Do Democrats Have a Plan B?

Meathead

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2012
Messages
50,597
Reaction score
24,455
Points
2,290
Location
Prague, Czech Republic
Now that Hilary is toast and everyone else closely associated with the Obama administration probably is too, do the Democrats have a viable candidate not soiled enough to run in 2016?
 
Now that Hilary is toast and everyone else closely associated with the Obama administration probably is too, do the Democrats have a viable candidate not soiled enough to run in 2016?

Sadly Hillary isn't toast. Most of the public is politically ignorant.
 
Hillary will absoutly destroy any right wing piece of trash that tries to run.

It will be an even bigger GOP clown show than it was in 2012 :up:
 
By the time obama gets done with Hillary her career will be all over and she'll have to run the Clinton foundation full time.
 
Now that Hilary is toast and everyone else closely associated with the Obama administration probably is too, do the Democrats have a viable candidate not soiled enough to run in 2016?

John Kerry! He's currently SecState and holding all the memos and otehr info that will make Hillary look like a witch, knocking her out of consideration for 2016.

Personally I think they will pick Deval patrick, another clean articulate black man who can promise lots of gov't cheese to inner city Negroes, assuring a Democrat victory.
 
Dems like that Hilly didn't give a **** about the Benghazi Consulate and lied about it, her approval shot up in the polls. You have to realize that Dems definition of success and greatness is the opposite of normal
 
After President Biden pardons Obama for his crimes in the IRS Scandal and lying the the American People over Benghazi, he will appoints Hilly as his VP
 
Yeah, get the hell outta dodge. The villagers are royally pissed.
 
Now that Hilary is toast and everyone else closely associated with the Obama administration probably is too, do the Democrats have a viable candidate not soiled enough to run in 2016?

John Kerry! He's currently SecState and holding all the memos and otehr info that will make Hillary look like a witch, knocking her out of consideration for 2016.

Personally I think they will pick Deval patrick, another clean articulate black man who can promise lots of gov't cheese to inner city Negroes, assuring a Democrat victory.

They might have to pick Patrick. Everyone knows once you go black you can never go back.
 
How does Benghazi differ from 9/11 in terms of executive culpability? Because Bush used the failure of his security apparatus on 9/11 to increase his polling popularity.
 
Did Bush give a stand down order? Did Bush blame a video that no one saw? Did Bush deny requested security? Democrats might try to compare 9/11/01 to 9/11/12, but it will fall flat every time.
 
After President Biden pardons Obama for his crimes in the IRS Scandal and lying the the American People over Benghazi, he will appoints Hilly as his VP

And we the People will file a recall election for both of them! And put Mitt Romney where he needs to be!!
 
Now that Hilary is toast and everyone else closely associated with the Obama administration probably is too, do the Democrats have a viable candidate not soiled enough to run in 2016?

Sadly Hillary isn't toast. Most of the public is politically ignorant.

No she isn't toast and it's not because of ignorance.

Quite the opposite. The public is much more versed on the politics of personal destruction employed by the GOP.
 
Did Bush give a stand order?
Someone did, apparently.

Did Bush blame a video that no one saw?
I don't understand how this pertains to the issue. There are many causes for Middle Eastern unrest.

Did Bush deny requested security?
Someone did, apparently.

9/11/01 was far, far worse than anything that happened on 9/11/12--no matter how you try and spin it.
 
15th post
How does Benghazi differ from 9/11 in terms of executive culpability? Because Bush used the failure of his security apparatus on 9/11 to increase his polling popularity.

But he didn't lie about it.

He may have. We will never know, because of the layers of secrecy that protected Bush's "testimony." 9/11 looked fishy then, and it still does.
 
Back
Top Bottom