- Aug 16, 2011
- 128,476
- 24,310
- 2,180
Hahaha…I thought so. You never give a straight answer…you can’t.
Like I said, you're too stupid to follow.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hahaha…I thought so. You never give a straight answer…you can’t.
I wouldn’t say the majority. But a very large percentage have illegal aliens for parents. Most of the others have parents holding Green Cards. Damned few ESL students have American citizens for both parents.The majority of ESL students in American schools are US CITIZENS, you fucking idiot.
I wouldn’t say the majority. ...
Hmmm….you seem to have the data, I’m certain you haven’t concocted an opinion rooted in globalist FEELZ. Tell us, what percentage of ESL students have a citizenship approved by We TheYes, the majority.
Red states do that every year.Do ya think?
I bet when the shit hits the fan the Socialist Republic of Cali will turn to washington dc for handouts
Do they “do that” because they are recruiting and paying for Mexico’s filth?Red states do that every year.
Only if there is a national disasterRed states do that every year.
"Most ELLs were born in the United States, and are U.S. citizens."Hmmm….you seem to have the data, I’m certain you haven’t concocted an opinion rooted in globalist FEELZ. Tell us, what percentage of ESL students have a citizenship approved by We The
People?
Try real hard to keep the entire context intact, try real hard to give straight answers without spin. Good luck
That doesn't invalidate my point. The students may be American citizens, but in the vast majority of cases their parents AREN'T. They're either legal or ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS. That's the problem with "birthright citizenship" and why only thirty countries in the entire world practice it. Other than the USA and Canada, the other twenty-eight are either tiny islands or third world crapholes like Venezuela, Cuba, El Salvador and Bolivia. No other first world country allows it."U.S. Census data found that 82 percent of prekindergarten to 5 th grade English-learners and 65 percent of 6 th and 12 th grade English-learners are U.S.-born."
Majority of English-Learner Students Are Born in the United States, Analysis Finds
The U.S.- and foreign-born children grow up learning English in school while also hearing and speaking one of more than 350 languages used in the United States at home.www.edweek.org
That doesn't invalidate my point. The students may be American citizens, but in the vast majority of cases their parents AREN'T. ....
... They're either legal or ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS. That's the problem with "birthright citizenship" ....
And?That doesn't invalidate my point. The students may be American citizens, but in the vast majority of cases their parents AREN'T. They're either legal or ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS. That's the problem with "birthright citizenship" and why only thirty countries in the entire world practice it. Other than the USA and Canada, the other twenty-eight are either tiny islands or third world crapholes like Venezuela, Cuba, El Salvador and Bolivia. No other first world country allows it.
... They're either legal or ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS. That's the problem with "birthright citizenship" ....
Which has absolutely nothing to do with the citizenship of the students, and the citizenship of the children does nothing to change the immigration status of the parents. By the way - prove your claim.
No problem with legal immigration. But I've never liked birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants. I believe that for citizenship by birth, BOTH parents should be either natural or naturalized citizens.What is the "problem" with legal immigration?
No problem with legal immigration. But I've never liked birthright citizenship for the children of immigrants. I believe that for citizenship by birth, BOTH parents should be either natural or naturalized citizens.
The Constitution doesn’t establish requirements for citizenship. The 14th Amendment sets a standard, but it’s clearly aimed at ex-slaves, not immigrants, that language was added by the Senate and agreed to by the House.Take it up with the Constitution.
The Constitution doesn’t establish requirements for citizenship. .....
It’s a change to the Constitution, not the document as written.The 14th Amendment is part of the Constitution.