Did flight 77 hit the Pentagon?

[Skylar]

This dumbass has said Eisenhower was a jew with a jewish name

Ignoring an eye witness because they have a 'jewish sounding name' is already spectacularly stupid.

Ignoring an eye witness named Jose Velasquez because someone ELSE has a 'jewish sounding name' is worth nothing more than a belly laugh

 

[EMH]

With plane parts found outside and inside the pentagon.

liar...

 

[EMH]

Ignoring an eye witness because they have a 'jewish sounding name' is already spectacularly stupid.

Ignoring an eye witness named Jose Velasquez because someone ELSE has a 'jewish sounding name' is worth nothing more than a belly laugh

That is just a list of bullshit names.

Just wait, everyone intentionally lying to enable the 911 hate hoax will be charged with treason when 911 reopens under Trump.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That is just a list of bullshit names.

Just wait, everyone intentionally lying to enable the 911 hate hoax will be charged with treason when 911 reopens under Trump.

It is the list you asked for now where is your evidence

 

[candycorn]

Virtually all of those names are Jewish names.

Does Art Bell know about you?

 

[EMH]

It is the list you asked for now where is your evidence

link?

Source?

 

[EMH]

Does Art Bell know about you?

Don't recall ever meeting an Art Bell...

 

[Soupnazi630]

link?

Source?

Asked and answered now your turn

 

[PeterPilot]

It is impossible to argue coherently with someone who just creates their own facts as they go along.

It's hard to win an argument with a smart person. It's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person.”​

― Bill Murray

Creating your own facts (those fed you by your friendly government and media) is what you're doing now. The facts show that no airliner crashed into the Pentagon. Those facts were known in 2001, yet you still regurgitate the official narrative 20+ years later.

 

[rightwinger]

Creating your own facts (those fed you by your friendly government and media) is what you're doing now. The facts show that no airliner crashed into the Pentagon. Those facts were known in 2001, yet you still regurgitate the official narrative 20+ years later.

Sorry Skippy
But I have no desire to engage in your fantasies

 

[PeterPilot]

Sorry Skippy
But I have no desire to engage in your fantasies

I don't blame you a bit. Continuously asserting claims contradicted by facts and physics would certainly be tiresome. You've been licking your intellectual wounds for 2 decades now.

 

[Skylar]

That is just a list of bullshit names.

Just wait, everyone intentionally lying to enable the 911 hate hoax will be charged with treason when 911 reopens under Trump.

Laughing.....dude, Trump was president for 4 years. None of your delusional nonsense ever happened. You're kidding yourself.

And its a name of witnesses to something that happened 23 years ago. You never gave the slightest shit about the witnesses, their names, or the testimony. You ignored them before you ever heard what they had to say.

Why would you ignore witnesses before hearing them? Because you're indoctrinated.

 

[Skylar]

link?

Source?

Link, source on evidence for that missile you made up?

You don't get to demand evidence when you've produced none, tinfoil.

 

[ranfunck]

Link, source on evidence for that missile you made up?

You don't get to demand evidence when you've produced none, tinfoil.

It has been posted many times

 

[Skylar]

It has been posted many times

The video offered doesn't show a missile. It shows an explosion.

So what evidence do y'all have of a missile? You can't demand evidence without presenting any.

Especially with all the eye witnesses of a plane, plane parts found in an around the pentagon, the bodies of Flight 77 passengers and crew pulled from the pentagon, and flight records of Flight 77 leading to the pentagon and then stopping.

As time goes on, sources for an event that happened 23 years ago is harder to find. Many of the articles being cited only exist in the waybackmachine. It seems like the Truthers are trying to argue that their missile case gets stronger as the dozens and dozens and dozens of witnesses that contradict them are lost track of after nearly a quarter century

 

[Soupnazi630]

Creating your own facts (those fed you by your friendly government and media) is what you're doing now. The facts show that no airliner crashed into the Pentagon. Those facts were known in 2001, yet you still regurgitate the official narrative 20+ years later.

There are no such facts

 

[ranfunck]

The video offered doesn't show a missile. It shows an explosion.

So what evidence do y'all have of a missile? You can't demand evidence without presenting any.

Especially with all the eye witnesses of a plane, plane parts found in an around the pentagon, the bodies of Flight 77 passengers and crew pulled from the pentagon, and flight records of Flight 77 leading to the pentagon and then stopping.

As time goes on, sources for an event that happened 23 years ago is harder to find. Many of the articles being cited only exist in the waybackmachine. It seems like the Truthers are trying to argue that their missile case gets stronger as the dozens and dozens and dozens of witnesses that contradict them are lost track of after nearly a quarter century

So what you are saying is that video doesn't show a plane or a missile. so somebody planted bombs there? thank you for clearing that up.

 

[Skylar]

So what you are saying is that video doesn't show a plane or a missile. so somebody planted bombs there? thank you for clearing that up.

What I'm saying is that the video y'all have offered of the 'missile' doesn't show a missile.

So what evidence do you have of a missile? Its a pretty simple question with no good answer. And yet here we are, almost a quarter century later.

This is the problem with the missile conspiracy: its entirely speculative. And worse, contradicted by eye witness testimony, debris on the ground and inside the pentagon, autopsies, genetic tests, flight records, and flight recorders.

And backing the missile conspiracy? A story.

 

[ranfunck]

What I'm saying is that the video y'all have offered of the 'missile' doesn't show a missile.

So what evidence do you have of a missile? Its a pretty simple question with no good answer. And yet here we are, almost a quarter century later.

This is the problem with the missile conspiracy: its entirely speculative. And worse, contradicted by eye witness testimony, debris on the ground and inside the pentagon, autopsies, genetic tests, flight records, and flight recorders.

And backing the missile conspiracy? A story.

if it wasn't a missile and to me and others, it certainly wasn't an airplane, what caused the explosion?

 

[Skylar]

if it wasn't a missile and to me and others, it certainly wasn't an airplane, what caused the explosion?

So you don't have video of a missile, what evidence of a missile do you have?

You run from this question like it is wearing a hockey mask and chasing you with a butcher knife.

And if you have no such evidence, then why are your ilk pushing that conspiracy? That's irrational.

And of course, you simply saying 'it certainly wasn't an airplane' doesn't make the dozens of witnesses of an airplane disappear. Or the airplane debris pulled from the building. Or the debris around the impact site. Or the bodies pulled from the building. Or the the autopsies and genetic tests on those bodies. Or the flight records. Or the flight recorder.

This is the folly of Truthers: they're clinging to a conspiracy without evidence AND ignoring evidence that contradicts that conspiracy. So double irrational.