Did MAGA Rig the election?

[The Duke]

See ya, pussy.

Oh, I'll be here to call out your bullshit, you fucking fraud!

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Oh I see. You want it by party.

I just ran it again with just Democrats since 1984. Still not an outlier.

And even if it was an outlier, I haven't factored in Kamala's numbers which are going to end up as the second highest Democrat popular vote total and would definitely be "close enough" to remove that label. The same way you're arguing that about Trump replicating his results.

Let me know if you want the summary statistics.

OMG

The 81mil is an outlier. Trump was too in 2020 except he did it again in 2024 and Harris will not reach 71mil? Maybe she will. Cali will count til 2029. Look below. You’re telling me the 81 doesn’t stand out as odd?

Come on bro

 

[XponentialChaos]

Oh, I'll be here to call out your bullshit, you fucking fraud!

Neat. I believe "calling out your bullshit" translates to "making emotional outbursts because I'm too stupid to say anything intelligent".

Go for it, pussy.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I didn't say 81 was an outlier. In fact, it's not an outlier with the data you asked me to calculate.

I said that the baseball example was an outlier. This isn't.

You re not being honest. It’s 10mil more than the next closest Dem candidate EVER.

It is 100% an outlier.

 

[XponentialChaos]

OMG

The 81mil is an outlier. Trump was too in 2020 except he did it again in 2024 and Harris will not reach 71mil? Maybe she will. Cali will count til 2029. Look below. You’re telling me the 81 doesn’t stand out as odd?

Come on bro

81 million is not a statistical outlier. This isn't an opinion, this is a fact.

And yes, she will get over 71 million.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

81 million is not a statistical outlier. This isn't an opinion, this is a fact.

And yes, she will get over 71 million.

Yeah it is. She won’t reach 72

So at best it’s 9mil more than the next closest Democrat. 100% it’s an outlier

 

[XponentialChaos]

You re not being honest. It’s 10mil more than the next closest Dem candidate EVER.

It is 100% an outlier.

I told you from the beginning that outlier has a specific definition and a specific formula. I can objectively say if something is an outlier or not. It's not.

If you're arguing it's an outlier, then you're arguing against its fucking definition.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Oh I see. You want it by party.

I just ran it again with just Democrats since 1984. Still not an outlier.

And even if it was an outlier, I haven't factored in Kamala's numbers which are going to end up as the second highest Democrat popular vote total and would definitely be "close enough" to remove that label. The same way you're arguing that about Trump replicating his results.

Let me know if you want the summary statistics.

Yet all you would Supply me was a stupid formula that didn't work. LOL now you're willing to give summary statistics. You are really a tool

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I told you from the beginning that outlier has a specific definition and a specific formula. I can objectively say if something is an outlier or not. It's not.

If you're arguing it's an outlier, then you're arguing against its fucking definition.

I am Not talking math / stats definitions. You do a chart and the 81mil will look like an anomaly. Sorry. You can’t dispute this. No other Democrat came close.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Yeah it is. She won’t reach 72

So at best it’s 9mil more than the next closest Democrat. 100% it’s an outlier

First you say she won't reach 71 million, then you say she won't reach 72 million. I think you might end up wrong on both accounts.

I know for a fact you're wrong about it being an outlier.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

First you say she won't reach 71 million, then you say she won't reach 72 million. I think you might end up wrong on both accounts.

I know for a fact you're wrong about it being an outlier.

How long will it take Cali to count? You think there are 1.1mil votes for her?

Again if we put this on a graph you would find the 81 to be an outlier. You’re not being honest.

 

[XponentialChaos]

I am Not talking math / stats definitions. You do a chart and the 81mil will look like an anomaly. Sorry. You can’t dispute this. No other Democrat came close.

I told you from the beginning that outlier has a specific definition. You can argue what an anomaly is but now you're getting into something that's entirely subjective.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Yeah it is. She won’t reach 72

So at best it’s 9mil more than the next closest Democrat. 100% it’s an outlier

She is only at 69 right now.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I told you from the beginning that outlier has a specific definition. You can argue what an anomaly is but now you're getting into something that's entirely subjective.

It’s an outlier. It’s obvious to anyone with a modicum of logic.

 

[XponentialChaos]

How long will it take Cali to count? You think there are 1.1mil votes for her?

Again if we put this on a graph you would find the 81 to be an outlier. You’re not being honest.

We'll see. Lots of votes still coming in.

Ok, you're welcome to think it's an outlier even though, by definition, it's not.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Yet all you would Supply me was a stupid formula that didn't work. LOL now you're willing to give summary statistics. You are really a tool

You don't even understand percentages. I'm not going to bother explaining the definition of an outlier for you. You're going to have to look that one up.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I told you from the beginning that outlier has a specific definition. You can argue what an anomaly is but now you're getting into something that's entirely subjective.

From AI

Outliers may be exceptions that stand outside individual samples of populations as well. In a more general context, an outlier is an individual that is markedly different from the norm in some respect.

Checkmate. The 81mil is at least 9mil more than the next closest Dem candidate ever.

It is an outlier

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

We'll see. Lots of votes still coming in.

Ok, you're welcome to think it's an outlier even though, by definition, it's not.

Outliers may be exceptions that stand outside individual samples of populations as well. In a more general context, an outlier is an individual that is markedly different from the norm in some respect

It’s different from the Norm. So it is.

 

[XponentialChaos]

It’s an outlier. It’s obvious to anyone with a modicum of logic.

Based on your feelings, sure. Not based on statistics or its own fucking definition.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Based on your feelings, sure. Not based on statistics or its own fucking definition.

Yes based on the fucking definition which I posted twice now. Here it is again you idiot leftist.

Outliers may be exceptions that stand outside individual samples of populations as well. In a more general context, an outlier is an individual that is markedly different from the norm in some respect