Democrats ushered in the era of a lawless society

[P@triot]

You don’t mention why they did that! There are good reasons for doing things that Can be misinterpreted the wrong way.

You in post #535: “BS! Prove it”

You in post #540: “Well…yeah…you told the truth. But…uh….um…they had a good reason”

This is all of the typical liberal tactics. First lie & deny. And then, once facts prevent the lying, then come up with excuses.

I’m sorry, there is not a “good reason” for the Democrats to first call for an insurrection, then facilitate an actual insurrection, and then publicly cheer that insurrection. It’s disgusting.

Every thing I’ve said in this thread is 100% truth backed up by verifiable news sources. The Democrat Party has devolved into a depraved party of degenerates with no decency whatsoever.

 

[P@triot]

Sure, you know me, don’t you?

I know that when I speak 100% truth - backed up with many links - and someone yells “BS”, that they are a person who lacks all character.

 

[Luckyone]

I know that when I speak 100% truth - backed up with many links - and someone yells “BS”, that they are a person who lacks all character.

Your OP statement: " Democrats ushered in the era of a lawless society"

Here is what AI has to say about it:

AI Overview

The statement that "Democrats ushered in the era of a lawless society" is a
political opinion/claim, not a universally accepted fact. Whether it is considered "false" or "fact" depends on an individual's political perspective and the specific events or policies they choose to emphasize.

Arguments for the statement (Fact perspective)
Those who view this as a fact often cite the following arguments:

• Progressive criminal justice reforms: Critics argue that policies supported by some Democrats, such as certain bail reform laws and changes in prosecutorial discretion, have led to repeat offenders being released back onto the streets, contributing to an increase in crime rates in some cities.
• "Defund the police" movement: Opponents point to calls by some on the far-left to reduce police funding as a cause of rising crime and a demoralized police force, which they argue fosters an environment of lawlessness.
• Specific city management: The argument is often made that many major U.S. cities with the highest crime rates are run by Democratic mayors and local officials, suggesting a link between Democratic leadership and public disorder.
• Border security: Some argue that the current administration's handling of the U.S. border with Mexico, which has seen sharp increases in migrant encounters, constitutes a form of lawlessness, as people are perceived to be entering the country illegally with few consequences.

Arguments against the statement (False perspective)
Those who view this as false offer counter-arguments and different data points:

• Rule of law applies to all: Opponents argue that the U.S. remains a nation under the rule of law, and that "lawlessness" claims often ignore the complexities of the legal system and the enforcement of numerous existing laws.
• Crime is a complex issue: Factors such as economic inequality, social conditions, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic are cited as major drivers of crime, rather than the policies of a single political party.
• Historical context of "lawlessness" claims: Claims of a "lawless" society have been made across different political eras and against both parties. For example, the ACLU has raised concerns about executive power and lack of accountability as forms of lawlessness, and President Trump focused on "lawlessness" in cities and at the border during his administration.
• Both parties engage in political attacks: Democrats and Republicans both accuse the other side of undermining the rule of law through various actions, such as pardons, defiance of court orders, or political attacks on opponents, suggesting such accusations are a common political tactic rather than a unique failing of one party.

It is NOT fact but a political opinion.

The links that you put up do not prove your statement. Some of them are purely opinion that came from right-wing sites and others did not fully support your claim as they were cherry-picked scenarios that applies to specific areas and to specific people that do not support your idea that they represent the party platform.

Do you believe your arguments? Of course you do, given that you are 100% a right-wing biased person. Nonetheless, it is not fact and that was clearly outlined by the AI response. You are choosing "specific events and policies to emphasize your position and not using the WHOLE picture".

I know that you will now attack AI but the fact is that the entire nation is now using and believing in what AI represents. That is both parties using AI 100% in the future. That proves that AI is what it is supposed to be, which is a fact-searching system that provides to a high probability what the reality is.

Sorry, but this is my last response to you on this OP. There is nothing either one of us will say that the other believes. Nonetheless, I am not a biased person as my life has been 100% the search for truth. That is the basis of my life and the basis of my ability to cope with the realities of life (many are which hard to deal with) and be successful in the end. You will never convince me of a biased point of view that is based on half-truths.

End of story

 

[P@triot]

You are choosing "specific events and policies to emphasize your position and not using the WHOLE picture".

“Reality isn’t real”

The “whole” picture is the specific events that I have posted. Tons of instances that prove the reality. I don’t care if you want to deny it because it makes you uncomfortable.

 

[P@triot]

So much unnecessary suffering because the Democrats ushered in the era of a lawless society…

'Act of Terror': Trump Says National Guard Shooting Suspect Afghan Who Entered US Through Biden Program

President Trump said the suspect in the shooting of two National Guard members was let in the U.S. under a President Joe Biden program.

www.dailysignal.com

 

[P@triot]

You are choosing "specific events and policies to emphasize your position and not using the WHOLE picture".

Sorry Luckyone, denying reality doesn’t alter reality no matter how much you wish it did…

We have 600 jurisdictions in which blue cities and states say that the federal law no longer applies in their jurisdiction

600 different jurisdictions isn’t “1 or 2”. The dirt-bag Democrats ushered in the era of a lawless society

Democrats’ Dangerous Game of Federal Nullification

The Democrats and maybe the Left in general are talking about ways of undermining the jurisdiction of our own federal government.

www.dailysignal.com

 

[Luckyone]

Sorry Luckyone, denying reality doesn’t alter reality no matter how much you wish it did…

Reality is that nothing is ever perfect. This means that if you look you will always find something that supports your view. Reality is that we all have to look at the "big picture", meaning all the good things and bad things and choose the one that has the most good. As such, this response of yours is pure bullshit as you picking the bad without comparing it to the good. That is what all Trump supporters do all the time................choose to criticize the bad but never mention or look at the good.

600 different jurisdictions isn’t “1 or 2”. The dirt-bag Democrats ushered in the era of a lawless society

Democrats’ Dangerous Game of Federal Nullification

The Democrats and maybe the Left in general are talking about ways of undermining the jurisdiction of our own federal government.

www.dailysignal.com

This media (Daily Signal) is not reliable to showing correct information. They are "extremely" biased-to-the-right source, meaning this data is not believable.

Overall, we rate the Daily Signal, Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right.

 

[Luckyone]

“Reality isn’t real”

The “whole” picture is the specific events that I have posted. Tons of instances that prove the reality. I don’t care if you want to deny it because it makes you uncomfortable.

I am not denying anything. For example, my wife has a lot of things that I do not like and that can be criticized correctly. Nonetheless, the good things she has are so MUCH better than the bad things that I ignore the bad and key on the good.

You should try to do that once in a while. It is a game-changer.

 

[Luckyone]

P@triot ...........Being a patriot is caring for the entire nation and not just for those that think and agree with you. As such, you are the furthest thing from what a Patriot is. You are a biased puppet that only cares about yourself and that throws those that do not agree with you, under a bus.

A good friend of mine for 40 years and one that I respected and wished the best to, was a Republican Trump supporter. Though we disagreed vehemently on that (though I understood why he supported Trump), it never affected our friendship because we both were "caring-for-others people"

You do not show that kind of caring and that puts you in the category of people that are not worth knowing.

 

[Hafar1014]

P@triot ...........Being a patriot is caring for the entire nation and not just for those that think and agree with you. As such, you are the furthest thing from what a Patriot is. You are a biased puppet that only cares about yourself and that throws those that do not agree with you, under a bus.

A good friend of mine for 40 years and one that I respected and wished the best to, was a Republican Trump supporter. Though we disagreed vehemently on that (though I understood why he supported Trump), it never affected our friendship because we both were "caring-for-others people"

You do not show that kind of caring and that puts you in the category of people that are not worth knowing.

Democrats endorsed a Marxist for mayor of NY who hates America

 

[Luckyone]

Democrats endorsed a Marxist for mayor of NY who hates America

What a load of stupid brain thinking this post is.

Mamdani is a socialist and that is something that is a negative but it is the farthest thing from hate as it can exist. If the truly hated America, he would not be looking to help Americans through the socialism he offers. Socialism is the poor being helped at the cost of the rich and powerful. Socialism is against Capitalism but that is not against American but against Rich Americans, which by nature of their richness, many should be hated because they did take advantage or used other Americans to obtain their richness. Key word here is "many", meaning not all rich people took advantage (used) others to accomplish their goals.

This response of mine is all about "common sense" (since I do not know Mamdani personally), but then neither do you.

This idea of Mamdani hating America is purely a political view that Republicans are pushing:

AI Overview

The idea that New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani "hates America" is a claim made by his political opponents and critics, who often point to his democratic socialist views and strong criticism of Israeli government policies. Mamdani and his supporters strongly deny these accusations, characterizing them as Islamophobic and politically motivated.

Arguments Made by Critics
Those who claim Mamdani hates America generally cite the following points:

• Political Ideology: Critics label him a "radical leftist" and "socialist" who fundamentally opposes American principles, capitalism, and national identity.
• Criticism of U.S. and Israeli Policies: Opponents state that his strong anti-Zionist stance and use of terms like "genocide" to describe Israel's actions equate to anti-Americanism, linking the two countries' safety and moral order.
• Controversial Statements: Zohran Mamdani's refusal to condemn the phrase "Globalize the Intifada" (a phrase many Jewish New Yorkers view as a call for violence) when pressed in interviews has been used by critics as evidence of supporting violence and holding extreme views.
• Associations and Upbringing: Some critics link Zohran Mamdani's political brand to the "anti-American ideology" they claim his father, Mahmood Mamdani, promoted for decades.

Mamdani's Responses and Defense
Mamdani and his supporters counter these claims:

• Focus on Local Issues: His campaign primarily focused on local issues such as affordable housing, rent freezes, and free public transport, which he argues are about improving the lives of working-class New Yorkers, aligning with the principles of social and economic equality, not national hatred.
• Denial of Hatred/Antisemitism: Mamdani has tearfully stated that there is "no room for antisemitism" in the city or country and has met with Jewish leaders to build coalitions and combat hate crimes.
• Experience of Islamophobia: He has spoken emotionally about his own experiences with Islamophobia and how Muslim New Yorkers are often made to feel like "guests in our own home," suggesting his critics are using "racist, baseless attacks" to slander him.
• American Values: He has framed his democratic socialist views in terms of American values, quoting Martin Luther King Jr. on the need for a better distribution of wealth "for all of god's children in this country".

Ultimately, the claim that Mamdani hates America is part of a deeply polarized political debate, with opponents viewing his policies and views as anathema to American values, and supporters seeing his platform as a path to a more equitable city and country.

 

[P@triot]

P@triot ...........Being a patriot is caring for the entire nation and not just for those that think and agree with you.

What a stupid comment. Patriots in the 1940’s - 1980’s did not “care” for communists during the Cold War

Each time some basic facts back you into a corner, you post something more outrageous than the last time.

 

[P@triot]

A good friend of mine for 40 years and one that I respected and wished the best to, was a Republican Trump supporter. Though we disagreed vehemently on that (though I understood why he supported Trump), it never affected our friendship because we both were "caring-for-others people"

You do not show that kind of caring and that puts you in the category of people that are not worth knowing.

Again, a shockingly stupid comment. I have friends and family members who are liberals. Never disowned any of them.

Stop trying to hijack the thread by directing it away from the extremism of Democrats. Nobody here cares about your personal relationships.

 

[Luckyone]

Again, a shockingly stupid comment. I have friends and family members who are liberals. Never disowned any of them.

Stop trying to hijack the thread by directing it away from the extremism of Democrats. Nobody here cares about your personal relationships.

the right extremism is even worse than the Left and what is even worse is that they are in control. The Left extremists have no control over anything and have not had it. Biden was a moderate..............all his life and proven over and over again repeatedly.

 

[Luckyone]

What a stupid comment. Patriots in the 1940’s - 1980’s did not “care” for communists during the Cold War

Each time some basic facts back you into a corner, you post something more outrageous than the last time.

?????

Are you implying I care for communists?

I will have you know that I was a Republican for 35 years and turned Independent in 2009, because the party went to the extreme Right.

I hate any and all extremes. I care about the Constitution and about what is right and wrong. I care about competency.................all of which Trump cares none about.

I am not by nature political in any way. I care about competency and being an American.............what Americanism has been since 1976 and up to 2009, when it became a power hungry struggle by the Republicans that started to go in the direction of "my way or the highway" strategy. Now and under Trump, it is the Dictators way and what America has stood for all those years is being thrown to the garbage, with the idea of "**** the other side, we are in control, and we are going to do what we want and if you don't agree, we will punish you"

 

[P@triot]

Are you implying I care for communists?

Not at all. Go back and read what you said and my response to it

 

[P@triot]

I will have you know that I was a Republican for 35 years and turned Independent in 2009, because the party went to the extreme Right.

I’ll have you know you’re lying like all liberals do.

The Republican Party has not moved one inch to the right since Abraham Lincoln. Not one inch. That’s the very nature of “conservatism”. To conserve what already is.

Meanwhile, progressivism prides it self on “progress”. If you continue to “progress” left, eventually you will hit the extremist end of the spectrum. And that’s where liberals have arrived after 150 years of proudly marching left towards extremism.

 

[P@triot]

I care about the Constitution and about what is right and wrong.

No you don’t. If you did, you would vehemently oppose Social Security, welfare, SNAP, Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and several million other things.

You’ve never even read the U.S. Constitution.

 

[P@triot]

the idea of "**** the other side, we are in control, and we are going to do what we want and if you don't agree, we will punish you"

You’re literally describing the Democrat Party and attempting to blame their actions and sins on the Republicans (a tactic used by fascists for decades and decades).

 

[Luckyone]

You’re literally describing the Democrat Party and attempting to blame their actions and sins on the Republicans (a tactic used by fascists for decades and decades).

Does your criticism of the Democrats doing it mean you are against it?