Desperate Dems Faking Mailbox Bombs. "You Cannot Be Civil"

[Faun]

Do you honestly think that a bomb squad can’t detonate a bomb without killing themselves?! Come on man, you lost so many points with that one

They use explosives to blow it up. You don't actually believe they flip some switch or cut some wire to make the bomb go off, do you? You're as dumb as that idiot Faux.

No man, you’re proving to take the idiot award all on your own. You honestly think the FBI got a harmless arrangement of pipes and wires, deemed a few of the bombs unstable and too risky to transport for no reason and then detonated them?!

You are so deep in LaLa land I don’t even think you realize it. Just imagine if it was a left winger making your ridiculous argument. You’d be going nuts on them. Instead you are just going nuts.

How did the bomb squad "detonate" them without using additional explosives? Faux is claiming the mechanics built into the bomb were used to make them explode. He denies that the bomb squad used additional explosives. If you know how that was accomplished, please let us know. Otherwise you will go down as being even dumber than Faux.

The bomb had a detonator and explosives. It did not require any additional explosives to set it off. You are unbelievably rightarded.

Actually it's not clear that the bomb did have a detonator. Assuming it did, how did the bomb squad trigger the detonator without blowing themselves up? You keep evading an answer to that question.

The additional explosives are used because the bomb squad doesn't want to push the "blow up the bomb" button with their fingers.

Still nothing to corroborate your bullshit.

 

[Faun]

Faux's claim is that the fact that the bomb squad "detonated" them proved they were real bombs. The bomb squad said they didn't know if the bombs were fake. Both those facts prove Faux is an idiot, and so are you for defending him.

The bomb squad said that more than one of the bombs were too unstable to transport back to headquarters so they were remotely detonated. They don’t do that to fake bombs. Official statements have been made confirming that the bombs contain explosives by Chris Wray, trumps FBI Director. The man accused of making them and sending them has been charged on counts of sending explosive devices, not fake bombs.

Last but not least... You’re and idiot

They do it all the time, moron. Blowing up a suspicious package is normally the safest course of action. Those griping dramas they show on TV where the hero saves everyone by cutting the blue wire just before the digital timer reaches zero are 99% bullshit. Normally what they do is just blow the thing up.

The bombs were said to contain "pyrotechnic powder." That's not the kind of thing that blows up from the slightest bump. They also weren't hooked up to any kind of functional detonator. They were fake.

There's no such charge as "sending fake bombs," so what do you imagine they are going to charge him with? Every way you look at it, you and Faux are full of shit.

Ok buddy... send a link to where you got that intel and I’ll easily show you why you are full of shit. Let me guess. Somebody looked at a photo and fed you that BS talking point. Prove me wrong

If the fucking moron could have posted even one single link claiming "other explosives" were used to detonate that bomb, he would have. He posts feigned bluster instead because there are no articles describing what he's claiming. Not one.

Only a moron would think that posting a link is required to prove that your claims are idiotic.

If your bullshit resembled reality, you'd be able to corroborate it. Why would anyone take the word of a fucking moron like you with absolutely zero corroboration?

 

[bripat9643]

I have never claimed I am 100% certain that the so-called "bomb" was fake, but since all the other "bombs" were fake, why should we believe this one was any different. The reason the police blew it up is the fact that they didn't know one way or the other. They admitted as much. How could they claim they didn't know whether the "bomb" was fake and then make it go off without adding any additional explosives? I know you hate discussing that issue because something deep down in your limbic system tells you that your understanding of reality isn't quite right.

LOL

I pointed out the bomb was detonated by police and posted corroborating evidence.

You’re still running around like a chicken with its head cut off trying to deflect from the stark reality that you can’t find one single verifiable source to corroborate your nonsensical idiocy that the police blew up a harmless envelope with other explosives.

You pointed out that the police did something that can't be done? How do the police trigger the bomb to explode without killing themselves? You keep weaseling out of explaining that. You also haven't explain how the police didn't know whether it was a bomb, but the were able to activate the trigger mechanism and make it explode.

You arne't denying that the police said they didn't know if it was a bomb, are you?

Fucking moron, police detonated bombs all the time. They’re smarter than you. Infinitely smarter. Meaning unlike you, they know how to detonate a bomb without killing themselves.

They also blow up "suspicious" backages all the time. Using the appeal to authority is a non sequitur in this discussion, moron. No one is disputing what the police said. What were disputing is your idiotic understanding of what they said. Your pathetic straw man attacks aren't fooling anyone.

LOL

Cries the fucking moron who appeals to his own made up bullshit.

Have you forgotten? You never were able to produce a single link which shows the police blew up a harmless, non-explosive, envelope using "other explosives."

You bullshitted and got caught. Now you're whining incessantly hoping that will suffice in lieu of your inability to prove your bullshit.

You keep asking for a link because you can't answer the questions that prove you're an idiot. Very simple logic proves you are wrong, but that's exactly why you can't figure it out.

 

[bripat9643]

The bomb squad said that more than one of the bombs were too unstable to transport back to headquarters so they were remotely detonated. They don’t do that to fake bombs. Official statements have been made confirming that the bombs contain explosives by Chris Wray, trumps FBI Director. The man accused of making them and sending them has been charged on counts of sending explosive devices, not fake bombs.

Last but not least... You’re and idiot

They do it all the time, moron. Blowing up a suspicious package is normally the safest course of action. Those griping dramas they show on TV where the hero saves everyone by cutting the blue wire just before the digital timer reaches zero are 99% bullshit. Normally what they do is just blow the thing up.

The bombs were said to contain "pyrotechnic powder." That's not the kind of thing that blows up from the slightest bump. They also weren't hooked up to any kind of functional detonator. They were fake.

There's no such charge as "sending fake bombs," so what do you imagine they are going to charge him with? Every way you look at it, you and Faux are full of shit.

Ok buddy... send a link to where you got that intel and I’ll easily show you why you are full of shit. Let me guess. Somebody looked at a photo and fed you that BS talking point. Prove me wrong

If the fucking moron could have posted even one single link claiming "other explosives" were used to detonate that bomb, he would have. He posts feigned bluster instead because there are no articles describing what he's claiming. Not one.

Only a moron would think that posting a link is required to prove that your claims are idiotic.

If your bullshit resembled reality, you'd be able to corroborate it. Why would anyone take the word of a fucking moron like you with absolutely zero corroboration?

You have to be an enormous dumbfuck to believe that an internet link is the sum total of reality.

I'm not asking anyone to take my word for anything, moron. I'm asking you to answer some very simple questions that you should have the answers to if you were correct. You obviously can't answer them.

 

[Faun]

LOL

I pointed out the bomb was detonated by police and posted corroborating evidence.

You’re still running around like a chicken with its head cut off trying to deflect from the stark reality that you can’t find one single verifiable source to corroborate your nonsensical idiocy that the police blew up a harmless envelope with other explosives.

You pointed out that the police did something that can't be done? How do the police trigger the bomb to explode without killing themselves? You keep weaseling out of explaining that. You also haven't explain how the police didn't know whether it was a bomb, but the were able to activate the trigger mechanism and make it explode.

You arne't denying that the police said they didn't know if it was a bomb, are you?

Fucking moron, police detonated bombs all the time. They’re smarter than you. Infinitely smarter. Meaning unlike you, they know how to detonate a bomb without killing themselves.

They also blow up "suspicious" backages all the time. Using the appeal to authority is a non sequitur in this discussion, moron. No one is disputing what the police said. What were disputing is your idiotic understanding of what they said. Your pathetic straw man attacks aren't fooling anyone.

LOL

Cries the fucking moron who appeals to his own made up bullshit.

Have you forgotten? You never were able to produce a single link which shows the police blew up a harmless, non-explosive, envelope using "other explosives."

You bullshitted and got caught. Now you're whining incessantly hoping that will suffice in lieu of your inability to prove your bullshit.

You keep asking for a link because you can't answer the questions that prove you're an idiot. Very simple logic proves you are wrong, but that's exactly why you can't figure it out.

LOL

Fucking moron, there’s no question of yours I need to answer. My many links corroborated my claims. The only one corroborating yours is you and you’re a fucking moron.

 

[Faun]

They do it all the time, moron. Blowing up a suspicious package is normally the safest course of action. Those griping dramas they show on TV where the hero saves everyone by cutting the blue wire just before the digital timer reaches zero are 99% bullshit. Normally what they do is just blow the thing up.

The bombs were said to contain "pyrotechnic powder." That's not the kind of thing that blows up from the slightest bump. They also weren't hooked up to any kind of functional detonator. They were fake.

There's no such charge as "sending fake bombs," so what do you imagine they are going to charge him with? Every way you look at it, you and Faux are full of shit.

Ok buddy... send a link to where you got that intel and I’ll easily show you why you are full of shit. Let me guess. Somebody looked at a photo and fed you that BS talking point. Prove me wrong

If the fucking moron could have posted even one single link claiming "other explosives" were used to detonate that bomb, he would have. He posts feigned bluster instead because there are no articles describing what he's claiming. Not one.

Only a moron would think that posting a link is required to prove that your claims are idiotic.

If your bullshit resembled reality, you'd be able to corroborate it. Why would anyone take the word of a fucking moron like you with absolutely zero corroboration?

You have to be an enormous dumbfuck to believe that an internet link is the sum total of reality.

I'm not asking anyone to take my word for anything, moron. I'm asking you to answer some very simple questions that you should have the answers to if you were correct. You obviously can't answer them.

LOLOL

Fucking moron, those links are to the press reporting the police informed them they detonated the bomb.

 

[bripat9643]

Ok buddy... send a link to where you got that intel and I’ll easily show you why you are full of shit. Let me guess. Somebody looked at a photo and fed you that BS talking point. Prove me wrong

If the fucking moron could have posted even one single link claiming "other explosives" were used to detonate that bomb, he would have. He posts feigned bluster instead because there are no articles describing what he's claiming. Not one.

Only a moron would think that posting a link is required to prove that your claims are idiotic.

If your bullshit resembled reality, you'd be able to corroborate it. Why would anyone take the word of a fucking moron like you with absolutely zero corroboration?

You have to be an enormous dumbfuck to believe that an internet link is the sum total of reality.

I'm not asking anyone to take my word for anything, moron. I'm asking you to answer some very simple questions that you should have the answers to if you were correct. You obviously can't answer them.

LOLOL

Fucking moron, those links are to the press reporting the police informed them they detonated the bomb.

Who do you think you're fooling, moron? Answer the questions I asked, or shut the fuck up.

 

[bripat9643]

You pointed out that the police did something that can't be done? How do the police trigger the bomb to explode without killing themselves? You keep weaseling out of explaining that. You also haven't explain how the police didn't know whether it was a bomb, but the were able to activate the trigger mechanism and make it explode.

You arne't denying that the police said they didn't know if it was a bomb, are you?

Fucking moron, police detonated bombs all the time. They’re smarter than you. Infinitely smarter. Meaning unlike you, they know how to detonate a bomb without killing themselves.

They also blow up "suspicious" backages all the time. Using the appeal to authority is a non sequitur in this discussion, moron. No one is disputing what the police said. What were disputing is your idiotic understanding of what they said. Your pathetic straw man attacks aren't fooling anyone.

LOL

Cries the fucking moron who appeals to his own made up bullshit.

Have you forgotten? You never were able to produce a single link which shows the police blew up a harmless, non-explosive, envelope using "other explosives."

You bullshitted and got caught. Now you're whining incessantly hoping that will suffice in lieu of your inability to prove your bullshit.

You keep asking for a link because you can't answer the questions that prove you're an idiot. Very simple logic proves you are wrong, but that's exactly why you can't figure it out.

LOL

Fucking moron, there’s no question of yours I need to answer. My many links corroborated my claims. The only one corroborating yours is you and you’re a fucking moron.

ROFL! Thanks for confirming that you're afraid to answer the questions. Of course, you can't answer them except by admitting that you've been posting pure horseshit since you chimed in on this thread.

 

[Slade3200]

Do you honestly think that a bomb squad can’t detonate a bomb without killing themselves?! Come on man, you lost so many points with that one

They use explosives to blow it up. You don't actually believe they flip some switch or cut some wire to make the bomb go off, do you? You're as dumb as that idiot Faux.

No man, you’re proving to take the idiot award all on your own. You honestly think the FBI got a harmless arrangement of pipes and wires, deemed a few of the bombs unstable and too risky to transport for no reason and then detonated them?!

You are so deep in LaLa land I don’t even think you realize it. Just imagine if it was a left winger making your ridiculous argument. You’d be going nuts on them. Instead you are just going nuts.

How did the bomb squad "detonate" them without using additional explosives? Faux is claiming the mechanics built into the bomb were used to make them explode. He denies that the bomb squad used additional explosives. If you know how that was accomplished, please let us know. Otherwise you will go down as being even dumber than Faux.

The bomb had a detonator and explosives. It did not require any additional explosives to set it off. You are unbelievably rightarded.

Actually it's not clear that the bomb did have a detonator. Assuming it did, how did the bomb squad trigger the detonator without blowing themselves up? You keep evading an answer to that question.

The additional explosives are used because the bomb squad doesn't want to push the "blow up the bomb" button with their fingers.

Bombs can be triggered by spark or friction. Why does it matter how the FBI did it? The bombs were real. If you are going to try and stay with the hoax narrative then you are continuing to sound like a fool

 

[Slade3200]

Faux's claim is that the fact that the bomb squad "detonated" them proved they were real bombs. The bomb squad said they didn't know if the bombs were fake. Both those facts prove Faux is an idiot, and so are you for defending him.

The bomb squad said that more than one of the bombs were too unstable to transport back to headquarters so they were remotely detonated. They don’t do that to fake bombs. Official statements have been made confirming that the bombs contain explosives by Chris Wray, trumps FBI Director. The man accused of making them and sending them has been charged on counts of sending explosive devices, not fake bombs.

Last but not least... You’re and idiot

They do it all the time, moron. Blowing up a suspicious package is normally the safest course of action. Those griping dramas they show on TV where the hero saves everyone by cutting the blue wire just before the digital timer reaches zero are 99% bullshit. Normally what they do is just blow the thing up.

The bombs were said to contain "pyrotechnic powder." That's not the kind of thing that blows up from the slightest bump. They also weren't hooked up to any kind of functional detonator. They were fake.

There's no such charge as "sending fake bombs," so what do you imagine they are going to charge him with? Every way you look at it, you and Faux are full of shit.

Ok buddy... send a link to where you got that intel and I’ll easily show you why you are full of shit. Let me guess. Somebody looked at a photo and fed you that BS talking point. Prove me wrong

If the fucking moron could have posted even one single link claiming "other explosives" were used to detonate that bomb, he would have. He posts feigned bluster instead because there are no articles describing what he's claiming. Not one.

Only a moron would think that posting a link is required to prove that your claims are idiotic.

Here are the two questions you refuse to answer because you can't.

1. How did the police cause the bomb's fusing mechanism to "detonate" the bomb?
2. Why did the police say they didn't know whether the bomb was fake when they supposedly knew how to trigger the fuse?

I’ll answer:
1. The detonate by applying spark or friction to the explosive element. There are a variety of ways to do this. Why do you care how?

2. I don’t know what police statement you are talking about, how about you post the quote. I do know that Jeff Sessions and Chris Wray made a public statement specifically saying the the bombs contained explosive material, timers and wiring and they were not a hoax or fake.

 

[bripat9643]

They use explosives to blow it up. You don't actually believe they flip some switch or cut some wire to make the bomb go off, do you? You're as dumb as that idiot Faux.

No man, you’re proving to take the idiot award all on your own. You honestly think the FBI got a harmless arrangement of pipes and wires, deemed a few of the bombs unstable and too risky to transport for no reason and then detonated them?!

You are so deep in LaLa land I don’t even think you realize it. Just imagine if it was a left winger making your ridiculous argument. You’d be going nuts on them. Instead you are just going nuts.

How did the bomb squad "detonate" them without using additional explosives? Faux is claiming the mechanics built into the bomb were used to make them explode. He denies that the bomb squad used additional explosives. If you know how that was accomplished, please let us know. Otherwise you will go down as being even dumber than Faux.

The bomb had a detonator and explosives. It did not require any additional explosives to set it off. You are unbelievably rightarded.

Actually it's not clear that the bomb did have a detonator. Assuming it did, how did the bomb squad trigger the detonator without blowing themselves up? You keep evading an answer to that question.

The additional explosives are used because the bomb squad doesn't want to push the "blow up the bomb" button with their fingers.

Bombs can be triggered by spark, friction, or other explosives. Why does it matter. The bombs were real. If you are going to try and stay with the hoax narrative then you are continuing to sound like a fool

Wrong, turd. We don't know whether the bombs were real. That's part of what we're trying to establish here. You don't get to beg the question by assuming your conclusion is correct.

The question here is how the bomb squad triggered the bomb. Faux claims the fact the bomb squad "detonated" them proves they are real. Of course, he doesn't want to have an anyone examine that claim because the result shows that he's an idiot.

We have reached the stage in Faux threads where he continues to repeat the same already discredited argument over and over again. You and he simply will not respond to any questions on your "logic" because you know it's bogus.

If you are agreeing with Faux, a proven fool, then you are one also. You're obviously as stupid as he is, because you don't even understand the point of the questions.

 

[Slade3200]

No man, you’re proving to take the idiot award all on your own. You honestly think the FBI got a harmless arrangement of pipes and wires, deemed a few of the bombs unstable and too risky to transport for no reason and then detonated them?!

You are so deep in LaLa land I don’t even think you realize it. Just imagine if it was a left winger making your ridiculous argument. You’d be going nuts on them. Instead you are just going nuts.

How did the bomb squad "detonate" them without using additional explosives? Faux is claiming the mechanics built into the bomb were used to make them explode. He denies that the bomb squad used additional explosives. If you know how that was accomplished, please let us know. Otherwise you will go down as being even dumber than Faux.

The bomb had a detonator and explosives. It did not require any additional explosives to set it off. You are unbelievably rightarded.

Actually it's not clear that the bomb did have a detonator. Assuming it did, how did the bomb squad trigger the detonator without blowing themselves up? You keep evading an answer to that question.

The additional explosives are used because the bomb squad doesn't want to push the "blow up the bomb" button with their fingers.

Bombs can be triggered by spark, friction, or other explosives. Why does it matter. The bombs were real. If you are going to try and stay with the hoax narrative then you are continuing to sound like a fool

Wrong, turd. We don't know whether the bombs were real. That's part of what we're trying to establish here. You don't get to beg the question by assuming your conclusion is correct.

The question here is how the bomb squad triggered the bomb. Faux claims the fact the bomb squad "detonated" them proves they are real. Of course, he doesn't want to have an anyone examine that claim because the result shows that he's an idiot.

We have reached the stage in Faux threads where he continues to repeat the same already discredited argument over and over again. You and he simply will not respond to any questions on your "logic" because you know it's bogus.

If you are agreeing with Faux, a proven fool, then you are one also. You're obviously as stupid as he is, because you don't even understand the point of the questions.

I pointed to statements made by trumps appointed directors of the DOJ and FBI saying that the bombs were not a hoax. What are you pointing to?

I don’t care about the semantics game you and faux are playing about how they were detonated. I’m looking at what matters. Were the bombs real or not. Puppets like you tried to say they were fakes and sent by Dems to help with the election. That conspiracy deflection theory has long passed. Yeah, you lost this one pages ago

 

[bripat9643]

The bomb squad said that more than one of the bombs were too unstable to transport back to headquarters so they were remotely detonated. They don’t do that to fake bombs. Official statements have been made confirming that the bombs contain explosives by Chris Wray, trumps FBI Director. The man accused of making them and sending them has been charged on counts of sending explosive devices, not fake bombs.

Last but not least... You’re and idiot

They do it all the time, moron. Blowing up a suspicious package is normally the safest course of action. Those griping dramas they show on TV where the hero saves everyone by cutting the blue wire just before the digital timer reaches zero are 99% bullshit. Normally what they do is just blow the thing up.

The bombs were said to contain "pyrotechnic powder." That's not the kind of thing that blows up from the slightest bump. They also weren't hooked up to any kind of functional detonator. They were fake.

There's no such charge as "sending fake bombs," so what do you imagine they are going to charge him with? Every way you look at it, you and Faux are full of shit.

Ok buddy... send a link to where you got that intel and I’ll easily show you why you are full of shit. Let me guess. Somebody looked at a photo and fed you that BS talking point. Prove me wrong

If the fucking moron could have posted even one single link claiming "other explosives" were used to detonate that bomb, he would have. He posts feigned bluster instead because there are no articles describing what he's claiming. Not one.

Only a moron would think that posting a link is required to prove that your claims are idiotic.

Here are the two questions you refuse to answer because you can't.

1. How did the police cause the bomb's fusing mechanism to "detonate" the bomb?
2. Why did the police say they didn't know whether the bomb was fake when they supposedly knew how to trigger the fuse?

I’ll answer:
1. The detonate by applying spark or friction to the explosive element. There are a variety of ways to do this. Why do you care how?

What did they "apply spark or friction" to? What "explosive element?" if you mean the "pyrotechnic material," that doesn't prove the bomb was functional since the bomb techs would be bypassing the fusing mechanism intended to set off the bomb. How did they "apply spark or friction" to material that was inside a plastic pipe?

Furthermore, you have no fucking idea how they set it off because the method was never discussed. However, anyone who knows anything about how bomb squads operate knows they used additional explosives with their own fusing mechanism.

2. I don’t know what police statement you are talking about, how about you post the quote. I do know that Jeff Sessions and Chris Wray made a public statement specifically saying the the bombs contained explosive material, timers and wiring and they were not a hoax or fake.

They contained "pyrotechnic material." Along with a timer and wiring, that doesn't mean the bomb was functional. The other bombs included a timer that didn't have an alarm function. That can't set off a bomb. Furthermore, detonating it by "applying spark or friction" certainly wouldn't prove it was a functioning bomb.

 

[Slade3200]

They do it all the time, moron. Blowing up a suspicious package is normally the safest course of action. Those griping dramas they show on TV where the hero saves everyone by cutting the blue wire just before the digital timer reaches zero are 99% bullshit. Normally what they do is just blow the thing up.

The bombs were said to contain "pyrotechnic powder." That's not the kind of thing that blows up from the slightest bump. They also weren't hooked up to any kind of functional detonator. They were fake.

There's no such charge as "sending fake bombs," so what do you imagine they are going to charge him with? Every way you look at it, you and Faux are full of shit.

Ok buddy... send a link to where you got that intel and I’ll easily show you why you are full of shit. Let me guess. Somebody looked at a photo and fed you that BS talking point. Prove me wrong

If the fucking moron could have posted even one single link claiming "other explosives" were used to detonate that bomb, he would have. He posts feigned bluster instead because there are no articles describing what he's claiming. Not one.

Only a moron would think that posting a link is required to prove that your claims are idiotic.

Here are the two questions you refuse to answer because you can't.

1. How did the police cause the bomb's fusing mechanism to "detonate" the bomb?
2. Why did the police say they didn't know whether the bomb was fake when they supposedly knew how to trigger the fuse?

I’ll answer:
1. The detonate by applying spark or friction to the explosive element. There are a variety of ways to do this. Why do you care how?

What did they "apply spark or friction" to? What "explosive element?" if you mean the "pyrotechnic material," that doesn't prove the bomb was functional since the bomb techs would be bypassing the fusing mechanism intended to set off the bomb. How did they "apply spark or friction" to material that was inside a plastic pipe?

Furthermore, you have no fucking idea how they set it off because the method was never discussed. However, anyone who knows anything about how bomb squads operate knows they used additional explosives with their own fusing mechanism.

2. I don’t know what police statement you are talking about, how about you post the quote. I do know that Jeff Sessions and Chris Wray made a public statement specifically saying the the bombs contained explosive material, timers and wiring and they were not a hoax or fake.

They contained "pyrotechnic material." Along with a timer and wiring, that doesn't mean the bomb was functional. The other bombs included a timer that didn't have an alarm function. That can't set off a bomb. Furthermore, detonating it by "applying spark or friction" certainly wouldn't prove it was a functioning bomb.

Seriously man where are you trying to go with this? You are on a dead end street. Sessions and Wray said that the bombs were not a hoax. They were real, end of story. Do you think they are lying?? Who cares if they were poorly constructed? Who cares how they were detonated by the FBI? Those are desperate attempts for you to pivot away from your stupid implication that they were fake bombs sent by the Dems to help an election. Go stand in the corner for a bit and reflect on how dumb you are sounding.

 

[bripat9643]

How did the bomb squad "detonate" them without using additional explosives? Faux is claiming the mechanics built into the bomb were used to make them explode. He denies that the bomb squad used additional explosives. If you know how that was accomplished, please let us know. Otherwise you will go down as being even dumber than Faux.

The bomb had a detonator and explosives. It did not require any additional explosives to set it off. You are unbelievably rightarded.

Actually it's not clear that the bomb did have a detonator. Assuming it did, how did the bomb squad trigger the detonator without blowing themselves up? You keep evading an answer to that question.

The additional explosives are used because the bomb squad doesn't want to push the "blow up the bomb" button with their fingers.

Bombs can be triggered by spark, friction, or other explosives. Why does it matter. The bombs were real. If you are going to try and stay with the hoax narrative then you are continuing to sound like a fool

Wrong, turd. We don't know whether the bombs were real. That's part of what we're trying to establish here. You don't get to beg the question by assuming your conclusion is correct.

The question here is how the bomb squad triggered the bomb. Faux claims the fact the bomb squad "detonated" them proves they are real. Of course, he doesn't want to have an anyone examine that claim because the result shows that he's an idiot.

We have reached the stage in Faux threads where he continues to repeat the same already discredited argument over and over again. You and he simply will not respond to any questions on your "logic" because you know it's bogus.

If you are agreeing with Faux, a proven fool, then you are one also. You're obviously as stupid as he is, because you don't even understand the point of the questions.

I pointed to statements made by trumps appointed directors of the DOJ and FBI saying that the bombs were not a hoax. What are you pointing to?

I don’t care about the semantics game you and faux are playing about how they were detonated. I’m looking at what matters. Were the bombs real or not. Puppets like you tried to say they were fakes and sent by Dems to help with the election. That conspiracy deflection theory has long passed. Yeah, you lost this one pages ago

Statements by political appointees on technical issues don't prove a fucking thing.

The whole point of this thread is whether the bombs were real or not, dumbass. If you aren't interested in that subject, then shut the fuck up and get lost. So far, all the evidence indicates they weren't capable of self detonating. In other words, they were fake. Whether the Dims are responsible isn't being discussed.

 

[bripat9643]

Ok buddy... send a link to where you got that intel and I’ll easily show you why you are full of shit. Let me guess. Somebody looked at a photo and fed you that BS talking point. Prove me wrong

If the fucking moron could have posted even one single link claiming "other explosives" were used to detonate that bomb, he would have. He posts feigned bluster instead because there are no articles describing what he's claiming. Not one.

Only a moron would think that posting a link is required to prove that your claims are idiotic.

Here are the two questions you refuse to answer because you can't.

1. How did the police cause the bomb's fusing mechanism to "detonate" the bomb?
2. Why did the police say they didn't know whether the bomb was fake when they supposedly knew how to trigger the fuse?

I’ll answer:
1. The detonate by applying spark or friction to the explosive element. There are a variety of ways to do this. Why do you care how?

What did they "apply spark or friction" to? What "explosive element?" if you mean the "pyrotechnic material," that doesn't prove the bomb was functional since the bomb techs would be bypassing the fusing mechanism intended to set off the bomb. How did they "apply spark or friction" to material that was inside a plastic pipe?

Furthermore, you have no fucking idea how they set it off because the method was never discussed. However, anyone who knows anything about how bomb squads operate knows they used additional explosives with their own fusing mechanism.

2. I don’t know what police statement you are talking about, how about you post the quote. I do know that Jeff Sessions and Chris Wray made a public statement specifically saying the the bombs contained explosive material, timers and wiring and they were not a hoax or fake.

They contained "pyrotechnic material." Along with a timer and wiring, that doesn't mean the bomb was functional. The other bombs included a timer that didn't have an alarm function. That can't set off a bomb. Furthermore, detonating it by "applying spark or friction" certainly wouldn't prove it was a functioning bomb.

Seriously man where are you trying to go with this? You are on a dead end street. Sessions and Wray said that the bombs were not a hoax. They were real, end of story. Do you think they are lying?? Who cares if they were poorly constructed? Who cares how they were detonated by the FBI? Those are desperate attempts for you to pivot away from your stupid implication that they were fake bombs sent by the Dems to help an election. Go stand in the corner for a bit and reflect on how dumb you are sounding.

Sessions and Wray are a couple of politicians who say what they think they are supposed to say. The subject of this thread is whether the bombs were capable of exploding on their own. All the evidence indicates they weren't, which means the targets were in no danger.

I haven't claimed they were sent by Dims. That's purely your spin.

Only a snowflake would claim that pointing out facts makes you sound stupid.

 

[Slade3200]

The bomb had a detonator and explosives. It did not require any additional explosives to set it off. You are unbelievably rightarded.

Actually it's not clear that the bomb did have a detonator. Assuming it did, how did the bomb squad trigger the detonator without blowing themselves up? You keep evading an answer to that question.

The additional explosives are used because the bomb squad doesn't want to push the "blow up the bomb" button with their fingers.

Bombs can be triggered by spark, friction, or other explosives. Why does it matter. The bombs were real. If you are going to try and stay with the hoax narrative then you are continuing to sound like a fool

Wrong, turd. We don't know whether the bombs were real. That's part of what we're trying to establish here. You don't get to beg the question by assuming your conclusion is correct.

The question here is how the bomb squad triggered the bomb. Faux claims the fact the bomb squad "detonated" them proves they are real. Of course, he doesn't want to have an anyone examine that claim because the result shows that he's an idiot.

We have reached the stage in Faux threads where he continues to repeat the same already discredited argument over and over again. You and he simply will not respond to any questions on your "logic" because you know it's bogus.

If you are agreeing with Faux, a proven fool, then you are one also. You're obviously as stupid as he is, because you don't even understand the point of the questions.

I pointed to statements made by trumps appointed directors of the DOJ and FBI saying that the bombs were not a hoax. What are you pointing to?

I don’t care about the semantics game you and faux are playing about how they were detonated. I’m looking at what matters. Were the bombs real or not. Puppets like you tried to say they were fakes and sent by Dems to help with the election. That conspiracy deflection theory has long passed. Yeah, you lost this one pages ago

Statements by political appointees on technical issues don't matter one fucking bit.

The whole point of this thread is whether the bombs were real or not, dumbass. If you aren't interested in that subject, then shut the fuck up and get lost. So far, all the evidence indicates they weren't capable of self detonating. In other words, they were fake. Whether the Dims are responsible isn't being discussed.

Wrong. Statements made by the directors of the DOJ and FBI hold a hell of a lot more weight than your idiotic analysis.

And the point of this thread which was appropriately moved into the conspiracy theory section is the implication that Dems sent Fake bombs to help them in elections. Just look at the title
Desperate Dems Faking Mailbox Bombs. "You Cannot Be Civil"

So what we know now are 3 things:
1. A trump supporting right wingnut was responsible and not the Dems
2. The bombs were not fake or a hoax, they were real and multiple were deemed unstable and were detonated, the others are being analyzed
3. You are a complete moron

 

[Slade3200]

If the fucking moron could have posted even one single link claiming "other explosives" were used to detonate that bomb, he would have. He posts feigned bluster instead because there are no articles describing what he's claiming. Not one.

Only a moron would think that posting a link is required to prove that your claims are idiotic.

Here are the two questions you refuse to answer because you can't.

1. How did the police cause the bomb's fusing mechanism to "detonate" the bomb?
2. Why did the police say they didn't know whether the bomb was fake when they supposedly knew how to trigger the fuse?

I’ll answer:
1. The detonate by applying spark or friction to the explosive element. There are a variety of ways to do this. Why do you care how?

What did they "apply spark or friction" to? What "explosive element?" if you mean the "pyrotechnic material," that doesn't prove the bomb was functional since the bomb techs would be bypassing the fusing mechanism intended to set off the bomb. How did they "apply spark or friction" to material that was inside a plastic pipe?

Furthermore, you have no fucking idea how they set it off because the method was never discussed. However, anyone who knows anything about how bomb squads operate knows they used additional explosives with their own fusing mechanism.

2. I don’t know what police statement you are talking about, how about you post the quote. I do know that Jeff Sessions and Chris Wray made a public statement specifically saying the the bombs contained explosive material, timers and wiring and they were not a hoax or fake.

They contained "pyrotechnic material." Along with a timer and wiring, that doesn't mean the bomb was functional. The other bombs included a timer that didn't have an alarm function. That can't set off a bomb. Furthermore, detonating it by "applying spark or friction" certainly wouldn't prove it was a functioning bomb.

Seriously man where are you trying to go with this? You are on a dead end street. Sessions and Wray said that the bombs were not a hoax. They were real, end of story. Do you think they are lying?? Who cares if they were poorly constructed? Who cares how they were detonated by the FBI? Those are desperate attempts for you to pivot away from your stupid implication that they were fake bombs sent by the Dems to help an election. Go stand in the corner for a bit and reflect on how dumb you are sounding.

Sessions and Wray are a couple of politicians who say what they think they are supposed to say. The subject of this thread is whether the bombs were capable of exploding on their own. All the evidence indicates they weren't, which means the targets were in no danger.

I haven't claimed they were sent by Dims. That's purely your spin.

Only a snowflake would claim that pointing out facts makes you sound stupid.

Look at the title of the thread dumbshit.

 

[Faun]

If the fucking moron could have posted even one single link claiming "other explosives" were used to detonate that bomb, he would have. He posts feigned bluster instead because there are no articles describing what he's claiming. Not one.

Only a moron would think that posting a link is required to prove that your claims are idiotic.

If your bullshit resembled reality, you'd be able to corroborate it. Why would anyone take the word of a fucking moron like you with absolutely zero corroboration?

You have to be an enormous dumbfuck to believe that an internet link is the sum total of reality.

I'm not asking anyone to take my word for anything, moron. I'm asking you to answer some very simple questions that you should have the answers to if you were correct. You obviously can't answer them.

LOLOL

Fucking moron, those links are to the press reporting the police informed them they detonated the bomb.

Who do you think you're fooling, moron? Answer the questions I asked, or shut the fuck up.

LOLOL

Fucking moron, I'll do neither. And why should I? I've already backed what I said with a multitude of links spanning from the left to the right.

You? Nada. Zip. Zilch.

You have nothing to back your claims except for you backing your claims. And you're a fucking moron. That's why you're screeching like a banshee.

 

[Faun]

Fucking moron, police detonated bombs all the time. They’re smarter than you. Infinitely smarter. Meaning unlike you, they know how to detonate a bomb without killing themselves.

They also blow up "suspicious" backages all the time. Using the appeal to authority is a non sequitur in this discussion, moron. No one is disputing what the police said. What were disputing is your idiotic understanding of what they said. Your pathetic straw man attacks aren't fooling anyone.

LOL

Cries the fucking moron who appeals to his own made up bullshit.

Have you forgotten? You never were able to produce a single link which shows the police blew up a harmless, non-explosive, envelope using "other explosives."

You bullshitted and got caught. Now you're whining incessantly hoping that will suffice in lieu of your inability to prove your bullshit.

You keep asking for a link because you can't answer the questions that prove you're an idiot. Very simple logic proves you are wrong, but that's exactly why you can't figure it out.

LOL

Fucking moron, there’s no question of yours I need to answer. My many links corroborated my claims. The only one corroborating yours is you and you’re a fucking moron.

ROFL! Thanks for confirming that you're afraid to answer the questions. Of course, you can't answer them except by admitting that you've been posting pure horseshit since you chimed in on this thread.

Fucking moron, when are you going to prove your bullshit?

Oh, never.

I have no need to prove you wrong simply because you can't prove yourself right.