Democrats Push Bills To Ensure Republicans Never Influence Or Win Another Election Again...EVER

[pknopp]

Offer a decent candidate and people will vote in whatever form for them. When you argue that you want the fewest number of people to vote you are acknowledging your candidate is not one the people can support.

You really think that Sleepy Joe was such a tremendous candidate? The man didn't leave his basement for months.

And I didn't vote for him.

Despite my candidate losing I still think it's great that we had a record turnout.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump did. If it's good enough for him, why is it not good enough for the people?

Trump also flew around on Air force 1 and has SS protection--you don't. States should not be mandated how they run their elections.

 

[Moonglow]

Offer a decent candidate and people will vote in whatever form for them. When you argue that you want the fewest number of people to vote you are acknowledging your candidate is not one the people can support.

You really think that Sleepy Joe was such a tremendous candidate? The man didn't leave his basement for months.

So what?

 

[Desperado]

"Congressional Democrats have a plan to forever keep Republicans from winning elections and influencing policy decisions with H.R. 1 in the House, and the similar S. 1 in the Senate.

They want to empower the government to police more speech, force states to allow vote-by-mail and taxpayer funding of candidates, and silence Americans through fear by exposing their support for issue groups.

H.R. 1 would undermine state election oversight, like efforts to clean up old voter rolls. It eliminates any restrictions on vote-by-mail. Taxpayers would be on the hook for matching 600% of campaign contributions to subsidize candidates they may disagree with – a practice that has been ripe for corruption."

SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF SPEECH:
"It empowers federal regulators to categorize and regulate speech, including online.
All speech that simply mentions a candidate could be illegal four months out from an election if groups speak to the public. Worse, at any time, any funded communication that mentions an issue that might be associated with a politician could be illegal. The government just has to say the speech "promotes," "attacks," "supports" or "opposes" a potential candidate.

A newly-partisan Federal Election Commission, since the president would appoint the chairman, who would have new powers, and be a tie-breaking vote on a five-person board (down from a bipartisan six-person board).


The bill would also create a 'registry' / database of Americans and what issues they support. After this latest win there are a lot of influential Democrats calling for Conservatives and Trump supporters to be 'de-programmed', 'rounded up and sent to re-education camps'. This bill would create a way to identify and catalog a list of 'political threats' to make 'rounding them up' easier. 'Democrats can dress this up with talk of "dark money" and pretend they’re worried about money in politics, but they’re only worried about Americans with right-of-center views speaking out.'

"No billionaires will be harmed in the making of this legislation. The point is to silence dissent and shut down debate through fear, intimidation and overregulation. Americans already feel they cannot engage in healthy debate. A Cato Institute poll released last summer found 62% of respondents don’t believe they can express opinions publicly."

Grover Norquist: Pelosi, Schumer priorities – here's how free speech, fair elections and more at risk

Congressional Democrats have a plan to forever keep Republicans from winning elections and influencing policy decisions with H.R. 1 in the House, and the similar S. 1 in the Senate.

www.foxnews.com

Democrats hate free and fair elections.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yes the feds can tell the states about the guidelines of running an election.
Article I, Section 4, Clause 1: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

So when the Republicans get leadership back, we can outlaw mail-in voting? We can force all states to purge their roles?

 

[pknopp]

Trump did. If it's good enough for him, why is it not good enough for the people?

Trump also flew around on Air force 1 and has SS protection--you don't. States should not be mandated how they run their elections.

Tell that to Texas.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Socialist always have to use suppression to maintain their power.
The Corrupt Democrats are destroying our democracy* because they can't function under it.

 

[Desperado]

oting a a Constitutionally protected right. We dismiss you haters of the Constitution.

So where in our Constitution does it state government needs to address you to vote? It says everybody has the right to vote, not that everybody has the right to have a ballot delivered to their doorstep.

Trump did. If it's good enough for him, why is it not good enough for the people?

You need to learn the difference between and absentee ballot and the lets mail ballots to everyone on the voter rolls

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Socialist always have to use suppression to maintain their power.
The Corrupt Democrats are destroying our democracy* because they can't function under it.

Democrats know without stupid people, they cannot win any elections. So they have to draw the stupid in to vote.

 

[pknopp]

oting a a Constitutionally protected right. We dismiss you haters of the Constitution.

So where in our Constitution does it state government needs to address you to vote? It says everybody has the right to vote, not that everybody has the right to have a ballot delivered to their doorstep.

Trump did. If it's good enough for him, why is it not good enough for the people?

You need to learn the difference between and absentee ballot and the lets mail ballots to everyone on the voter rolls

Why? It's been done in some states now for awhile with no issues.

 

[Moonglow]

Yes the feds can tell the states about the guidelines of running an election.
Article I, Section 4, Clause 1: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

So when the Republicans get leadership back, we can outlaw mail-in voting? We can force all states to purge their roles?

The states enacted mail in voting and were controlled by Republicans in many states like the one I live in, your obsession about mail in voting only being desired by the Dems is confusing.

 

[pknopp]

Socialist always have to use suppression to maintain their power.
The Corrupt Democrats are destroying our democracy* because they can't function under it.

Democrats know without stupid people, they cannot win any elections. So they have to draw the stupid in to vote.

Did they elect someone that believes wild fires are from space lasers?

 

[Moonglow]

Socialist always have to use suppression to maintain their power.
The Corrupt Democrats are destroying our democracy* because they can't function under it.

Democrats know without stupid people, they cannot win any elections. So they have to draw the stupid in to vote.

You must know a lot of stupid people that voted.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Did they elect someone that believes wild fires are from space lasers?

When did Trump ever say that? Stay on topic.

 

[pknopp]

Did they elect someone that believes wild fires are from space lasers?

When did Trump ever say that? Stay on topic.

He called and cheered on the one that did.

 

[Missourian]

Pretty condescending to say that if you don’t vote for Trump, you’re ignorant and stupid.

Good point...correlation is not causation.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Socialist always have to use suppression to maintain their power.
The Corrupt Democrats are destroying our democracy* because they can't function under it.

Democrats know without stupid people, they cannot win any elections. So they have to draw the stupid in to vote.

You must know a lot of stupid people that voted.

I know people that vote Democrat, yes. Look at the outcome of this past election. You'd have to be stupid to vote for this guy over one that had such tremendous success running this country. If you go to the race track, you bet on the horse that has a winning track record, not a horse that barely limps to the starting gate.

 

[noonereal]

Democrats Push Bills To Ensure Republicans Never Influence Or Win Another Election Again...EVER

Good Ole' Joe, getting it done!

 

[Desperado]

Socialist always have to use suppression to maintain their power.
The Corrupt Democrats are destroying our democracy* because they can't function under it.

Democrats know without stupid people, they cannot win any elections. So they have to draw the stupid in to vote.

Did they elect someone that believes wild fires are from space lasers?

Did they elect someone that believe too many people on an island will cause it to capsize? Did they elect someone that shits in his pants on tv?, Did they elect people that hired Chinese spies as their drive/aide?

 

[Moonglow]

Socialist always have to use suppression to maintain their power.
The Corrupt Democrats are destroying our democracy* because they can't function under it.

Trump was his own worst enemy.


Trump has baselessly blamed his unacknowledged loss on widespread voter fraud, pointing particularly to majority Black cities in states that flipped to Biden. But Trump "suffered his greatest erosion with white voters, particularly white men in both state groups," Fabrizio concluded. Despite "double digit gains with Hispanics in both groups," he added, Trump "lost ground with almost every age group in both state groupings" and suffered "double-digit erosion" among "white college-educated voters across the board."

"Biden had a clear edge over [Trump] on being seen as honest & trustworthy," Fabrizio wrote, but Trump was harmed especially by his COVID-19 response. The coronavirus was the top issue for voters, and Biden won those voters by nearly a 3-to-1 margin. About 75 percent of voters supported mask mandates and a similar share approved of Dr. Anthony Fauci, and most voters prioritized quashing the pandemic over reopening the economy, Fabrizio found. He had advised Trump to take battling the pandemic more seriously in a memo over the summer, Politico notes.

Trump's 'greatest erosion' of support in 2020 was among 'white men,' internal campaign autopsy found

Former President Donald Trump's chief pollster, Tony Fabrizio, compiled a 27-page postmortem of the campaign in December and passed it around among Trump's top political advisers right before President Biden's inauguration, Politico reports, and the main takeaways are that Trump "suffered from...

www.yahoo.com