Zone1 Disclosure of Secrets

[toty5]

I'm simply stating the facts, not attacking anyone.
But some Islamophobes here refuse to accept the facts.


1-

Judaism and Christianity do not believe in all the prophets and denigrate them in all manner of filthy ways. Their scriptures are distorted.

Faith is not valid without belief in all the prophets, especially in the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, the Seal of the Prophets.

Islam is a correction of the previous scriptures and the final revelation to humanity.

Allah gives falsification tests. Allah says in the Quran that if you believe that the Quran is from other than the one true God then produce a book like it. This is known as the linguistic miracle of the Quran that can not be imitated by a human. 1400 years have passed and no one has been able to meet this challenge.





نصراني قبطي يتفاجئ بتحدي القرآن الكريم





Allah also says that if you think the Quran is from other than the one true God then you should be able to find within it contradictions.





We believe the quran is the direct word of god. God spoke to the angel gabriel who revealed the quran to the prophet Muhammad who's followers wrote it down. The quran has certain parameters to prove its truthfulness. God says, "if this book were from other than God you would've found within it many inconsistencies" just like in science, we have a falsification test. Also God says "we revealed the reminder and we will preserve it" the quran claims that it'll he preserved, additionally we believe the quran is inimitable. God challenged the Arabs of old "make a chapter like it" if you don't believe the quran is from god then create something like it. Something that speaks about morality and law and history and science and has prophecies and is memorised by millions. We believe these 3 tests are what's nessecary for a book to even be considered to be from God. The Bible on the other hand is not preserved, it has had insersions and omissions. The bible is not free from error, the book of job speaks about how the earth has 4 legs like a table, the bible isn't inimitable, there are so many different editions of the bible. From this perspective we say the bible doesn't even have a right to be considered as a book from God.





Islam gives the best way of life and I challenge anyone to give a better way of life. For example, it prohibits the poisons that are destroying individuals, families and communities: gambling, alcohol, drugs, sexual immorality, prostitution, pornography, interest dealings etc. We have politicians educated at the best university possible but they can not provide guidance and a way of life better than an illiterate man 1400 years ago that has solutions to the poisons that are destroying societies today and instead encourage it and profit out of them.



The Quran contains knowledge that could not have been known such as scientific facts, historical facts and prophecies. To suggest the the facts mentioned in the Quran is a coincidence when it has been demonstrated to be correct over and over again is absurd and delusional. Also, if the Quran copied from the Bible then how was it able to correct the historical mistakes the Bible makes? To say that the Quran copied from the Greeks is also absurd because there are things that the Greeks were wrong about which the Quran gets right. Also if it copied from the Greeks then it would have copied the the things that they got wrong too but that is not the case. For some examples, go to minute 21:40 of this video:



Afghan Girl Claims That Muslims Are Blind Followers?! Muhammed Ali





















We can also study the life of prophet Muhammad and can rule out that he was crazy, liar, delusional, deceived and therefore the only possible explanation remaining is that he has indeed who he claim to be, the final messenger of God. The authentic sayings and teachings of Muhammad (hadiths) is also more preserved than any history book due to the way it has been preserved.



فتاة امريكية تتحدي مسلماَ في صحة الحديث النبوي









Islam is simple, makes sense and it fits in with your natural inclination/disposition that you were born with. For example, one great creator that did not leave us alone without guidance or purpose and sent messengers with the same core message . He does not switch up the message and confuse people. He is not racist or ethnocentric where he believes that you have to be born from a particular tribe or nation to be saved or to receive guidance. He does not punish someone unless the message has been sent to them through messengers and prophets. Everyone is born sinless, a kid is not held accountable for his actions until he reaches the age of maturity, neither is a person who is mentally insane and not aware of his actions. The main beliefs in Islam is to believe in the one true God, his angels, his messengers, revelation that was given to these messengers, destiny, day of judgement and life after death. Allah warns us about eternal hellfire and gives us glad tidings of the opportunity to live eternally in paradise by worshiping him alone without any partners and following and obeying the messenger of your time. Islam is simply the submission of will to the one true God, a person who does this is called a muslim.



This is an example of a youtube channel that you can watch to learn more about Islam and how it compares to other religions such as atheism, christianity etc:

The Muslim Lantern

This is the official channel of Muhammed Ali. The Main Goals of The Muslim Lantern are Tackling Muslim Contemporary Issues, Refuting The Doubts put Forward Against Islam And Educating those who seek Guidance and Truth.

m.youtube.com

If you are convinced that Allah is the only one worthy of worship and Muhammad is final messenger then you are ready to become a muslim and start your journey one step at a time.

 

[toty5]

2-

What Western scholarship is saying about the Qur'an with Dr Hythem Sidky




Comments of Western Christian scholars on the miracles of the Holy Qur’an

Scientists' comments on Quran

www.islamicity.org

. If they decide to act blind enough to refute ten miracles, we'll just bring another hundred. How many are they going to claim is false, huh?

Let me remind you, those who have an agenda to lead people astray are not interested in educating themselves. They are merely grasping at straws.

If you can get their attention then try to get them to refute this too:

The Qur'an and the Secrets of Egypt




The Qur'an and the Secrets of Babylon


Once they are done let me know, I'll bring you a hundred more. There's neither an end to the evidences of Islam being the truth nor an end to their arrogance and ignorance.

What is the Textual Authenticity of the Qur'an? - Dr Zakir Naik







Books Recommended By Dr Zakir Naik To Understand Islam | Quran Translation - Biography Of Prophet.







Which Book is More Reliable?



- YouTube





The Gospels, the Injil, and the Qur'an | Paul Williams
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpMkH3q0zN4


Are there Contradictions in the Quran? | Dr. Shabir Ally


www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_O-fDmeRpM&t=2s

DIW '24: Why Is Islam the Correct Religion? - Paul Williams
www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBbAOt7IUZk

 

[toty5]

3-

The unreliability of the Bible

People increasingly question the validity of the Bible because so much of the Bible has been found to be invalidated by science, archaeology and history.

One, the supernatural contains no explanatory power. If their is a mystery, appealing to a bigger mystery only complicates, not explains the situation.

Two, it contradicts most of what we learn about the cosmos and how it works. This is due to the fact that it was written by bronze age and iron age shepherds.

Three it upholds immorality. The bible holds that slavery is ok, rape and murder done in the name of god is acceptable. Genocide is god’s past time. Racism and homophobia his M.O.

Four, it is not supported by evidence. The claims made in the bible are first, second or even third hand accounts. They are not supported by third party neutral accounts, geological records and so on.





Here we have a document. Well, more accurately, many many version of a document because it’s been translated many times over many centuries and in widely-differing societies and each time new nuances and preconceptions are, wittingly or unwittingly, introduced by the translators. How should we translate the Greek word παρϑενον (‘parthenon’) in Luke 1.26? A young woman? Or a virgin? It makes a huge difference to how what follows is interpreted.

Some versions are not translations so much as paraphrases so they will reflect the standpoint of the paraphraser even more. Which version is authoritative? Can a translation ever be authoritative? How many of us can read the Koine Greek of the New Testament (not that hard to learn, superficially, for anybody who wants to make the effort). How many can read the Aramaic of the Old Testament? (Much harder).

And then, it’s not a single document, it’s an anthology of many different writings. What is canon and what isn’t?

There is no consistent guidance and I’d be prepared to bet that you cannot find three verses in the Bible that are not at least partially contradicted elsewhere in the same tome. It is at least partly why Christianity is now broken up into 5 main denominations and maybe 33,000 sub-denominations. I mean, if you all agreed on all the guidance in the Bible, then surely that wouldn’t happen.


Dr. Zakir Naik's 41 Scientific Errors In The Bible

 

[toty5]

4-

It is clear from these sayings of Jesus that he did not die for your sins. He tells you how hard it is to enter the kingdom of heaven. He stressed the importance of living a sin free life and working hard doing good deeds. Listen to and follow the words of Jesus and not the false prophet Paul.





--

“If your hand causes you to stumble, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life maimed than with two hands to go into hell, where the fire never goes out.”

“And if your foot causes you to stumble, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life crippled than to have two feet and be thrown into hell.”

“And if your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell, where ‘the worms that eat them do not die, and the fire is not quenched.’”

Mark 9:43-48 NIV







Jesus was to die for our sins then Jesus would have not made such strong statements like above. Jesus is stating how hard it is to enter heaven if you sin. If your hand causes you to sin, it is better to cut it to stop you sinning, as you will be destined to hell.









--

“And someone said to him, ‘Lord, will those who are saved be few?’ And he said to them,” Luke 13:23 RSV

“Strive to enter by the narrow door; for many, I tell you, will seek to enter and will not be able.” Luke 13:24 RSV





The narrow door is the door to heaven. Jesus tells us to work hard (following the law, doing good deeds, working for the next life not this life) to try and enter it, as only a few shall enter it. This contradicts all the teachings of Paul.





--



“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.” Matthew 7:21-23 NIV

“Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’”

”Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’”

Jesus is clearly telling you that even if you “follow him” you are not saved. Your works of righteous must be great.





The ones who worship Jesus (as God), prophesise and do miracles in his name are the evil doers for associating him as a partner with the true God. There will be countless generations of Christians who will be rejected on that day.

To kill an innocent person without cause is a Christian invention

.God is able to forgive sins without the shedding of human blood.

Did Jesus die for our sins? Dr. Zakir Naik reply​

 

[toty5]

The Bible has too many false stories for the crucifixion story to also be taken literally.

Ironically, considering that it was apparently done by the people from whom we have the most records of litteraly every minutiae of every aspect of their doings in that era, no, the Romans didn't record an incredibly influential person being executed and then rising from the dead.

We have accounts of the event that claim to have been dictated by four men (the gospels of Luke, John, Matthew, and Mark) none of which were eyewitnesses to the ministry of Jesus.

We even have the journals of a close friend of Pontius Pilate, which offers no record of the event.
No - there are no other records outside the bible referencing Jesus, the crucifixion or the resurrection. It is claimed that some contemporaneous reference was made to Jesus and his followers by Josephus but there is some scholarly suspicion that these references were added by Christians some time later.

It's funny that the resurrection of a dead man did not make the news of the time, or that nobody made a note of all the tombs opening and the dead wandering the streets as claimed in the bible …. Its almost as it it never happened !

It's impossible that on the Easter event, the dead get out of their tombs and graves and walk around town and nobody writes it down. If either of these had happened, we'd have at least a dozen surviving accounts from those historians. Instead, there are zero.


The bible isn't a record of anything, but some historians say there was a very different story of the crusifiction that the bible fabricated to further their narrative, this account states that this fella Jesus was in fact real, but he was not the son of God,

The bible is not a record of the crucifixion. The first of hundreds of versions of the bible was written a century after the supposed event took place. It is a collection of lore, stories of past times passed to succeeding generations by word of mouth. The bible is a story.


Was Jesus (pbuh) really Crucified? by Dr Zakir Naik

www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGzS9sfC8P0&t=25s


Jesus was not crucified according to 1st Century Christians




مسيحي هندي يحاول شرح الثالوث… وينتهي به الأمر في حيرة!



مناظرة ملحمية! الشيخ عثمان في مواجهة طلاب مسيحيين حول الكتاب المقدس والقرآن والتناقضات!



مناظرة مضحكة 2 ضد 1! وعّاظ مسيحيون لم يتوقعوا ما حدث! لا تفوّت المشاهدة!




نهاية النقاش! بعد هذا الطرح… لن يذكروا موضوع سنّ عائشة مرة أخرى! لا تفوّت المشاهدة!

 

[toty5]

BEARING WITNESS
Another issue in which the Quran and the Bible disagree is the issue of women bearing witness. It is true that the Quran has instructed the believers dealing in financial transactions to get two male witnesses or one male and two females (2:282).

However, it is also true that the Quran in other situations accepts the testimony of a woman as equal to that of a man. In fact the woman's testimony can even invalidate the man's. If a man accuses his wife of unchastity, he is required by the Quran to solemnly swear five times as evidence of the wife's guilt. If the wife denies and swears similarly five times, she is not considered guilty and in either case the marriage is dissolved (24:6-11).


In the Christian West, both ecclesiastical and civil law debarred women from giving testimony until late last century.




On the other hand, women were not allowed to bear witness in early Jewish society.

- The Rabbis counted women's not being able to bear witness among the nine curses inflicted upon all women section. Women in today's Israel are not allowed to give evidence in Rabbinical courts.

- The Rabbis justify why women cannot bear witness by citing Genesis 18:9-16, where it is stated that Sara, Abraham's wife had lied. The Rabbis use this incident as evidence that women are unqualified to bear witness. It should be noted here that this story narrated in Genesis 18:9-16 has been mentioned more than once in the Quran without any hint of any lies by Sara (11:69-74, 51:24-30).



-If a man accuses his wife of unchastity, her testimony will not be considered at all according to the Bible. The accused wife has to be subjected to a trial by ordeal. In this trial, the wife faces a complex and humiliating ritual which was supposed to prove her guilt or innocence (Num. 5:11-31). If she is found guilty after this ordeal, she will be sentenced to death. If she is found not guilty, her husband will be innocent of any wrongdoing.


Besides, if a man takes a woman as a wife and then accuses her of not being a virgin, her own testimony will not count. Her parents had to bring evidence of her virginity before the elders of the town. If the parents could not prove the innocence of their daughter, she would be stoned to death on her father's doorsteps. If the parents were able to prove her innocence, the husband would only be fined one hundred shekels of silver and he could not divorce his wife as long as he lived:


"If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes her and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, 'I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof of her virginity,' then the girl's father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate. The girl's father will say to the elders, 'I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. Now he has slandered her and said I did not find your daughter to be a virgin. But here is the proof of my daughter's virginity.' Then her parents shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, and the elders shall take the man and punish him. They shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give them to the girl's father, because this man has given an Israelite virgin a bad name. She shall continue to be his wife; he must not divorce her as long as he lives. If, however, the charge is true and no proof of the girl's virginity can be found, she shall be brought to the door of her father's house and there the men of the town shall stone her to death. She has done a disgraceful thing in Israel by being promiscuous while still in her father's house. You must purge the evil from among you." (Deuteronomy 22:13-21)


سياح اندهشوا من معرفة حقوق المرأة في الإسلام وأسباب تحجّبها




فتاة رومانية تعتنق الإسلام بعد حوارها مع شمسي



شاب بريطاني حاول دحض الإسلام فانتهى به الحال مسلماً


مسيحي أمريكي يكتشف حقيقة الكتاب المقدس على يد مسلمين


أمريكية تبكي وتعتنق الإسلام بعد الإجابة عن سؤالها

 

[toty5]

allaah



Christians of the 600’s (at the time of Muhammad’s life) in Arabia called “the God” as Allah. To my knowledge, Christians in Arabic countries continue to call the God as Allah.



However, the qualifications of the God of Islam and Christianity differ. Islam utterly rejects the doctrine of trinity. Thus, Allah is more or less equal to the God the Father. Jesus is seen as one of the most holy prophets, but a human being nonetheless.





the fundamental concept of the oneness of God in Islam and Christianity is different. From the biblical perspective we know that all the other prophets taught about the oneness of God, not a triune entity. So from this perspective it would be easy to say that the God concept is the same as Muslims. From a Muslim perspective we consider the God that Jesus prayed to, to be the actual true God and so Muslims will syau yes we believe in the same God as the Christians, but it is limited to the absolute oneness of God (trinitarian beliefs negate that concept)

For Muslims, they have the doctrine of the Tawhid, which means that God our Lord your Lord is one, emphasis in surat al-ikhlas:



For Christians, the God is a triun God, The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit. Three persons share the same essence (divinity) Which the Islamic doctrine disagree with, for Muslims, Jesus is just a messenger and The Holy Spirit is the archangel Gabriel, which means that Islam do not accept the doctrine Of The Trinity



From an Islamic perception, which accept only strict monotheism, the Trinity is polytheistic concept i.e associating partners with God.







In addition, Allah is both to be loved and feared at the same time in Islam. He is so unknowable, so above the human understanding that He instills a feeling of awe that inherently includes trembling.



Furthermore, the Christian conception of the God is more personal. The Islamic God is much less personal. Although the Quran talks about Allah speaking, seeing, hearing etc., it emphasizes that this needs to be understood in the proper context. Islamic God, being outside of our space-time, is essentially incomprehensible and unknowable save what has been revealed.



Apart from these differences, they are almost identical. Again, Christians of the Middle East have called the God as Allah, and have been continuing to do so implies that they refer to the same God. The differences only arise from the differences in respective religions.

Another thing to note is that you may see the Christian response to this vary based on where you live. In America, there is a constant push by evangelical groups to paint Islam in as bad of a light as possible.





”, and suggest that because we use an Arabic Name for God, we don’t worship God. The terrible logic of this is that Arab Christians called God using the Name “Allah” as well. And that’s because it’s the Arabic Name for God. So these evangelicals basically denounce their own Arab brothers and sisters in faith when they make such claims. It’s totally illogical, but they’ve brainwashed plenty of Christians in the process, sadly.









Jesus Christ will be questioned by the God almighty whether Jesus claims divinity or not. Jesus Christ is alive physically and his life extended for only he proves that he never claim divinity.



There is not a single unambiguous or unequivocal verse in the verse that Jesus claims divinity.



Jesus Christ is one of the human prophets like Adam, Abraham, Moses etc. Eating, sleeping, drinking, peeing, frightening,wondering, beginning, physical activities are not the qualification of God.









Christ said



3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.



John 17:3





Christ also did not claim divinity and restricted divinity to God (the Father) alone

He did not say that he is a god or that the Holy Spirit is a god







On the Day of Resurrection, Christ will expel Christians who are considered God or equal to God



22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’

Matthew 7:22-23





Islam is the final message to humanity

It was narrated from Abu Hurayrah, from the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), that he said: “By the One in Whose hand is the soul of Muhammad, no one of this nation, Jew or Christian, hears of me then dies without having believed in that with which I was sent, but he will be one of the people of the Fire.” Narrated by Muslim (240).

This hadith is a well-known and authentic narration found in Sahih Muslim (Hadith 240).

Here is a brief explanation of its context and significance in Islamic theology:



Universality of the Message: The hadith emphasizes that the message of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is addressed to all of humanity after his advent, including the earlier "People of the Scripture" (Jews and Christians).

The Requirement of Faith: The central message is that if the message of Islam reaches a person in a clear and correct manner, and then that person deliberately rejects it and dies in that state, they will not attain salvation in the hereafter.

Clarity (Al-Hujjah): Islamic scholars explain that this applies to those for whom the truth has been made clearly evident. If a person has never heard of Islam, or has only heard a distorted version, different rules apply according to the Quran.



The hadith is used to emphasize the importance of faith (iman) in Muhammad (pbuh) as the final messenger to attain salvation according to Islamic teachings.









Christian Gives It His All — Then This Happens | Hashim | Speakers Corner









HOT DEBATE!! Muslim Wrecks Arrogant Indian Christian | Hashim | Speakers Corner









Quran ‘Mistakes’ Claim Backfires BADLY | Mansur | Speakers Corner

 

[toty5]

Abraham, Moses, Jesus , Mohmmed all had visions from God and set new laws, and they were called prophets as they did prophets

(do not eat pork, only eat kosher food, circumcision,
.worshiping God the father etc.) would be called a prophet.



Paul was a false prophet (wolf). He would disguise himself as an apostle (sheep’s clothing) otherwise everyone instantly would have realised he was one of the false prophets to come that Jesus spoke about.

Surely a man who has a vision from someone he considers is God: set news laws, i.e. to stop worshiping God the father, but now includes the worship of Jesus and abolish the previous laws.
He is considered a false prophet

“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” Matthew 7:15 KJV
“For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.” Matthew 24:24 KJV

Paul never knew Jesus.

Paul decides to abolish the law, the law of what’s forbidden to us and doing works, good deeds e.g:



"But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed."


Jesus never said he was going to die for our sins. Something as major as that would surely have been mentioned at least once in the four gospels by Jesus.

Paul here abolishes the law because he says “Jesus died for our sins”.

“I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.” John 17:4 KJV

Jesus is speaking to God here and clearly mentions that his teachings, the miracles he performed (by the finger of God) is complete, that all his work is now done. The work God gave Jesus to do is done. Jesus could have said “I have finished all things except dying on the cross for everyone’s sins”, but he didn’t.



The Christian Dilemma Nobody Can Answer | Mansur | Speakers Corner



“Islam Restricts Women” Muslim Woman Confronts Muslim | Hashim | Speakers Corner


Unitarian Christians Break Under Questioning | Hashim | Speakers Corner

 

[toty5]

The prohibition of adultery in the Bible and its punishment for stoning


And justice is that this legislation be applied to every adulterer

but
In the New Testament

Jesus permitted adultery not to apply the law to prostitutes

We come to an important point, which is one of the most dangerous types of manipulation in the heavenly law

Let us see Jesus' position with the sinners and his violation of the heavenly law, which resulted in the permissibility of adultery and abnormality in a clear way, on the pretext that Jesus is the Savior and everyone who believed in that, he was saved from the pit into which he fell because of his sins


it seems that just a luminous candle in the church erases any crime fornication that occurred






Example

John
15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water so that I won’t get thirsty and have to keep coming here to draw water.”

16 He told her, “Go, call your husband and come back.”

17 “I have no husband,” she replied.

Jesus said to her, “You are right when you say you have no husband. 18 The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.”

19 “Sir,” the woman said, “I can see that you are a prophet.
John 4:15-19


Jesus' position to this woman is very strange, and she had five husbands and was living with another man who was not her husband. I assume that her husbands died

Or they divorced her, it seems that she was free of marriage and She lived with a man and had sex with her.


So she was definitely guilty of adultery ... but Jesus did not condemn her and did not apply the law on her, and allowed her to practice her intercourse in a steady way, and he did not care except that he was happy that she knew that he was a prophet.


Here, two things appear to us

the first

Jesus' ignorance of whether she was a married woman or not...and this is not one of God's attributes

the second

“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.

He had to to apply the law ..



now
The question that every Christian must ask himself to confirm whether or not Christianity permits adultery

What legislation applies to the adulterer according to church law?





While Writing Anti-Islam Book He Became Muslim! - The Story of Joram Van Klaveren





Famous British Youtuber Converted to Islam - Story of Jay Palfrey @JayPalfrey

My Journey From Atheism to Islam | Shaykh Mustafa Umar



Hard Atheism Questions To Muslim Historian! - Can He Answer in 100 Seconds?



British Rapper's Inspiring Convert Story! - "I Don't Care If I Die! I Have to Become Muslim!"
- YouTube