Democrats still big mad about J6

[Lesh]

If we wanted to destroy the capitol there's not a damn thing you could do about it, little man.

Your bullshit has turned you into a flaming idiot.

Really? “Not a damn thing “I” could do”?

No but the NG and cops could blow your criminal asses away. Ask Ashes Babbitt

 

[Lesh]

Fact. They've known who did it for four years and kept the information hidden. (Gee I wonder why).

Sure QMan

 

[MarcATL]

Are the events of January 6th something to be happy, or even proud, about OP?

 

[Contumacious]

Are the events of January 6th something to be happy, or even proud, about OP?

Are the events of November 3rd 2020 in which the Socialist Demon Rats stole the election something to be happy, or even proud, about ?

 

[mudwhistle]

You just can’t bring yourself to admit you would want violence used to protect Trump. You know that kills your argument about Ashes Babbitt

OMG. So you say that cops can't shoot an assassin?

What are you, some kind of idiot?

 

[mudwhistle]

Are the events of January 6th something to be happy, or even proud, about OP?

Dumb question.

Why should anyone be happy about Jan 6th.....unless you planned it and have been using it to take people's rights away?

 

[mudwhistle]

Really? “Not a damn thing “I” could do”?

No but the NG and cops could blow your criminal asses away. Ask Ashes Babbitt

Is that a threat?

Here's facts, dipshit. If those people hadn't been grandmas and grandpas (as well as unarmed females), the cops wouldn't have been able to stop an armed assault. They would have murdered them all and burned the place to the ground. But none of that shit happened, dickwad.

What did happen was cops started firing at lawful protesters and the Democrat controlled media helped Democrats cover it up.

That's what happened.

 

[Lesh]

OMG. So you say that cops can't shoot an assassin?

What are you, some kind of idiot?

Where did I say anything like that… ya ******* moron

 

[mudwhistle]

Where did I say anything like that… ya ******* moron

You said we can't use violence to protect the president.

 

[Lesh]

You said we can't use violence to protect the president.

I did not. Can you read?

 

[mudwhistle]

I did not. Can you read?

Yeah....really well too.

 

[MarcATL]

Are the events of November 3rd 2020 in which the Socialist Demon Rats stole the election something to be happy, or even proud, about ?

November 2020 was the best day in modern history.

But not for what you think happened though.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Wrong on both. He wasn’t sent there to kill anyone. He acted in the defense of our elected officials when Ashley Dumbbitch decided to do something stupid. It isn’t illegal for him to defend our elected officials.


Not really. Being stupid, in both cases, directly results in death. Making stupid decisions has consequences. She fucked around and she found out.

I can see that you're not able to think in nuances or with alternate scenarios. Kind of like the concrete mentality of a child. It's okay, just go on with your bad self. You are really of no consequence.

 

[Blisterfinger]

It wasn’t a protest **** up. It was an insurrection by a bunch of whiny White old ******* pieces of shit.

There was no insurrection

 

[Blisterfinger]

Because they didn’t find him. Simple as that. Do you think they find every criminal every time?

They didn't find him because he was one of theirs dumbass!

 

[Blisterfinger]

Bird was doing his job. He was defending our elected officials. You would be fine with lethal force being used if it was needed to protect Trump.

She acted stupid. She paid the price for it. There are consequences to stupid decisions.

It is not illegal to be stupid or act stupid. It is certainly not correct to be murdered for acting stupid. It should be in your case, but it's not.

 

[Contumacious]

November 2020 was the best day in modern history.

But not for what you think happened though.

THINK? OR KNOW?

The evidence before the Court shows that voting machines are hackable and votes can be changed from one party to another in real time without leaving a trace of evidence " Federal Judge Amy Totenberg , Curling v Raffensperger , Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-2989 -AT . ND Georgia, Atlanta Division November 10, 2023
Curling v. Raffensperger, 403 F. Supp. 3d 1311 | Casetext Search + Citator

 

[Blisterfinger]

Watched the video, and what was weird is the hesitation that took place until the shot was finally fired.

One would think that the person using the club or whatever it was, in order to try and breech the glass door, would have been shot first by the officer with the gun, and it all being due to the violence involved when trying to break that glass in a bid to enter into the area where the officer's were stationed or had stationed themselves.

Why such hesitation before the weapon was then forwarded as if to target the specific individual who was then shot dead by the officer when the targeting seem to be directed specifically by that officer at that individual ?

Was the victim also playing a role in bashing the glass with an instrument in hopes to somehow breech the area in order to go beyon̈d the doors that were clearly under attack in the video ???

If so, did it draw the attention of the officer that ended up taking a shot due to the possible breech that would occur if he didn't take the shot ?

Was the victim just unfortunate enough to step into the picture after the glass was breached by the other assailant's that were clearly seen bashing the glass door's or door ???

Why the silence by the officer who should have been yelling commands while pointing his weapon at the door's or window's being bashed, otherwise for example he should have been yelling - Stay back, don't breech or come any closer or you will be shot or maybe this - move back, don't breech or enter this restricted area, this is your final warning !!!

Did anyone hear any commands being yelled by the officer's on the other side of those door's or door in the video prior to the shot that was released ??

It's almost as if the individual/victim was singled out to be made an example of by the gun toting officer during the event, otherwise by the way that it looked in the video because of the silence before the shot was delivered.

What was Ashley's role or actions at the point of being shot at or near to the glass door's or window's that clearly were under attack by some in that crowd ??

The final look at the overall picture is this, if the election was rigged coupled with all the other evidence against Democrat's for attacking Trump for 4 year's straight, then I'd say that once again blood is on the Democrat's hands for stirring up the American people against the Democrat party, and doing it in such a way that on January the 6th the people had finally had enough of it all, otherwise when they protested the 2020 election of a president that proved their case (that he Biden), should not have ever been nominated or elected at all.

Any rational competent officer would have went and stood in FRONT of the melee happening on the other side of the glass, with his gun out pointed at the rioters. That way he could have issued his warnings with teeth and stopped the advance (if you call Ashley Babbitt sticking her head through window an advance). There were officers with long guns standing right with the rioters on the other side and it looked like they were paying no attention! They looked ******* bored with it ! Byrd came in from the side to lie in wait silently. Ashley would have stopped if she would have had a gun put into her face . She could have been arrested by the officers with long guns inside. . rioters were brandishing no weapons, if they realized if they were going to be shot they would have stopped or been shot. The whole scenario looked set up the way it was.
Seems impossible for these government apologists on here to see this in a logical fashion. I Wonder why we're trying to convince them otherwise. Almost as if they are part of it.
Bird was indeed pardoned by Biden, I wonder why? Rhetorical question.

 

[Lesh]

Any rational competent officer would have went and stood in front of the melee happening on the other side of the glass with his gun out pointed at the rioters. That way he could have issued his warnings with teeth and stopped the advance (if you call Ashley Babbitt sticking her head through window an advance). There were officers with long guns standing right with the rioters on the other side and it looked like they were paying no attention! They looked ******* bored with it ! Byrd came in from the side to lie in wait silently. Ashley would have stopped if she would have had a gun put into her face . She could have been arrested by the officers with long guns inside. . rioters were brandishing no weapons, if they realized if they were going to be shot they would have stopped or been shot. The whole scenario looked set up the way it was.
Seems impossible for these government apologists on here to see this in a logical fashion. I Wonder why we're trying to convince them otherwise. Almost as if they are part of it.
Bird was indeed pardoned by Biden, I wonder why? Rhetorical question.

She HAD a gun pointed at her face and numerous people were making her aware of that. Didn’t stop her
The bullet did though

 

[Blisterfinger]

She HAD a gun pointed at her face and numerous people were making her aware of that. Didn’t stop her
The bullet did though

Actually bird was standing to the side. Stop lying