Democrats need to understand what evidence means

Reports, assumptions, guesses, rumors, stretches, extrapolations and internet claims are not evidence.

What may be a fact -- a bank statement, for example -- is still not evidence of a crime. The statement must be directly linked to an actual crime in some way.

This is the same mistake MAGA World made with the "rigged election" farce. One plus one plus (maybe, could be, looks like, those damn commies) does not equal a crime. Sorry.

The thread title is another example of MAGA projection. It's a long list.
 
Last edited:
Because CONGRESS is investigating him, and they are finding an alarming amount of evidence every week.
No, they're _saying_ they have evidence.

And it always turns out that they don't.

After a hundred iterations of that, you'd think even the slowest cult members would figure out how they're being played. You never figure it out.
 
No, they're _saying_ they have evidence.

And it always turns out that they don't.

After a hundred iterations of that, you'd think even the slowest cult members would figure out how they're being played. You never figure it out.
If they have no evidence, then why are you even worried about it? Why respond to threads about evidence that you say doesnt exist? I sure as hell dont waste my time on "9/11 inside job" threads. :dunno:
 
No, youre right. Comers investigation and the hearings dont hurt Joe at all. He is perfectly safe and he is a strong candidate. You guys are going to win big with Joe at the helm.
If investigations hurt candidates then it's probably going to be the candidate with 5 on going criminal investigations rather than a gimmicky political one who's going to get maimed. 😄
 
If investigations hurt candidates then it's probably going to be the candidate with 5 on going criminal investigations rather than a gimmicky political one who's going to get maimed. 😄
No, Trumps indictments have just made him stronger. Joe wont have that perk.
 
A big part of the dispute is that Democrats, in their effort to defend what increasingly looks like a highly corrupt and compromised Biden, scream “there’s no evidence!!!” The problem is that Democrats don’t understand what evidence is.

They think it means absolute proof. It does not. It means facts that make a claim likely, and to that we have whistleblower testimony, Archer’s testimony, 30+ visits from Hunter’s Burisma partner to the WH, bank records and SARs, the creation of 20 shell companies, the payoffs of $20 million coming from foreign countries and distributed to nine Biden family members, and so forth.

PLENTY of evidence.

Have evidence of an actual crime...

Pointing a map and saying it is sunny yesterday in DC and that is proof that Joe Biden committed a crime...

Change the thread titel to 'Sunny days in DC are proof of Biden committing a crime...', it looks more credible
 
The DOJ wont indict a sitting president. How could you not know that at this point?

Is the FBI investigating him? I have no fucking idea. Do you?
Is the FBI investigating anyone? We have no idea...

Congress can try and impeach him... Go on ahead, need the laugh......
 
If they have no evidence, then why are you even worried about it?
Ah, the "If you laugh at our delusions, it means you're secretly worried we're correct!" defense.

Cult boi, don't look for a deeper meaning. When people laugh at your delusions, they're doing it because they think your delusions are funny.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom