Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,236
- 99,370
- 3,645
Anyone can abandon it. So reality says otherwise.That you can't abandon that concept says otherwise.
Or did you just err and mix up "can't" and "won't" again?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone can abandon it. So reality says otherwise.That you can't abandon that concept says otherwise.
In order to be a true atheist one must objectively prove the non-existence of God and the concept of a Spiritual Realm. This means the atheist must be in possession of factual evidence that proves God does not exist. There is a simple list based upon logic and reason that the true atheist should be able to produce upon request, that proves there is no Spiritual God....if they are a true atheist.Imagine there is no "god." Imagine there is no afterlife...no reward for a life of virtue and no punishment for a life of evil. Imagine that you do not believe that humans are somehow "children of god" or intrinsically more "valuable" than animals and plants.
Now given this set of non-beliefs, would you care about thousands of people being killed on the other side of the world - people whom you do not know, and nobody you ever encounter would know? If so, why?
Would you care about the carnage that goes on in our inner cities every weekend?
Would you care about any tragedies that don't affect you or your posse? Why?
If you do care about these things, please explain.
In order for a person to believe red is better than blue one must objectively prove that red is superior to blue.In order to be a true atheist one must objectively prove the non-existence of God and the concept of a Spiritual Realm.
In order to be a true atheist one must objectively prove the non-existence of God and the concept of a Spiritual Realm. This means the atheist must be in possession of factual evidence that proves God does not exist. There is a simple list based upon logic and reason that the true atheist should be able to produce upon request, that proves there is no Spiritual God....if they are a true atheist.
The atheist must prove with objective evidence. Matter is eternal, having always existed void of any contingent cause. Matter is all that exists. Matter has always existed. No one piece of matter is of more value than the next piece of matter. By sheer chance, dead matter became living matter. By sheer chance, dead matter became conscience.
By sheer chance dead matter became a living human being with a conscience that can direct its own fate by the decisions he/she makes.
Reality: Applied Science cannot objectively prove any of the items on this list.......thus, you have Theory injected into the equation. Theory is based upon nothing but human thought and reasoning within the mind of man as it can't be objectively proven, or it would be a Law of Physics. Theory, as admitted by those who propagate theory as science, theoretical (wink, wink) SCIENCE.......is a way of thinking, based upon error and correction. In other words its human philosophy pretending to be applied science. When something can't be prove to be a fact.........the only alternative according to the laws of logic and reason, when someone corrects the theory......that theory was a lie. According to theoretical science is based upon lies presented as truths and will serve as truth until a better lie is thought of.
Example: When I was a child in elementary school, I was taught as scientific truth.......the earth itself is 1 billion years old..........today in our classrooms the age of the earth as changed from 1 billion years to over 3 billion years. Was I lied to when I was a child or Am I being lied to today? The earth has aged over 2 billion years in a span of a few decades......is it MAGIC? No......someone came up with a superior lie.
www.goodreads.com/quotes/962093-science-is-more-than-a-body-of-knowledge-it-is
Modern Science when applied to the reality that surrounds us.......i.e, the Physical Universe and everything within its physical sphere of influence proves that the Universe is not eternal and by the very Laws of Physics must have had a cause that is superior to nature itself.
What benefits the tribe is good and what harms the tribe is evil. Fantasies about the afterlife or pretensions to empathy have nothing to do with objective morality. Humans and other animals form tribes/herds/packs/etc. for the purpose of improving the survival rates of members. Morality is simply a set of behaviors that evolve to maximize survival.
Talk about a lack of logic. Belief is not proof of anything.........its a thought that originates in the human mind. Facts and Truth do not evolve.....or it was never truth to begin with. What was true in the 1st century is just as true today. Societies might evolve......truth does not.In order for a person to believe red is better than blue one must objectively prove that red is superior to blue.
Bad logic sir.
99-100% of things we believe do not require proof. You believe what seems logical to you. We don’t go around proving stuff all the time. Anybody who does that certainly doesn’t have any friends. It would get obnoxious.
Not if that person has faith that red is better.In order for a person to believe red is better than blue one must objectively prove that red is superior to blue.
If you're looking for Jesus to appear at Times Square at 12:00 noon as proof, you aren't going to find it.
You just proved my point. Atheists don't even understand why morality should be an issue. They don't understand the concept of it.
When I was 22, I went out with a beautiful atheist girl who offered me sex on a silver platter. It was right there for the taking, but I turned her down and explained why. She acted like something was wrong with me. She had never in her life heard that sex outside marriage was immoral. Earlier in the evening I had asked if she was Catholic and she scoffed at the notion and told me of her atheism. I was very disappointed because I liked her.
But no one does. It's actually quite the opposite. They rationalize they don't even when they do.Anyone can abandon it. So reality says otherwise.
Or did you just err and mix up "can't" and "won't" again?
Do you even follow what you said? I don't have time for games.Why?
Yeah. You're pushing a lame stereotype because you don't like atheists. Whatever. Mind your own business much?Do you even follow what you said? I don't have time for games.
I care about people on the other side of the world. It seems like I care more than religious people do. Religious people in America seem to only care about Americans. Fuck the people in the middle east or south America.Imagine there is no "god." Imagine there is no afterlife...no reward for a life of virtue and no punishment for a life of evil. Imagine that you do not believe that humans are somehow "children of god" or intrinsically more "valuable" than animals and plants.
Now given this set of non-beliefs, would you care about thousands of people being killed on the other side of the world - people whom you do not know, and nobody you ever encounter would know? If so, why?
Would you care about the carnage that goes on in our inner cities every weekend?
Would you care about any tragedies that don't affect you or your posse? Why?
If you do care about these things, please explain.
Imagine there is no "god." Imagine there is no afterlife...no reward for a life of virtue and no punishment for a life of evil. Imagine that you do not believe that humans are somehow "children of god" or intrinsically more "valuable" than animals and plants.
Now given this set of non-beliefs, would you care about thousands of people being killed on the other side of the world - people whom you do not know, and nobody you ever encounter would know? If so, why?
Would you care about the carnage that goes on in our inner cities every weekend?
Would you care about any tragedies that don't affect you or your posse? Why?
If you do care about these things, please explain.
How are you caring? I mean, is it just a feeling, or are you actively sending them some kind of support?I care about people on the other side of the world. It seems like I care more than religious people do.
We see why our primitive ancestors came up with the God concept. How could this all be? Must have been made for us.That you can't abandon that concept says otherwise.
How are you caring? I mean, is it just a feeling, or are you actively sending them some kind of support?
How are you caring? I mean, is it just a feeling, or are you actively sending them some kind of support?
There is no meaning in life itself.Neil DeGrasse Tyson Knows The Meaning Of Life
So — what is the meaning of life? I think people ask that question on the assumption that 'meaning' is something you can look for and go, 'Here it is, I found it. Here's the meaning. I've been looking for.' That scenario, however, doesn't consider the possibility that 'meaning' is something you create. You manufacture it for yourself and for others.
So when I think of 'meaning' in life, I ask, 'Did I learn something today that I didn't know yesterday, bringing me a little closer to knowing all that can be known in the universe?' If I live a day and I don't know a little more than I did the day before, I think I wasted that day. So the people who, at the end of the school year, say 'The summer! I don't have to think anymore!' — I just don't know. To think brings you closer to nature. To learn how things work gives you power to influence events. Gives you power to help people who may need it — to help yourself and your trajectory.
So when I think of the meaning of life, that's not an eternal and unanswerable question — to me, that's in arm's reach of me everyday. So to you, at age six-and-three-quarters, may I suggest that you explore nature as much as you possibly can. And occasionally that means getting your clothes dirty because you might want to jump into puddles and your parents don't want you to do that. You tell them that I gave you permission.`
For humans I think the meaning of life is to live. To have more children to continue life. To build societies where future generations can live. So we live for ourselves and for future humans.There is no meaning in life itself.