Democrats ushered in the era of a lawless society

It's doubtful. Because military lawyers have said they told Trump that what he was doing was illegal, and they will be called to court.
What was he supposedly ā€œdoingā€? None of you seem able to say šŸ˜‚
 
***They setup President Trump before he won 2016.

...they had to eliminate President Trump. So, they conspired to frame him, indict him, convict him with rigged judges and juries; demonize him with a massive fraudulent sting operation on January 6th; and when all of that failed, they ordered two assassination attempts.

The only way to get to the bottom of this ā€œConspiracy of the Centuryā€ is to hire a team of legal pitbull prosectors to go after all the participants- Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Hillary, etc- and then threaten them all with life in prison…preferably at Gitmo…and then offer immunity if they finger ā€œthe capo di tuttiā€ who gave them the orders- Barack Obama.

I call it lawless socialism
I'm from vt
Bernie Sanders stole our soul


Yeah
Fuckin' Sanders House


Thanks a lot
Left Vermont
Paying for
your
psychotic political
Scorched earth bernie.

Tarzan & Jane Sanders
net worth 50 million ?

If those
Potatoes
don't
scream communism,
I don't know what does...


Breath of really fresh Vermont DC air !
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20251018_182443_Chrome.webp
    Screenshot_20251018_182443_Chrome.webp
    90.5 KB · Views: 13
Last edited:
Since the Obama Administration, the Democrats have:

50% of the links are to right biased websites that are not known for providing facts but known for providing false narratives to their liking.

The other 50% of the websites (like Wikipedia) did not prove the point you were making.

I checked every one of your links.
Weaponized link is to a pure biased website

TruNews - Bias and Credibility
Voter fraud link is to another biased website that offers fake news

Daily Signal - Bias and Credibility
  • Assisted illegal aliens with invading the U.S. and avoiding prosecution

Assisted illegal aliens with invading the U.S. is a stretch given in the link there is no word about illegal aliens.

This quote is from your link:

SACRAMENTO (CBSLA/AP) - California's new governor is promising the most populous state will be a "sanctuary to all who seek it" in a direct affront to President Donald Trump's immigration policies.

Your "allow rioting" is pure invention on your part.

Wheeler's office denies that any policy ever existed barring officers from responding. Instead, he says he told police to stay out of federal business unless public safety was at stake.

Installed DA's? No, none were INSTALLED. Kennedy "introduced" a bill to require violent crimes to be prosecuted. There is no comment about that having happened already anywhere. From your link:

John Kennedy WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, today introduced the Prosecutors Need to Prosecute Act to require district attorneys (DAs) to report violent crimes that they fail to charge criminals with committing. Prosecutors who fail to report these decisions risk losing priority funding for their districts.

The legislation responds to a nation-wide trend of DAs who are declining to prosecute murder, aggravated assault, robbery, rape, burglary, motor vehicle theft, arson and other serious crimes.

There is no proof submitted to that effect, meaning you cannot say that it HAS HAPPENED, especially nationwide.

Your link has absolutely nothing there that says anything about the Democrats allowing militants to overthrow U.S. cities. It is a pure lie on your part.
  • Encouraged their voters to harass Republicans

Maxine Waters is ONE person and she does not run the Democrat party so even though she did do that, you are accusing the entire party of doing that.

This is all entirely biased bullshit on your part.
 
Last edited:
50% of the links are to right biased websites that are not known for providing facts but known for providing false narratives to their liking.

The other 50% of the websites (like Wikipedia) did not prove the point you were making.

I checked every one of your links.

Weaponized link is to a pure biased website

TruNews - Bias and Credibility

Voter fraud link is to another biased website that offers fake news

Daily Signal - Bias and Credibility


Assisted illegal aliens with invading the U.S. is a stretch given in the link there is no word about illegal aliens.

This quote is from your link:

SACRAMENTO (CBSLA/AP) - California's new governor is promising the most populous state will be a "sanctuary to all who seek it" in a direct affront to President Donald Trump's immigration policies.


Your "allow rioting" is pure invention on your part.

Wheeler's office denies that any policy ever existed barring officers from responding. Instead, he says he told police to stay out of federal business unless public safety was at stake.


Installed DA's? No, none were INSTALLED. Kennedy "introduced" a bill to require violent crimes to be prosecuted. There is no comment about that having happened already anywhere. From your link:

John Kennedy WASHINGTON – Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, today introduced the Prosecutors Need to Prosecute Act to require district attorneys (DAs) to report violent crimes that they fail to charge criminals with committing. Prosecutors who fail to report these decisions risk losing priority funding for their districts.

The legislation responds to a nation-wide trend of DAs who are declining to prosecute murder, aggravated assault, robbery, rape, burglary, motor vehicle theft, arson and other serious crimes.

There is no proof submitted to that effect, meaning you cannot say that it HAS HAPPENED, especially nationwide.


Your link has absolutely nothing there that says anything about the Democrats allowing militants to overthrow U.S. cities. It is a pure lie on your part.


Maxine Waters is ONE person and she does not run the Democrat party so even though she did do that, you are accusing the entire party of doing that.

This is all entirely biased bullshit on your part.
Wall of text are you calling me a fibber ?
 
???? I am calling P@triot a fibber. Why do you say that I am my doing it to you?
This coming from a guy who lied about who was going to win the election, a guy that told us to buy a solid stock in Zlab, that is down almost $15 a share from when you told us to buy. You tried to mislead people in the judge who had her house catch fire and tried to make it look like MAGA was responsible, a shame that you need to exploit a poor family’s tragedy into false political narrative.

You are the last person who should be criticizing a persons honesty.
 
Assisted illegal aliens with invading the U.S. is a stretch given in the link there is no word about illegal aliens.

This quote is from your link:

SACRAMENTO (CBSLA/AP) - California's new governor is promising the most populous state will be a "sanctuary to all who seek it" in a direct affront to President Donald Trump's immigration policies.
Yeeahh…ummmmm…who do you think they are providing ā€œsanctuaryā€ for - Americans?!? :lmao:

Americans don’t need ā€œsanctuaryā€, little guy. We’re here legally. Sanctuary is for illegal aliens.

And you know that. But like all leftists, you’ll lie all day for liberalism. You’ll even lie about your lies.
 
Your link has absolutely nothing there that says anything about the Democrats allowing militants to overthrow U.S. cities. It is a pure lie on your part.
That’s an outrageous lie. And here the link is again to prove you’re lying šŸ˜‚

Democrats allowed their minions to overthrow U.S. cities and setup ā€œAutonomous Zonesā€

 
That’s an outrageous lie. And here the link is again to prove you’re lying šŸ˜‚

Democrats allowed their minions to overthrow U.S. cities and setup ā€œAutonomous Zonesā€

Thank you for proving MY point.

Here is who CHOP was:

AI Overview



The Capitol Hill Occupied Protest (CHOP) in Seattle was not created by a single person or group, but emerged from the George Floyd protests after police abandoned the East Precinct building
. The area was initially named the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) by protesters, then renamed CHOP. Some Democrat politicians offered public statements supporting the right to protest or acknowledging the situation, such as Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan, who focused on listening to the community, while others, like socialist councilmember Kshama Sawant, publicly expressed support for the occupation itself.

Creation of CHOP
  • CHOP originated from the widespread protests against police brutality that followed the murder of George Floyd.
  • Protesters took control of the area around the East Precinct after the Seattle Police Department retreated from the building on June 8, 2020.
  • The zone was initially called CHAZ, which was later changed to CHOP.
  • No single person or group "made" the zone; it was an organic development by protesters who occupied the area and established a self-governing space.

Democrat support
  • Support varied among Democrats. Some, like Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan, focused on the importance of listening to the community's concerns but did not explicitly endorse the occupation itself.
  • Other Democrats, such as socialist councilmember Kshama Sawant, explicitly supported the occupation, stating that "the idea of occupation isn't a new one, and it's an immensely powerful idea as a part of protest movements," as reported by the BBC.
You are taking one event in which the protest was about the biased killing of George Floyd and turning that to mean the Democrats support "the overthrow of U.S. cities. Only a FEW Democrats supported CHOP and it was main a few socialist Democrats that did. Both parties have extremes so finding a few Democrats that do what you say they do, is not a difficult thing to do. Nonetheless and unlike the Republicans, the extreme Left does not have much power among the Democrat Party, unlike the Far Right that is in CHARGE of the Republican party.

By you showing this link, you are proving my point that you are cherry picking things in an attempt to prove your biased OP.
 
Yeeahh…ummmmm…who do you think they are providing ā€œsanctuaryā€ for - Americans?!? :lmao:

Americans don’t need ā€œsanctuaryā€, little guy. We’re here legally. Sanctuary is for illegal aliens.

And you know that. But like all leftists, you’ll lie all day for liberalism. You’ll even lie about your lies.
Sanctuary is for people that are unfairly prosecuted. They "may" be illegal aliens but the legally-in-the-U.S. people are also being persecuted for a number of things that they are not guilty of.
 
You are taking one event in which the protest was about the biased killing of George Floyd and turning that to mean the Democrats support "the overthrow of U.S. cities.
You’re lying throughout your entire post and you know it. Democrats instructed law enforcement to stand down and allow cities to be overthrown.

Setting up an ā€œAutonomous Zoneā€ is impossible unless it’s allowed. Otherwise, all of those seditious thugs would have been arrested immediately.
Only a FEW Democrats supported CHOP and it was main a few socialist Democrats that did.
I don’t care if it was 1 Democrat (and it was far more than that). Some Democrats called for an actual insurrection, others proudly supported it once it happened, while others still facilitated it happening by instructing law enforcement to stand down and allow actual American soil to be overthrown. Disgusting.
 
Democrat Alejandro Mayorkas alone has:

  • Stopped construction of the border wall.
  • Expanded and abused the parole authority to process illegal aliens across the border.
  • Enabled asylum fraud by including those leaving their country for economic reasons instead of using asylum claims properly for those fleeing violence and persecution.
  • Released more than 85% of apprehended illegal immigrants into the country.
  • Prevented DHS from enforcing immigration law resulting in a mass decline in removals.
  • Boosted the profit of Mexican criminal syndicates by facilitating the smuggling of human beings across the border (cartels charge people to be smuggled across).
  • Forced Border Patrol agents off the line and into administrative positions of processing the entry of aliens rather than stopping them.
  • Streamlined the importation of illegal immigrants with the CBP One appwhich has been used in more than 65.3 million applications.
  • Overseen the most dramatic influx of illegal immigrants in the nation’s history, a whopping 10 million and counting.
  • Lied to Congress when he said ā€œThe border is closed, the border is secure.ā€
Mayorkas should have been charged with dereliction of duty.
Treason? Sedition? Surely something serious.
The lack of courage by the Powers That Be is disappointing.
 
You’re lying throughout your entire post and you know it. Democrats instructed law enforcement to stand down and allow cities to be overthrown.

BS! Prove it
Setting up an ā€œAutonomous Zoneā€ is impossible unless it’s allowed. Otherwise, all of those seditious thugs would have been arrested immediately.

I don’t care if it was 1 Democrat (and it was far more than that). Some Democrats called for an actual insurrection, others proudly supported it once it happened, while others still facilitated it happening by instructing law enforcement to stand down and allow actual American soil to be overthrown. Disgusting

Do I need to remind you of January 6 protest that Trump generated based on a proven to be untrue lie (elections was stolen)?
 
Nonetheless and unlike the Republicans, the extreme Left does not have much power among the Democrat Party, unlike the Far Right that is in CHARGE of the Republican party.
ā–ŖļøFact: The further right you go, government gets smaller and weaker until it ceases to exist at all (anarchy)

ā–ŖļøFact: There are 0 actual anarchists in the Republican Party holding public office. Not at the federal level. Not at the state level. Not even at the local level.

ā–ŖļøFact: Slightly before anarchists, are the ā€œSovereign Citizensā€. There are 0 actual ā€œSovereign Citizensā€ in the Republican Party holding public office. Not at the federal level. Not at the state level. Not even at the local level.

Which means there are zero ā€œextremistsā€ with the Republican Party. Literally zero. Unlike the Democrat Party, which is overflowing with extremists such as Bernie Sanders (socialist), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (socialist), and Zohran Mamdani (socialist). The entire party is controlled by extremists, while the Republican Party is exclusively made up of moderates.
 
15th post
BS! Prove it
The fact that the ā€œAutonomous Zonesā€ existed, proves it 🤣

Notice that none of them existed in Republican-controlled cities?!? Because they couldn’t. They would be arrested the second they tried to block off a public area.

It happened in Democrat-controlled cities because Democrats in charge explicitly instructed law-enforcement to stand down.

I truly don’t know what’s crazier, Luckyone - the fact that you comment when you don’t have the slightest clue what you’re talking about or the fact that you’re too lazy to even take 3 seconds for a simple Google search:

IMG_5160.webp


Let that sink in for a moment. Democrats instructed law enforcement to abandon their post. A severe dereliction of duty by Democrats which resulted in loss of life. Every last one of them should be charged with more than a dozen crimes, including accessory to murder.
 
Sanctuary is for people that are unfairly prosecuted.
No, it’s not. All you do is lie. Democrat ā€œsanctuary citiesā€ are for ILLEGAL ALIENS. Because the dirt-bag Democrats are trying to create a lawless society.
They "may" be illegal aliens but the legally-in-the-U.S. people are also being persecuted for a number of things that they are not guilty of.
  1. It’s embarrassing that you don’t know the difference between ā€œpersecutedā€ and ā€œprosecutedā€ (further supports the fact that you’re likely a Russian or Chinese disinformation account)
  2. Prosecution is the legal/proper due process of the United States. You just accidentally admitted that Democrats are actively undermining our legal system. Oops!!
 
No, it’s not. All you do is lie. Democrat ā€œsanctuary citiesā€ are for ILLEGAL ALIENS. Because the dirt-bag Democrats are trying to create a lawless society.

  1. It’s embarrassing that you don’t know the difference between ā€œpersecutedā€ and ā€œprosecutedā€ (further supports the fact that you’re likely a Russian or Chinese disinformation account)
  2. Prosecution is the legal/proper due process of the United States. You just accidentally admitted that Democrats are actively undermining our legal system. Oops!!
Sure, you know me, don’t you?
 
The fact that the ā€œAutonomous Zonesā€ existed, proves it 🤣

Notice that none of them existed in Republican-controlled cities?!? Because they couldn’t. They would be arrested the second they tried to block off a public area.

It happened in Democrat-controlled cities because Democrats in charge explicitly instructed law-enforcement to stand down.

I truly don’t know what’s crazier, Luckyone - the fact that you comment when you don’t have the slightest clue what you’re talking about or the fact that you’re too lazy to even take 3 seconds for a simple Google search:

View attachment 1188054

Let that sink in for a moment. Democrats instructed law enforcement to abandon their post. A severe dereliction of duty by Democrats which resulted in loss of life. Every last one of them should be charged with more than a dozen crimes, including accessory to murder.
You don’t mention why they did that! There are good reasons for doing things that Can be misinterpreted the wrong way. You should know that. The Republicans always come up with excuses for what Trump does.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom