postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 24,966
- 14,095
- 1,400
MN Statute 609.66, signed by TAmpon.
Look it up and get educated.
I did yesterday, and posted it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MN Statute 609.66, signed by TAmpon.
Look it up and get educated.
It's hard to believe the geniuses who make it to the highest level of government know that ICE agents don't have absolute immunity, so this is clearly a very intentional lie.They have immunity when they are performing their federal duties, and any issue regarding if they were would be a federal matter.
They have immunity from State prosecution under the supremacy clause, either due to performing their federal duties, or the feds have jurisdiction to try them if they do something when the fact of it being a duty comes into question.
We all can see the interference, you idiots just ignore it.
Using your vehicle to block traffic isn't protesting, it's interfering. Especially when you do so perpendicular to the flow of traffic.
So you know it was a good shoot.I did yesterday, and posted it.
As I pointed out, the two shots from the side/rear while Good was driving away, were not legal.So you know it was a good shoot.
Why are you still doing the bidding of your handlers, stupid?
If America's traitors regain power, they will quickly collapse America and enslave its population. There will never be another chance to bring the oligarchs to justice. Most of MAGA will be dead by 2030.They seemed right upset that the Learing Center thing was recorded.
It's hard to believe the geniuses who make it to the highest level of government know that ICE agents don't have absolute immunity, so this is clearly a very intentional lie.
Recording a cop from 10 feet away is not interference but some ICE agent who believes they have absolute immunity will physically assault and arrest you for doing so. Standing on a sidewalk and talking shit about ICE agents into a megaphone is not interfering but an army of ICE agents who believe they have absolute immunity will come out and violently arrest you for doing so. Following a cop around town is not interfering but an ICE agent who believes they have absolute immunity will stop you and threaten you for doing so.
There is definitely a lot of people interfering. There's also a lot of people being physically assaulted and threatened for doing thigns that are not interfering.
The average person needs to understand thatThere is definitely a lot of people interfering. There's also a lot of people being physically assaulted and threatened for doing thigns that are not interfering.
As I pointed out, the two shots from the side/rear while Good was driving away, were not legal.
The average person needs to understand thatProud BoysICE agents are not like cops. They're not thinking about coexisting with the public, hence the masks.
They're far more dangerous and aggressive. They're highly ideological. They are under the control of an aggressive authoritarian.
And again, "history doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme".
They have qualified immunity, not absolute immunity. Don't get all mush mouthed. You had it right the first time before you realized your leaders said otherwise.They have absolute immunity when performing their lawful duties with regards to State actions against them.
ICE is threatening people who are not in front of them, who are behind them and following them around town.Everything is relative.
Most of these people are never 10 feet away.
And the whole concept of "de-arresting" someone shows they intend to interfere.
Getting in front of them and stopping their free movement is interfering.
You guys have made it clear you absolutely adore strong central government. The parts you do not like are illegal to you. The illegal immigrant issue should not be one. You made it into one like so many other agendas. Laws exist to deal with it. And yet during the last administration you guys spouted you needed new legislation enacted. You lie all the time. And that is not good for the new government you want to install.It's hard to believe the geniuses who make it to the highest level of government know that ICE agents don't have absolute immunity, so this is clearly a very intentional lie.
Recording a cop from 10 feet away is not interference but some ICE agent who believes they have absolute immunity will physically assault and arrest you for doing so. Standing on a sidewalk and talking shit about ICE agents into a megaphone is not interfering but an army of ICE agents who believe they have absolute immunity will come out and violently arrest you for doing so. Following a cop around town is not interfering but an ICE agent who believes they have absolute immunity will stop you and threaten you for doing so.
There is definitely a lot of people interfering. There's also a lot of people being physically assaulted and threatened for doing thigns that are not interfering.
They have qualified immunity, not absolute immunity. Don't get all mush mouthed. You had it right the first time before you realized your leaders said otherwise.
ICE is threatening people who are not in front of them, who are behind them and following them around town.
A guy standing 10 feet away from an arrest was assaulted and arrested, not interfering, just standing there.
A guy talking shit about ICE was assaulted and arrested, not interfering just talking shit.
This is all on video.
The Minneapolis cops should be working with ICE to get the work done so ICE could leave. Minneapolis is a city of drama. Children of the Vikings. Who'd believe it?They have qualified immunity, not absolute immunity. Don't get all mush mouthed. You had it right the first time before you realized your leaders said otherwise.
ICE is threatening people who are not in front of them, who are behind them and following them around town.
A guy standing 10 feet away from an arrest was assaulted and arrested, not interfering, just standing there.
A guy talking shit about ICE was assaulted and arrested, not interfering just talking shit.
This is all on video.
Then let's allow the investigation and possible trial to conclude before we make rash statements like this is a murder, the LEO is in the wrong, etc., okay? He was in a bad situation, apparently had been hit by the car and chose to fire his weapon. Was he justified or not, we can't really make that call right now, can we? All we can do is allow the evidence to be gathered and both sides to make their case. Right now, it looks like it was justified, but we don't know everything yet.Actually they aren't allowed to intentionally "flip it over", that would be excessive use of force.
The other maneuvers, like ramming etc. are just like they're allowed to tackle a fleeing suspect.
And because there are many other methods of catching a fleeing suspect, other than through deadly force, they can call out an APB, set up roadblocks, or even pursue them with drones, instead of a high speed police chase, that would be more people in danger than the original incident.
Gibberish. If you're putting qualifications on their immunity, then it isn't absolute immunity. You're saying that they have immunity when performing legal duties as federal agents. One, that's a qualified immunity since you are putting on qualifications, and two that's not even the legal standard, which is that they are performing their legal duties in a reasonable manner.Not really. Qualified Immunity involves them doing something wrong, but because they didn't know it was wrong (because there was no court decision telling them it was wrong) and them not being liable for it. Going forward now that a court say it was wrong, others can't have qualified immunity to it.
What they have is absolute immunity from State prosecution if they are performing their legal duties as federal agents. Only if it is determined that what they did wasn't part of their legal duties does the immunity end, and only a federal court can decide that due to the supremacy clause.
You're making shit up, like you usually do.LOL, we know the game. you show the video of the guy doing nothing meanwhile 10 seconds before he was trying to "de-arrest" one of his buddies.
Gibberish. If you're putting qualifications on their immunity, then it isn't absolute immunity. You're saying that they have immunity when performing legal duties as federal agents. One, that's a qualified immunity since you are putting on qualifications, and two that's not even the legal standard, which is that they are performing their legal duties in a reasonable manner.
Lastly, that's only for state charges. They can and should be charged by the federal government if they break the law while performing their duties.
You can't sane-wash claiming they have absolute immunity. They don't. Saying so is dangerous.
You're making shit up, like you usually do.
![]()
Video shows chaotic scene as Border Patrol agents detain two men in St Paul | Fox News Video
Federal Border Patrol agents on Sunday detained two men at a St. Paul gas station as agitators surrounded the scene. (Credit: FNTV)www.foxnews.com
You already agreed they don't have absolute immunity but now you are trying to walk it back because your masters said otherwise and you can't ever admit they're wrong.Stop trying to discuss things you know nothing about.
Qualified immunity is only given AFTER it has been determined what they did is technically wrong, but no one told them is was wrong.
Arresting illegals with valid federal warrants or detainers is not wrong in any situation.
You are a moron.
When Trump is gone the Madam Defarges on the left are going to be going down their lists with a vengeance.
The fact that Walz hasen't been impeached for the fraud by what I hope is the vast number of tax paying honest MN citizens is disappointing to say the least.
You already agreed they don't have absolute immunity but now you are trying to walk it back because your masters said otherwise and you can't ever admit they're wrong.
Let me know when you watch the video and want to come up with some fantasy excuse for why the assault and arrest of the man filming was justified.
You're inventing "nuance" to twist reality and bend it to your agenda.It's relative to what we are talking about. If you can't get the nuances of the discussion that's your fault, not mine.
Sorry, but videos like that start too late or end too early to tell the whole story. Take your propaganda elsewhere.