Dick Durbin blocks release of Epstein flight logs

People are just raising the hypothetical question (why didn't tater head release the files?) to get you conspiracy theorists to understand the fallacies in your illogical conclusions of which you have no evidence for.
You aren’t saying anything. Typical MAGA!
 
It’s just shorthand for your mindset. I didn’t invent the designation. That was the diaper wearers.
but you use it quit a bit...like i said you have maga on the mind....that makes you as crazy as those you bad mouth....
 


So much for democrat transparency
Durbin demands Griswell tapes interview. But made no effort with all the powerful dem judges to do any interviews himself
Umm...excuse me.

Why is anyone demanding the Epstein flight logs be released when they were already released several years ago?

Is this the ******* Twilight Zone?
 
Umm...excuse me.

Why is anyone demanding the Epstein flight logs be released when they were already released several years ago?

Is this the ******* Twilight Zone?
The list with noTrump and a lot of Bill Clinton?

That list?
 


So much for democrat transparency
Durbin demands Griswell tapes interview. But made no effort with all the powerful dem judges to do any interviews himself
It seems at least once a month some fool asks why the flight log has not been released.

Um...

Flight Log_Released in U.S. v. Maxwell


.
 
It seems at least once a month some fool asks why the flight log has not been released.
What happened to the rest of the evidence and why is Trump hiding it? That’s what Americans want to know.
 
15th post
Yes, that is what I thought when I saw that quote.

Why would the Senate Majority go along with a supbpoena for the staff of a U.S. Supreme Court Justice? That would look bad for the Senate, and would set a precedent that could cause the Supreme Court to become afraid to interact with staff.

Not to mention that the subpoena could be quashed by - of course - the Supreme Court.

That almost seems like a poison pill designed to force Durbin to refuse the Epstein supbpoena along with the USSC, so Blackburn could have something to crow about.

And I like Blackburn. She's my favorite GILF, but I call out bullshit on either side.
And you got suckered by Dems bullshit. It was not a "poison pill" the proposed amendments were unrelated and stand alone.

 
You're FOS.

AMENDMENT Intended to be Proposed byMrs. BLACKBURNTo the amendment proposed by Mr Durbin to the Motionof Senator Richard J. Durbin, Chair, Committee onthe Judiciary, dated November 2, 2023

1 Add the following?

From 2023?

You dumb-asses will try ANYTHING to protect your dear leader.
 
What happened to the rest of the evidence and why is Trump hiding it? That’s what Americans want to know.
Okay, I was going to start a topic about this, but we have enough Epstein topics already.

So here's the thing.

Donald Trump's best friend was arrested in July 2019, a year and a half before Cankles' failed coup.

The MAGA media has tried to deflect from the fact Trump had the Epstein files first. More than a dozen rubes have parroted the question, "Why did Biden hide them?", deflecting from the fact TRUMP HAD THEM FIRST.

So here are points to ponder:

1) If the Epstein files had damning evidence against Trump and other oligarchs, Trump would have buried them where Biden couldn't find them.

2) If the Epstein files had damning evidence against Democrats, Trump would have used them to win the 2020 election in an actual landslide. Biden would have had no chance to bury them.

3) Most likely of all is that there are no Epstein files outside of what is already in the public realm, like the flight log everyone keeps asking for which is ALREADY PUBLIC. JPMorgan's Chase's role is known. Deutsche Bank's role is already known. Les Wexner's role is already known. Yet each of these will eventually be harped as "revelations" in the near future for the ignorant rubes demanding to be satisified; and all sorts of assumptions, manufactured bullshit, and conspiracy theories will be hatched anew. The mob will never be content.



.
4) The only real curiousity which needs to be answered is US Attorney Alex Acosta's bizarrely lenient plea deal with Jeffrey Epstein and four (or more) of his co-conspirators. Acosta gave Epstein a 13-month sentence for molesting ONE underage girl. During that 13 months, Epstein was allowed to work in his office six days a week for 18 hours a day, with a limo chauffeuring him to and fro. This is unfuckingbelievable.

But here's the really curious thing. Epstein used four women to recruit his victims. Now how is it he was charged with molesting ONE girl when he had FOUR women recruiting victims? In the plea deal, the four co-conspirators (Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, and Nadia Marcinkova) were immunized from prosecution. And with one final, highly unorthodox twist, the plea deal states, "The United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova."

Anyone else involved was given a Get Out Of Jail Free card before they were even discovered to be in on the underage prostitution ring!

So why bother investigating any further, right? They shut this thing down hard!

Acosta was rewarded for his good works by Jeffrey Epstein's nearby neighbor with an appointment as Labor Secretary in his Cabinet.

.
But most child molesters never stop. Epstein certainly didn't. Thanks to Alex Acosta, Esptein was able to continue preying on the innocent for another 12 years.


.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom