Democrats Never Met A Communist....

[PoliticalChic]

Ijn Greece the formerly ruling, right-wing New Democracy party won just under 28 percent of the vote. This could happen in America if Capitalism sucks any worse for the masses.

Greece the shift left the class struggle and communist tactics - Liberation News

look at all the good Communism did for China and the USSR!! About 100 million people murdered

but but but they did build a wall to keep their people in.............GATED COUNTRIES................

LOL

If Progressives were honest theyd say put us in power so we can inflict unimaginable poverty, misery, torture and murder and the first ones we round up will be the useful idiots who put us here because they demonstrated that they cannot be trusted

"If Progressives were honest...."


1. " If Democrats were forthright and respectful they would have enough confidence in their proposals and their countrymen to speak plainly. They would say: “We’re not idiots; you’re not idiots; and only an idiot could believe it’s possible for government to do big things that help lots of people without also imposing big costs, through taxes and regulations, that adversely affect lots of people. The reason you should support the Democratic agenda is not that we’re magicians who can make something out of nothing. It’s that the benefits of our programs will exceed their costs—so much so that our country and most of our citizens will be better off paying the higher taxes and complying with the more stringent regulations than we would be absent the taxes, the regulations, and the benefits they make possible.”

a. Democrats eschew such candor with reason. In 1984 Walter Mondale told the voters, “Mr. Reagan will raise taxes, and so will I. He won’t tell you. I just did.” Mondale went on to sweep the jurisdictions of Minnesota and the District of Columbia, forcing President Reagan to cobble together an Electoral College majority by carrying the other 49 states."
Liars Remorse The Weekly Standard



There'll be an honest Progressive any day now......any day......

Governments don't operate to make a profit. If they did it would cost you $5 just to mail a letter to someone. Public schools would cost more. Police would ticket more to make more profit.

And without regulations you'd pay a lot more for everything. Your way doesn't work.

Of course, your attempt at a post has nothing to do with the linked post, which focuses on the dishonesty of Progressives/Liberals/communists/Democrats....

Speaking of dishonesty....and simply out of curiosity, why is it that the numerous posts which have proven you to be wrong, and/or lying......

...why do you continue in the same manner?

Is that why you are a Liberal....because there are no restrictions related to truth?

 

[sealybobo]

look at all the good Communism did for China and the USSR!! About 100 million people murdered

but but but they did build a wall to keep their people in.............GATED COUNTRIES................

LOL

If Progressives were honest theyd say put us in power so we can inflict unimaginable poverty, misery, torture and murder and the first ones we round up will be the useful idiots who put us here because they demonstrated that they cannot be trusted

"If Progressives were honest...."


1. " If Democrats were forthright and respectful they would have enough confidence in their proposals and their countrymen to speak plainly. They would say: “We’re not idiots; you’re not idiots; and only an idiot could believe it’s possible for government to do big things that help lots of people without also imposing big costs, through taxes and regulations, that adversely affect lots of people. The reason you should support the Democratic agenda is not that we’re magicians who can make something out of nothing. It’s that the benefits of our programs will exceed their costs—so much so that our country and most of our citizens will be better off paying the higher taxes and complying with the more stringent regulations than we would be absent the taxes, the regulations, and the benefits they make possible.”

a. Democrats eschew such candor with reason. In 1984 Walter Mondale told the voters, “Mr. Reagan will raise taxes, and so will I. He won’t tell you. I just did.” Mondale went on to sweep the jurisdictions of Minnesota and the District of Columbia, forcing President Reagan to cobble together an Electoral College majority by carrying the other 49 states."
Liars Remorse The Weekly Standard



There'll be an honest Progressive any day now......any day......

Governments don't operate to make a profit. If they did it would cost you $5 just to mail a letter to someone. Public schools would cost more. Police would ticket more to make more profit.

And without regulations you'd pay a lot more for everything. Your way doesn't work.

that's gotta be one of the dumbest statements ever posted on the board

To run a government it costs money. The question is what do we get for all the taxes we pay? And who should pay more? The poor middle class or rich and corporations.

The rich say we should.

I say not only roll back the bush tax breaks but also the Reagan tax cuts

 

[sealybobo]

look at all the good Communism did for China and the USSR!! About 100 million people murdered

but but but they did build a wall to keep their people in.............GATED COUNTRIES................

LOL

If Progressives were honest theyd say put us in power so we can inflict unimaginable poverty, misery, torture and murder and the first ones we round up will be the useful idiots who put us here because they demonstrated that they cannot be trusted

"If Progressives were honest...."


1. " If Democrats were forthright and respectful they would have enough confidence in their proposals and their countrymen to speak plainly. They would say: “We’re not idiots; you’re not idiots; and only an idiot could believe it’s possible for government to do big things that help lots of people without also imposing big costs, through taxes and regulations, that adversely affect lots of people. The reason you should support the Democratic agenda is not that we’re magicians who can make something out of nothing. It’s that the benefits of our programs will exceed their costs—so much so that our country and most of our citizens will be better off paying the higher taxes and complying with the more stringent regulations than we would be absent the taxes, the regulations, and the benefits they make possible.”

a. Democrats eschew such candor with reason. In 1984 Walter Mondale told the voters, “Mr. Reagan will raise taxes, and so will I. He won’t tell you. I just did.” Mondale went on to sweep the jurisdictions of Minnesota and the District of Columbia, forcing President Reagan to cobble together an Electoral College majority by carrying the other 49 states."
Liars Remorse The Weekly Standard



There'll be an honest Progressive any day now......any day......

Governments don't operate to make a profit. If they did it would cost you $5 just to mail a letter to someone. Public schools would cost more. Police would ticket more to make more profit.

And without regulations you'd pay a lot more for everything. Your way doesn't work.

Of course, your attempt at a post has nothing to do with the linked post, which focuses on the dishonesty of Progressives/Liberals/communists/Democrats....

Speaking of dishonesty....and simply out of curiosity, why is it that the numerous posts which have proven you to be wrong, and/or lying......

...why do you continue in the same manner?

Is that why you are a Liberal....because there are no restrictions related to truth?

Nothing you've posted proves me wrong

 

[danielpalos]

So, what if democrats never met a communist they didn't like; some chics on the right can be pretty hot. It isn't the fault of the left, that the right still doesn't have a clue or a Cause as to why some on left are becoming better poets and know it, instead of better Communists and not know it. It may be one reason why that form of cognitive dissonance of the right, exogenous to ourselves, caused the right to have to go practice their Communism, in Cuba, while claiming Capitalism is useless when they really really want the Socialism of a trade embargo.

 

[sealybobo]

So, what if democrats never met a communist they didn't like; some chics on the right can be pretty hot. It isn't the fault of the left, that the right still doesn't have a clue or a Cause as to why some on left are becoming better poets and know it, instead of better Communists and not know it. It may be one reason why that form of cognitive dissonance of the right, exogenous to ourselves, caused the right to have to go practice their Communism, in Cuba, while claiming Capitalism is useless when they really really want the Socialism of a trade embargo.

Here are my favorite governments and economies in order.

1 progressive moderate Democrats that regulate
2.moderate conservatives
3 socialism
4 conservative republicans
5 libertarians
6 communism

Basically unregulated free market capitalism would lead to anarchy. Trickle down doesn't work. Republicans deregulate too much and favor rich to the rest of us.

 

[HenryBHough]

If Democrats were suddenly honest I'd hurry out the door with a shotgun to get some free bacon from the flying pigs.

 

[Jroc]

but but but they did build a wall to keep their people in.............GATED COUNTRIES................

LOL

If Progressives were honest theyd say put us in power so we can inflict unimaginable poverty, misery, torture and murder and the first ones we round up will be the useful idiots who put us here because they demonstrated that they cannot be trusted

"If Progressives were honest...."


1. " If Democrats were forthright and respectful they would have enough confidence in their proposals and their countrymen to speak plainly. They would say: “We’re not idiots; you’re not idiots; and only an idiot could believe it’s possible for government to do big things that help lots of people without also imposing big costs, through taxes and regulations, that adversely affect lots of people. The reason you should support the Democratic agenda is not that we’re magicians who can make something out of nothing. It’s that the benefits of our programs will exceed their costs—so much so that our country and most of our citizens will be better off paying the higher taxes and complying with the more stringent regulations than we would be absent the taxes, the regulations, and the benefits they make possible.”

a. Democrats eschew such candor with reason. In 1984 Walter Mondale told the voters, “Mr. Reagan will raise taxes, and so will I. He won’t tell you. I just did.” Mondale went on to sweep the jurisdictions of Minnesota and the District of Columbia, forcing President Reagan to cobble together an Electoral College majority by carrying the other 49 states."
Liars Remorse The Weekly Standard



There'll be an honest Progressive any day now......any day......

Governments don't operate to make a profit. If they did it would cost you $5 just to mail a letter to someone. Public schools would cost more. Police would ticket more to make more profit.

And without regulations you'd pay a lot more for everything. Your way doesn't work.

that's gotta be one of the dumbest statements ever posted on the board

To run a government it costs money. The question is what do we get for all the taxes we pay? And who should pay more? The poor middle class or rich and corporations.

The rich say we should.

I say not only roll back the bush tax breaks but also the Reagan tax cuts

I say you're an idiot, no doubt you sit at home collecting your government check. The federal government should be cut. Departments eliminated, the bureaucracy scaled way back. The crony capitalism eliminated

 

[DonaldFG]

Republican, Democrat, Communist, Socialist, Capitalist, whatever type of government we talk about, everything that happens depends on who is running it all! If a minority elite has control, the people suffer.

On the other hand, if it is the people who control - really control - the government in whatever form, it will be made into a just and fair system. In none of the examples mentioned in this thread did the people have control. Thus the results experienced.

 

[DonaldFG]

They still hate Reagan for calling the USSR an Evil Empire, promising to defeat it and collapsing their empire

Sure, the Dems back then really wanted communism to work, I think they were really dissapointed

Just because we disagree with lord Reagan doesn't mean we were rooting for Russia. But that's how republicans are with Obama. They'd love for him and the dems to fail back when we were in charge. In fact they obstructed and slowed our recovery all for politics. Treasonist

Republicans think Democrats want the government to have too much power. Democrats think Republicans want the government to not have enough power so it is powerless against the rich. Basically they want a puppet government that serves the rich and corporations, not the poor.

This is nothing new in human history. The Greeks and their democracy was the same way. It wasn't for the poor and they owned slaves. Only the rich are smart enough to decide things. Not the masses. Republicans to this day believe this. You'll notice it when they delight in the fact that only 30% of the voting population shows up to vote. They don't think those other 70% should vote because they aren't smart enough. Well neither are middle class people who vote GOP. That doesn't stop them.

The tendency of all governments is to move towards total control. Thats the trend. As they establish and grow burocracies like the EPA that create laws though regulations, you can watch your freedoms very slowly dissapear. Were not there yet, but the government expansion makes life hard for the little guy who has to follow all their rules. The Government determines who is considered rich and who is not, and whos money is to be to distributed to whom, I dont think the average democrat is a communist by far, but I believe the elites in washington love the idea of the socialist/communist model. They want to move us in that direction , but they cant do it all at once. Republicans I feel dont give a damn really either, there really is no party that represents the people anymore, to them were all citizens of the world, you can see that in our immigration policies, so who does washington represent anyway these days? besides themselves. Never trust any of them,
only try to vote for the lesser of the evils

Our government is capitalist and controlled by corporations. Capitalism is self empowering, so it is not just about the economy. As capitalism gains financial power, it also gains political power. So it trends towards Facism, and as we are currently seeing this trend is getting stronger. This is Eisenhower's military-industrial complex! Enjoy it while it lasts.

 

[longly]

....that they didn't adore.



...

“Never met a communist they didn’t adore” , that is not really so, up until the later part of Vietnam they were pretty good about resisting communist aggression, But when it looked like they going to win the Cold War liberal spines turned to jelly. Who was the liberal anchor woman who praised the liberation of Saigon? They were desperate to be on the winning side; the communist were not very forgiving. They considered anyone that stood up to them as a war criminal, to be punished. As punishment they raped almost ever German woman in their in their sector of occupied Germany.

 

[PoliticalChic]

....that they didn't adore.



...

“Never met a communist they didn’t adore” , that is not really so, up until the later part of Vietnam they were pretty good about resisting communist aggression, But when it looked like they going to win the Cold War liberal spines turned to jelly. Who was the liberal anchor woman who praised the liberation of Saigon? They were desperate to be on the winning side; the communist were not very forgiving. They considered anyone that stood up to them as a war criminal, to be punished. As punishment they raped almost ever German woman in their in their sector of occupied Germany.

"“Never met a communist they didn’t adore” , that is not really so, up until the later part of Vietnam they were pretty good about resisting communist aggression,..."

Perhaps you've never heard of Franklin Roosevelt.

He did everything he could to support Stalin and make certain that communism survived....including lie to the American people about communism.

September 30, 1941, FDR claimed that there was freedom of religion in the USSR. "The claim that Stalin's Russia allowed religious freedom was the first step in a massive pro-Soviet campaign that the White House coordinated for the duration of the war."
"Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow,"by Dennis J. Dunn, p. 137

 

[eagle1462010]

....that they didn't adore.



...

“Never met a communist they didn’t adore” , that is not really so, up until the later part of Vietnam they were pretty good about resisting communist aggression, But when it looked like they going to win the Cold War liberal spines turned to jelly. Who was the liberal anchor woman who praised the liberation of Saigon? They were desperate to be on the winning side; the communist were not very forgiving. They considered anyone that stood up to them as a war criminal, to be punished. As punishment they raped almost ever German woman in their in their sector of occupied Germany.

"“Never met a communist they didn’t adore” , that is not really so, up until the later part of Vietnam they were pretty good about resisting communist aggression,..."

Perhaps you've never heard of Franklin Roosevelt.

He did everything he could to support Stalin and make certain that communism survived....including lie to the American people about communism.

September 30, 1941, FDR claimed that there was freedom of religion in the USSR. "The claim that Stalin's Russia allowed religious freedom was the first step in a massive pro-Soviet campaign that the White House coordinated for the duration of the war."
"Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow,"by Dennis J. Dunn, p. 137

LOL

Freedom in the USSR...............FDR

LOL

 

[Wry Catcher]

Herein is a video from a different perspective; long time readers of this message board understand that PoliticalChic is a hard and fast partisan,whose posts are mindful of a Monday morning QB. Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is one sided and measured by a moral judgment today and a time when she can assassinate the character of those long dead.

The video is an example of a pragmatic POTUS, who chose the lives of American GI's over the lives of Russian troops. Here's is a thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently, and sent our troops into Eastern Europe to fight the Germans, and then to fight the Russians?

My dad served for the duration, as did many of your dad's or grandfathers, as did my father-in-law and countless others who never would have come home & had families, if had FDR and HST acted differently.

Idealogues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced and the cold hard decisions they made.

Did the West sell out Eastern Europe at Yalta Eastern Front Videos WW2History.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

Herein is a video from a different perspective; long time readers of this message board understand that PoliticalChic is a hard and fast partisan,whose posts are mindful of a Monday morning QB. Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is one sided and measured by a moral judgment today, when the blood of those who have fallen has long disappeared and she can assassinate the character of those long dead.

The video is an example of a pragmatic POTUS, who chose the lives of American GI's over the lives of Russian troops. Here's is thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently and sent our troops into Eastern Europe to fight the Germans, and then to fight the Russians?

My dad served for the duration, as did many of your dad's or grandfathers.

Idealogues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced.

Did the West sell out Eastern Europe at Yalta Eastern Front Videos WW2History.com

"Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is" based on truth, knowledge and courage.

You, a foul-mouthed dunce who has no ability to lean or to incorporate knowledge into his worldview.

One example will destroy your post:

On March 26, 1945, Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall issued the following order: "Censor all stories, delete criticism Russian treatment." This was aimed at those Americans who had been POWs of the Red Army. Note that some 20,000 US soldiers were never returned by "Uncle Joe."

a. FDR died April 12th..but, based on Marshall's order, the White House clearly knew of the following prior to that:

" By May 15, 1945, the Pentagon believed 25,000 American POWs "liberated" by the Red Army were still being held hostage to Soviet demands that all "Soviet citizens" be returned to Soviet control, "without exception" and by force if necessary, as agreed to at the Yalta Conference in February 1945. When the U.S. refused to return some military formations composed of Soviet citizens, such as the First Ukrainian SS Division, Stalin retaliated by returning only 4,116 of the hostage American POWs. On June 1, 1945, the United States Government issued documents, signed by General Dwight D. Eisenhower, explaining away the loss of approximately 20,000 POWs remaining under Stalin's control." http://www.nationalalliance.org/wwii/wwii.htm



"Here's is (sic) thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently ..."
Tell that to the 20,000 American troops that FDR sacrificed to his pal, Stalin, you dope.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Herein is a video from a different perspective; long time readers of this message board understand that PoliticalChic is a hard and fast partisan,whose posts are mindful of a Monday morning QB. Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is one sided and measured by a moral judgment today, when the blood of those who have fallen has long disappeared and she can assassinate the character of those long dead.

The video is an example of a pragmatic POTUS, who chose the lives of American GI's over the lives of Russian troops. Here's is thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently and sent our troops into Eastern Europe to fight the Germans, and then to fight the Russians?

My dad served for the duration, as did many of your dad's or grandfathers.

Idealogues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced.

Did the West sell out Eastern Europe at Yalta Eastern Front Videos WW2History.com

"Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is" based on truth, knowledge and courage.

You, a foul-mouthed dunce who has no ability to lean or to incorporate knowledge into his worldview.

One example will destroy your post:

On March 26, 1945, Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall issued the following order: "Censor all stories, delete criticism Russian treatment." This was aimed at those Americans who had been POWs of the Red Army. Note that some 20,000 US soldiers were never returned by "Uncle Joe."

a. FDR died April 12th..but, based on Marshall's order, the White House clearly knew of the following prior to that:

" By May 15, 1945, the Pentagon believed 25,000 American POWs "liberated" by the Red Army were still being held hostage to Soviet demands that all "Soviet citizens" be returned to Soviet control, "without exception" and by force if necessary, as agreed to at the Yalta Conference in February 1945. When the U.S. refused to return some military formations composed of Soviet citizens, such as the First Ukrainian SS Division, Stalin retaliated by returning only 4,116 of the hostage American POWs. On June 1, 1945, the United States Government issued documents, signed by General Dwight D. Eisenhower, explaining away the loss of approximately 20,000 POWs remaining under Stalin's control." http://www.nationalalliance.org/wwii/wwii.htm



"Here's is (sic) thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently ..."
Tell that to the 20,000 American troops that FDR sacrificed to his pal, Stalin, you dope.

"Ideologues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced and the cold hard decisions they made."

 

[Wry Catcher]

Herein is a video from a different perspective; long time readers of this message board understand that PoliticalChic is a hard and fast partisan,whose posts are mindful of a Monday morning QB. Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is one sided and measured by a moral judgment today, when the blood of those who have fallen has long disappeared and she can assassinate the character of those long dead.

The video is an example of a pragmatic POTUS, who chose the lives of American GI's over the lives of Russian troops. Here's is thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently and sent our troops into Eastern Europe to fight the Germans, and then to fight the Russians?

My dad served for the duration, as did many of your dad's or grandfathers.

Idealogues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced.

Did the West sell out Eastern Europe at Yalta Eastern Front Videos WW2History.com

"Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is" based on truth, knowledge and courage.

You, a foul-mouthed dunce who has no ability to lean or to incorporate knowledge into his worldview.

One example will destroy your post:

On March 26, 1945, Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall issued the following order: "Censor all stories, delete criticism Russian treatment." This was aimed at those Americans who had been POWs of the Red Army. Note that some 20,000 US soldiers were never returned by "Uncle Joe."

a. FDR died April 12th..but, based on Marshall's order, the White House clearly knew of the following prior to that:

" By May 15, 1945, the Pentagon believed 25,000 American POWs "liberated" by the Red Army were still being held hostage to Soviet demands that all "Soviet citizens" be returned to Soviet control, "without exception" and by force if necessary, as agreed to at the Yalta Conference in February 1945. When the U.S. refused to return some military formations composed of Soviet citizens, such as the First Ukrainian SS Division, Stalin retaliated by returning only 4,116 of the hostage American POWs. On June 1, 1945, the United States Government issued documents, signed by General Dwight D. Eisenhower, explaining away the loss of approximately 20,000 POWs remaining under Stalin's control." http://www.nationalalliance.org/wwii/wwii.htm



"Here's is (sic) thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently ..."
Tell that to the 20,000 American troops that FDR sacrificed to his pal, Stalin, you dope.

BTW genius, you link goes no where.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Herein is a video from a different perspective; long time readers of this message board understand that PoliticalChic is a hard and fast partisan,whose posts are mindful of a Monday morning QB. Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is one sided and measured by a moral judgment today, when the blood of those who have fallen has long disappeared and she can assassinate the character of those long dead.

The video is an example of a pragmatic POTUS, who chose the lives of American GI's over the lives of Russian troops. Here's is thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently and sent our troops into Eastern Europe to fight the Germans, and then to fight the Russians?

My dad served for the duration, as did many of your dad's or grandfathers.

Idealogues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced.

Did the West sell out Eastern Europe at Yalta Eastern Front Videos WW2History.com

"Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is" based on truth, knowledge and courage.

You, a foul-mouthed dunce who has no ability to lean or to incorporate knowledge into his worldview.

One example will destroy your post:

On March 26, 1945, Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall issued the following order: "Censor all stories, delete criticism Russian treatment." This was aimed at those Americans who had been POWs of the Red Army. Note that some 20,000 US soldiers were never returned by "Uncle Joe."

a. FDR died April 12th..but, based on Marshall's order, the White House clearly knew of the following prior to that:

" By May 15, 1945, the Pentagon believed 25,000 American POWs "liberated" by the Red Army were still being held hostage to Soviet demands that all "Soviet citizens" be returned to Soviet control, "without exception" and by force if necessary, as agreed to at the Yalta Conference in February 1945. When the U.S. refused to return some military formations composed of Soviet citizens, such as the First Ukrainian SS Division, Stalin retaliated by returning only 4,116 of the hostage American POWs. On June 1, 1945, the United States Government issued documents, signed by General Dwight D. Eisenhower, explaining away the loss of approximately 20,000 POWs remaining under Stalin's control." http://www.nationalalliance.org/wwii/wwii.htm



"Here's is (sic) thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently ..."
Tell that to the 20,000 American troops that FDR sacrificed to his pal, Stalin, you dope.

"Ideologues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced and the cold hard decisions they made."

So......when was the time that America had to align itself with homicidal, sociopathic murderers?

1933?
Right after Muggeridge and Garth Jones revealed how Stalin starved seven million farmers, men, women, and children, to death?

Really, you moron?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Herein is a video from a different perspective; long time readers of this message board understand that PoliticalChic is a hard and fast partisan,whose posts are mindful of a Monday morning QB. Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is one sided and measured by a moral judgment today, when the blood of those who have fallen has long disappeared and she can assassinate the character of those long dead.

The video is an example of a pragmatic POTUS, who chose the lives of American GI's over the lives of Russian troops. Here's is thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently and sent our troops into Eastern Europe to fight the Germans, and then to fight the Russians?

My dad served for the duration, as did many of your dad's or grandfathers.

Idealogues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced.

Did the West sell out Eastern Europe at Yalta Eastern Front Videos WW2History.com

"Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is" based on truth, knowledge and courage.

You, a foul-mouthed dunce who has no ability to lean or to incorporate knowledge into his worldview.

One example will destroy your post:

On March 26, 1945, Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall issued the following order: "Censor all stories, delete criticism Russian treatment." This was aimed at those Americans who had been POWs of the Red Army. Note that some 20,000 US soldiers were never returned by "Uncle Joe."

a. FDR died April 12th..but, based on Marshall's order, the White House clearly knew of the following prior to that:

" By May 15, 1945, the Pentagon believed 25,000 American POWs "liberated" by the Red Army were still being held hostage to Soviet demands that all "Soviet citizens" be returned to Soviet control, "without exception" and by force if necessary, as agreed to at the Yalta Conference in February 1945. When the U.S. refused to return some military formations composed of Soviet citizens, such as the First Ukrainian SS Division, Stalin retaliated by returning only 4,116 of the hostage American POWs. On June 1, 1945, the United States Government issued documents, signed by General Dwight D. Eisenhower, explaining away the loss of approximately 20,000 POWs remaining under Stalin's control."



"Here's is (sic) thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently ..."
Tell that to the 20,000 American troops that FDR sacrificed to his pal, Stalin, you dope.

BTW genius, you link goes no where.

Have someone read this to you, and then tell you what to think:
National Alliance of Families

 

[Wry Catcher]

Herein is a video from a different perspective; long time readers of this message board understand that PoliticalChic is a hard and fast partisan,whose posts are mindful of a Monday morning QB. Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is one sided and measured by a moral judgment today, when the blood of those who have fallen has long disappeared and she can assassinate the character of those long dead.

The video is an example of a pragmatic POTUS, who chose the lives of American GI's over the lives of Russian troops. Here's is thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently and sent our troops into Eastern Europe to fight the Germans, and then to fight the Russians?

My dad served for the duration, as did many of your dad's or grandfathers.

Idealogues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced.

Did the West sell out Eastern Europe at Yalta Eastern Front Videos WW2History.com

"Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is" based on truth, knowledge and courage.

AD HOMINEM ALERT

You, a foul-mouthed dunce who has no ability to lean or to incorporate knowledge into his worldview.


One example will destroy your post:

ONE VIDEO WITH SEVERAL DIFFERENT SOURCES VIS A VIS YOUR FAILED LINK ONLY DESTROYS ONE THINK: POLICITICALCHIC

On March 26, 1945, Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall issued the following order: "Censor all stories, delete criticism Russian treatment." This was aimed at those Americans who had been POWs of the Red Army. Note that some 20,000 US soldiers were never returned by "Uncle Joe."

a. FDR died April 12th..but, based on Marshall's order, the White House clearly knew of the following prior to that:

" By May 15, 1945, the Pentagon believed 25,000 American POWs "liberated" by the Red Army were still being held hostage to Soviet demands that all "Soviet citizens" be returned to Soviet control, "without exception" and by force if necessary, as agreed to at the Yalta Conference in February 1945. When the U.S. refused to return some military formations composed of Soviet citizens, such as the First Ukrainian SS Division, Stalin retaliated by returning only 4,116 of the hostage American POWs. On June 1, 1945, the United States Government issued documents, signed by General Dwight D. Eisenhower, explaining away the loss of approximately 20,000 POWs remaining under Stalin's control." http://www.nationalalliance.org/wwii/wwii.htm



"Here's is (sic) thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently ..."
Tell that to the 20,000 American troops that FDR sacrificed to his pal, Stalin, you dope.

ONE VIDEO WITH SEVERAL DIFFERENT SOURCES VIS A VIS YOUR FAILED LINK ONLY DESTROYS ONE THINK: POLICITICALCHIC

Fix the link, then we'll discuss.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Herein is a video from a different perspective; long time readers of this message board understand that PoliticalChic is a hard and fast partisan,whose posts are mindful of a Monday morning QB. Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is one sided and measured by a moral judgment today, when the blood of those who have fallen has long disappeared and she can assassinate the character of those long dead.

The video is an example of a pragmatic POTUS, who chose the lives of American GI's over the lives of Russian troops. Here's is thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently and sent our troops into Eastern Europe to fight the Germans, and then to fight the Russians?

My dad served for the duration, as did many of your dad's or grandfathers.

Idealogues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced.

Did the West sell out Eastern Europe at Yalta Eastern Front Videos WW2History.com

"Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is" based on truth, knowledge and courage.

AD HOMINEM ALERT

You, a foul-mouthed dunce who has no ability to lean or to incorporate knowledge into his worldview.


One example will destroy your post:

ONE VIDEO WITH SEVERAL DIFFERENT SOURCES VIS A VIS YOUR FAILED LINK ONLY DESTROYS ONE THINK: POLICITICALCHIC

On March 26, 1945, Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall issued the following order: "Censor all stories, delete criticism Russian treatment." This was aimed at those Americans who had been POWs of the Red Army. Note that some 20,000 US soldiers were never returned by "Uncle Joe."

a. FDR died April 12th..but, based on Marshall's order, the White House clearly knew of the following prior to that:

" By May 15, 1945, the Pentagon believed 25,000 American POWs "liberated" by the Red Army were still being held hostage to Soviet demands that all "Soviet citizens" be returned to Soviet control, "without exception" and by force if necessary, as agreed to at the Yalta Conference in February 1945. When the U.S. refused to return some military formations composed of Soviet citizens, such as the First Ukrainian SS Division, Stalin retaliated by returning only 4,116 of the hostage American POWs. On June 1, 1945, the United States Government issued documents, signed by General Dwight D. Eisenhower, explaining away the loss of approximately 20,000 POWs remaining under Stalin's control." http://www.nationalalliance.org/wwii/wwii.htm



"Here's is (sic) thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently ..."
Tell that to the 20,000 American troops that FDR sacrificed to his pal, Stalin, you dope.

ONE VIDEO WITH SEVERAL DIFFERENT SOURCES VIS A VIS YOUR FAILED LINK ONLY DESTROYS ONE THINK: POLICITICALCHIC

Fix the link, then we'll discuss.

It is fixed, dolt.
The only thing not fixable is your cognitive inability.