

" Invokes Goad Rather Than Suppositions More Valid "

* Absurdities Of Natural Rites Theorists *

According to your theory , simply because something is possible it is inalienable .

Thus , according to your theory , yes they do and the rites to do so are inalienable .

Incorrect. Standards exist for logical reasons, dummy.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Natural Rites Theorists Debased By Nature "

* Dummies Giving Advice Of Pretentious Hubris *

Incorrect. Standards exist for logical reasons, dummy.

Wrong , options exist , so choose the ones most valid to facilitate an objective .

 

[ding]

" Natural Rites Theorists Debased By Nature "

* Dummies Giving Advice Of Pretentious Hubris *

Wrong , options exist , so choose the ones most valid to facilitate an objective .

Again... standards exist for logical reasons. Deviate from that standard and the reason for the standard will be experienced through consequences of deviating from the standard.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" No Sequitur "

* Red Herring Aphorisms *

Again... standards exist for logical reasons. Deviate from that standard and the reason for the standard will be experienced through consequences of deviating from the standard.

Duh , no shit .

None of which has anything to do with inalienable .

 

[ding]

" No Sequitur "

* Red Herring Aphorisms *

Duh , no shit .

None of which has anything to do with inalienable .

How can it not? Standards - like logic and truth - are universal. That's what makes rights inalienable.

What is your logic for rights are alienable?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Projections Of Reality "

* Invoking Goad To Dictate Stupid Standards *

How can it not? Standards - like logic and truth - are universal. That's what makes rights inalienable.
What is your logic for rights are alienable?

You are asserting that simply because something is possible means that it is inalienable , but that is existentialism .

Alternatively , anything that is possible , but can be alienated , is not inalienable , that is reality .

 

[ding]

" Projections Of Reality "

* Invoking Goad To Dictate Stupid Standards *

You are asserting that simply because something is possible means that it is inalienable , but that is existentialism .

Alternatively , anything that is possible , but can be alienated , is not inalienable , that is reality .

Actually that's not what I asserted. Try reading it again and get back to me when you have figured it out. Until then I'll stand by what I wrote.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Figment Of Imagination Hunting "

* Academic Incompetence Typical Flatulence Level Of Discourse *

Actually that's not what I asserted. Try reading it again and get back to me when you have figured it out. Until then I'll stand by what I wrote.

What was the reference ?

Are you capable of reiterating , of carrying forward , of clarifying whichever bloviate yearn will has provided as a foundation for reason ?

The contemporary natural rites theory has specific claims for absolution to implement its deontology of public policy , and this moniker has long understood and evaluated its verses that are concluded to be pretentious hubris within the spectrum of consequentialism , of positive law ( legal positivism - posit - put in place - not defacto - not absolute ) , of perspectvism , wherein any perspectives represent one of an innumerable number of truths , while not all perspectives of truth are equally valid .

Because it is contrary with and defiant of nature and natural order , contemporary natural rites theory should be stripped of the term natural and be referred to as theistic rites theory .

As is typical of double speak , double think , those conspiring to commandeer public narrative through deceit seek to conscript terms to conflagrate the clarity and legitimacy of the vernacular .

 

[ding]

" Figment Of Imagination Hunting "

* Academic Incompetence Typical Flatulence Level Of Discourse *

What was the reference ?

Are you capable of reiterating , of carrying forward , of clarifying whichever bloviate yearn will has provided as a foundation for reason ?

The contemporary natural rites theory has specific claims for absolution to implement its deontology of public policy , and this moniker has long understood and evaluated its verses that are concluded to be pretentious hubris within the spectrum of consequentialism , of positive law ( legal positivism - posit - put in place - not defacto - not absolute ) , of perspectvism , wherein any perspectives represent one of an innumerable number of truths , while not all perspectives of truth are equally valid .

Because it is contrary with and defiant of nature and natural order , contemporary natural rites theory should be stripped of the term natural and be referred to as theistic rites theory .

As is typical of double speak , double think , those conspiring to commandeer public narrative through deceit seek to conscript terms to conflagrate the clarity and legitimacy of the vernacular .

Really can't explain it better than this... Standards - like logic and truth - are universal. That's what makes rights inalienable.