Did flight 77 hit the Pentagon?

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You have never "debunked" anything, and you are too much of an intellectual coward to answer basic climate questions....

You've been embarrassed again. You're a scumbag.

 

[Skylar]

ok.. can someone who doesn't believe in 9/11 conspiracies explain why we haven't seen (plane crashed) footage from these cameras?

As I said, I have tried to get an answer on that question for years, no need to read this whole thread, the answers won't be there either, you cultists always try to weasel you way out of it, but you're welcome to prove me wrong..

View attachment 1027927

Can you factually establish that those are cameras? Or is this your assumption, based on a fuzzy photograph?

 

[Faun]

bunker buster cruise missile.

Too bad for nuts like you, planes, not missiles, do this kind of damage...

... which also applies to the two rows of light poles that were knocked down.

 

[Faun]

Yes, as I told mini moo moo.. lol.. don't ask, on the left is what an engine of a crashed plane looks like, on the right is what they came up with at the Pentagon.. spot the differences..

View attachment 1027917View attachment 1027919

It is the right size for a cruise missile though..



View attachment 1027918

Yeah, the difference is one plane was gliding with no engine power at about 150MPH before skimming rooftops in a residential neighborhood before crashing; while the other was flying at about 90% of top speed at about 530MPH, flying head on into the reinforced concrete walls of pentagon.

What a stupid comparison. I'm embarrassed for you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes, as I told mini moo moo.. lol.. don't ask, on the left is what an engine of a crashed plane looks like, on the right is what they came up with at the Pentagon.. spot the differences..

View attachment 1027917View attachment 1027919

It is the right size for a cruise missile though..



View attachment 1027918

Get your stupid lies out of here.

 

[EMH]

Too bad for nuts like you, planes, not missiles, do this kind of damage...

View attachment 1028036

... which also applies to the two rows of light poles that were knocked down.

That's pretty good for 911 fudge.

Now find us a 757 pilot who can fly it with the nose 8 feet off the ground at 600mph....

 

[EMH]

Yeah, the difference is one plane was gliding with no engine power at about 150MPH before skimming rooftops in a residential neighborhood before crashing; while the other was flying at about 90% of top speed at about 530MPH, flying head on into the reinforced concrete walls of pentagon.

What a stupid comparison. I'm embarrassed for you.

And the person flying the 757 like an F16.... oh yeah, a KID with NO EXPERIENCE FLYING IT....

great story...

 

[Skylar]

And the person flying the 757 like an F16.... oh yeah, a KID with NO EXPERIENCE FLYING IT....

great story...

So what evidence do you have that it was a missile that hit the Pentagon? The video you posted didn't show any missile. But a blur and an explosion.

So what evidence do you have to back your story?

 

[Jantje_Smit]

It HAS been expplained and you simply ignore facts,

Those cameras were pointed at the ground and taking still shots. They were not designed to capure images of aircraft.

They were to there spot vehicles and pedestrians.

You DID get answers to that for years and like a child you keep repeating the question ignoring the facts

Seriously?

It's the Pentagon ffs, probably the most heavily surveillanced building on the planet, full of paranoid generals with budgets of hundreds of $billions, you think they would install some cheap cameras that could only take still pics when it comes to their own security.. please.. and even if they were only pointed at the ground, how could they miss a boeing 777 flying at ground level?

Also, another funny thing, did you know that (fake) FBI agents confiscated the tapes of security cameras from the buildings overlooking the Pentagon within an hour of the (supposed) plane crash, why, maybe there was something on those tapes they didn't want people to see..

And you are still ignoring the question, there are plenty of pictures/videos of planes hitting the towers but there aren't any pictures of a plane hitting the Pentagon.. not a single one.. with hundreds of cameras around, that simply isn't possible yet you expect people to swallow it, no questions asked... so what is your evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon?

 

[Skylar]

Seriously?

It's the Pentagon ffs, probably the most heavily surveillanced building on the planet, full of paranoid generals with budgets of hundreds of $billions, you think they would install some cheap cameras that could only take still pics when it comes to their own security.. please.. and even if they were only pointed at the ground, how could they miss a boeing 777 flying at ground level?

That's you evidence? You just randomly speculating about something you don't know a goddamn thing about. And then insisting that the lack of photographs or video from cameras that you made up is somehow evideence of a cover up the Pentagon?

Do you have evidence of a missile? Or is this just another Truther speculation circle jerk?

 

[Jantje_Smit]

Too bad for nuts like you, planes, not missiles, do this kind of damage...

View attachment 1028036

... which also applies to the two rows of light poles that were knocked down.

Yeah, that reminds me, one more funny thing.. can you point out those two rows of light poles that were knocked down...

 

[Jantje_Smit]

That's you evidence? You just randomly speculating about something you don't know a goddamn thing about. And then insisting that the lack of photographs or video from cameras that you made up is somehow evideence of a cover up the Pentagon?

Do you have evidence of a missile? Or is this just another Truther speculation circle jerk?

See, that's the problem with you morons.. do you have evidence of a missile.. lol.. while completely ignoring the fact that there is zero evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon which makes a missile the only logical explanation...

 

[Jantje_Smit]

And while I'm at it, another one of those things..

It's not just one thing that's suspicious and doesn't make sense, there are many more and when you add them all together there can be only one conclusion..

 

[Faun]

That's pretty good for 911 fudge.

Now find us a 757 pilot who can fly it with the nose 8 feet off the ground at 600mph....

For about a couple of hundred feet or so? Anybody with training.

Regardless of your bullshit... 2 rows of light poles knocked down... a plane shaped crater into the Pentagon... Boeing 757-200 parts recovered. Passenger remains from AA77 recovered... American Airlines debris recovered... radar of AA77 flying into the Pentagon... witnesses describing an American Airlines plane flying toward the Pentagon...

And all you have is -- nuh-uh!

Fuck off.

 

[Faun]

And the person flying the 757 like an F16.... oh yeah, a KID with NO EXPERIENCE FLYING IT....

great story...

No one flew a 757 like an F16. You lie because you have no facts to back your bullshit.

 

[Faun]

Yeah, that reminds me, one more funny thing.. can you point out those two rows of light poles that were knocked down...



View attachment 1028225

The only light pole I see to the left of that car is the one in the street that hit that car...

 

[Jantje_Smit]

The only light pole I see to the left of that car is the one in the street that hit that car...

I have seen that picture before and as I told that guy, it's obviously planted.. you want to tell me a plane flying at 500mph hits a light pole, slices it in two and then the head of the pole ends up a few feet a away from the mast.. lol.. but you said two rows of light poles were knocked down, any pictures of that?

Never mind, I know there arent any, but just like the other cultists you keep avoiding the important question, why are there no pictures of the fucking plane?

 

[Skylar]

I have seen that picture before and as I told that guy, it's obviously planted.. you want to tell me a plane flying at 500mph hits a light pole, slices it in two and then the head of the pole ends up a few feet a away from the mast.. lol.. but you said two rows of light poles were knocked down, any pictures of that?

Never mind, I know there arent any, but just like the other cultists you keep avoiding the important question, why are there no pictures of the fucking plane?



View attachment 1028265

View attachment 1028264

And by 'obviously planted', you mean you're just going to straight up ignore it.

The old Truther standby. Anything that doesn't ape your conspiracy becomes part of it!

 

[Jantje_Smit]

And by 'obviously planted', you mean you're just going to straight up ignore it.

The old Truther standby. Anything that doesn't ape your conspiracy becomes part of it!

I didn't ignore it, I explained why it's obviously planted.. unlike you cultists I can actually come up with arguments, why don't you try to prove that a plane hit the Pentagon for a change, how hard can it be?

 

[EMH]

For about a couple of hundred feet or so? Anybody with training.

Bull, so sayeth...

Pilots for 911 Truth

Pilots For 9/11 Truth

Founded in 2006, Pilots For 9/11 Truth is a growing organization of aviation professionals researching and analyzing the events of September 11, 2001.

pf911t.org

Boeing 757-200 parts recovered.

LIE

Passenger remains from AA77 recovered... American Airlines debris recovered... radar of AA77 flying into the Pentagon... witnesses describing an American Airlines plane flying toward the Pentagon...

All lies