Discrimination: 2,098 Syrian muslims admitted into US - Only 53 Christians

[koshergrl]

"...the United Nations itself is strongly beholden to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), it’s largest voting bloc, which has its own views on the refugee situation that are unlikely to conform with U.S. interests and equally unlikely to favor Christians, given that at the OIC’s home headquarters, in Saudi Arabia, the practice of Christianity is itself largely illegal.
"....perhaps most largely problematic, is the appearance of overt anti-Christian bias by the State Department itself. As good friend of the Center, Institute for Religion and Democracy’s Faith McDonnell notes in her recent piece on the state of Christian refugees, the State Department has explicitly declared they, “would not support a special category to bring Assyrian Christians into the United States,” in response to a plan by a private aid group to fund, entirely free of taxpayer dollars, the transport of Assyrian Christians facing extermination by Islamic State.
"In other words, even when its free, no cost to them, the State Department has preferred to snub Christians rather than save them."

Center for Security Policy | The Refugee Resettlement Process is Already Discriminatory

Center for Security Policy - Frank Gaffney? Gaffney is a discredited conspiracy theorist.

Try to speak to the points instead of the same, stale well poisoning ad hominem garbage. You haven't countered a single fact.

He doesn't spew any facts - surely you can find more reputable sources?

That's not disputing facts, and I used many sources. You are the one sounding like a conspiracy theorist now.

 

[koshergrl]

" Christians are to be excluded from an impending official United States government declaration of ISIS genocide. If true, it would reflect a familiar pattern within the administration of a politically correct bias that views Christians — even non-Western congregations such as those in Iraq and Syria — never as victims but always as Inquisition-style oppressors."
"ISIS and other Islamist extremists are waging genocide, the most egregious of all human-rights atrocities, against Christians, Yazidis, Mandaeans, and other defenseless religious minorities, whom the administration, apart from last year’s airstrikes to help the Yazidis, has failed. This religious genocide is distinct from but simultaneous with the region’s wars. Similar to Jews under Nazi domination during World War II, the Christians and other minorities in the Middle East today are facing, in addition to the wartime privations suffered by the general population, a relentless and deliberate extermination campaign being carried out in the name of Islamic purification. In the summer of 2014, ISIS launched its caliphate from Mosul by marking Christian homes with the red letter “N,” for “Nazarene,” before confiscating them and exiling their owners. Since then, it has pursued Christians and the other minorities with a systematic intensity intended to delete every trace of their ancient presence. Solely for their religion, Christians and Yazidis have been beheaded, enslaved, abducted and sold, forcibly converted to Islam, and stripped of all their property. Their houses of worship and their cultural artifacts have been expropriated or demolished, including the fifth-century monastery in Qaraytain and Nineveh’s fourth-century Mar Behnam monastery."

And our admin absolutely refuses to let them in except en masse WITH the people who are killing them.

In a word, they're holding the Christians HOSTAGE, forcing us to accommodate muslim TERRORISTS in order to get even the few Christians in that we can.

Keep in mind...Christians do not pose a terror threat. There are no terrorists sneaking in with Christian groups, posing as Christian immigrants, so they can cross the border and blow us up. That is an ISLAMIC thing. We can EASILY accommodate these people. And Obama refuses to do so, except that they come across the border with the people who are killing them (and us).

Read more at: Christians Not ISIS Genocide Victims, State Department May Rule | National Review Online
ISIS Genocide Victims Do Not Include Christians, the State Department Is Poised to Rule, by Nina Shea, National Review

This is not excluding Christians from refugee status - did you read it?

This is about what constitutes genocide - and Yazidi's are a group that ISIS has specifically targeted for genocide and almost succeeded in accomplishing. Genocide has a very high bar to meet in order to be categorized as genocide. That's not "religious discrimmination" it's terminology. ISIS has some degree of tolerance (minimal arguably) for other Islamic sects and for "people of the book" but none whatsoever for Yazidi's whom they consider pagan who must be killed or inslaved.

"GENOCIDE HAS A VERY HIGH BAR TO MEET IN ORDER TO BE CATEGORIZED AS GENOCIDE" <<<< bullshit sophistry-----all bars have
been over topped in reference to the chaldeans of Iraq LONG AGO

Calm down Rosie. The definition of "genocide" under international law is very specific.

Yes we addressed that. It's specifically anti Christian. That's the point. Exceptions and special assifications are made for terrorists, criminal Mexicans, you name it. But Christians are stopped, prosecuted and deported....provided they survive the UN Muslim gauntlet.

How is the definition of genocide "specifically anti-Christian"?''

What "exceptions and special assifications" are made for terrorists and criminal Mexicans in the designation of genocide.

Please...be specific. Your source wasn't.

Yes, all the sources were very specific.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Catholic charity hit with death threats after hysterical conservatives push false reports about ‘wandering’ refugee
A faith-based charity has received death threats after conservative media and Republican elected officials highlighted their work helping to relocate Syrian refugees in Louisiana.

 

[Coyote]

This is not excluding Christians from refugee status - did you read it?

This is about what constitutes genocide - and Yazidi's are a group that ISIS has specifically targeted for genocide and almost succeeded in accomplishing. Genocide has a very high bar to meet in order to be categorized as genocide. That's not "religious discrimmination" it's terminology. ISIS has some degree of tolerance (minimal arguably) for other Islamic sects and for "people of the book" but none whatsoever for Yazidi's whom they consider pagan who must be killed or inslaved.

"GENOCIDE HAS A VERY HIGH BAR TO MEET IN ORDER TO BE CATEGORIZED AS GENOCIDE" <<<< bullshit sophistry-----all bars have
been over topped in reference to the chaldeans of Iraq LONG AGO

Calm down Rosie. The definition of "genocide" under international law is very specific.

Yes we addressed that. It's specifically anti Christian. That's the point. Exceptions and special assifications are made for terrorists, criminal Mexicans, you name it. But Christians are stopped, prosecuted and deported....provided they survive the UN Muslim gauntlet.

How is the definition of genocide "specifically anti-Christian"?''

What "exceptions and special assifications" are made for terrorists and criminal Mexicans in the designation of genocide.

Please...be specific. Your source wasn't.

Yes, all the sources were very specific.

So - What "exceptions and special assifications" are made for terrorists and criminal Mexicans in the designation of genocide?

 

[irosie91]

" Christians are to be excluded from an impending official United States government declaration of ISIS genocide. If true, it would reflect a familiar pattern within the administration of a politically correct bias that views Christians — even non-Western congregations such as those in Iraq and Syria — never as victims but always as Inquisition-style oppressors."
"ISIS and other Islamist extremists are waging genocide, the most egregious of all human-rights atrocities, against Christians, Yazidis, Mandaeans, and other defenseless religious minorities, whom the administration, apart from last year’s airstrikes to help the Yazidis, has failed. This religious genocide is distinct from but simultaneous with the region’s wars. Similar to Jews under Nazi domination during World War II, the Christians and other minorities in the Middle East today are facing, in addition to the wartime privations suffered by the general population, a relentless and deliberate extermination campaign being carried out in the name of Islamic purification. In the summer of 2014, ISIS launched its caliphate from Mosul by marking Christian homes with the red letter “N,” for “Nazarene,” before confiscating them and exiling their owners. Since then, it has pursued Christians and the other minorities with a systematic intensity intended to delete every trace of their ancient presence. Solely for their religion, Christians and Yazidis have been beheaded, enslaved, abducted and sold, forcibly converted to Islam, and stripped of all their property. Their houses of worship and their cultural artifacts have been expropriated or demolished, including the fifth-century monastery in Qaraytain and Nineveh’s fourth-century Mar Behnam monastery."

And our admin absolutely refuses to let them in except en masse WITH the people who are killing them.

In a word, they're holding the Christians HOSTAGE, forcing us to accommodate muslim TERRORISTS in order to get even the few Christians in that we can.

Keep in mind...Christians do not pose a terror threat. There are no terrorists sneaking in with Christian groups, posing as Christian immigrants, so they can cross the border and blow us up. That is an ISLAMIC thing. We can EASILY accommodate these people. And Obama refuses to do so, except that they come across the border with the people who are killing them (and us).

Read more at: Christians Not ISIS Genocide Victims, State Department May Rule | National Review Online
ISIS Genocide Victims Do Not Include Christians, the State Department Is Poised to Rule, by Nina Shea, National Review

This is not excluding Christians from refugee status - did you read it?

This is about what constitutes genocide - and Yazidi's are a group that ISIS has specifically targeted for genocide and almost succeeded in accomplishing. Genocide has a very high bar to meet in order to be categorized as genocide. That's not "religious discrimmination" it's terminology. ISIS has some degree of tolerance (minimal arguably) for other Islamic sects and for "people of the book" but none whatsoever for Yazidi's whom they consider pagan who must be killed or inslaved.

"GENOCIDE HAS A VERY HIGH BAR TO MEET IN ORDER TO BE CATEGORIZED AS GENOCIDE" <<<< bullshit sophistry-----all bars have
been over topped in reference to the chaldeans of Iraq LONG AGO

Calm down Rosie. The definition of "genocide" under international law is very specific.

actually ----it is not VERY SPECIFIC at all-------and----the definition you cite
has been over topped LONG ago in reference to the chaldeans of Iraq. That
definition had never come CLOSE to being achieved in reference to the muslims
of Burma-----but that does not stop you from using the "G" word.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Ben Carson Compares Refugees To Rabid Dogs

 

[irosie91]

"GENOCIDE HAS A VERY HIGH BAR TO MEET IN ORDER TO BE CATEGORIZED AS GENOCIDE" <<<< bullshit sophistry-----all bars have
been over topped in reference to the chaldeans of Iraq LONG AGO

Calm down Rosie. The definition of "genocide" under international law is very specific.

Yes we addressed that. It's specifically anti Christian. That's the point. Exceptions and special assifications are made for terrorists, criminal Mexicans, you name it. But Christians are stopped, prosecuted and deported....provided they survive the UN Muslim gauntlet.

How is the definition of genocide "specifically anti-Christian"?''

What "exceptions and special assifications" are made for terrorists and criminal Mexicans in the designation of genocide.

Please...be specific. Your source wasn't.

Yes, all the sources were very specific.

So - What "exceptions and special assifications" are made for terrorists and criminal Mexicans in the designation of genocide?

wtf is an ASSIFICATION?

 

[Coyote]

" Christians are to be excluded from an impending official United States government declaration of ISIS genocide. If true, it would reflect a familiar pattern within the administration of a politically correct bias that views Christians — even non-Western congregations such as those in Iraq and Syria — never as victims but always as Inquisition-style oppressors."
"ISIS and other Islamist extremists are waging genocide, the most egregious of all human-rights atrocities, against Christians, Yazidis, Mandaeans, and other defenseless religious minorities, whom the administration, apart from last year’s airstrikes to help the Yazidis, has failed. This religious genocide is distinct from but simultaneous with the region’s wars. Similar to Jews under Nazi domination during World War II, the Christians and other minorities in the Middle East today are facing, in addition to the wartime privations suffered by the general population, a relentless and deliberate extermination campaign being carried out in the name of Islamic purification. In the summer of 2014, ISIS launched its caliphate from Mosul by marking Christian homes with the red letter “N,” for “Nazarene,” before confiscating them and exiling their owners. Since then, it has pursued Christians and the other minorities with a systematic intensity intended to delete every trace of their ancient presence. Solely for their religion, Christians and Yazidis have been beheaded, enslaved, abducted and sold, forcibly converted to Islam, and stripped of all their property. Their houses of worship and their cultural artifacts have been expropriated or demolished, including the fifth-century monastery in Qaraytain and Nineveh’s fourth-century Mar Behnam monastery."

And our admin absolutely refuses to let them in except en masse WITH the people who are killing them.

In a word, they're holding the Christians HOSTAGE, forcing us to accommodate muslim TERRORISTS in order to get even the few Christians in that we can.

Keep in mind...Christians do not pose a terror threat. There are no terrorists sneaking in with Christian groups, posing as Christian immigrants, so they can cross the border and blow us up. That is an ISLAMIC thing. We can EASILY accommodate these people. And Obama refuses to do so, except that they come across the border with the people who are killing them (and us).

Read more at: Christians Not ISIS Genocide Victims, State Department May Rule | National Review Online
ISIS Genocide Victims Do Not Include Christians, the State Department Is Poised to Rule, by Nina Shea, National Review

This is not excluding Christians from refugee status - did you read it?

This is about what constitutes genocide - and Yazidi's are a group that ISIS has specifically targeted for genocide and almost succeeded in accomplishing. Genocide has a very high bar to meet in order to be categorized as genocide. That's not "religious discrimmination" it's terminology. ISIS has some degree of tolerance (minimal arguably) for other Islamic sects and for "people of the book" but none whatsoever for Yazidi's whom they consider pagan who must be killed or inslaved.

"GENOCIDE HAS A VERY HIGH BAR TO MEET IN ORDER TO BE CATEGORIZED AS GENOCIDE" <<<< bullshit sophistry-----all bars have
been over topped in reference to the chaldeans of Iraq LONG AGO

Calm down Rosie. The definition of "genocide" under international law is very specific.

actually ----it is not VERY SPECIFIC at all-------and----the definition you cite
has been over topped LONG ago in reference to the chaldeans of Iraq. That
definition had never come CLOSE to being achieved in reference to the muslims
of Burma-----but that does not stop you from using the "G" word.

The UN, who thus far is the main body handling and classifying refugees operates by the definition of genocide given under international law. You and I can fling genocide charges left and right but it doesn't mean a thing in terms of international law.

 

[irosie91]

the definition of genocide is anti Christian when it is considered in reference to Christians in muslim countries

 

[Coyote]

Calm down Rosie. The definition of "genocide" under international law is very specific.

Yes we addressed that. It's specifically anti Christian. That's the point. Exceptions and special assifications are made for terrorists, criminal Mexicans, you name it. But Christians are stopped, prosecuted and deported....provided they survive the UN Muslim gauntlet.

How is the definition of genocide "specifically anti-Christian"?''

What "exceptions and special assifications" are made for terrorists and criminal Mexicans in the designation of genocide.

Please...be specific. Your source wasn't.

Yes, all the sources were very specific.

So - What "exceptions and special assifications" are made for terrorists and criminal Mexicans in the designation of genocide?

wtf is an ASSIFICATION?

I don't know - ask kg ....

Kind of an interesting word though

 

[irosie91]

" Christians are to be excluded from an impending official United States government declaration of ISIS genocide. If true, it would reflect a familiar pattern within the administration of a politically correct bias that views Christians — even non-Western congregations such as those in Iraq and Syria — never as victims but always as Inquisition-style oppressors."
"ISIS and other Islamist extremists are waging genocide, the most egregious of all human-rights atrocities, against Christians, Yazidis, Mandaeans, and other defenseless religious minorities, whom the administration, apart from last year’s airstrikes to help the Yazidis, has failed. This religious genocide is distinct from but simultaneous with the region’s wars. Similar to Jews under Nazi domination during World War II, the Christians and other minorities in the Middle East today are facing, in addition to the wartime privations suffered by the general population, a relentless and deliberate extermination campaign being carried out in the name of Islamic purification. In the summer of 2014, ISIS launched its caliphate from Mosul by marking Christian homes with the red letter “N,” for “Nazarene,” before confiscating them and exiling their owners. Since then, it has pursued Christians and the other minorities with a systematic intensity intended to delete every trace of their ancient presence. Solely for their religion, Christians and Yazidis have been beheaded, enslaved, abducted and sold, forcibly converted to Islam, and stripped of all their property. Their houses of worship and their cultural artifacts have been expropriated or demolished, including the fifth-century monastery in Qaraytain and Nineveh’s fourth-century Mar Behnam monastery."

And our admin absolutely refuses to let them in except en masse WITH the people who are killing them.

In a word, they're holding the Christians HOSTAGE, forcing us to accommodate muslim TERRORISTS in order to get even the few Christians in that we can.

Keep in mind...Christians do not pose a terror threat. There are no terrorists sneaking in with Christian groups, posing as Christian immigrants, so they can cross the border and blow us up. That is an ISLAMIC thing. We can EASILY accommodate these people. And Obama refuses to do so, except that they come across the border with the people who are killing them (and us).

Read more at: Christians Not ISIS Genocide Victims, State Department May Rule | National Review Online
ISIS Genocide Victims Do Not Include Christians, the State Department Is Poised to Rule, by Nina Shea, National Review

This is not excluding Christians from refugee status - did you read it?

This is about what constitutes genocide - and Yazidi's are a group that ISIS has specifically targeted for genocide and almost succeeded in accomplishing. Genocide has a very high bar to meet in order to be categorized as genocide. That's not "religious discrimmination" it's terminology. ISIS has some degree of tolerance (minimal arguably) for other Islamic sects and for "people of the book" but none whatsoever for Yazidi's whom they consider pagan who must be killed or inslaved.

"GENOCIDE HAS A VERY HIGH BAR TO MEET IN ORDER TO BE CATEGORIZED AS GENOCIDE" <<<< bullshit sophistry-----all bars have
been over topped in reference to the chaldeans of Iraq LONG AGO

Calm down Rosie. The definition of "genocide" under international law is very specific.

actually ----it is not VERY SPECIFIC at all-------and----the definition you cite
has been over topped LONG ago in reference to the chaldeans of Iraq. That
definition had never come CLOSE to being achieved in reference to the muslims
of Burma-----but that does not stop you from using the "G" word.

The UN, who thus far is the main body handling and classifying refugees operates by the definition of genocide given under international law. You and I can fling genocide charges left and right but it doesn't mean a thing in terms of international law.

Yes-----I am very familiar with your support of Islamic genocide

 

[irosie91]

for the record-------IN THE FILTH OF SHARIAH LAW-------not only can Christians and jews be "DHIMMIS" ------historically ZOROASTRIANS were designated as dhimmis ----too. Yazidis are----essentially Zoroastrians. The ISIS now DEFINES them as
PAGAN SHIT worthy of DEATH ----is actually an innovation------they actually have the same standing that Christians "enjoy" in classical shariah shit

 

[Coyote]

the definition of genocide is anti Christian when it is considered in reference to Christians in muslim countries

Really?

Then it's discriminatory in reference to Muslims, Zorastrians, and other religious minorities living under ISIS.

Persecution in and of itself doesn't equal genocide.

Genocide has been applied to the Yazidi's: Persecution of Yazidis by ISIL - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The persecution of the Yazidi people has been viewed as qualifying as "genocide" by groups such as the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in a March 2015 report. The organization cited the numerous atrocities such as forced religious conversion and sexual slavery as being parts of an overall malicious campaign.[3][57] Multiple individual human rights activists such as Nazand Begikhani[58] and Widad Akrawi have also advocated for this view.[59] The term itself first arose in 1944 as the creation of a Polish-Jewish lawyer named Raphael Lemkin, who himself defined the term as reflecting "a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves."[60]

A lot of groups can be persecuted and killed or might fall under war crimes, but don't qualify as genocide. When the Bosnians were attacked and killed by the Serbs - it still wasn't called a genocide so arguing that there is some sort of religious bias at work is thin.

 

[Coyote]

for the record-------IN THE FILTH OF SHARIAH LAW-------not only can Christians and jews be "DHIMMIS" ------historically ZOROASTRIANS were designated as dhimmis ----too. Yazidis are----essentially Zoroastrians. The ISIS now DEFINES them as
PAGAN SHIT worthy of DEATH ----is actually an innovation------they actually have the same standing that Christians "enjoy" in classical shariah shit

Actually Christians have a better standing than Yazidi's who are despised.

 

[Coyote]

This is not excluding Christians from refugee status - did you read it?

This is about what constitutes genocide - and Yazidi's are a group that ISIS has specifically targeted for genocide and almost succeeded in accomplishing. Genocide has a very high bar to meet in order to be categorized as genocide. That's not "religious discrimmination" it's terminology. ISIS has some degree of tolerance (minimal arguably) for other Islamic sects and for "people of the book" but none whatsoever for Yazidi's whom they consider pagan who must be killed or inslaved.

"GENOCIDE HAS A VERY HIGH BAR TO MEET IN ORDER TO BE CATEGORIZED AS GENOCIDE" <<<< bullshit sophistry-----all bars have
been over topped in reference to the chaldeans of Iraq LONG AGO

Calm down Rosie. The definition of "genocide" under international law is very specific.

actually ----it is not VERY SPECIFIC at all-------and----the definition you cite
has been over topped LONG ago in reference to the chaldeans of Iraq. That
definition had never come CLOSE to being achieved in reference to the muslims
of Burma-----but that does not stop you from using the "G" word.

The UN, who thus far is the main body handling and classifying refugees operates by the definition of genocide given under international law. You and I can fling genocide charges left and right but it doesn't mean a thing in terms of international law.

Yes-----I am very familiar with your support of Islamic genocide

I don't support genocide on Muslims or anyone but if that is all you got, well...you go girl

 

[irosie91]

the definition of genocide is anti Christian when it is considered in reference to Christians in muslim countries

Really?

Then it's discriminatory in reference to Muslims, Zorastrians, and other religious minorities living under ISIS.

Persecution in and of itself doesn't equal genocide.

Genocide has been applied to the Yazidi's: Persecution of Yazidis by ISIL - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The persecution of the Yazidi people has been viewed as qualifying as "genocide" by groups such as the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in a March 2015 report. The organization cited the numerous atrocities such as forced religious conversion and sexual slavery as being parts of an overall malicious campaign.[3][57] Multiple individual human rights activists such as Nazand Begikhani[58] and Widad Akrawi have also advocated for this view.[59] The term itself first arose in 1944 as the creation of a Polish-Jewish lawyer named Raphael Lemkin, who himself defined the term as reflecting "a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves."[60]

A lot of groups can be persecuted and killed or might fall under war crimes, but don't qualify as genocide. When the Bosnians were attacked and killed by the Serbs - it still wasn't called a genocide so arguing that there is some sort of religious bias at work is thin.

nothing "thin" about it-----I am alluding to YOUR definitions--------as to who says what------LOTS AND LOTS of people decided that DA JOOOS are committing genocide against the PALESTINIANS-------according to your own statements----DA JOOOOS ain't coming close despite that which lots of people and agencies SAY

 

[irosie91]

for the record-------IN THE FILTH OF SHARIAH LAW-------not only can Christians and jews be "DHIMMIS" ------historically ZOROASTRIANS were designated as dhimmis ----too. Yazidis are----essentially Zoroastrians. The ISIS now DEFINES them as
PAGAN SHIT worthy of DEATH ----is actually an innovation------they actually have the same standing that Christians "enjoy" in classical shariah shit

Actually Christians have a better standing than Yazidi's who are despised.

"actually" ??? whom did you ask? I have spoken to lots of muslims-----not quite as many but enough----copts and chaldeans.--------only one Zoroastrian but he was from MUMBAI---------the most RANCIDLY hated group by muslims (second to jews) have been <yuck> CHRISTIANS -----"the enemeeeees of islaaaaaam----
perverse liarrrrrrrrssssssss"

of course Yazidis in sunni Iraq had the additional handicap of having ORIGIN IN
<yuck> IRAN <ick>

 

[Coyote]

Interesting article: is what ISIS doing genocide and if so what does that mean in terms of world action? I think it is genocide - ultimately.

Do ISIS’s atrocities against Christians, Yazidis and Shias really amount to genocide? - On Freedom

 

[Coyote]

the definition of genocide is anti Christian when it is considered in reference to Christians in muslim countries

Really?

Then it's discriminatory in reference to Muslims, Zorastrians, and other religious minorities living under ISIS.

Persecution in and of itself doesn't equal genocide.

Genocide has been applied to the Yazidi's: Persecution of Yazidis by ISIL - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The persecution of the Yazidi people has been viewed as qualifying as "genocide" by groups such as the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in a March 2015 report. The organization cited the numerous atrocities such as forced religious conversion and sexual slavery as being parts of an overall malicious campaign.[3][57] Multiple individual human rights activists such as Nazand Begikhani[58] and Widad Akrawi have also advocated for this view.[59] The term itself first arose in 1944 as the creation of a Polish-Jewish lawyer named Raphael Lemkin, who himself defined the term as reflecting "a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves."[60]

A lot of groups can be persecuted and killed or might fall under war crimes, but don't qualify as genocide. When the Bosnians were attacked and killed by the Serbs - it still wasn't called a genocide so arguing that there is some sort of religious bias at work is thin.

nothing "thin" about it-----I am alluding to YOUR definitions--------as to who says what------LOTS AND LOTS of people decided that DA JOOOS are committing genocide against the PALESTINIANS-------according to your own statements----DA JOOOOS ain't coming close despite that which lots of people and agencies SAY

Sorry Rosie, I've never said that genocide was being conducted against the Palestinians.

 

[irosie91]

the definition of genocide is anti Christian when it is considered in reference to Christians in muslim countries

Really?

Then it's discriminatory in reference to Muslims, Zorastrians, and other religious minorities living under ISIS.

Persecution in and of itself doesn't equal genocide.

Genocide has been applied to the Yazidi's: Persecution of Yazidis by ISIL - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The persecution of the Yazidi people has been viewed as qualifying as "genocide" by groups such as the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in a March 2015 report. The organization cited the numerous atrocities such as forced religious conversion and sexual slavery as being parts of an overall malicious campaign.[3][57] Multiple individual human rights activists such as Nazand Begikhani[58] and Widad Akrawi have also advocated for this view.[59] The term itself first arose in 1944 as the creation of a Polish-Jewish lawyer named Raphael Lemkin, who himself defined the term as reflecting "a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves."[60]

A lot of groups can be persecuted and killed or might fall under war crimes, but don't qualify as genocide. When the Bosnians were attacked and killed by the Serbs - it still wasn't called a genocide so arguing that there is some sort of religious bias at work is thin.

nothing "thin" about it-----I am alluding to YOUR definitions--------as to who says what------LOTS AND LOTS of people decided that DA JOOOS are committing genocide against the PALESTINIANS-------according to your own statements----DA JOOOOS ain't coming close despite that which lots of people and agencies SAY

Sorry Rosie, I've never said that genocide was being conducted against the Palestinians.

I did not claim you did-------millions of other people do------YOU claimed----"see---other people say it is NOT genocide or ----other people say it IS genocide--------"
I AM NOT IMPRESSED what tom, dick and harry call "genocide" I know what
genocide is. Today people being subjected to genocide are Christians
in muslim shit holes--------lots of them-----arab countries, and others Indonesia,
Pakistatan, Iran, The muslims of the middle east are not subjected to genocide-------and Shiites have to option of IRAN. The Christians are being afforded virtually NO OPTIONS