jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 150,345
- 34,504
- 2,180
there has to have been injury to someone. They never named it.Nope, not in the least. I'm not the one that tried to compare a victimless fraud defense, a fraud by definition requires harm of some nature, to a DUI defense where no one was hurt. Can you say major false equivalency?
.