Dick Durbin attempts to defend Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Sen. Richard J. Durbin on Sunday defended the record of Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson after Republican criticism of her handling of child pornography cases in judicial and policy roles.
Durbin (D-Ill.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, dismissed allegations made last week by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) in tweets that claimed “an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children.”

MSN

Accusations of leniency in child porn cases preface ...​

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/20/...

15 hours ago · “Judge Jackson’s history of sentencing below guidelines, particularly in cases involving child exploitation, raises legitimate questions about …

Comment:
Dick Durban is a prolific prevaricator.
Of course Durbin will defend child porn crimes.
Senator Hawley is correct, Judge Jackson is soft on child porn crimes.
She does not follow the minimum sentencing guild lines and she uses racial disparities as her excuse.
Joe chose Jackson because she is a very good representative of the far left extremist and radical and racist Democrat Party.
Jackson will ignore the Constitution instead of defending it.
All of the usual Democrat Cult News Orgs are doing their "Fact Checking"(lying) about this.
"We Fact Checked it" LMAO >> WaPo NYT Yahoo HuffyPo
This is an important issue because of Hunter Biden's lap top pictures of him abusing a minor and Bill Clinton's many visits to Epstein's Lolita Island.
She will be put on the Supreme Court and as usual the Democrats will accuse the Republicans of racism for having doubts about her.
The Democrats are slowly working their way towards an Orwellian nightmare neo-marxist totalitarian one party police state and Jackson will help them get there.
Enjoy your freedom while it lasts.

 

[Dragonlady]

Sen. Richard J. Durbin on Sunday defended the record of Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson after Republican criticism of her handling of child pornography cases in judicial and policy roles.
Durbin (D-Ill.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, dismissed allegations made last week by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) in tweets that claimed “an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children.”

MSN

Accusations of leniency in child porn cases preface ...​

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/20/...

15 hours ago · “Judge Jackson’s history of sentencing below guidelines, particularly in cases involving child exploitation, raises legitimate questions about …

Comment:
Dirty Dick Durban is a prolific prevaricator.
Of course Durbin will defend child porn crimes.
Senator Hawley is correct, Judge Jackson is soft on child porn crimes.
She does not follow the minimum sentencing guild lines and she uses racial disparities as her excuse.
Pedo Joe chose Jackson because she is a very good representative of the far left extremist and radical and racist Democrat Party.
Jackson will ignore the Constitution instead of defending it.
All of the usual Democrat Cult News Orgs are doing their "Fact Checking"(lying) about this.
"We Fact Checked it" LMAO >> WaPo NYT Yahoo HuffyPo
This is an important issue because of Hunter Biden's lap top pictures of him abusing a minor and Bill Clinton's many visits to Epstein's Lolita Island.
She will be put on the Supreme Court and as usual the Democrats will accuse the Republicans of racism for having doubts about her.
The Democrat Cult is slowly working their way towards an Orwellian nightmare neo-marxist totalitarian one party police state and Jackson will help them get there.
Enjoy your freedom while it lasts.

Strange but you didn't consider Brett Kavenaugh's history of sexually abusing women at all important, nor the behaviour of Clarence Thomas.

You have no moral high ground on ANY nomination, considering the ODIOUS and disgusting picks by Trump, and others.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Strange but you didn't consider Brett Kavenaugh's history of sexually abusing women at all important, nor the behaviour of Clarence Thomas.

You have no moral high ground on ANY nomination, considering the ODIOUS and disgusting picks by Trump, and others.

Kavanaugh and Thomas are both great examples of how the Dirty Democrat Party smears innocent people.
The Dirty Democrats illegally used our own FBI and DOJ to smear President Trump and the Press played along with it.
Left Wingers have zero ethics or morals.

 

[j-mac]

Strange but you didn't consider Brett Kavenaugh's history of sexually abusing women at all important, nor the behaviour of Clarence Thomas.

You have no moral high ground on ANY nomination, considering the ODIOUS and disgusting picks by Trump, and others.

So, you don’t deny that Jackson is soft on pedophiles?

 

[1srelluc]

So, you don’t deny that Jackson is soft on pedophiles?

That's what it looks like from where I sit.....No surprise really.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Strange but you didn't consider Brett Kavenaugh's history of sexually abusing women

There is no such history. Just lies from the left and morons like you who believe said lies.

Besides YOU ARE A FOREIGNER so your opinion is WORTHLESS

 

[Votto]

Strange but you didn't consider Brett Kavenaugh's history of sexually abusing women at all important, nor the behaviour of Clarence Thomas.

You have no moral high ground on ANY nomination, considering the ODIOUS and disgusting picks by Trump, and others.

Get out the tin foil hat everyone!

None of that is proven, as where the record of the Supreme Court justice nominee is for all to see.

And yes, we realize the loons run the asylum and there is absolutely nothing that can be done to stop this travesty.

It just makes your day, doesn't it.

 

[Votto]

There is no such history. Just lies from the left and morons like you who believe said lies.

Besides YOU ARE A FOREIGNER so your opinion is WORTHLESS

But if democrats could not lie they would all have to kill themselves.

 

[eddiew37]

Get out the tin foil hat everyone!

None of that is proven, as where the record of the Supreme Court justice nominee is for all to see.

And yes, we realize the loons run the asylum and there is absolutely nothing that can be done to stop this travesty.

It just makes your day, doesn't it.

The asylum being our Supreme Court

 

[postman]

Sen. Richard J. Durbin on Sunday defended the record of Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson after Republican criticism of her handling of child pornography cases in judicial and policy roles.
Durbin (D-Ill.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, dismissed allegations made last week by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) in tweets that claimed “an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children.”

Give me a break. Clarence Thomas overturned part of the child pornography protection act of 1996

Thomas opinion in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002),

The Court suggests that the Government's interest in enforcing prohibitions against real child pornography cannot justify prohibitions on virtual child pornography, ….

 

[postman]

So, you don’t deny that Jackson is soft on pedophiles?

So is Clarence Thomas, and he's O.K. for the Supreme Court.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Strange but you didn't consider Brett Kavenaugh's history of sexually abusing women at all important, nor the behaviour of Clarence Thomas.

You have no moral high ground on ANY nomination, considering the ODIOUS and disgusting picks by Trump, and others.

That's was all fabricated lies. The nominee has an actual history for pedos. Big difference.

 

[Auld Phart]

Sen. Richard J. Durbin on Sunday defended the record of Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson after Republican criticism of her handling of child pornography cases in judicial and policy roles.
Durbin (D-Ill.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, dismissed allegations made last week by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) in tweets that claimed “an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children.”

MSN

Accusations of leniency in child porn cases preface ...​

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/20/...

15 hours ago · “Judge Jackson’s history of sentencing below guidelines, particularly in cases involving child exploitation, raises legitimate questions about …

Comment:
Dirty Dick Durban is a prolific prevaricator.
Of course Durbin will defend child porn crimes.
Senator Hawley is correct, Judge Jackson is soft on child porn crimes.
She does not follow the minimum sentencing guild lines and she uses racial disparities as her excuse.
Pedo Joe chose Jackson because she is a very good representative of the far left extremist and radical and racist Democrat Party.
Jackson will ignore the Constitution instead of defending it.
All of the usual Democrat Cult News Orgs are doing their "Fact Checking"(lying) about this.
"We Fact Checked it" LMAO >> WaPo NYT Yahoo HuffyPo
This is an important issue because of Hunter Biden's lap top pictures of him abusing a minor and Bill Clinton's many visits to Epstein's Lolita Island.
She will be put on the Supreme Court and as usual the Democrats will accuse the Republicans of racism for having doubts about her.
The Democrat Cult is slowly working their way towards an Orwellian nightmare neo-marxist totalitarian one party police state and Jackson will help them get there.
Enjoy your freedom while it lasts.

Unclean OP

New "Clean Start" Policy on Creating Threads

We always HAVE been a Discussion board. We've always focused almost solely on getting thread topics to be discussed and not on arbitrary content issues.. STILL completely committed to the Free Speech thing.. But lately, the thread titles and Opening Posts have been giving Free Speech a bad...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[2aguy]

I would like someone to explain how it is that this judge, Biden's nominee for the Supreme Court, thought it was a good idea to give 3 months to a man who had 600 images of child rape.....

The Federal guideline was 10 years.

The left wing, D.C. prosecutor asked for 2 years.

Biden's Supreme Court nominee gave the guy with 600 or more images of child rape, children between the ages of 8-12......a 3 month sentence.

This alone should rule against her sitting on the highest court of the land....right?

“[In] United States vs. Chazin, the prosecutor asked for 78 to 97 months. You imposed 28 months. Twenty-eight months is a 64 percent reduction. In United States vs. Cooper, the prosecutor asked for 72 months, you imposed 60 months,” Cruz listed. “That was a 17 percent reduction. In United States vs. Downs, the prosecutor asked for 70 months, you imposed 60 – that was a 14 percent reduction. United States vs. Hawkins, the prosecutor asked for 24 months, you imposed three months – that was an 80 percent reduction. In United States vs. Savage, the prosecutor asked for 49 months, you imposed 37 – that was a 24 percent reduction. In the United States vs. Stewart, the prosecutor asked for 97 months, you imposed 57 – that was a 40 percent reduction.”

“Do you believe the voice of the children is heard when 100 percent of the time you’re sentencing those in possession of child pornography to far below what the prosecutors asking for?” Cruz asked.

Sen. Ted Cruz grills Ketanji Brown Jackson during hearing

Tuesday’s questioning began at 9 a.m., with each senator getting up to 30 minutes to quiz Jackson in order of seniority.

nypost.com

Keep in mind....these images that these individuals have are images of children, young children being raped ....... and having listened to some of the testimony.....she would sit there and apologize to these individuals for the sentences they recieved.....

Again.....shouldn't this be disqualifying ?

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Pedo Joe's crackhead son made kiddy porn with himself as the star.
Wonder what Judge Jackson would do if she had his court case.

 

[RodISHI]

Again.....shouldn't this be disqualifying ?

Yes it should be beyond a doubt. Previously if it wasn't the leftist judge of choice many of them would have been agreeing but it appears that reasonable expectations to protect children from such beasts have gone out the door with many of them.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I would like someone to explain how it is that this judge, Biden's nominee for the Supreme Court, thought it was a good idea to give 3 months to a man who had 600 images of child rape.....

The Federal guideline was 10 years.

The left wing, D.C. prosecutor asked for 2 years.

Biden's Supreme Court nominee gave the guy with 600 or more images of child rape, children between the ages of 8-12......a 3 month sentence.

This alone should rule against her sitting on the highest court of the land....right?

“[In] United States vs. Chazin, the prosecutor asked for 78 to 97 months. You imposed 28 months. Twenty-eight months is a 64 percent reduction. In United States vs. Cooper, the prosecutor asked for 72 months, you imposed 60 months,” Cruz listed. “That was a 17 percent reduction. In United States vs. Downs, the prosecutor asked for 70 months, you imposed 60 – that was a 14 percent reduction. United States vs. Hawkins, the prosecutor asked for 24 months, you imposed three months – that was an 80 percent reduction. In United States vs. Savage, the prosecutor asked for 49 months, you imposed 37 – that was a 24 percent reduction. In the United States vs. Stewart, the prosecutor asked for 97 months, you imposed 57 – that was a 40 percent reduction.”

“Do you believe the voice of the children is heard when 100 percent of the time you’re sentencing those in possession of child pornography to far below what the prosecutors asking for?” Cruz asked.

Sen. Ted Cruz grills Ketanji Brown Jackson during hearing

Tuesday’s questioning began at 9 a.m., with each senator getting up to 30 minutes to quiz Jackson in order of seniority.

nypost.com

Keep in mind....these images that these individuals have are images of children, young children being raped ....... and having listened to some of the testimony.....she would sit there and apologize to these individuals for the sentences they recieved.....

Again.....shouldn't this be disqualifying ?

No wonder the Left love her. She’s a pedophillia supporter who can’t tell you what a woman is.

 

[Meathead]

We'll have to change the designation to LGBTQP to be more inclusive. Pedos are people to.

 

[Vastator]

We'll have to change the designation to LGBTQP to be more inclusive. Pedos are people to.

They are, and have been working in earnest to do just that.

 

[candycorn]

Wow, you get 10 years for child porn? That is as much as some get for murder.

We've got to fix the sentencing guidelines in this nation ASAP.

If true (which I doubt), the pornographer should have gotten much longer than three months.