DJT stock price below $20.00

Yeah. Kind of. :dunno: But, unfortunately if the orange bag O' shit loses, all bets are off.

I honestly thought that after he lost in 2020 and then got caught starting an insurrection, the Republicans would find their backbones and testicles and actually stand up to the guy.

I'm not entirely sure that this will happen WHEN he loses again in November.
 
I honestly thought that after he lost in 2020 and then got caught starting an insurrection, the Republicans would find their backbones and testicles and actually stand up to the guy.

I'm not entirely sure that this will happen WHEN he loses again in November.

I was shocked that Republicans refused to impeach him for January 6th. By even more shocking than that is the corruption of the Supreme Court to find that ANYTHING he does as President is legal. Like sell pardons - it's an "official act".

And getting "tips" from companies you've given public contracts to????? Your courts have been thoroughly corrupted.
 
I was shocked that Republicans refused to impeach him for January 6th. By even more shocking than that is the corruption of the Supreme Court to find that ANYTHING he does as President is legal. Like sell pardons - it's an "official act".

And getting "tips" from companies you've given public contracts to????? Your courts have been thoroughly corrupted.

Well, that problem entirely preceeds Trump.

The problem is, Nixon was right. When the President does it, it is legal unless Congress impeaches him. Clinton was caught red-handed breaking a bunch of laws, but Democrats told the Republicans, "We don't care if you have video of Clinton murdering someone; we aren't voting to remove him!"

Nixon only resigned because he thought that an impeachment drama might encourage the Soviets to make a move on Western Europe. But who knows what would have happened if he stuck it out and impeachment became a loyalty test for Republicans.

It takes 2/3rds of the Senate to remove a President, this is why it's never been done. The party will always stick up for their guy, no matter how bad he is, lest they face the wrath of their voters.
 
Well, that problem entirely preceeds Trump.

The problem is, Nixon was right. When the President does it, it is legal unless Congress impeaches him. Clinton was caught red-handed breaking a bunch of laws, but Democrats told the Republicans, "We don't care if you have video of Clinton murdering someone; we aren't voting to remove him!"

Nixon only resigned because he thought that an impeachment drama might encourage the Soviets to make a move on Western Europe. But who knows what would have happened if he stuck it out and impeachment became a loyalty test for Republicans.

It takes 2/3rds of the Senate to remove a President, this is why it's never been done. The party will always stick up for their guy, no matter how bad he is, lest they face the wrath of their voters.
I’m sure you think that about Joe Biden too, right?
 
I don't think that Bad Selfies of your Son is an impeachable offense, and that's all you guys have really "proven".
WASHINGTON, Aug 19 (Reuters) - U.S. House of Representatives Republicans issued a report on Monday alleging Democratic President Joe Biden committed impeachable offenses, but it was unclear whether they would push for a vote following a probe the White House has long dismissed as politically motivated.
A 291-page report by three House committees alleged that Biden profited from an influence-peddling scheme to enrich himself and members of his family through foreign business dealings beginning in 2014, when Biden was vice president.

"The committees present this information to the House of Representatives for its evaluation and consideration of appropriate next steps," the report said.
It was not clear if Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson would schedule a vote to impeach Biden in the weeks leading up to the Nov. 5 election, in which Republican Donald Trump is locked in a tight battle with Vice President Kamala Harris.
Even if the Republican-controlled House were to pass such a measure, it would be unlikely to remove Biden from office, given that he would need to be convicted by a Senate controlled 51-49 by his own Democratic Party. Biden, who withdrew his own reelection bid last month, is due to leave office when his successor is sworn in on Jan. 20.

Democrats have disparaged the effort as retribution for Trump, who was impeached twice by a Democratic-controlled House and acquitted each time by the Senate. The first impeachment alleged that Trump pressured Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to help smear Biden in return for U.S. aid.
A House impeachment against Biden's top border official, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, was put to a swift end by the Senate in April.

Johnson, in a statement, commended the committees' work and said House Republicans "encourage all Americans to read this report."
The House investigators say that Biden used his influence to benefit the business dealings of his son, Hunter Biden, with partners from Ukraine, China, Russia and other countries.
Hunter Biden has been convicted on charges that he lied about his illegal drug use to buy a gun and is awaiting trial on charges of tax evasion, including an allegation that he accepted payments from a Romanian businessman who sought to influence U.S. government agencies in connection with a criminal probe in Romania.

The impeachment inquiry, which lawmakers formally authorized last December and has been carried out by the House Oversight, Judiciary and Ways & Means Committees, has been criticized by members of both parties for failing to produce hard evidence of wrongdoing by Biden.


It was more than selfies dummy…
 
Right. No evidence, but they can always claim it.
There’s plenty of evidence. However, it has to be politically tenable to carry impeachment through the dem controlled Senate, which wouldn’t happen.

Unlike dems who used impeachment knowing it wouldn’t go to removal, but used it anyway for a political talking point, republicans wanted to do it the proper way.

But, don’t worry, you and others have given us some great talking points when y’all start using the process against Trump next year, my biggest hope is that we take all 3 branches so that the boot stays on your neck.
No, it really wasn't.

So, tell me where Biden’s 27million net wealth came from?
 
Oops. doesn't look good for people who spent their money investing in Orange Jesus.


The stock drifted to a new post-merger low Tuesday, closing at $20.99. In the last 30 trading days, it has lost more than 40% of its value.

And it's below $20.00 today.

DJT running real businesses; the Biden’s and Congress, selling access and Insider Trading
 
There’s plenty of evidence. However, it has to be politically tenable to carry impeachment through the dem controlled Senate, which wouldn’t happen.

Unlike dems who used impeachment knowing it wouldn’t go to removal, but used it anyway for a political talking point, republicans wanted to do it the proper way.

But, don’t worry, you and others have given us some great talking points when y’all start using the process against Trump next year, my biggest hope is that we take all 3 branches so that the boot stays on your neck.

Well, guy, Trump isn't going to win, so you might as well get that out your head.

But you guys investigated Biden for four years, and came up with... nothing. Other than his family members made money.
 
Well, guy, Trump isn't going to win, so you might as well get that out your head.

But you guys investigated Biden for four years, and came up with... nothing. Other than his family members made money.
So, no answer eh? Where’d Joe get $27 million?

All you got is trash talk.
 
Don't know. Don't care.
So, it’s ok when dem politicians grift their positions to enrich themselves? But, you care if it were Trump.
40 years of public service,
In which time, Biden was described as “the dumbest man in the Senate”…And, he was breaking the law the whole time.
plus the post-VP speaking stuff, I'm sure he did fine.
That’s laughable and you know it…$27 million….Let that sink in…
 
So, it’s ok when dem politicians grift their positions to enrich themselves? But, you care if it were Trump.

In which time, Biden was described as “the dumbest man in the Senate”…And, he was breaking the law the whole time.

That’s laughable and you know it…$27 million….Let that sink in…

How is making sound investments 'grifting"?

Unlike Trump, who has convinced you drones to invest in a "Social Media" that loses 300 million a quarter.
 
WASHINGTON, Aug 19 (Reuters) - U.S. House of Representatives Republicans issued a report on Monday alleging Democratic President Joe Biden committed impeachable offenses, but it was unclear whether they would push for a vote following a probe the White House has long dismissed as politically motivated.
A 291-page report by three House committees alleged that Biden profited from an influence-peddling scheme to enrich himself and members of his family through foreign business dealings beginning in 2014, when Biden was vice president.

"The committees present this information to the House of Representatives for its evaluation and consideration of appropriate next steps," the report said.
It was not clear if Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson would schedule a vote to impeach Biden in the weeks leading up to the Nov. 5 election, in which Republican Donald Trump is locked in a tight battle with Vice President Kamala Harris.
Even if the Republican-controlled House were to pass such a measure, it would be unlikely to remove Biden from office, given that he would need to be convicted by a Senate controlled 51-49 by his own Democratic Party. Biden, who withdrew his own reelection bid last month, is due to leave office when his successor is sworn in on Jan. 20.

Democrats have disparaged the effort as retribution for Trump, who was impeached twice by a Democratic-controlled House and acquitted each time by the Senate. The first impeachment alleged that Trump pressured Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to help smear Biden in return for U.S. aid.
A House impeachment against Biden's top border official, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, was put to a swift end by the Senate in April.

Johnson, in a statement, commended the committees' work and said House Republicans "encourage all Americans to read this report."
The House investigators say that Biden used his influence to benefit the business dealings of his son, Hunter Biden, with partners from Ukraine, China, Russia and other countries.
Hunter Biden has been convicted on charges that he lied about his illegal drug use to buy a gun and is awaiting trial on charges of tax evasion, including an allegation that he accepted payments from a Romanian businessman who sought to influence U.S. government agencies in connection with a criminal probe in Romania.

The impeachment inquiry, which lawmakers formally authorized last December and has been carried out by the House Oversight, Judiciary and Ways & Means Committees, has been criticized by members of both parties for failing to produce hard evidence of wrongdoing by Biden.


It was more than selfies dummy…

They issued a whole bunch of bullshit reports but there wasn't a shred of evidence in ANY of them, including this one. If there had been, they would have impeached Biden in a heartbeat. Look how they went after Hunter and all he did was file his taxes late.
 
How is making sound investments 'grifting"?

Unlike Trump, who has convinced you drones to invest in a "Social Media" that loses 300 million a quarter.
Liar.

Show us all these “sound investments”….

You’re full of shit.
 
They issued a whole bunch of bullshit reports but there wasn't a shred of evidence in ANY of them, including this one. If there had been, they would have impeached Biden in a heartbeat. Look how they went after Hunter and all he did was file his taxes late.
I wonder if you ever have a moment where even you can’t stand your lies….
 
Oops. doesn't look good for people who spent their money investing in Orange Jesus.


The stock drifted to a new post-merger low Tuesday, closing at $20.99. In the last 30 trading days, it has lost more than 40% of its value.

And it's below $20.00 today.

Does this represent a buying opportunity ?
 
Back
Top Bottom