Did flight 77 hit the Pentagon?

[EMH]

No one flew a 757 like an F16. You lie because you have no facts to back your bullshit.

LOL!!!

Getting a 757 in that position at 600 mph would be difficult for an ace F16 pilot in an F16, impossible for a 757 regardless of who flies it.

 

[EMH]

The only light pole I see to the left of that car is the one in the street that hit that car...

The hilarious part about this particular Zionist Fascist 911 Lie is that if the 757 had clipped a light pole, it would have cartwheeled in a fantastic crash before hitting the Pentagon. That did not happen.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

LOL!!!

Getting a 757 in that position at 600 mph would be difficult for an ace F16 pilot in an F16, impossible for a 757 regardless of who flies it.

Yes, experienced airline pilots say it can't be done but we're supposed to believe that some terrorist nutjob who spend a few hours on a flight simulator in a cave pulled it off without a problem.. and then there is that hole in the Pentagon, a boeing 757 doesn't fit in there, so what happened to the wings, not to mention the engines..

Also, look at the grass in front of that hole, it looks like a golf course, no piece of airplane to be seen anywhere.. it's a logical question, what the **** happened to the plane.. and why are there no pictures.. notice how they avoid answering that, they know the official story doesn't make any sense but they can't bring themselves to admit it..

As Mark Twain said, “It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

 

[EMH]

Yes, experienced airline pilots say it can't be done but we're supposed to believe that some terrorist nutjob who spend a few hours on a flight simulator in a cave pulled it off without a problem.. and then there is that hole in the Pentagon, a boeing 757 doesn't fit in there, so what happened to the wings, not to mention the engines..

Also, look at the grass in front of that hole, it looks like a golf course, no piece of airplane to be seen anywhere.. it's a logical question, what the **** happened to the plane.. and why are there no pictures.. notice how they avoid answering that, they know the official story doesn't make any sense but they can't bring themselves to admit it..

As Mark Twain said, “It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

View attachment 1028301

View attachment 1028298

The people defending the "official version of 911" here are all Zionist Fascists, Mossad, and in soup's case, a Mossad janitor...

 

[Jantje_Smit]

The people defending the "official version of 911" here are all Zionist Fascists, Mossad, and in soup's case, a Mossad janitor...

I'm not familiar with the soupnazi but I'm catching on fast, he won't get promoted beyond janitor anytime soon.. lol..

9/11 was a long time and a few computers ago, I lost most of the links I had but I remember one of the dancing joos on the roof with the burning towers in the background, the Mossad was in on it too but they weren't the ring leaders, that would be Cheney and his buddies, PNAC, the need for a new pearl harbor.. another one of those funny things..

 

[Soupnazi630]

Seriously?

It's the Pentagon ffs, probably the most heavily surveillanced building on the planet, full of paranoid generals with budgets of hundreds of $billions, you think they would install some cheap cameras that could only take still pics when it comes to their own security.. please.. and even if they were only pointed at the ground, how could they miss a boeing 777 flying at ground level?

Also, another funny thing, did you know that (fake) FBI agents confiscated the tapes of security cameras from the buildings overlooking the Pentagon within an hour of the (supposed) plane crash, why, maybe there was something on those tapes they didn't want people to see..

And you are still ignoring the question, there are plenty of pictures/videos of planes hitting the towers but there aren't any pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon.. not a single one.. with hundreds of cameras around, that simply isn't possible yet you expect people to swallow it, no questions asked... so what is your evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon?

It is NOT and never WAS the most heavily surveilled or secured building in the world

That is your first mistake and a stupid one. They installed cammeras to captutre groiund level threats and they did not need to be ongoing video, They took stills every one or two seconds.


Those are simple facts. Your fake incredulity is simply based on a desire to be right. The Situation in NYC was massively different. There were no fake FBI agengts confiiscating video they were real and of course they had good reason to take those videos with permission of the owners who were happy to cooperate.

In NYC you have a city full of tourists. There is only one knwon video of the first impact and that was by accident. The video in NYC was overwhemingly taken of the SECOND impact because everyone looked at it after the first one.

That is you explanation and why it is different than tne pentagon

The evidence is hundreds of witnesses who saw the plane not to mention massive amounts of wreckage and debris from the plane

You lose stupid

 

[Soupnazi630]

The people defending the "official version of 911" here are all Zionist Fascists, Mossad, and in soup's case, a Mossad janitor...

Which is bullshit of course and just more lies from you

When proven wrong and YOU HAVE BEEN PROVEN WRONG your go to excuse is zionist mossad , zionist mossad ziolnist mossad

One more time DIPPSHIT there is no mossad here because you are unimportant and no one gives a **** about the stupid, disprovern and debunked crap you spew

 

[Soupnazi630]

I didn't ignore it, I explained why it's obviously planted.. unlike you cultists I can actually come up with arguments, why don't you try to prove that a plane hit the Pentagon for a change, how hard can it be?

View attachment 1028268

It has been proven and you know it

You just ignore the evidence because you are a second hand loser who is too childish to admit you are wrong. Much like EMH who makes this crap up to compensate for being such a virgin loser


But you KNOW you are massively OWNED

 

[PeterPilot]

You never explained what took down the light poles. It’s physical evidence...you have to account for them. Clearly a missile couldn’t have done it. Nor could the aircraft you say was substituted for AA77.

C’mon sonny....spill it.

It really doesn't matter what took down the light poles. What matters is that a 757 did not strike the Pentagon.

 

[Papageorgio]

Yes

 

[PeterPilot]

The video offered doesn't show a missile. It shows an explosion.

So what evidence do y'all have of a missile? You can't demand evidence without presenting any.

Especially with all the eye witnesses of a plane, plane parts found in an around the pentagon, the bodies of Flight 77 passengers and crew pulled from the pentagon, and flight records of Flight 77 leading to the pentagon and then stopping.

As time goes on, sources for an event that happened 23 years ago is harder to find. Many of the articles being cited only exist in the waybackmachine. It seems like the Truthers are trying to argue that their missile case gets stronger as the dozens and dozens and dozens of witnesses that contradict them are lost track of after nearly a quarter century

You can't demand the official narrative is true when all the facts and evidence contradict it. At least if you want to be an honest adult engaged in rational public dialogue.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

It is NOT and never WAS the most heavily surveilled or secured building in the world

That is your first mistake and a stupid one. They installed cammeras to captutre groiund level threats and they did not need to be ongoing video, They took stills every one or two seconds.

That is simply retarded, one frame a second.. lol.. even the local McDonalds can afford something better than that, yeah, back in 2001 too..

About the rest of your drivel, I could ask for some pictures of those massive amounts of wreckage and debris from the plane but we know there aren't any, I noticed this part though..

There were no fake FBI agengts confiiscating video they were real and of course they had good reason to take those videos with permission of the owners who were happy to cooperate.

That's interesting, what good reason did they have to take those videos, if there were any pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon on it why not release those and put an end to the conspiracy theories?

 

[Faun]

I didn't ignore it, I explained why it's obviously planted.. unlike you cultists I can actually come up with arguments, why don't you try to prove that a plane hit the Pentagon for a change, how hard can it be?

View attachment 1028268

No, you made up some bullshit excuse for why you want to stay married to your delusions.

 

[PeterPilot]

No, you made up some bullshit excuse for why you want to stay married to your delusions.

Why have you stayed married to your delusions on this subject matter? Because the official story has been repeated endlessly for 23 years?

 

[Faun]

Bull, so sayeth...

Pilots for 911 Truth

Pilots For 9/11 Truth

Founded in 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals researching and analyzing the events of September 11, 2001.

pf911t.org

LIE





All lies

More nuh-uh's.

 

[Faun]

Why have you stayed married to your delusions on this subject matter? Because the official story has been repeated endlessly for 23 years?

Nope. Better luck next time.

 

[Faun]

The hilarious part about this particular Zionist Fascist 911 Lie is that if the 757 had clipped a light pole, it would have cartwheeled in a fantastic crash before hitting the Pentagon. That did not happen.

LOL

So 9/11 didn't happen because it didn't happen the way you pretend it should have?

 

[Faun]

Yes, experienced airline pilots say it can't be done but we're supposed to believe that some terrorist nutjob who spend a few hours on a flight simulator in a cave pulled it off without a problem.. and then there is that hole in the Pentagon, a boeing 757 doesn't fit in there, so what happened to the wings, not to mention the engines..

Also, look at the grass in front of that hole, it looks like a golf course, no piece of airplane to be seen anywhere.. it's a logical question, what the **** happened to the plane.. and why are there no pictures.. notice how they avoid answering that, they know the official story doesn't make any sense but they can't bring themselves to admit it..

As Mark Twain said, “It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

View attachment 1028301

View attachment 1028298

The plane doesn't fit in the hole? What a shame you have to lie like ya do. In reality, from which you're divorced, the hole is shaped like a plane...

 

[candycorn]

It really doesn't matter what took down the light poles.

Yes it does. It’s physical evidence. Not anyone’s spin or opinion.

What matters is that a 757 did not strike the Pentagon.

Every bit of evidence points to a 757 in the form of AA77 hitting the Pentagon. Including the light poles you can’t account for

 

[rightwinger]

LOL!!!

Getting a 757 in that position at 600 mph would be difficult for an ace F16 pilot in an F16, impossible for a 757 regardless of who flies it.

Actually, the pilot has to get in ANY position that will allow him to hit the Pentagon.

That just happened to be the one that was flown