Did you know that 50% of ICE Agents are Mexican Americans

[WEATHER53]

Fine legal citizens who almost unanimously oppose illegal invaders. A fact the media will never pursue nor report

 

[WEATHER53]

At least 170 so far.

I know one of my very dear friends is a Filipina-American. She is married to a US Army veteran and has been a citizen for about 8 years.

But she still feels a need to carry a copy of her naturalization papers and US Passport with her when she travels for business.

She recently compared this country to 1930s Germany, and I really can't disagree with her.

170 out of 100,000 is fly shit in a cattle pasture And those arrested were swimming with the tunas

 

[cnm]

170 out of 100,000 is fly shit in a cattle pasture And those arrested were swimming with the tunas

WEATHER53 is demanding his right as an American citizen arbitrarily to be beaten up and detained by law enforcement.

Because that's what freedumb is.

 

[LeftofLeft]

You unbelievable idiot. The '51 Status of Refugees Convention and the '67 Protocol to it is the supreme law of the land in the US. Don't you know your constitution?

That was rhetorical, you're demonstrating your ignorance with every post.

“Supreme law of the Land” is your language. You are pointing to the UN yet failing to demonstrate where and how it is part of the US Code (Constitution) or where, how it usurps the US Constitution.

 

[WEATHER53]

WEATHER53 is demanding his right as an American citizen arbitrarily to be beaten up and detained by law enforcement.

Because that's what freedumb is.

Yeah the ole emotional deflection of what if it was me
I don’t hang with invading criminals so I won’t be swept up with them. You should give that a try and stop endorsing illegals

 

[Superbadbrutha]

It is a criminal offense to enter and remain in the US undocumented. The US is protecting its sovereignty by enforcing these laws as most all other nations do.

US citizens who are of Hispanic origin are no different than white US citizens.most want the US immigration laws enforced while some are for open borders.

Why can’t the race hustlers and race baiters on this board understand that?

Keep thinking you aren't different, how many legal hispanic US citizens have been detained by ICE and how many legal white US citizens have been detained by ICE?

 

[22lcidw]

Replacement theory? How white supremacist of you!

They are doing it to themselves. The self-importance of careers that when they are old and dead very few will remember overwhelms them. All of this diversity and feminism and quotas was supposed to have the answers. Don't you remember when it was pushed 60 years ago. Or are you conveniently forgetting or worse never knew of it. Two trillion-dollar yearly deficits on a seven trillion-dollar federal budget. We do not even have the gumption to pay for are largesse.

 

[cnm]

“Supreme law of the Land” is your language. You are pointing to the UN yet failing to demonstrate where and how it is part of the US Code (Constitution) or where, how it usurps the US Constitution.

I'm not even American. Just how ignorant are MAGAts to not know their founding documents?

That was rhetorical, we see the answer in every post.

Supreme law of the land is American language. You're so ignorant.

Article VI ​

[...]​

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.​

​

The US is signatory to the 1967 Protocol, which embraces the '51 Convention.

https://www.unhcr.org/media/states-parties-1951-convention-and-its-1967-protocol

 

[TimFitz]

The United States did sign the Geneva Conventions, specifically the four treaties established in 1949, which set standards for humanitarian treatment in war. However, the U.S. has not ratified some additional protocols related to these conventions.​

It was only 50 years old at the time.

 

[TimFitz]

They are doing it to themselves. The self-importance of careers that when they are old and dead very few will remember overwhelms them. All of this diversity and feminism and quotas was supposed to have the answers. Don't you remember when it was pushed 60 years ago. Or are you conveniently forgetting or worse never knew of it. Two trillion-dollar yearly deficits on a seven trillion-dollar federal budget. We do not even have the gumption to pay for are largesse.

So, you’re doubling down on white replacement nonsense.

Toss in a little misogyny to flavor the deplorable pot!

 

[LeftofLeft]

Keep thinking you aren't different, how many legal hispanic US citizens have been detained by ICE and how many legal white US citizens have been detained by ICE?

I don’t have those numbers. If Hispanics are being targeted and there is detail behind the numbers vs. the simple fact that the likelihood of an Hispanic US Citizen gets detained by ICE because the represent the majority of illegals, then, let’s see it.

 

[LeftofLeft]

I'm not even American. Just how ignorant are MAGAts to not know their founding documents?

That was rhetorical, we see the answer in every post.

Supreme law of the land is American language. You're so ignorant.

Article VI ​

[...]​

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.​

​

The US is signatory to the 1967 Protocol, which embraces the '51 Convention.

https://www.unhcr.org/media/states-parties-1951-convention-and-its-1967-protocol

Yep, the US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land; not a Treaty. The Constitution and the Laws of the United States usurp the Treaties. If the United States wants to make the Treaty law of the Land, it can. But, signatory to a Treaty does not necessarily become Supreme Law of the Land though it can if the United States “Under the Authority of The United States” deems the Treaty as such.

You need to read the part, Under the Authority of the United States.

 

[struth]

The same way they used slaves to catch runaway slaves.

I see the comparison and glad you are admitting you want to keep illegals here to exploit for cheap labor like your party fought for slavery

 

[JoeB131]

The problem with this argument is that it is flawed. It suggests that all races should stick together and put themselves first. That's an argument for white people to actually deport anyone who isn't white.

No, it's an argument that when you do something truly evil to a group, you will find some of their own to sell them out.

There's really no good reason for white people to deport anyone.

Just like there was no good reason for the Germans to send the Jews to camps. (In fact, the resources they wasted doing it probably cost them the war.)

The ironic thing about the current policy is we need immigrants. Not enough people are being born to replace the people who die.

 

[Zincwarrior]

They are useful to know to racially profile Latinos

What do you make out of this?

According to MAGA on this board they are not real Americans

 

[JoeB131]

Fine legal citizens who almost unanimously oppose illegal invaders. A fact the media will never pursue nor report

Because it's not really true.

Surge in U.S. Concern About Immigration Has Abated

The percentage of Americans wanting less immigration has dropped by nearly half this year to 30%, with 79% now saying immigration benefits the U.S.

news.gallup.com

Story Highlights​

• 30% of Americans want immigration decreased, down from 55% a year ago
• Record-high 79% consider immigration good for the country
• Support down for border wall, mass deportation

After climbing to 55% in 2024, the percentage of Americans who say immigration should be reduced has dropped by nearly half to 30%. Sentiment is thus back to the level measured in 2021, before the desire for less immigration started to mount. Meanwhile, 38% now want immigration kept at its current level, and 26% say it should be increased.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Did you know that 90% of the Ole Miss Rebels football team are black?

 

[Bootstraps]

No, it's an argument that when you do something truly evil to a group, you will find some of their own to sell them out.

There's really no good reason for white people to deport anyone.

Just like there was no good reason for the Germans to send the Jews to camps. (In fact, the resources they wasted doing it probably cost them the war.)

The ironic thing about the current policy is we need immigrants. Not enough people are being born to replace the people who die.

No, it's an argument to make about races segregating and working against each other. Anytime you call someone a race traitor or accuse them of turning their back on their people, that's the argument you make.

And we need legal immigrants, not illegals.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

I see the comparison and glad you are admitting you want to keep illegals here to exploit for cheap labor like your party fought for slavery

Learn something.

 

[JoeB131]

No, it's an argument to make about races segregating and working against each other. Anytime you call someone a race traitor or accuse them of turning their back on their people, that's the argument you make.

And we need legal immigrants, not illegals.

No, I call people race traitors when they betray their own to curry favor with their oppressors.

Going back to those Jewish Camp Guards, they just got thrown into the gas chambers last.