- Oct 6, 2008
- Reaction score
- Brooklyn, NY
To be clear, you aren't making any novel arguments against evolution. You are tossing out the same academically dishonest crap that creationists (or proponents of intelligent design) often toss out to try and muddy the waters.1."your motives aren't scientific."
Let's dispense with any notion that your inclinations have anything to do with science.
My 'motives,' whatever you imagine them to be, have nothing to do with the facts and questions posed by the OP.
In reality you are merely seeking to obfuscate the fact that you have no answers for same.
You've danced around the questions and attempted to make the argument about me.
Let's be honest: you're a dope.
2. "You are interested in pushing your agenda, which you aren't honest or brave enough to admit too."
Another fib....with the same purpose as exposed above.
And to prove it....my 'agenda' is right there in the title....you know, the words that inflamed you.
AND...the reason they inflamed you is that you believe in Darwinism...yet can't defend it.
3. "Considering all of your degrees are in the fine arts, and I have an M.D.;..."
First, I have never mentioned my degree...
...second, M.D., in your case, clearly stands for Mundane Drivel.
4. "...your opinion on my understanding of science."
Hardly my opinion....I'll prove it. I'll put up post with the four questions from the OP that you won't be able to answer.
Read post 32 if you dare.....and quake in your shoes.
As you have no background in the natural sciences, I could understand how an ordinary person could be confused by all of these items. However, you are intelligent enough to know exactly what you are doing. Watching you be intentionally obtuse is not terribly inspiring or interesting to those of us who know better.
As an aside, when did you become so easily flustered? Perhaps you are experiencing some cognitive decline as you progress into the golden years?
"As an aside, when did you become so easily flustered?"
Would you mind showing where I was ever.....ever....flustered?
Do you actually imagine that folks reading this won't see how you are trying to reverse the facts......
....with post #32 as glaring proof?
Or....do you not understand that 'flustered' means 'confused'?
So......which of us is confused?
Correct: you are.