Did they recover the bullet that hit Kirk?

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Messages
73,284
Reaction score
108,426
Points
3,488
Location
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
I've not heard one way or the other. :dunno:

I know they have the rifle/casing (the rifle was recovered with the spent casing still in the chamber) but did the bullet head to parts unknown or was it recovered? Today's hunting bullets hold up pretty well, even with a spine hit.

Not that it really matters, just curious......Given all of the other evidence that has been collected thus far, that would just be adding gravy; the meal has already been prepared.

 
I've not heard one way or the other. :dunno:

I know they have the rifle/casing (the rifle was recovered with the spent casing still in the chamber) but did the bullet head to parts unknown or was it recovered? Today's hunting bullets hold up pretty well, even with a spine hit.

Not that it really matters, just curious......Given all of the other evidence that has been collected thus far, that would just be adding gravy; the meal has already been prepared.

I hope they recovered it or that they do. The evidence that has been recovered beyond that can be disallowed by some whack job DEI judge.
 
Last edited:
I've not heard one way or the other. :dunno:

I know they have the rifle/casing (the rifle was recovered with the spent casing still in the chamber) but did the bullet head to parts unknown or was it recovered? Today's hunting bullets hold up pretty well, even with a spine hit.

Not that it really matters, just curious......Given all of the other evidence that has been collected thus far, that would just be adding gravy; the meal has already been prepared.

It’s like the JFK Assassination
 

Did they recover the bullet that hit Kirk?​


I have to tell you, when I saw your headline, I was all ready to read some idiot posting the theory that Charlie Kirk shooting was faked to make ANTIFA or LBGT, or whomever look bad.

If you had asked me a year ago if anyone could stoop that low as to theorize such an idiotic notion, I would have doubted it.

But, now, it's the first thing that popped into my mind as the level of discourse in this country is at the level of glue-sniffing Civit cats.
 
I have to tell you, when I saw your headline, I was all ready to read some idiot posting the theory that Charlie Kirk shooting was faked to make ANTIFA or LBGT, or whomever look bad.

If you had asked me a year ago if anyone could stoop that low as to theorize such an idiotic notion, I would have doubted it.

But, now, it's the first thing that popped into my mind as the level of discourse in this country is at the level of glue-sniffing Civit cats.
Nah, it was just an evidentiary aspect that I had not heard anything about.

Still don't know for that matter.
 
No, there will be no ballistics, because the real shooter was with 15 feet of Charlie.
 
I have to tell you, when I saw your headline, I was all ready to read some idiot posting the theory that Charlie Kirk shooting was faked to make ANTIFA or LBGT, or whomever look bad.

If you had asked me a year ago if anyone could stoop that low as to theorize such an idiotic notion, I would have doubted it.

But, now, it's the first thing that popped into my mind as the level of discourse in this country is at the level of glue-sniffing Civit cats.



This post is another PROOF Mossad did it and the trans is the STOOGE...
 
No, there will be no ballistics, because the real shooter was with 15 feet of Charlie.


Wow, haven't heard that. It is perfectly clear this emaciated trans did not pull this off alone, doubtful she is anything but a stooge. Where the real shot originated, 15 feet is "too close." Everyone around Charlie would've known who did it.

Most likely the shot that killed Charlie came from inside a building far away.
 

Did they recover the bullet that hit Kirk?​

I've not heard one way or the other.

Yes, I have an xray from his pathology along with a partial autopsy report.
 
The bullet had no exit wound. It was still in his body. Because of the nature of the crime, I bet they physically removed it for evidence.
 
15th post
The bullet had no exit wound. It was still in his body. Because of the nature of the crime, I bet they physically removed it for evidence.

I was telling people here the day of the shooting that the bullet never exited the body. All one needs do is check my posts for verification.

xrays show it lodged in the bones of the cervical spine along the outer bones. I'm sure it has been removed for forensics to match it up with the rifle found in the woods.
 
I've not heard one way or the other. :dunno:

I know they have the rifle/casing (the rifle was recovered with the spent casing still in the chamber) but did the bullet head to parts unknown or was it recovered? Today's hunting bullets hold up pretty well, even with a spine hit.

Not that it really matters, just curious......Given all of the other evidence that has been collected thus far, that would just be adding gravy; the meal has already been prepared.

I heard they found the bullet inside of him just beneath the skin.

That sounds weird. It was a .30-06 @200yds. Perhaps they meant that they found a bullet fragment? :dunno:
 
Last edited:
I heard they found the bullet inside of him just beneath the skin.
That sounds weird. It was a .30-06 @200yds. Perhaps they meant that they found a bullet fragment? :dunno:

The bullet was lodged in the bone of the outer spine in his neck just below the skin.
 
Back
Top Bottom