Do leftists have the right to desecrate the US flag?

[rupol2000]

You can often see how leftists and their henchmen treat the US flag with disdain, for example, they sew panties out of it, or they can place it next to the flags of faggots.

The Fathers said the following about this:

When our land is illuminated with Liberty's smile,
If a foe from within strike a blow at her glory,
Down, down with the traitor that dares to defile
The flag of her stars and the page of her story!
By the millions unchained, who our birthright have gained,
We will keep her bright blazon forever unstained!
And the Star-Spangled Banner in triumph shall wave
While the land of the free is the home of the brave.

Therefore, the Fathers bequeathed to destroy the traitors and queers who desecrate the American flag in the United States.

Does the current law allow it?

In my opinion, if the law is contrary to the basic values, it is not valid and must be corrected in accordance with the Spirit of America and the precepts of the Fathers.

 

[WinterBorn]

They are not allowed to destroy some else's flag. But if they own the flag, yes they can do with their property as they please.

Having said that, there are more then a few examples of citizens stopping the desecration of a flag. Some have faced assault charges. But they are typically given a suspended sentence by a sympathetic judge.

 

[rupol2000]

They are not allowed to destroy some else's flag. But if they own the flag, yes they can do with their property as they please.

Having said that, there are more then a few examples of citizens stopping the desecration of a flag. Some have faced assault charges. But they are typically given a suspended sentence by a sympathetic judge.

This is a left scam. The law cannot contradict the Fundamentals.

 

[rupol2000]

They are not allowed to destroy some else's flag. But if they own the flag, yes they can do with their property as they please.

Having said that, there are more then a few examples of citizens stopping the desecration of a flag. Some have faced assault charges. But they are typically given a suspended sentence by a sympathetic judge.

Leftist lawyers are dumbass. the flag is not mere private property. The owner owns only the physical material and not the symbols, just as the reader owns the book but not the copyright to the work.

European left stupidity must be eradicated. American lawers should be tested for IQ

 

[justoffal]

You can often see how leftists and their henchmen treat the US flag with disdain, for example, they sew panties out of it, or they can place it next to the flags of faggots.

The Fathers said the following about this:

When our land is illuminated with Liberty's smile,
If a foe from within strike a blow at her glory,
Down, down with the traitor that dares to defile
The flag of her stars and the page of her story!
By the millions unchained, who our birthright have gained,
We will keep her bright blazon forever unstained!
And the Star-Spangled Banner in triumph shall wave
While the land of the free is the home of the brave.

Therefore, the Fathers bequeathed to destroy the traitors and queers who desecrate the American flag in the United States.

Does the current law allow it?

In my opinion, if the law is contrary to the basic values, it is not valid and must be corrected in accordance with the Spirit of America and the precepts of the Fathers.

Try doing that to a rainbow flag in public and you will have your real answer.

 

[MisterBeale]

Leftist lawyers are dumbass. the flag is not mere private property. The owner owns only the physical material and not the symbols, just as the reader owns the book but not the copyright to the work.

European left stupidity must be eradicated. American lawers should be tested for IQ

The First Amendment is more important than what the flag symbolizes.

You are clearly NOT an American, nor do you understand America.

 

[MisterBeale]

This is a left scam. The law cannot contradict the Fundamentals.

Freedom of expression IS a fundamental in THIS nation. . . I don't know about YOUR nation.

 

[justoffal]

The First Amendment is more important than what the flag symbolizes.

You are clearly NOT an American, nor do you understand America.

And yet if you did it to a rainbow flag in public you would be charged with a hate crime.

 

[rupol2000]

The First Amendment is more important than what the flag symbolizes.

You are clearly NOT an American, nor do you understand America.

In the first amendment there is no "freedom" to offend national symbols.

 

[MisterBeale]

And yet if you did it to a rainbow flag in public you would be charged with a hate crime.

If it was YOUR rainbow flag?

I doubt it.

 

[MisterBeale]

In the first amendment there is no "freedom" to offend national symbols.

Why do you come here, with all your foreign ignorance, and pretend to know shit about Americans, when you are ignorant as hell? Go back to your authoritarian nation, and worship the state. . . here? We are a free people.

"1990–2006: Congress makes seven attempts to overrule the U.S. Supreme Court by passing a constitutional amendment that would make an exception to the First Amendment. Had it passed, it would have allowed the government to ban flag desecration. When the amendment was first brought up in 1990, it failed to achieve the necessary two-thirds majority in the House. In 1991, the amendment passed in the House overwhelmingly but was defeated in the Senate. The last attempt was in 2006, in which the Senate failed to confirm the amendment by one vote."

The History of U.S. Laws Against Flag-Burning

Flag-burning first became an issue in the U.S. after the Civil War, and it's had a colorful and vast legal history since that time. Discover a timeline.

www.thoughtco.com

The U.S. Constitution | Constitution Center

Learn about the text, history, and meaning of the U.S. Constitution from leading scholars of diverse legal and philosophical perspectives.

constitutioncenter.org

 

[rupol2000]

Why do you come here, with all your foreign ignorance, and pretend to know shit about Americans, when you are ignorant as hell? Go back to your authoritarian nation, and worship the state. . . here? We are a free people.

"1990–2006: Congress makes seven attempts to overrule the U.S. Supreme Court by passing a constitutional amendment that would make an exception to the First Amendment. Had it passed, it would have allowed the government to ban flag desecration. When the amendment was first brought up in 1990, it failed to achieve the necessary two-thirds majority in the House. In 1991, the amendment passed in the House overwhelmingly but was defeated in the Senate. The last attempt was in 2006, in which the Senate failed to confirm the amendment by one vote."

The History of U.S. Laws Against Flag-Burning

Flag-burning first became an issue in the U.S. after the Civil War, and it's had a colorful and vast legal history since that time. Discover a timeline.

www.thoughtco.com

The U.S. Constitution | Constitution Center

Learn about the text, history, and meaning of the U.S. Constitution from leading scholars of diverse legal and philosophical perspectives.

constitutioncenter.org

This is stupidity and left fraud. freedom means only non-slavery, but this term has never meant and does not mean permissiveness. All leftist plague along with their bogus laws must be expelled from the US.

 

[rupol2000]

Anyone who has defiled the national symbols of the US Freedom Fighters should be executed with a shameful execution, as the Fathers willed.

 

[rupol2000]

If it is not allowed to insult even one person, then how can you allow insulting an entire nation and its Heroes?

 

[MisterBeale]

freedom means only non-slavery

That is not what the founders believed mudak.

as the Fathers willed.

You can't back that shit up. Founders did believe that crap.

 

[MisterBeale]

If it is not allowed to insult even one person, then how can you allow insulting an entire nation and its Heroes?

Of course it is allowed to insult as many folks as you wish? Where the hell do YOU Live?

I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It​

I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It – Quote Investigator®

quoteinvestigator.com

Age of Enlightenment - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Wow, you really talk and act like an authoritarian leftist yourself. You want to control folks speech and freedom of expression.

 

[rupol2000]

Now the worthless slaves are mocking the Great American people, they cannot even defend their symbolism and memory from the leftist villains.

 

[rupol2000]

Of course it is allowed to insult as many folks as you wish? Where the hell do YOU Live?

I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It​

I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It – Quote Investigator®

quoteinvestigator.com

Age of Enlightenment - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Wow, you really talk and act like an authoritarian leftist yourself. You want to control folks speech and freedom of expression.

You're lying. The real Rightists have never welcomed dishonor and depravity, these are the characteristics of leftist slaves.

 

[rupol2000]

The right one is a man of honor. The Rightist is on the side of truth, he is the defender of the downtrodden, he is the enemy of villainy. The right does not need the "freedom" of the left villains and slave owners.

 

[rupol2000]