Did MAGA Rig the election?

[XponentialChaos]

From AI

Outliers may be exceptions that stand outside individual samples of populations as well. In a more general context, an outlier is an individual that is markedly different from the norm in some respect.

Checkmate. The 81mil is at least 9mil more than the next closest Dem candidate ever.

It is an outlier

"Markedly different" is subjective. That's why there's a formula associated with it. Ask AI what the formula is and run the numbers yourself if you like.

 

[The Duke]

81 million is not a statistical outlier. This isn't an opinion, this is a fact.

And yes, she will get over 71 million.

You are 100% a tard.
You wanna get Homer Stokes'd? No? STFU then.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

"Markedly different" is subjective. That's why there's a formula associated with it. Ask AI what the formula is and run the numbers yourself if you like.

Asshole you’re back pedaling.

9mil more is markedly different

What is outlier? | Definition from TechTarget

This definition explains what an outlier is, in the context of statistics, and discusses how outliers are caused as well as how they are dealt with by statisticians.

www.techtarget.com

 

[XponentialChaos]

You are 100% a tard.

The pussy is upset today. Probably because he can't afford coffee.

Stupid fuck.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Asshole you’re back pedaling.

9mil more is markedly different

What is outlier? | Definition from TechTarget

This definition explains what an outlier is, in the context of statistics, and discusses how outliers are caused as well as how they are dealt with by statisticians.

www.techtarget.com

9 million is "markedly different" according to who?

 

[Blisterfinger]

You don't even understand percentages. I'm not going to bother explaining the definition of an outlier for you. You're going to have to look that one up.

You supply the formula that didn't even work. You couldn't use it yourself, what do you expect from us? I don't need you for anything

 

[XponentialChaos]

You supply the formula that didn't even work. You couldn't use it yourself, what do you expect from us? I don't need you for anything

It does work. You're just stupid.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

9 million is "markedly different" according to who?

According to a logical person. You don’t think 9mil is markedly different? Are you trolling? If a candidate receives 9mil fewer votes the party would do a deep dive as to why, would they not? Thats markedly different. It’s an anomaly that cannot be explained without a forensic deep dive. You’re just trolling now.

 

[The Duke]

The pussy is upset today. Probably because he can't afford coffee.

Stupid fuck.

You have zero ass, boy. You are a punk. A dishonest POS punk that needs absolutely bitchslapped.

 

[XponentialChaos]

According to a logical person. You don’t think 9mil is markedly different?

It depends on the data. That's why, again, there's a formula for this definition. I'll try to explain it for you in simple terms.

Data 1: 5 6 7 8 9 9,000,009

In this data set, the biggest number is 9 million over the next data point. This is definitely an outlier.


Data 2: 5,000,000,000 6,000,000,000 7,000,000,000 8,000,000,000 9,000,000,000 9,0009,000,000

In this data set, the biggest number is also 9 million over the next data point. This is not an outlier.


It's not about how big 9,000,000 is itself. It's about where it is in relation to the rest of the data. "Markedly different" is subjective. Being bigger than the other data points, even being 9 million bigger, doesn't necessarily make it "markedly different". According to the definition of an outlier, it's not. Check AI yourself if you don't believe me.

 

[XponentialChaos]

You have zero ass, boy. You are a punk. A dishonest POS punk that needs absolutely bitchslapped.

The angry pussy is angry again.

 

[Blisterfinger]

It does work. You're just stupid.

Why couldn't you use it? dumbass

 

[The Duke]

The angry pussy is angry again.

Ain't nobody paying serious attention to you.
I would feel bad for ya, but I know you have enough malice to where if you had brains
you'd be dangerous, and I thank God you do not.
You're not exactly an upstanding and forthright person.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

It depends on the data. That's why, again, there's a formula for this definition. I'll try to explain it for you in simple terms.

Data 1: 5 6 7 8 9 9,000,009

In this data set, the biggest number is 9 million over the next data point. This is definitely an outlier.


Data 2: 5,000,000,000 6,000,000,000 7,000,000,000 8,000,000,000 9,000,000,000 9,0009,000,000

In this data set, the biggest number is also 9 million over the next data point. This is not an outlier.


It's not about how big 9,000,000 is itself. It's about where it is in relation to the rest of the data. Being bigger than the other data points, even being 9 million bigger, doesn't necessarily make it an outlier. According to the definition, it's not. Check AI yourself if you don't believe me.

I already explained that the 81 is an aberration compared to prior totals and one post total received by a Democrat candidate. It’s such an aberration that the Democrats are scratching their heads as to why. It doesn’t have to be a stat definition it has to look odd. And it does. 81 mil. The next closest before that was 69mil. Since will be 72mil. So the 81 is an aberration. You can’t just give this one up. I posted A link and definitions. You simply don’t have any common sense. If you’re running the Democratic Party you would shrug and just accept the 9mil delta as normal? You’re lying to yourself

 

[XponentialChaos]

Why couldn't you use it? dumbass

I did. You're just too stupid to understand it.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Ain't nobody paying serious attention to you.
I would feel bad for ya, but I know you have enough malice to where if you had brains
you'd be dangerous, and I thank God you do not.

That's nice, pussy.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

It depends on the data. That's why, again, there's a formula for this definition. I'll try to explain it for you in simple terms.

Data 1: 5 6 7 8 9 9,000,009

In this data set, the biggest number is 9 million over the next data point. This is definitely an outlier.


Data 2: 5,000,000,000 6,000,000,000 7,000,000,000 8,000,000,000 9,000,000,000 9,0009,000,000

In this data set, the biggest number is also 9 million over the next data point. This is not an outlier.


It's not about how big 9,000,000 is itself. It's about where it is in relation to the rest of the data. "Markedly different" is subjective. Being bigger than the other data points, even being 9 million bigger, doesn't necessarily make it "markedly different". According to the definition of an outlier, it's not. Check AI yourself if you don't believe me.

Your formula has flaws. The delta isn’t 1,2,3,4 it’s 9

Now do the set with 1,1,1,1,1,9 and see if 9 is the outlier.

 

[Blisterfinger]

I did. You're just too stupid to understand it.

You couldn't use it. What does that say about you? dumbass

 

[XponentialChaos]

I already explained that the 81 is an aberration compared to prior totals and one post total received by a Democrat candidate. It’s such an aberration that the Democrats are scratching their heads as to why. It doesn’t have to be a stat definition it has to look odd. And it does. 81 mil. The next closest before that was 69mil. Since will be 72mil. So the 81 is an aberration. You can’t just give this one up. I posted A link and definitions. You simply don’t have any common sense. If you’re running the Democratic Party you would shrug and just accept the 9mil delta as normal? You’re lying to yourself

I told you I was going to use the term outlier because it has a specific definition and formula to it. "Aberration" doesn't, which makes it subjective.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Now do the set with 1,1,1,1,1,9 and see if 9 is the outlier.

Yup. It's an outlier.