Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no, but, there is no system that is fraud proofso basically, there's no way to avoid voter fraud?
sorry, utter nonsense is a waste of time to attempt to rebutThen rebut it point by point.
no, but, there is no system that is fraud proof
it comes down to the actual people running the elections
best answer, get involved with your local election board
whats should be a tuip off, is where the "problems occure"
in democrat controled areas
yeah, haul off the election workers in those districtsI'd say no, but I'd sure as hell say when shifty results match up with confessions someone needs to get hauled off.
because that was where they were having "problems"Another tipoff are that patches seem to be necessary in democratic areas moreso than republican.
sorry, utter nonsense is a waste of time to attempt to rebut
The District of Columbia has witnessed yet another triumph of electronic voting this week, when a computer malfunction inflated records of write-in votes in the city's Tuesday primary elections by insane amounts:
D.C. election officials blamed a defective computer memory cartridge yesterday for producing what appeared to be thousands of write-in votes that officials say did not exist.... For example, in the Republican at-large race, 1,560 write-ins at 9:50 p.m. dwindled to 18 by 12:16 a.m. The problem also added thousands of votes to individual candidates, inflating vote totals. At 9:50 p.m. 8,246 ballots were recorded cast in the at-large Republican primary, but that shrank to 3,735 by 12:16 a.m.
Hmm. This time around, the malfunction was caught and corrected. But how it happened remains something of a mystery. The firm that supplied D.C.'s voting machines, Sequoia Voting Systems, says that its database and software functioned just fine, so something else must have gone wrong:
Instead, the company pointed to possible static discharge or other scenarios, including the possibility of human error.
Could be. But that's what concerns me. A voting system should not be susceptible to math errors this large because of minor goofs like, say, somebody dragging their feet on the carpet and picking up too much static that zaps a memory card when they pick it up.
hey, not dieboldFine with me.
Here's a recent fun little bugaboo. You don't get these with paperballot boxes:
Yes, we should have stayed with what we had.
When you say that Democrats wanted machines (which coincidentally, I don't ever remember being a rallying cry for Democrats), that is not really accurate. Democrats wanted a means to make sure that votes were counted accurately. No Democrat wanted to swap a faulty system for a system that is also faulty. You are confusing form with substance.
I live in a fantasy world for believing politicians are corrupt and opportunistic???? Surely the fantasy world belongs to those who believe politicians do not lie cheat and steal.
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
The story says what the headline says, Diebold technicians claim the vote was rigged.
optical scan ballots are likely the bestOh and I have said all along that they are all bad, they all have been shown to be easily corruptible. I usually pick on Diebold because they have name recognition but Sequoia and ES&S are just as bad, and so is Hart Intercivic.
I'd say no, but I'd sure as hell say when shifty results match up with confessions someone needs to get hauled off.
and it isnt supported in the storyThis is the headline.
Stephen Spoonamore, a cyber security expert and lifelong Republican, has also stated that he believes that the 2002Georgia Senate race was rigged in favor of Chambliss. "If you look at the case of Saxby Chambliss, that's ridiculous. The man was not elected. He lost that election by five points. Max Cleland won. They flipped the votes, clear as day," Spoon said in another exclusive interview posted on YouTube by VR at YouTube - Velvet Revolution Interviews Stephen Spoonamore (segment 3).
VR has been working with whistleblowers who have stated that the GOP, under the direction of Karl Rove, has been using computers to change election results. In order to protect the 2008 election from such manipulations, a federal lawsuit is being pursued inOhio to take depositions from those who have been implicated in this illegal strategy. Complete coverage of this suit is a VELVETREVOLUTION.US : Protect Elections, Prosecute Rove.
This is the headline.
I never said anyone "confessed," except that DIEBOLD (the manufacturer) confesses their code drops votes.
I said that technicians claim it was rigged. They said that their supervisor or president of the company or something told them to install a patch for a problem that did not exist.
Here is more of the article: