OODA_Loop
Account Terminated
Did the NY court not respect themselves when they UNCONDITIONALLY DISCHARGED all 34 counts?Donald Trump's convictions to a MAGAT.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did the NY court not respect themselves when they UNCONDITIONALLY DISCHARGED all 34 counts?Donald Trump's convictions to a MAGAT.
And media is amplifying words that can be argued to incite the more mentally disturbed among the left to take action and murder.
No.Only if you can show that the people they said it to went and started fighting like hell.
Trump’s words led to thousands of his supporters storming the Capitol and injuring over a hundred cops.
He said to be peaceful.The difference is Trump said those words to a mob who immediately went to the Capitol and literally “fought like hell”.
It's really quite plain to see...Just because you are in denial about it, doesn't mean that it's untrue...When you can draw a direct connection between those words and the violence, let me know.
Because we can very easily draw a direction connection between Trump’s call to fight and the fighting that immediately followed.
The truth of the matter is that you had a small group of people within those protesting infront of the Capitol that day that were inciting people to riot.
They always have to cut out context.He said to be peaceful.
And I said Kirk’s death was tragic and wrong but some MAGA dipshits say I’m celebrating it.He said to be peaceful.
It's really quite plain to see...Just because you are in denial about it, doesn't mean that it's untrue...
No, you can’t.When you can draw a direct connection between those words and the violence, let me know.
Because we can very easily draw a direction connection between Trump’s call to fight and the fighting that immediately followed.
Quote him saying to storm the Capital, Simp.Yet you don’t want to believe Trump was the one doing the inciting.
By the way, even if someone is guilty of “inciting”, the person who rioted is still legally culpable.
Absolutely.Yet you don’t want to believe Trump was the one doing the inciting.
By the way, even if someone is guilty of “inciting”, the person who rioted is still legally culpable.
Ok, then we have nothing to discuss.You see what isn’t there out of convenience.
You guys are delusional.
Ok, then we have nothing to discuss.
Irony overload.Not until you can have a normal conversation.
You can’t talk people out of delusions. You’re now insulated from reality.
That's your opinion unfortunately...The problem is that it is only rooted in your absolute refusal to engage honestly, and be tolerant of opposing viewpoints...That's not a me problem....Not until you can have a normal conversation.
You can’t talk people out of delusions. You’re now insulated from reality.
That's your opinion unfortunately...The problem is that it is only rooted in your absolute refusal to engage honestly, and be tolerant of opposing viewpoints...That's not a me problem....![]()
It's really quite plain to see...Just because you are in denial about it, doesn't mean that it's untrue...
Not because you say so, mentally ill MAGA Nazi.
From you? No.You think this is engaging honestly?
It’s not. There’s nothing to say after you reply like this. You just believe whatever you want to believe without feeling any obligation to support it.
From you? No.