Do any of you Dems want to see the Burisma Biden’s investigated?

[alang1216]

You know, since you’re so against .gov corruption and all....I’d think you’d want to see them probed pretty heavily just to be sure there’s no fire where there’s mass amounts of smoke....right?

I don't think the gov't should be able to investigate ANYONE without some evidence of a crime. I think that is a standard for a search warrant and it is a good one. Should the DOJ be used for political purposes? Nope.

If there is any evidence that the Bidens or any other Dem may have committed a crime then by all means investigate. No evidence, no investigating.

Remember, "evidence" is often circumstantial and circumstantial evidence is always highly subjective.

True enough but any evidence is better than no evidence. Do you think the gov't should be able to investigate anyone solely at their discretion?

 

[colfax_m]

Because there’s no evidence he did. I don’t believe things that have no evidence.

you ever heard the phrase,," you dont talk about ongoing investigations"???

The DoJ has stated they have nothing going on with regard to Biden and Ukraine. There is no ongoing investigation to not talk about.

But you raise a good point. You don’t talk about ongoing investigations unless Trump is withholding military aid and is demanding you tell the world about your investigation.

there can be investigations without an official announcement,,,they happen all the time and we dont know it,,,and it was mainly trump
and not the DOJ doing it,,,
its already been established thats not why he delayed the aid,,,

There shouldn’t be announcements of investigations. The fact that Trump was pushing for an announcement of an investigation into Biden is incriminating.

What was Trump doing if you claim it was “mainly trump and not the doj doing it”

incriminating to what end???

trump was investigating what happened in Ukraine as to the DNC collusion to effect the 2016 election with respects to many things including the dossier,,,

I think biden was an after thought due to his videoed confession,,,

It’s incriminating that Trump wanted Biden investigated for personal political reasons. We don’t make announcements about investigations in this country because the person under investigation is potentially innocent and announcing an investigation puts a cloud over them.

On the phone call, Trump tried to claim that Crowdstrike was linked to Ukraine (a lie), that the server was in Ukraine (zero evidence of that) and that Biden bragged about ending an investigation (another lie). This also is incriminating. Trump was asking for an investigation based on false pretenses.

 

[jc456]

You know, since you’re so against .gov corruption and all....I’d think you’d want to see them probed pretty heavily just to be sure there’s no fire where there’s mass amounts of smoke....right?

I don't think the gov't should be able to investigate ANYONE without some evidence of a crime. I think that is a standard for a search warrant and it is a good one. Should the DOJ be used for political purposes? Nope.

If there is any evidence that the Bidens or any other Dem may have committed a crime then by all means investigate. No evidence, no investigating.

Remember, "evidence" is often circumstantial and circumstantial evidence is always highly subjective.

True enough but any evidence is better than no evidence. Do you think the gov't should be able to investigate anyone solely at their discretion?

you do. cause you think the spying on carter page was ok. so thanks for your play.

 

[karpenter]

One of the things that makes our country great is our justice system not being influenced by politics.

At Least For Anything AFTER Jan 20, 2017

​

 

[colfax_m]

Comey stayed out of politics to the best of his ability. He didn’t always have a choice. Strzok and Page communicates privately about politics as is their right.

Democrats didn’t control the House from 2010 through 2018. You should be asking that question to the Republicans.

so? still should be investigated. right?

Doubt it. Once you throw out the nonsense lies Republicans have been spouting, there isn’t probable cause for an investigation.

But I’m not the one who makes these decisions. Nor should I be.

I asked you. sill should be investigated right? If he's tainted.

And I gave you my answer.

no you didn't, you gave mumbo jumbo didn't respond shit. either it should or you don't it should. not what the left want you to think. Your opinion, your thought. and you failed.

I responded adequately. If you don’t my answer, I could really care less.

 

[jc456]

you ever heard the phrase,," you dont talk about ongoing investigations"???

The DoJ has stated they have nothing going on with regard to Biden and Ukraine. There is no ongoing investigation to not talk about.

But you raise a good point. You don’t talk about ongoing investigations unless Trump is withholding military aid and is demanding you tell the world about your investigation.

there can be investigations without an official announcement,,,they happen all the time and we dont know it,,,and it was mainly trump
and not the DOJ doing it,,,
its already been established thats not why he delayed the aid,,,

There shouldn’t be announcements of investigations. The fact that Trump was pushing for an announcement of an investigation into Biden is incriminating.

What was Trump doing if you claim it was “mainly trump and not the doj doing it”

incriminating to what end???

trump was investigating what happened in Ukraine as to the DNC collusion to effect the 2016 election with respects to many things including the dossier,,,

I think biden was an after thought due to his videoed confession,,,

It’s incriminating that Trump wanted Biden investigated for personal political reasons. We don’t make announcements about investigations in this country because the person under investigation is potentially innocent and announcing an investigation puts a cloud over them.

On the phone call, Trump tried to claim that Crowdstrike was linked to Ukraine (a lie), that the server was in Ukraine (zero evidence of that) and that Biden bragged about ending an investigation (another lie). This also is incriminating. Trump was asking for an investigation based on false pretenses.

where did he say any of this garbage? shit I should say.

 

[jc456]

so? still should be investigated. right?

Doubt it. Once you throw out the nonsense lies Republicans have been spouting, there isn’t probable cause for an investigation.

But I’m not the one who makes these decisions. Nor should I be.

I asked you. sill should be investigated right? If he's tainted.

And I gave you my answer.

no you didn't, you gave mumbo jumbo didn't respond shit. either it should or you don't it should. not what the left want you to think. Your opinion, your thought. and you failed.

I responded adequately. If you don’t my answer, I could really care less.

so you have no thought.

 

[progressive hunter]

you ever heard the phrase,," you dont talk about ongoing investigations"???

The DoJ has stated they have nothing going on with regard to Biden and Ukraine. There is no ongoing investigation to not talk about.

But you raise a good point. You don’t talk about ongoing investigations unless Trump is withholding military aid and is demanding you tell the world about your investigation.

there can be investigations without an official announcement,,,they happen all the time and we dont know it,,,and it was mainly trump
and not the DOJ doing it,,,
its already been established thats not why he delayed the aid,,,

There shouldn’t be announcements of investigations. The fact that Trump was pushing for an announcement of an investigation into Biden is incriminating.

What was Trump doing if you claim it was “mainly trump and not the doj doing it”

incriminating to what end???

trump was investigating what happened in Ukraine as to the DNC collusion to effect the 2016 election with respects to many things including the dossier,,,

I think biden was an after thought due to his videoed confession,,,

It’s incriminating that Trump wanted Biden investigated for personal political reasons. We don’t make announcements about investigations in this country because the person under investigation is potentially innocent and announcing an investigation puts a cloud over them.

On the phone call, Trump tried to claim that Crowdstrike was linked to Ukraine (a lie), that the server was in Ukraine (zero evidence of that) and that Biden bragged about ending an investigation (another lie). This also is incriminating. Trump was asking for an investigation based on false pretenses.

that would be true if not for the fact trump started investigating over a yr before that,,,

 

[colfax_m]

The DoJ has stated they have nothing going on with regard to Biden and Ukraine. There is no ongoing investigation to not talk about.

But you raise a good point. You don’t talk about ongoing investigations unless Trump is withholding military aid and is demanding you tell the world about your investigation.

there can be investigations without an official announcement,,,they happen all the time and we dont know it,,,and it was mainly trump
and not the DOJ doing it,,,
its already been established thats not why he delayed the aid,,,

There shouldn’t be announcements of investigations. The fact that Trump was pushing for an announcement of an investigation into Biden is incriminating.

What was Trump doing if you claim it was “mainly trump and not the doj doing it”

incriminating to what end???

trump was investigating what happened in Ukraine as to the DNC collusion to effect the 2016 election with respects to many things including the dossier,,,

I think biden was an after thought due to his videoed confession,,,

It’s incriminating that Trump wanted Biden investigated for personal political reasons. We don’t make announcements about investigations in this country because the person under investigation is potentially innocent and announcing an investigation puts a cloud over them.

On the phone call, Trump tried to claim that Crowdstrike was linked to Ukraine (a lie), that the server was in Ukraine (zero evidence of that) and that Biden bragged about ending an investigation (another lie). This also is incriminating. Trump was asking for an investigation based on false pretenses.

where did he say any of this garbage? shit I should say.

Read the transcript kiddo. If that’s too hard have someone read it to you.

 

[colfax_m]

Doubt it. Once you throw out the nonsense lies Republicans have been spouting, there isn’t probable cause for an investigation.

But I’m not the one who makes these decisions. Nor should I be.

I asked you. sill should be investigated right? If he's tainted.

And I gave you my answer.

no you didn't, you gave mumbo jumbo didn't respond shit. either it should or you don't it should. not what the left want you to think. Your opinion, your thought. and you failed.

I responded adequately. If you don’t my answer, I could really care less.

so you have no thought.

I said I doubt he should be investigated. Read for once.

 

[colfax_m]

The DoJ has stated they have nothing going on with regard to Biden and Ukraine. There is no ongoing investigation to not talk about.

But you raise a good point. You don’t talk about ongoing investigations unless Trump is withholding military aid and is demanding you tell the world about your investigation.

there can be investigations without an official announcement,,,they happen all the time and we dont know it,,,and it was mainly trump
and not the DOJ doing it,,,
its already been established thats not why he delayed the aid,,,

There shouldn’t be announcements of investigations. The fact that Trump was pushing for an announcement of an investigation into Biden is incriminating.

What was Trump doing if you claim it was “mainly trump and not the doj doing it”

incriminating to what end???

trump was investigating what happened in Ukraine as to the DNC collusion to effect the 2016 election with respects to many things including the dossier,,,

I think biden was an after thought due to his videoed confession,,,

It’s incriminating that Trump wanted Biden investigated for personal political reasons. We don’t make announcements about investigations in this country because the person under investigation is potentially innocent and announcing an investigation puts a cloud over them.

On the phone call, Trump tried to claim that Crowdstrike was linked to Ukraine (a lie), that the server was in Ukraine (zero evidence of that) and that Biden bragged about ending an investigation (another lie). This also is incriminating. Trump was asking for an investigation based on false pretenses.

that would be true if not for the fact trump started investigating over a yr before that,,,

Supposedly. No one has seen any evidence of it.

 

[The Original Tree]

The only transcript we need to read is the one Schiff if Obstructing The President's Defense from reading and that is the IG Transcript.

You Lefty Commies, don't want us to look at Ukraine, so that is exactly where we should look.


All Roads Lead To Ukraine

ALL ROADS LEAD TO UKRAINE

Don't forget one of the first things Trump did when he got in to office was do audits sending all these bureacrats in to a panicked state.

How did Hillary Clinton ‘lose’ $6 billion at the State Department?

One has to wonder why The Obama Administration, Clinton Campaign, Obama State Department, and Podesta Group were throwing so much money in to The Ukraine Elections to Oppose an Anti-Corruption Government that was trying to get elected there.

Obama did his dirty work through The Podesta Group, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, Joe Biden, and The US Embassy In Ukraine, and funneled money in to a Ukraine NGO owned by Soros to oppose The Anti Corruption Candidates in Ukraine. Manfort and Gates were heavily used by The Obama Administration and Podesta Group for operations in Ukraine.

Then after that election when The Anti-Corruption Government was Elected, The Ukrainian Politicians Obama was supporting all fled to Russia.

Then Obama Seals his records on Ukraine citing Executive Privilege!

Then Obama had The Clinton Campaign be granted Full Blanket Immunity!

Then Obama had The Podesta Group be granted Full Blanket Immunity!

A Whistle Blower rats on Clinton about her secret Server which Obama denies knowledge of despite being caught in a lie when it was revealed he and his staff used aliases to communicate clandestinely with Clinton on that server so they could avoid FOIA and other types of discovery.

Comey Allows Clinton To Bleach Bit Her Server of 33,000 Emails!

The IT tech who Bleach Bitted Clinton's Server in violation of 2 Federal Court Orders is given immunity in exchange for testimony. He is asked 256 questions about his actions and about what he knows and despite having full immunity, pleads the 5th 256 Times!

Guccifer who says he and other countries did hack Clinton's Server despite The Obama Administration saying that never happened. Guccifer also says, he knows the original DNC Server was shipped to The Ukraine to hide it, and then an "edited copy" of the hard drive was given to Crowdstrike.

No Subpoena is ever issued on The DNC Server which The DNC Claimed was hacked and exposed Podesta's Emails. Only Crowdstrike looks at a copy of the VHD from the DNC Server and claims Russia hacked it. Weeks later, they had to retract nearly all of their statements as IT Techs all over the blogosphere called them out on all of their logical fallacies, errors, and technical nonsense. Lies in laymen terms.

Guccifer is arrested, extradited to The US and is locked up and is never heard from again.

Hillary Clinton Destroys 17 Electronic Devices!
Pakistani Hackers Hired by Clinton, Destroy dozens of hard drives as they flee The US!

Seth Rich gets murdered after uploading Podesta Emails to Assange.
The Remaining Hacker goes with Hillary Clinton to work on her campaign, despite being caught prying in to Congressional Files!

Comey sweeps all Clinton's Crimes Under the Rug.

The Obama Administration launches Russian Collusion COUP Hoax based on Russian Dirty Dossier he paid for that we now find out actually originated from The Ukraine and US Embassy. This Russian or Ukrainian Propaganda is later used falsely in FISA to get Wiretap Warrants on The Trump Campaign.

Gates and Manafort who worked for Obama and knew what was going on in The Ukraine, have their homes raided, are placed in solitary confinement, convicted on bogus charges and are never heard from again.

Julian Assange who says he got the Podesta Emails from Seth Rich is eventually Extradited, Locked Up and has never been hear from again!

Trump makes a phone call to congratulate The Ukraine President who ran on a Anti-Corruption Ukraine platform and then asks him to keep him informed about rumors of alleged corruption in Ukraine committed by The Obama Administration.

A Few weeks Later, Vindman a Ukrainian and his Brother who works for Adam Schiff, helps Adam Schiff and Eric Ciaramella write a Bogus Whistle Blower Report on a call to Ukraine!

Suddenly old footage of Joe Biden threatening The Ukraine to fire The Prosecutor Resurface as some people realize there is something fishy going on with this whole never ending attempt to remove President Trump.

Joe Biden:
"Fire The Prosecutor Investigating Hunter, or you aren't getting The Millions"!

President Trump shocks Schiff and releases The Transcript! contradicting The Whistle Blower Report

Schiff gets up in front of America and reads a completely Sham and Fictitious Manufactured Version of that phone call Transcript!

Adam Schiff who originally said everyone would get to interview The Whistle Blower shuts that down, says No, and then interrupts anyone who even dares to get close to revealing who The Whistle Blower is in testimony.

Schiff then has The IG Interview transcript which is critical of Schiff and The Whistleblower and seems to indicate Schiff lied about contact with The Whistleblower classified as "Intelligence" and refuses to allow The Trump Defense team to see that transcript. No one has seen it yet, and Schiff is refusing to turn it over.

The Pelosi Lead House Rushes to start an impeachment about The Ukraine phone call despite The Ukraine President telling The House, that their accusations are false. Adam Schiff refuses to release memos of his conversations with Vindman and The Whistle Blower, or The IGs testimony.

Hunter Biden refuses to comply with a Judges Order to turn over his Financial Records documenting his earnings at Burisma in his Child Support Case.

Joe Biden states he will refuse to comply with a Senate Subpoena to answer any questions about anything he knows about Ukraine or Burisma.

And here we are today.

 

[jc456]

there can be investigations without an official announcement,,,they happen all the time and we dont know it,,,and it was mainly trump
and not the DOJ doing it,,,
its already been established thats not why he delayed the aid,,,

There shouldn’t be announcements of investigations. The fact that Trump was pushing for an announcement of an investigation into Biden is incriminating.

What was Trump doing if you claim it was “mainly trump and not the doj doing it”

incriminating to what end???

trump was investigating what happened in Ukraine as to the DNC collusion to effect the 2016 election with respects to many things including the dossier,,,

I think biden was an after thought due to his videoed confession,,,

It’s incriminating that Trump wanted Biden investigated for personal political reasons. We don’t make announcements about investigations in this country because the person under investigation is potentially innocent and announcing an investigation puts a cloud over them.

On the phone call, Trump tried to claim that Crowdstrike was linked to Ukraine (a lie), that the server was in Ukraine (zero evidence of that) and that Biden bragged about ending an investigation (another lie). This also is incriminating. Trump was asking for an investigation based on false pretenses.

where did he say any of this garbage? shit I should say.

Read the transcript kiddo. If that’s too hard have someone read it to you.

I did, none of what you wrote is there. so quote the piece that confirms your post.

 

[progressive hunter]

there can be investigations without an official announcement,,,they happen all the time and we dont know it,,,and it was mainly trump
and not the DOJ doing it,,,
its already been established thats not why he delayed the aid,,,

There shouldn’t be announcements of investigations. The fact that Trump was pushing for an announcement of an investigation into Biden is incriminating.

What was Trump doing if you claim it was “mainly trump and not the doj doing it”

incriminating to what end???

trump was investigating what happened in Ukraine as to the DNC collusion to effect the 2016 election with respects to many things including the dossier,,,

I think biden was an after thought due to his videoed confession,,,

It’s incriminating that Trump wanted Biden investigated for personal political reasons. We don’t make announcements about investigations in this country because the person under investigation is potentially innocent and announcing an investigation puts a cloud over them.

On the phone call, Trump tried to claim that Crowdstrike was linked to Ukraine (a lie), that the server was in Ukraine (zero evidence of that) and that Biden bragged about ending an investigation (another lie). This also is incriminating. Trump was asking for an investigation based on false pretenses.

that would be true if not for the fact trump started investigating over a yr before that,,,

Supposedly. No one has seen any evidence of it.

racheal madcow did a big interview with paarnas that admitted to it,,,

and I have seen a lot of evidence to show it was and posted all of it,,,

 

[BlueGin]

You know, since you’re so against .gov corruption and all....I’d think you’d want to see them probed pretty heavily just to be sure there’s no fire where there’s mass amounts of smoke....right?

Naw. They want to throw the book at two Hollywood actresses for buying educations for their kids. But ignore Democrat politicians buying cushy jobs for their kids with bribes.

Typical hypocritical moonbats.

 

[karpenter]

It’s incriminating that Trump wanted Biden investigated for personal political reasons.

Why Ukraine Fired A Prosecutor
And Dropped A Corruption Investigation Into Sonny Toot-Toot's Company
After JOE BIDEN Threatened Ukraine With Quid Pro Quo ??

 

[colfax_m]

There shouldn’t be announcements of investigations. The fact that Trump was pushing for an announcement of an investigation into Biden is incriminating.

What was Trump doing if you claim it was “mainly trump and not the doj doing it”

incriminating to what end???

trump was investigating what happened in Ukraine as to the DNC collusion to effect the 2016 election with respects to many things including the dossier,,,

I think biden was an after thought due to his videoed confession,,,

It’s incriminating that Trump wanted Biden investigated for personal political reasons. We don’t make announcements about investigations in this country because the person under investigation is potentially innocent and announcing an investigation puts a cloud over them.

On the phone call, Trump tried to claim that Crowdstrike was linked to Ukraine (a lie), that the server was in Ukraine (zero evidence of that) and that Biden bragged about ending an investigation (another lie). This also is incriminating. Trump was asking for an investigation based on false pretenses.

where did he say any of this garbage? shit I should say.

Read the transcript kiddo. If that’s too hard have someone read it to you.

I did, none of what you wrote is there. so quote the piece that confirms your post.

they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it

Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution

Be honest. Did you really read the transcript? Because if you claim you read the transcript and missed it, I want to question your literacy.

 

[jc456]

incriminating to what end???

trump was investigating what happened in Ukraine as to the DNC collusion to effect the 2016 election with respects to many things including the dossier,,,

I think biden was an after thought due to his videoed confession,,,

It’s incriminating that Trump wanted Biden investigated for personal political reasons. We don’t make announcements about investigations in this country because the person under investigation is potentially innocent and announcing an investigation puts a cloud over them.

On the phone call, Trump tried to claim that Crowdstrike was linked to Ukraine (a lie), that the server was in Ukraine (zero evidence of that) and that Biden bragged about ending an investigation (another lie). This also is incriminating. Trump was asking for an investigation based on false pretenses.

where did he say any of this garbage? shit I should say.

Read the transcript kiddo. If that’s too hard have someone read it to you.

I did, none of what you wrote is there. so quote the piece that confirms your post.

they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it

Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution

Be honest. Did you really read the transcript? Because if you claim you read the transcript and missed it, I want to question your literacy.

you said, and I quote "Trump was asking for an investigation based on false pretenses" no he wasn't. it was right there in the transcript, crowdstrike was from 2016? Biden was VP and not a opponent. you're really one confused parrot. I understand why.

 

[S.J.]

I think it is pretty clear that Schiff, Nadler and Pelosi understand the role of the House when it comes to impeachment since Trump is now only the third President in history to be impeached.

Yeah, by ONE party. Not one member of the other party. In fact, the only bipartisanship was to NOT impeach. Under these circumstances it means nothing more than the Dem party trying to deny the American people the President THEY CHOSE because it wasn't one of THEIRS. We'll see how that plays out in November.

 

[jc456]

It’s best to keep politicians out of justice. Trump still doesn’t seem to get that.

TRUMP doesn't get it? How about Schiff, Nadler, Pelosi? And how about FBI officials staying out of politics?

Oh Trump does get it- he just believes that as President he can do whatever the hell he wants to do.

I think it is pretty clear that Schiff, Nadler and Pelosi understand the role of the House when it comes to impeachment since Trump is now only the third President in history to be impeached.

No, the House did not impeach the president, the demofks did.