Disgusting

[peach174]

So any CEo whos company gets subsidies should not vote?

That is a tax code problem and that is why we need to change the tax code.
It's totally diffent problem.

Now think about this one.

if you have a system where people have to give up tehir vote to get needed help to survive then you have a governmnet that pays people to NOT VOTE!

how fucking stupid are you

How stupid are you, not to know the difference between welfare checks and tax loopholes?

 

[HUGGY]

Doesn't help the Republican position

You know what? IF Romney deserved to win, he would be able to do so without having shit like that done on his behalf.

IF the incumbent "deserves" to win, he should be able to do so by getting votes of actual eligible voters.

In a perfect world you would be the only "eligible" voter...right?

 

[Truthmatters]

You want a government that pays people not to vote.

do you understand how fucking stupid that is?

how antifreedom that is

 

[Truthmatters]

You know what? IF Romney deserved to win, he would be able to do so without having shit like that done on his behalf.

IF the incumbent "deserves" to win, he should be able to do so by getting votes of actual eligible voters.

In a perfect world you would be the only "eligible" voter...right?

fuck you are even more dishonest and stupid than peach liability

 

[peach174]

I think that's the whole point. They know they can't win fair and square so they're doing all they can to steal the election.

And, that's just in case buying it doesn't work.

I can't imagine anything less "American" but, not surprisingly, the rw's don't mind this lying and cheating. Not in the least.

"Disgusting" is exactly the right word for it.

It's more disgusting that the Dems have been cheating with the votes for 40 years.
That is what he meant, the Repubs now have a fair chance at winning without all of the cheating that the Dems have done as well as some Repubs.
We have had arrests and convictions from both parties you know.

you have no proof you fucking idiot.

I have court documents and their own words to prove your party cheats

Same with Dems, but you ignore those court convictions on the left.

 

[BDBoop]

You know what? IF Romney deserved to win, he would be able to do so without having shit like that done on his behalf.

IF the incumbent "deserves" to win, he should be able to do so by getting votes of actual eligible voters.

In a perfect world you would be the only "eligible" voter...right?

I was just wondering - isn't this a pretty literal example of "taxation without representation is tyranny"? If they have been taken off the registered voter logs (like in Florida), or cannot vote in the States that aren't exactly informing people what they are up to, or making it difficult to vote - then they shouldn't have to pay taxes, either.

Things could get pretty damn ugly.

 

[Si modo]

That is a tax code problem and that is why we need to change the tax code.
It's totally diffent problem.

Now think about this one.

if you have a system where people have to give up tehir vote to get needed help to survive then you have a governmnet that pays people to NOT VOTE!

how fucking stupid are you

How stupid are you, not to know the difference between welfare checks and tax loopholes?

I really hope you are not surprised about that.

 

[Truthmatters]

they are saying it right out loud now.


they have been caught and are being watched and sued.


they are killing htemselves

 

[Si modo]

IF the incumbent "deserves" to win, he should be able to do so by getting votes of actual eligible voters.

In a perfect world you would be the only "eligible" voter...right?

fuck you are even more dishonest and stupid than peach liability

Pssst. That's not Liability.

 

[peach174]

Now think about this one.

if you have a system where people have to give up tehir vote to get needed help to survive then you have a governmnet that pays people to NOT VOTE!

how fucking stupid are you

How stupid are you, not to know the difference between welfare checks and tax loopholes?

I really hope you are not surprised about that.

No not at all.

 

[Truthmatters]

yes it was liability

 

[Liability]

You know what? IF Romney deserved to win, he would be able to do so without having shit like that done on his behalf.

IF the incumbent "deserves" to win, he should be able to do so by getting votes of actual eligible voters.

In a perfect world you would be the only "eligible" voter...right?

Wrong as usual, Smugz.

Dayum. One would imagine that you'd get tired of being wrong and petty so often.

But the evidence suggests otherwise.

The premise is not even difficult.

If you support the notion that the liberal Democrat Chicago style political thieves ought to be able to register dead people to vote in elections -- or that aliens (legal or illegal) should be able to vote in OUR elections -- then you are a sub-moron.

TderpM is, of course, a sub-moron. I harbored slightly higher hopes for you.

Alas.

 

[Liability]

IF the incumbent "deserves" to win, he should be able to do so by getting votes of actual eligible voters.

In a perfect world you would be the only "eligible" voter...right?

fuck you are even more dishonest and stupid than peach liability

Said TderpM responding to Smugly.

 

[Truthmatters]

backing the disenfranchisement of voters will NOT win you an endless majority like Rove planned.

 

[Truthmatters]

It will kill your party.


your plans have been outed and are in court

 

[Liability]

yes it was liability

No. Your reply was to Huggy, you complete fucking idiot.

 

[Liability]

It offends TderpM that Republicans maintain that only living Americans of proper age should vote in American elections.

 

[BDBoop]

/thread death by TM

//sorrow

 

[BDBoop]

PA Democrats Ridicule Turzai, GOP Over Voter ID; Say

His comments have drawn ire from state and national Democrats and liberals, and has led to headlines across the country. Because until now, pro-Voter ID Republicans have maintained the rule has nothing to do with partisan politics, everything to do with voter fraud. Capitalizing on that, some General Assembly Democrats held a press conference this morning where they unloaded on Turzai and Pennsylvania Republicans.

The press conference, organized by State Sen. Daylin Leach, began with background on Turzai’s statements, which the Majority Leader’s spokesman Stephen Miskin say are being taken out of context for political gain.

“He was simply referencing, for the first time in a long while, the Republican Presidential candidate will be on a more even keel thanks to Voter ID…Anyone looking further into it has their own agenda,” said Miskin, who also noted, according to CBS, the “Republican candidate – presidential candidate – is going to have a fairer playing field.”

Leach said that explanation does “not pass the laugh test.” He noted voter fraud is virtually nonexistent in Pennsylvania and the United States and ended his opening statements with this burn: “If you have to stop people voting to win elections, your ideas suck.”

During debate on the issue in March, Leach noted Americans are more likely to be hit by lightning than misrepresent themselves at the polls.

 

[Truthmatters]

/thread death by TM

//sorrow

how is it I am killing this thread?