Democrats seek criminal probe over group chat on Houthi strike

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It's called precedent. Highlights the stark difference how your cult chooses to treat administration officials differently depending on whether they are a Republican or a Democrat.

Yes, stop doing that and follow the law.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Oh, Ghost, just stop. You are not nearly as good as most of your opponent's here.

Waltz screwed up seriously and nothing changes that.

 

[Rawley]

Yes, stop doing that and follow the law.

We do. You cult doesn't, they are driven by politics. The sooner you recognize that and call them out on it, the better for your party and for the country.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

We do. You cult doesn't, they are driven by politics. The sooner you recognize that and call them out on it, the better for your party and for the country.

No, you don't. The sooner your ilk are out of office the better chance we of curing all the ills you butts have caused.

 

[Rawley]

No, you don't. The sooner your ilk are out of office the better chance we of curing all the ills you butts have caused.

QED

In case you haven't yet figured it out, the ridiculous political lawfare bullshit your party pulled in the last four years is a significant reason President Trump was reelected. You put him back in office.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

QED

In case you haven't yet figured it out, the ridiculous political lawfare bullshit your party pulled in the last four years is a significant reason President Trump was reelected. You put him back in office.

Never because of lawfare. Trump will have righteous judicial obstruction jammed up his ass until he starts complying with the law of how things are done.

 

[Rawley]

Never because of lawfare. Trump will have righteous judicial obstruction jammed up his ass until he starts complying with the law of how things are done.

QED Oh well. Can't say you weren't warned.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Oh, Ghost, just stop. You are not nearly as good as most of your opponent's here.

I don't give twenty three shits about how "good" you think I am compared to my "opponents" (whoever they are). You and Joe are the only ones I've interacted with here anyway.

I'm just here to point out Democrat hypocrisy. Besides, how would you know? I haven't argued any of the things you thought I argued this whole time.

Waltz screwed up seriously and nothing changes that.

No shit Sherlock. Did I say or suggest he didn't?

I never imagined that someone could paint such a comprehensive and in-depth picture of a person or argument based on, literally, things they didn't say.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Ghost of a Rider just does not make sense within the parameters of the world which we live in.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Ghost of a Rider just does not make sense within the parameters of the world which we live in.

You said Waltz's blunder was serious and I agreed. What, exactly, doesn't make sense to you?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You said Waltz's blunder was serious and I agreed. What, exactly, doesn't make sense to you?

Read #108 above. No dirty deleting or changing, Ghost.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Read #108 above. No dirty deleting or changing, Ghost.

I've never deleted or changed anything to any post I've made since I've been here and I see no reason to modify this one.

Having said that, I still don't understand what doesn't make sense to you. I agreed that Waltz's blunder was serious, which is exactly what you wanted the whole time. So what doesn't make sense to you?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I've never deleted or changed anything to any post I've made since I've been here and I see no reason to modify this one.

Having said that, I still don't understand what doesn't make sense to you. I agreed that Waltz's blunder was serious, which is exactly what you wanted the whole time. So what doesn't make sense to you?

I can't make you understand. You have to do it yourself.

The rest still defend his blunder. Get to work in changing their minds.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

I can't make you understand. You have to do it yourself.

At least point me in the right direction. Because I am honestly and completely baffled by what you're trying to do and say here.

The rest still defend his blunder. Get to work in changing their minds.

You say I have to take it upon myself to try to understand what you say is not making any sense to you in my arguments and then you tell me to get to work to change their minds.

Holy shit, what self-righteous arrogance.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

 

[Frankeneinstein]

At least point me in the right direction. Because I am honestly and completely baffled by what you're trying to do and say here.

He's trying to say that journalists cannot be trusted and giving them access to sensitive information is akin to whispering it in the enemies ear.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

He's trying to say that journalists cannot be trusted and giving them access to sensitive information is akin to whispering it in the enemies ear.

I don't know if that's what he's saying but he said my comments didn't make sense. Specifically, he said: "Ghost of a Rider just does not make sense within the parameters of the world which we live in."

I asked him to tell me what didn't make sense to him but he refused to say.

 

[Harry Dresden]

I don't know if that's what he's saying but he said my comments didn't make sense. Specifically, he said: "Ghost of a Rider just does not make sense within the parameters of the world which we live in."

I asked him to tell me what didn't make sense to him but he refused to say.

john dont do questions....

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

He's trying to say that journalists cannot be trusted and giving them access to sensitive information is akin to whispering it in the enemies ear.

I agree. Fire Hegseth.

 

[Concerned American]

I agree. Fire Hegseth.

No