Dershowitz — I am scared of the Democrat party.

[EvilCat Breath]

I think that if a poor public defender is good enough for poor people, they should be good enough for rich murderers like OJ and von Bulow.

These guys weren't innocent, they had teams of lawyers who gamed the system in their favor.

So no private attorneys.

 

[JohnDB]

Democrats R Dumb

I knew it was a thing....and I've seen a few corporations move....most of that is just publicity for politicians who give them tax breaks to move....

But

To actually have enough multi million+ dollar mansions sell to affect national sales price indexes....

That's a lot of tax flights

But speaking of such things....
I wonder if they found a place to house their private planes.

 

[struth]

This is the guy who fought for the rights of guys like OJ and Von Bulow to murder their wives with no consequence.

He fought for their rights, which included making the govt prove their allegations beyond a reasonable doubt

The fact that bothers you, is why normal people are scared of your demafascit party

 

[MarcATL]

The biggest psy-op in American, and perhaps world, history.

If you read his lips closely you'll see he's screaming "STAGED! STAGED! STAGED!"

 

[Lockback]

The biggest psy-op in American, and perhaps world, history.

If you read his lips closely you'll see he's screaming "STAGED! STAGED! STAGED!"

Says our Resident Crackpot ...

 

[Luckyone]

Welcome to our world, Alan. The Left is one of the most destructive entities in human history.

First of all, Dershowitz left the Dem's due to what he conceived to be an anti-Israel mood. Dershowitz is a Jew himself and as such, very sensitive to that issue.

Nonetheless: While he has shifted to the Republican party, Dershowitz has noted that he still disagrees with the GOP on issues like abortion, immigration, and taxes, but is prioritizing the Israel issue. He has stated that his goal is to help ensure the Democrats lose control of Congress, hoping this will force them to move back to the political center.

It is important to note that the shift has not been against the Jews but against Netanyahu's approach and actions against Gaza, which have been (in my opinion) way overdone and should be criticized.

AI Overview

Based on data up to early May 2026, the Democratic Party has experienced a significant shift towards opposing the actions of the Israeli government, rather than a monolithic move against Jewish people as a group.

In addition, and addressing the shifts from one party to the other since 2016, here is a VERY TELLING statistic:

Educational and Racial Shifts: White voters without a college degree have moved toward the Republican Party, while white college-educated voters have trended toward the Democratic Party.

This means the Republican party has seen more dumb people that can't think move over to them, the Democrats are getting smarter.

 

[JoeB131]

So no private attorneys.

Justice shouldn't be for sale.

 

[JoeB131]

He fought for their rights, which included making the govt prove their allegations beyond a reasonable doubt

The fact that bothers you, is why normal people are scared of your demafascit party

Except that's not what happened in either case.

In the case of Von Bulow, they had that guy dead to rights. Found the syringe he used to put his wife into a fatal coma in his bathroom. But because it was found by a private investigator hired by the wife's children, Dershashitz got it thrown out.

In the case of Simpson, he and the Dream Team played the race card.

 

[struth]

Except that's not what happened in either case.

In the case of Von Bulow, they had that guy dead to rights. Found the syringe he used to put his wife into a fatal coma in his bathroom. But because it was found by a private investigator hired by the wife's children, Dershashitz got it thrown out.

In the case of Simpson, he and the Dream Team played the race card.

Haha. Of course it’s what happened in both cases, they had jury trials. Cases were litigated.

Van Bulow was tried a second time because the court of appeals found error and he was acquitted by a jury in the second trial

I get you hate our democratic system and hate the fact that you can’t just lock up whomever you accuse and dislike due process and the rule of law…it’s apparent

 

[Crepitus]

Sweet. When do we see Hillary Clinton, Barry Obumma, Joe Biden, Mayorkas, Nancy, Cole Allen and about 30 other democrats all get the electric chair?

I love the smell of burning flesh and dim, flickering lights in the morning.

You won't. None of them committed treason.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Justice shouldn't be for sale.

Without lawyers, what would your justice look like? Can't have judges either because like lawyers, Judges are both good and bad, knowledgeable and dense.

 

[JoeB131]

Haha. Of course it’s what happened in both cases, they had jury trials. Cases were litigated.

Van Bulow was tried a second time because the court of appeals found error and he was acquitted by a jury in the second trial

you mean after evidence was thrown out because Dershie gave them some song and dance about justice being for sale if you hire your own investigators.

I get you hate our democratic system and hate the fact that you can’t just lock up whomever you accuse and dislike due process and the rule of law…it’s apparent

Your argument would be great if innocent people were freed.

Except they weren't. We know OJ was guilty. He later admitted as much. We know that Von Bulow was guility.

Guilty men walking free is a failure of our system.

 

[struth]

you mean after evidence was thrown out because Dershie gave them some song and dance about justice being for sale if you hire your own investigators.



Your argument would be great if innocent people were freed.

Except they weren't. We know OJ was guilty. He later admitted as much. We know that Von Bulow was guility.

Guilty men walking free is a failure of our system.

1) why can’t someone hire their own investigators? Are we all suppose to simply relay on who the govt says did it? You really have a problem with people defending themselves from accusations i see
2) innocent people are freed, often…even after wrongfully convicted
3) the govt couldn’t prove it. That seems to be your problem, you have a issue with due process

 

[JoeB131]

1) why can’t someone hire their own investigators? Are we all suppose to simply relay on who the govt says did it? You really have a problem with people defending themselves from accusations i see
2) innocent people are freed, often…even after wrongfully convicted
3) the govt couldn’t prove it. That seems to be your problem, you have a issue with due process

You missed the point. Sunny's children DID hire their own investigators. The investigators found evidence that caught old Claus with his dick in his hand. (I.E. a syringe full of insulin with his fingerprints and her blood on it). But because they were hired by her children, POS Dershowitz went to court and claimed the evidence was invalid

The government proved it just fine. Then Dershie used some trickery to get him off the hook.

 

[struth]

You missed the point. Sunny's children DID hire their own investigators. The investigators found evidence that caught old Claus with his dick in his hand. (I.E. a syringe full of insulin with his fingerprints and her blood on it). But because they were hired by her children, POS Dershowitz went to court and claimed the evidence was invalid

The government proved it just fine. Then Dershie used some trickery to get him off the hook.

1) that’s actually not what happened. It was tossed because they lied. You think it’s ok to fabricate evidence because you think someone is guilty?
2) no they didn’t, hence why the jury found him not guilty. In fact 8 experts testified she was never given insulin

 

[22lcidw]

you mean after evidence was thrown out because Dershie gave them some song and dance about justice being for sale if you hire your own investigators.



Your argument would be great if innocent people were freed.

Except they weren't. We know OJ was guilty. He later admitted as much. We know that Von Bulow was guility.

Guilty men walking free is a failure of our system.

Many people liked OJ. Of course, the "he was one of the good ones" crap rose up against white people. OJ just did not murder two people. It was not a cleaner death with a handgun or rifle. He butchered them. For him to do that he had to be in pure rage. So, what do you do? You get undereducated people from the inner cities who have gripes of their own and convince them of certain elements of the crime and he walks free. When the time comes and we are poor enough, we will reap what we sow on the way people treat each other. For all of you who think we have evolved. The devolving will be quick and apparent.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Dershowitz is a HITLER NAZI ZIONIST!

 

[JoeB131]

1) that’s actually not what happened. It was tossed because they lied. You think it’s ok to fabricate evidence because you think someone is guilty?
2) no they didn’t, hence why the jury found him not guilty. In fact 8 experts testified she was never given insulin

Except nobody fabricated evidence.

You can hire an "expert" to tell you the moon is made of green cheese if you pay them enough.

Von Bulow was as guilty as shit, and Dershie got him off.

 

[struth]

Except nobody fabricated evidence.

You can hire an "expert" to tell you the moon is made of green cheese if you pay them enough.

Von Bulow was as guilty as shit, and Dershie got him off.

The court of appeals disagreed.

Or investagors as the court of appeals found

Maybe, so what? In our constitutional system it’s the duty od the govt to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, and in doing so not violate the rights of the accused. The govt couldn’t do that.

I get in your Demafasict belief system that shouldn’t be the case.

 

[JoeB131]

The court of appeals disagreed.

Or investagors as the court of appeals found

Maybe, so what? In our constitutional system it’s the duty od the govt to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, and in doing so not violate the rights of the accused. The govt couldn’t do that.

I get in your Demafasict belief system that shouldn’t be the case.

Except they proved it beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury found him guilty because... he was guilty.

Then Dershawitz confused the issue with bullshit.