sure he did--sure
Not if the 50% promised did not exist.
You need to go back and look again if you think what you said is true. Not to mention fracking had nothing to do with the housing market bubble that led to banks needing bailed out, and car companies needing bailed out as well. Worst part of it was that Obama was forced to deal with those issues through a bail out set up by the President before him.
Market correction?
"With that in mind, it may be tough for stocks to enjoy nearly as explosive a rally under Trump in the next four (or eight) years as it has during Obama's tenure.
The Dow has gone up more than 140% since Obama's inauguration in January 2009.
If you look at how the Dow has done since it hit its low point on March 6, 2009, it's up 210%."
The Obama bull market: A 140% jump in the Dow
If the two steps forward were preceded by three steps backward you’re not improving.
You need to go back and look again if you think what you said is true. Not to mention fracking had nothing to do with the housing market bubble that led to banks needing bailed out, and car companies needing bailed out as well. Worst part of it was that Obama was forced to deal with those issues through a bail out set up by the President before him.
Market correction?
"With that in mind, it may be tough for stocks to enjoy nearly as explosive a rally under Trump in the next four (or eight) years as it has during Obama's tenure.
The Dow has gone up more than 140% since Obama's inauguration in January 2009.
If you look at how the Dow has done since it hit its low point on March 6, 2009, it's up 210%."
The Obama bull market: A 140% jump in the Dow
Lol, so nobody lost any real money in the 2008 market crash?
If the two steps forward were preceded by three steps backward you’re not improving.
You need to go back and look again if you think what you said is true. Not to mention fracking had nothing to do with the housing market bubble that led to banks needing bailed out, and car companies needing bailed out as well. Worst part of it was that Obama was forced to deal with those issues through a bail out set up by the President before him.
Market correction?
"With that in mind, it may be tough for stocks to enjoy nearly as explosive a rally under Trump in the next four (or eight) years as it has during Obama's tenure.
The Dow has gone up more than 140% since Obama's inauguration in January 2009.
If you look at how the Dow has done since it hit its low point on March 6, 2009, it's up 210%."
The Obama bull market: A 140% jump in the Dow
Only those who recklessly invested. Most people lost money that never really existed. It was a market correction.
And I told you that when you’re on the bottom you have one direction to go.If the two steps forward were preceded by three steps backward you’re not improving.
You need to go back and look again if you think what you said is true. Not to mention fracking had nothing to do with the housing market bubble that led to banks needing bailed out, and car companies needing bailed out as well. Worst part of it was that Obama was forced to deal with those issues through a bail out set up by the President before him.
Market correction?
"With that in mind, it may be tough for stocks to enjoy nearly as explosive a rally under Trump in the next four (or eight) years as it has during Obama's tenure.
The Dow has gone up more than 140% since Obama's inauguration in January 2009.
If you look at how the Dow has done since it hit its low point on March 6, 2009, it's up 210%."
The Obama bull market: A 140% jump in the Dow
You didn't even read it did you? If you take the point the Dow was at when Obama took office, it went up 140% over his two terms. If you take it from the lowest point, which was about two months into his presidency when he had enough time to do anything, it went up 201% during his terms.
If the two steps forward were preceded by three steps backward you’re not improving.
You need to go back and look again if you think what you said is true. Not to mention fracking had nothing to do with the housing market bubble that led to banks needing bailed out, and car companies needing bailed out as well. Worst part of it was that Obama was forced to deal with those issues through a bail out set up by the President before him.
Market correction?
"With that in mind, it may be tough for stocks to enjoy nearly as explosive a rally under Trump in the next four (or eight) years as it has during Obama's tenure.
The Dow has gone up more than 140% since Obama's inauguration in January 2009.
If you look at how the Dow has done since it hit its low point on March 6, 2009, it's up 210%."
The Obama bull market: A 140% jump in the Dow
You didn't even read it did you? If you take the point the Dow was at when Obama took office, it went up 140% over his two terms. If you take it from the lowest point, which was about two months into his presidency when he had enough time to do anything, it went up 201% during his terms.
And I told you that when you’re on the bottom you have one direction to go.If the two steps forward were preceded by three steps backward you’re not improving.
You need to go back and look again if you think what you said is true. Not to mention fracking had nothing to do with the housing market bubble that led to banks needing bailed out, and car companies needing bailed out as well. Worst part of it was that Obama was forced to deal with those issues through a bail out set up by the President before him.
Market correction?
"With that in mind, it may be tough for stocks to enjoy nearly as explosive a rally under Trump in the next four (or eight) years as it has during Obama's tenure.
The Dow has gone up more than 140% since Obama's inauguration in January 2009.
If you look at how the Dow has done since it hit its low point on March 6, 2009, it's up 210%."
The Obama bull market: A 140% jump in the Dow
You didn't even read it did you? If you take the point the Dow was at when Obama took office, it went up 140% over his two terms. If you take it from the lowest point, which was about two months into his presidency when he had enough time to do anything, it went up 201% during his terms.
When you drive things from near bottom to the bottom you have only one direction to go.
Two steps forward following three steps backward is a net negative.
Liberal thieves on wall street.
If 140 or 210 follow 160 or 250 in the other direction you have a net negative. Not rocket science.And I told you that when you’re on the bottom you have one direction to go.If the two steps forward were preceded by three steps backward you’re not improving.
You need to go back and look again if you think what you said is true. Not to mention fracking had nothing to do with the housing market bubble that led to banks needing bailed out, and car companies needing bailed out as well. Worst part of it was that Obama was forced to deal with those issues through a bail out set up by the President before him.
Market correction?
"With that in mind, it may be tough for stocks to enjoy nearly as explosive a rally under Trump in the next four (or eight) years as it has during Obama's tenure.
The Dow has gone up more than 140% since Obama's inauguration in January 2009.
If you look at how the Dow has done since it hit its low point on March 6, 2009, it's up 210%."
The Obama bull market: A 140% jump in the Dow
You didn't even read it did you? If you take the point the Dow was at when Obama took office, it went up 140% over his two terms. If you take it from the lowest point, which was about two months into his presidency when he had enough time to do anything, it went up 201% during his terms.
When you drive things from near bottom to the bottom you have only one direction to go.
Two steps forward following three steps backward is a net negative.
How in the hell did he drive it to the bottom? Even if you wanted to keep up that ridiculous argument, 140% growth under him is not anything negative.
Do you know how numbers work? I'm not talking about economics, just numbers?
A 140% or 210% growth is not negative.
I have no idea how to respond to your complete detachment from reality.
If 140 or 210 follow 160 or 250 in the other direction you have a net negative. Not rocket science.And I told you that when you’re on the bottom you have one direction to go.If the two steps forward were preceded by three steps backward you’re not improving.You need to go back and look again if you think what you said is true. Not to mention fracking had nothing to do with the housing market bubble that led to banks needing bailed out, and car companies needing bailed out as well. Worst part of it was that Obama was forced to deal with those issues through a bail out set up by the President before him.
Market correction?
"With that in mind, it may be tough for stocks to enjoy nearly as explosive a rally under Trump in the next four (or eight) years as it has during Obama's tenure.
The Dow has gone up more than 140% since Obama's inauguration in January 2009.
If you look at how the Dow has done since it hit its low point on March 6, 2009, it's up 210%."
The Obama bull market: A 140% jump in the Dow
You didn't even read it did you? If you take the point the Dow was at when Obama took office, it went up 140% over his two terms. If you take it from the lowest point, which was about two months into his presidency when he had enough time to do anything, it went up 201% during his terms.
When you drive things from near bottom to the bottom you have only one direction to go.
Two steps forward following three steps backward is a net negative.
How in the hell did he drive it to the bottom? Even if you wanted to keep up that ridiculous argument, 140% growth under him is not anything negative.
Do you know how numbers work? I'm not talking about economics, just numbers?
A 140% or 210% growth is not negative.
My household lost $80k in disposable $$ due to Obama energy policy. Things improved after fracking but we never recouped that loss.
Our investment plan yo-yo’d but we never banked on the higher amount because it was inflated. Our property value similarly see-sawed but we monitored the real value.
