Zone1 Dennis Prager after his accident



Dennis says some profound things in this interview. Among them is the importance of the Judeo-Christian influence within the US. Being a Jew himself, Dennis says he has more in common with Christian conservatives than he does his secular Jewish friends who are Leftists.

As he rightly points out, the Founding Fathers believed that only a moral and religious people could obtain and keep freedom and the Constitution.


Dennis puts it like this, wisdom can only come from God, and through Godly wisdom comes what is good for society.

He also says that Islam does not believe in the same God, which is why the societies they run are oppressive hell holes that lead the world in terrorism.

I can't really argue, and is why Charlie Kirk was out their putting his life on the line every day like the Founding Fathers did to start the Republic

Not many people realize that the Founding Fathers risked, not only their fortune, but their very lives to fight a war that they should never have won on paper.

Prager is making money off the rubes hand over fist.
 
Muslims believe in monolithic G-d too so we all believe in the same G-d. I can't prove it but I have read enough about the history of power and influence campaigns to believe that perhaps Jewish leaders and Christian leaders found (find?) the other religion as some minor threat to their doctrine. Then of course there is the history of the fake Christians of WWII from Germany and the Catholic church lead by the Pope quietly.supporting the Holocaust. With the rise of communism, Marxism and the far-left extremists around.the globe, often supported by foreign governments; it is far better, perhaps.critical that people of faith unite rather than engage in theological differences. Jews and Christians are the easiest match as one rose.from the other. Many Christians read the Old Testament and accept a Rabbi as their Messiah, a man related to Abraham. As.an aside I heard Prager fell, I dont know the details.but he apparently improved from a worse state from what I heard.
Christians did not go through the Bible with a bottle of "white out" to fix the corrupt false passages, which is what Mouhammad and Islam claim. Other cults have done this as well.

For example, the notion that God put another man on the cross instead of Jesus is blatantly absurd and offensive.

Mohammad was born some 500 years plus after Jesus cannot come and rewrite his life. He can, but again, it's just absurd.

But there are also the prophets before Jesus who were routinely rounded up and oppressed or murdered themselves, like the prophet Jeremiah, which is the problem for Mohammad theologically. Why does he not fit the mold of the prophets that came before him as he converted with the sword instead? In fact, the OT speaks of the Messiah who is to come, but not a word about Mohammad who supposedly fixed the entire Bible, making it all true once again.

Hitler also claimed he followed the God of the Bible, but he too found the Bible to be "corrupted". In fact, his favorite verse was about Jesus chasing out the money changers with a whip because the Jews there were so corrupt. But the rest of the text he simply ignored as false as he probably viewed is as corrupted by the dirty Jews like Mohammad thought.

Interestingly enough, Hitler wished that he had been born in a culture with Islam instead of Christianity.




HITLER'S ADMIRATION FOR ISLAM
According to Minister of Armaments and War Production Albert Speer, Hitler wished that the Caliphate had won the Battle of Tours against the Franks in 732: "The Mohammedan religion would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"[193] "Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers — already, you see, the world had fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing was Christianity ! — then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies heroism and which opens the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so."[194] According to Speer, Hitler was convinced that had Islam taken root in central Europe at this time, the Germanic people would have become the "heirs of that religion" with Islam being "perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament".

I view Hitler and Mohammad in much the same light, even though Mohammad did not murder as many people as Hitler and even though Hitler did not marry a 6 year old girl. Both claimed the Bible as the truth but only after pointing out where it errors and both hated Jews.

But you get the idea, even though both claimed to follow the God of the Bible, neither did.

So why did the Bible not mention Mohammad then since he has effected the world in such a horrendous way? Well, there is the false prophet in Revelation, which is what I peg Mohammad to have been.
 
Last edited:
Christians did not go through the Bible with a bottle of "white out" to fix the corrupt false passages, which is what Mouhammad and Islam claim. Other cults have done this as well.

For example, the notion that God put another man on the cross instead of Jesus is blatantly absurd and offensive.

A man who was born some 500 years plus after Jesus cannot come and rewrite his life. He can, but again, it's just absurd.

But there are also the prophets before Jesus who were routinely rounded up and oppressed or murdered themselves, like the prophet Jeremiah, which is the problem for Mohammad theologically. Why does he not fit the mold of the prophets that came before him as he converted with the sword instead? In fact, the OT speaks of the Messiah who is to come, but not a word about Mohammad who supposedly fixed the entire Bible, making it all true once again.

Hitler also claimed he followed the God of the Bible, but he too found the Bible to be "corrupted". In fact, his favorite verse was about Jesus chasing out the money changers with a whip because the Jews there were so corrupt. But the rest of the text he simply ignored as false as he probably viewed is as corrupted by the dirty Jews like Mohammad thought.

Interestingly enough, Hitler wished that he had been born in a culture with Islam instead of Christianity.




HITLER'S ADMIRATION FOR ISLAM
According to Minister of Armaments and War Production Albert Speer, Hitler wished that the Caliphate had won the Battle of Tours against the Franks in 732: "The Mohammedan religion would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"[193] "Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers — already, you see, the world had fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing was Christianity ! — then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies heroism and which opens the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so."[194] According to Speer, Hitler was convinced that had Islam taken root in central Europe at this time, the Germanic people would have become the "heirs of that religion" with Islam being "perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament".

I view Hitler and Mohammad in much the same light, even though Mohammad did not murder as many people as Hitler and even though Hitler did not marry a 6 year old girl. Both claimed the Bible as the truth but only after pointing out where it errors.

But you get the idea, even though both claimed to follow the God of the Bible, neither did.

So why did the Bible not mention Mohammad then since he has effected the world in such a horrendous way? Well, there is the false prophet in Revelation, which is what I peg Mohammad to have been.
Where is the source for this quote|
 


Dennis says some profound things in this interview. Among them is the importance of the Judeo-Christian influence within the US. Being a Jew himself, Dennis says he has more in common with Christian conservatives than he does his secular Jewish friends who are Leftists.

As he rightly points out, the Founding Fathers believed that only a moral and religious people could obtain and keep freedom and the Constitution.


Dennis puts it like this, wisdom can only come from God, and through Godly wisdom comes what is good for society.

He also says that Islam does not believe in the same God, which is why the societies they run are oppressive hell holes that lead the world in terrorism.

I can't really argue, and is why Charlie Kirk was out their putting his life on the line every day like the Founding Fathers did to start the Republic

Not many people realize that the Founding Fathers risked, not only their fortune, but their very lives to fight a war that they should never have won on paper.

This man was and is now still a despicable human being. All he has ever done is demonize opponents making them out to be enemies.
 
Christians did not go through the Bible with a bottle of "white out" to fix the corrupt false passages, which is what Mouhammad and Islam claim. Other cults have done this as well.

For example, the notion that God put another man on the cross instead of Jesus is blatantly absurd and offensive.

Mohammad was born some 500 years plus after Jesus cannot come and rewrite his life. He can, but again, it's just absurd.

But there are also the prophets before Jesus who were routinely rounded up and oppressed or murdered themselves, like the prophet Jeremiah, which is the problem for Mohammad theologically. Why does he not fit the mold of the prophets that came before him as he converted with the sword instead? In fact, the OT speaks of the Messiah who is to come, but not a word about Mohammad who supposedly fixed the entire Bible, making it all true once again.

Hitler also claimed he followed the God of the Bible, but he too found the Bible to be "corrupted". In fact, his favorite verse was about Jesus chasing out the money changers with a whip because the Jews there were so corrupt. But the rest of the text he simply ignored as false as he probably viewed is as corrupted by the dirty Jews like Mohammad thought.

Interestingly enough, Hitler wished that he had been born in a culture with Islam instead of Christianity.




HITLER'S ADMIRATION FOR ISLAM
According to Minister of Armaments and War Production Albert Speer, Hitler wished that the Caliphate had won the Battle of Tours against the Franks in 732: "The Mohammedan religion would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"[193] "Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers — already, you see, the world had fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing was Christianity ! — then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies heroism and which opens the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so."[194] According to Speer, Hitler was convinced that had Islam taken root in central Europe at this time, the Germanic people would have become the "heirs of that religion" with Islam being "perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament".

I view Hitler and Mohammad in much the same light, even though Mohammad did not murder as many people as Hitler and even though Hitler did not marry a 6 year old girl. Both claimed the Bible as the truth but only after pointing out where it errors and both hated Jews.

But you get the idea, even though both claimed to follow the God of the Bible, neither did.

So why did the Bible not mention Mohammad then since he has effected the world in such a horrendous way? Well, there is the false prophet in Revelation, which is what I peg Mohammad to have been.
Good gawd!

Yet another failed attempt at an equivalency.

This comparing the Islam of then and now - leaving out you most likely are referring to the radical elements withing Islam, is akin to accusing Democrats of today with those of the Civil War era. Democrats today try and take down Statues and such honoring the Confederates and their cause.
 
Charlie and Dennis taught us to believe in free speech. They condemned silencing anybody's speech, whether it was by the federal government or by privately owned entities such as this website. So can I ask, isn't is crazy that, damn, God killed charlie, and crippled prager? In His name, we pray :eusa_pray:
Wow. You’re a hell of a scumbag.
 
It's a goddamn video you moron. You can see their lips move and the violent rhetoric come out of their mouths. I was still of the opinion that the left should be dealt with as if they had some little bit of common sense. Your comment has taken that little bit and completely annihilated it. You are officially the death of me taking any of you loons seriously.

You will now all be receiving the appropriate amount of disdain proportionate to any stupid comments you make. I wonder if I can get paid for this ? With the amount of stupidity that leaks like a sieve from the left it could be considered a full time job.

If they were in the video, you would have no problem posting the quotes.

Thanks for playing. Check please.
 
If they were in the video, you would have no problem posting the quotes.

Thanks for playing. Check please.
Why would I have to post a quote when you can watch them actually speak their violent rhetoric ?

I have to ask what the **** is wrong with you because I'm stumped.
 
Why would I have to post a quote when you can watch them actually speak their violent rhetoric ?
So the context can be fact-checked; we can look at what was said before and after. Your doctored film clips don't offer such an opportunity.
I have to ask what the **** is wrong with you because I'm stumped.
Yeah, you hate it when someone asks you to provide information....
 
Good gawd!

Yet another failed attempt at an equivalency.

This comparing the Islam of then and now - leaving out you most likely are referring to the radical elements withing Islam, is akin to accusing Democrats of today with those of the Civil War era. Democrats today try and take down Statues and such honoring the Confederates and their cause.
I would say that the vast majority of Muslims are peace loving

However, you cannot divorce the teachings of Sharia law and jihad from the religion. So long as Muslims are in the minority, they live peaceably for the most part. However, once the majority, things quickly change.

This means that of the 2 billion plus Muslims in the world today, they all desire to implement Sharia law, because Sharia law is Islam. It is a marriage of the Mosque and state. The long dream of those in Islam is worldwide Sharia law that can only occur once their numbers in each country make them the majority. As we see in countries today that already have an Islamic majority, freedom wanes significantly, especially for women and gays, etc.

But the teaching of jihad, which is essentially the right to kill based on perceived oppression, oppression which we all encounter in life, is an additional dagger into the dark soul of Islam. Granted, most sensible about the teaching and don't actually going around converting with the sword like Mohammad did, but as I have always said, mental illness and Islam is a deadly combination. Of the 2 billion plus Muslims in the world, it is a conservative estimate that about 400 million have some form of mental illness and will then act on their impulses in conjunction with the dogma they are fed about jihad. We see this pretty much every day as we just witnessed in Manchester England.
 
I would say that the vast majority of Muslims are peace loving

However, you cannot divorce the teachings of Sharia law and jihad from the religion. So long as Muslims are in the minority, they live peaceably for the most part. However, once the majority, things quickly change.

This means that of the 2 billion plus Muslims in the world today, they all desire to implement Sharia law, because Sharia law is Islam. It is a marriage of the Mosque and state. The long dream of those in Islam is worldwide Sharia law that can only occur once their numbers in each country make them the majority. As we see in countries today that already have an Islamic majority, freedom wanes significantly, especially for women and gays, etc.

But the teaching of jihad, which is essentially the right to kill based on perceived oppression, which we all encounter in life, is an additional dagger into the dark soul of Islam. Granted, most sensible about the teaching and don't actually going around converting with the sword like Mohammad did, but as I have always said, mental illness and Islam is a deadly combination. Of the 2 billion plus Muslims in the world, it is a conservative estimate that about 400 million have some form of mental illness and will then act on their impulses in conjunction with the dogma they are fed about jihad.
"Jihad" has many meanings. Sharia law? WTF is trying to make Sharia law an American thing?
 
"Jihad" has many meanings. Sharia law? WTF is trying to make Sharia law an American thing?
Muslims only make up 1 to 2% of the population in the US.

As the minority, it would be virtually impossible.

The goal then to implement it, is to increase their numbers through such things as conversion or immigration.

As we have studied the life of Mohammad, he was relatively tolerate of other religions while he was in the minority, but that ended once he became the majority.

All Islamic dominated cultures have Sharia law.
 
15th post
So the context can be fact-checked; we can look at what was said before and after. Your doctored film clips don't offer such an opportunity.

Yeah, you hate it when someone asks you to provide information....
"We are at war",
"fight them in the streets"
"kick them when they are down "
"I would like to punch him in the face"
"when is the last time an actor has assassinated a president"
"I will go and take out Trump tonight"
"You are still going to have to go out and put a bullet in Trump"

Just a few from the video. What other context could there be ? I'm thinking you didn't watch the video, you think there is nothing wrong with what the violent rhetoric from the left, or you are just willingly ignorant.
 


Dennis says some profound things in this interview. Among them is the importance of the Judeo-Christian influence within the US. Being a Jew himself, Dennis says he has more in common with Christian conservatives than he does his secular Jewish friends who are Leftists.

As he rightly points out, the Founding Fathers believed that only a moral and religious people could obtain and keep freedom and the Constitution.


Dennis puts it like this, wisdom can only come from God, and through Godly wisdom comes what is good for society.

He also says that Islam does not believe in the same God, which is why the societies they run are oppressive hell holes that lead the world in terrorism.

I can't really argue, and is why Charlie Kirk was out their putting his life on the line every day like the Founding Fathers did to start the Republic

Not many people realize that the Founding Fathers risked, not only their fortune, but their very lives to fight a war that they should never have won on paper.

Wisdom?

In the he maga that is forbidden
 
Muslims only make up 1 to 2% of the population in the US.

As the minority, it would be virtually impossible.

The goal then to implement it, is to increase their numbers through such things as conversion or immigration.

As we have studied the life of Mohammad, he was relatively tolerate of other religions while he was in the minority, but that ended once he became the majority.

All Islamic dominated cultures have Sharia law.
So, the christian crusades were what then
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom