Dinesh D’Souza, Creator of ‘2000 Mules,’ Must Defend Film’s Election Denial Claims in Court

[Lastamender]

No, YOU didn't read the link. The GBI already looked at True the Vote's 'cell phone data'. And confirmed it most definitely did NOT prove fraud.

Worse, True the Vote has admitted, in court, that they don't have evidence to back their ballot stuffing claims in Georgia.

Nor has True the Vote EVER released their 'data' publicly. They've even gone to jail rather than release their 'evidence'. And now we know why.

There is none.

You've literally got nothing, Rube.

They did not look at it the way it was supposed to be viewed. The investigation was a sham. You can see they refused to name the people which they could have done and still can. They won't because they would prove what the film said. That simple. They are holding no one accountable.

 

[Lastamender]

The creators of the film should be charged criminally.

For what Blowhole?

 

[Winco]

The investigation was a sham.

D'Souza is a sham and a Felon.

And you have given money to this felon.
Shame on you.

 

[Lastamender]

D'Souza is a sham and a Felon.

And you have given money to this felon.
Shame on you.

Wrong. The article posted shows the GBI did nothing to investigate. They refused to use the evidence properly because they knew it was quite provable.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

They did not look at it the way it was supposed to be viewed. The investigation was a sham. You can see they refused to name the people which they could have done and still can. They won't because they would prove what the film said. That simple. They are holding no one accountable.

Right-wing election lies aren't evidence.

 

[Lastamender]

One moment, please...

Listen to the real truth.

 

[bripat9643]

Apart from a total lack of evidence.

There's abundant evidence, douchebag.

 

[Faun]

There's abundant evidence, douchebag.

That's why it's never been proven.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Should Oliver Stone defend in court his JFK assassination bullshit?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

There's abundant evidence, douchebag.

Lmao.

 

[Lastamender]

 

[Skylar]

They did not look at it the way it was supposed to be viewed.

Says who?

Is it you citing yourself? Its you, citing yourself, isn't it?

Why then, pray tell, haven't you viewed the cell phone data the 'way its supposed to be viewed'? Given that you are your own source, your source has never viewed cell phone data. So how would you know its quality, what it implies, or how it is supposed to be viewed?

Remember, TTV to this day refuses to release their 'evidence' to the public. So you've never seen any of it.

 

[Frankenstein]

That's why it's never been proven.

It was, however the courts including the Supreme court, knew it would start a civil war and let it stand that is fact. Their have to be liberal arts majors to work mcdonalds and we would have wiped them out!

 

[Skylar]

It was, however the courts including the Supreme court, knew it would start a civil war and let it stand that is fact. Their have to be liberal arts majors to work mcdonalds and we would have wiped them out!

Or.....you conflate speculation and accusation with actual evidence. As demonstrated by your imaginary take on what the 'courts and Supreme court knew'.

Every single court, without exception, to have ever heard a Big Lie case has rejected the Big Lie nonsense.

Every count, hand count, machine count, recount, audit, forensic audit, official tally, state county and electoral vote has the same outcome:

A Biden landslide.

 

[Frankenstein]

Or.....you conflate speculation and accusation with actual evidence. As demonstrated by your imaginary take on what the 'courts and Supreme court knew'.

Every single court, without exception, to have ever heard a Big Lie case has rejected the Big Lie nonsense.

Every count, hand count, machine count, recount, audit, forensic audit, official tally, state county and electoral vote has the same outcome:

A Biden landslide.

Nonsense they never actually listened to the evidence

 

[Skylar]

Nonsense they never actually listened to the evidence

On the contrary. In many instances the 'evidence' being presented was found to be supposition, speculation, lacking factual basis, or uselessly unreliable. Take Melissa Carone for example made claims before a judge that the judge found neither believable nor credible.

That the same ballots were being re-run dozens of times in favor of Biden....and yet no one else, not any election official, not even one of the near dozen Republican poll observers reported seeing any such thing?

And while standing has been an issue cited as a reason for Trump's loses, so has the case Trump or his supporters presenting FAILING ON ITS MERITS. Judges have addressed the 'evidence' presented again and again and indicated that these cases would fail on their

"A. The Campaign has no strong likelihood of success on the merits
As discussed, the Campaign cannot win this lawsuit. It conceded that it is not alleging
election fraud. It has already raised and lost most of these state-law issues, and it cannot
relitigate them here. It cites no federal authority regulating poll watchers or notice and cure.
It alleges no specific discrimination. And it does not contest that it lacks standing under the
Elections and Electors Clauses. These claims cannot succeed.....

......
The Campaign’s claims have no merit. The number of ballots it specifically chal-
lenges is far smaller than the roughly 81,000-vote margin of victory. And it never claims
fraud or that any votes were cast by illegal voters. Plus, tossing out millions of mail-in
ballots would be drastic and unprecedented, disenfranchising a huge swath of the electorate
and upsetting all down-ballot races too."

-Trump v. Lawerence
November 25, 2020

This from a Trump appointed judge. And again different Trump appointed Judge, same conclusion: the case fails on standing AND merits.

"Wood does not allege unfairness in counting the ballots; instead, he alleges that select non-party, partisan monitors were not permitted to observe the Audit in an ideal manner. Wood presents no authority, and the Court finds none, providing for a right to unrestrained observation or monitoring of vote counting, recounting, or auditing......

.....As discussed above, Wood's allegations are the quintessential generalized grievance. He has not presented any evidence demonstrating how he will suffer any particularized harm as a voter or donor by the denial of this motion....

-Wood. V. Raffensperger
November 11, 2020


And yet ANOTHER Trump judge cited yet another election challenge by Trump's team as failing on its merits.


"A sitting president who did not prevail in his bid for reelection has asked for federal court help in setting aside the popular vote based on disputed issues of election administration, issues he plainly could have raised before the vote occurred....

....This Court has allowed plaintiff the chance to make his case and he has lost on the merits."

-U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig
December 12th 2020


With Trump appointed judge calling Trump's claims 'bizarre' and noting that Trump had failed to prove his claims. Again and again and again, these cases failed on standing AND their lack merit, with utterly insufficient evidence to back their claims.

Worse still, Trump had every opportunity to present all the evidence he wanted, call his witnesses and make his case. He was granted a full trial . And the day before the trial was to begin, when Trump's claims would face actual cross examination and be subject to the court standards of evidence, Trump voluntarily dismissed his own case

"On the eve of getting the day in court they supposedly were begging for, President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger rather than submit their evidence to a court and to cross-examination. However, even in capitulation, they continue to spread disinformation."

Trump Legal Team Folds | Georgia Secretary of State

President Trump and Chairman David Shafer’s legal team folded Thursday and voluntarily dismissed their election contests.

sos.ga.gov

All of which you know. But really hope we don't.

 

[Faun]

It was, however the courts including the Supreme court, knew it would start a civil war and let it stand that is fact. Their have to be liberal arts majors to work mcdonalds and we would have wiped them out!

Utter bullshit. If there was actual evidence of widespread fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election, there would not have been civil war had Trump rightfully been given the presidency.

Where there could have been civil war is if he was given the presidency with no evidence of such fraud; which is what he wanted.

 

[Skylar]

Utter bullshit. If there was actual evidence of widespread fraud that would have changed the outcome of the election, there would not have been civil war had Trump rightfully been given the presidency.

Where there could have been civil war is if he was given the presidency with no evidence of such fraud; which is what he wanted.

Yeah, it was Trump's own choice for the Department of Justice that advocated using the US military to put down any protests against Trump seizing and holding power after losing the 2020 election.

 

[Faun]

Nonsense they never actually listened to the evidence

Not true. Roughly half the cases were dismissed due to lack of evidence or lack of merit, because the evidence brought to court couldn't prove the claims filed.

 

[Lastamender]

Says who?

Is it you citing yourself? Its you, citing yourself, isn't it?

Why then, pray tell, haven't you viewed the cell phone data the 'way its supposed to be viewed'? Given that you are your own source, your source has never viewed cell phone data. So how would you know its quality, what it implies, or how it is supposed to be viewed?

Remember, TTV to this day refuses to release their 'evidence' to the public. So you've never seen any of it.

Look at the post above yours. That is who says so. And I told you they gave their evidence. All that has to be done is investigate to corroborate it. They can get the names that go with those cell phone numbers and they will not. Stop the bullshit.