Democrats misuse definition of insurrection, like they do many other terms

[Votto]

Insurrection Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

Insurrection refers to an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. It is a violent revolt against an oppressive authority. Insurrection is different from

definitions.uslegal.com

Insurrection refers to an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. It is a violent revolt against an oppressive authority. Insurrection is different from riots and offenses connected with mob violence. In insurrection there is an organized and armed uprising against authority or operations of government whereas riots and offenses connected with mob violence are simply unlawful acts in disturbance of the peace which do not threaten the stability of the government or the existence of political society.

So if the people of January 6th were insurrectionists, then where are the charges of insurrection upon detaining them?

Is it the first insurrection in world history that was conducted unarmed? Being armed is part of what makes it an insurrection.

And if it was organized, was it run by the Viking and the unarmed woman shot dead in the Capital?

Lastly, if these people murdered others, where are the murder charges?

Democrats are notorious for misusing terms, such as racist. When every political opponent is charged with being a racist, it tends to bastardize it's meaning.

 

[Mac1958]

 

[Votto]

Here are the charges levied against those on January 6th

Thirteen Charged in Federal Court Following Riot at the United States Capitol

Thirteen individuals have been charged so far in federal court in the District of Columbia related to crimes committed at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C, on Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021. In addition to those who have been charged, additional complaints have been submitted and investigations are...

www.justice.gov

Home » Office of Public Affairs » News
SHARE

JUSTICE NEWS​

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs

---

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Friday, January 8, 2021

Thirteen Charged in Federal Court Following Riot at the United States Capitol​

Approximately 40 charged in Superior Court​

Thirteen individuals have been charged with federal crimes. The defendants and charges are outlined below:

1. Cleveland Meredith was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with making interstate threats to Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
2. Richard Barnett, of Arkansas, was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful entry; violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds; and theft of public money, property, or records. Barnett allegedly entered a restricted area of the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.
3. Lonnie Coffman, of Alabama, was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with possession of an unregistered firearm (destructive device) and carrying a pistol without a license. It is alleged that Coffman’s vehicle contained 11 explosive devices known as Molotov cocktails and firearms. It is further alleged he was in possession of two firearms. Coffman was arrested and is currently being held. His detention hearing is scheduled for Jan. 12, 2021.
4. Mark Leffingwell, was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority; assault on a federal law enforcement officer; and violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. Leffingwell allegedly entered the Senate side of the Capitol and when stopped by law enforcement, struck an officer in the helmet and chest. Leffingwell is currently being held and has a detention hearing in district court today.
5. Christopher Alberts, of Maryland, was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with carrying or having readily accessible, on the grounds of the United States Capitol Building, a firearm and ammunition. Specifically a Taurus G2C, 9mm handgun and 9mm caliber ammunition. The defendant appeared in district court and was released. He has a preliminary hearing scheduled for Jan. 28, 2021.
6. Joshua Pruitt, was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority. The defendant appeared in district court and was released. He has a preliminary hearing scheduled for Jan. 28, 2021.
7. Matthew Council, of Florida, was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority and violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. Council allegedly unlawfully entered the Capitol building, and when stopped by law enforcement, he pushed the officer.
8. Cindy Fitchett, of Virginia, was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority; or knowingly, with intent to impede government business or official functions, engaging in disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds; and violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.
9. Michael Curzio, of Florida, was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority; or knowingly, with intent to impede government business or official functions, engaging in disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds; and violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.
10. Douglas Sweet, of Florida, was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority; or knowingly, with intent to impede government business or official functions, engaging in disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds; and violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.
11. Bradley Ruskelas, of Illinois, was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority; or knowingly, with intent to impede government business or official functions, engaging in disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds; and violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.
12. Terry Brown, of Pennsylvania, was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority; or knowingly, with intent to impede government business or official functions, engaging in disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds; and violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.
13. Thomas Gallagher was charged on Jan. 7, 2021, with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority; or knowingly, with intent to impede government business or official functions, engaging in disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds; and violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.

 

[Votto]

What is the LEGAL definition?

Thanks for ignoring it in my thread.

 

[Mac1958]

What is the LEGAL definition?

Thanks for ignoring it in my thread.

Don't know. I use the dictionary definition, and it's as clear as day.

You can call it a "saxophone" if it makes you feel better. I don't care.

 

[Godboy]

Wouldnt that limited definition also be applied to every democrat riot? Were they not rebelling against a "civil authority", aka cops?

 

[Mac1958]

Wouldnt that limited definition also be applied to every democrat riot? Were they not rebelling against a "civil authority", aka cops?

Sure, if you'd like. I just want you to be happy.

 

[Votto]

Don't know. I use the dictionary definition, and it's as clear as day.

You can call it a "saxophone" if it makes you feel better. I don't care.

Since the law is charging these people we need to use their definition idiot.

 

[Mac1958]

Since the law is charging these people we need to use their definition idiot.

Aw, you're getting upset.

For the fiftieth time, the insurrectionists are being charged with the various individual crimes they committed during the insurrection.

This really isn't that complicated.

I'm not sure why this has you people so worked up, but it's a hoot to watch.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

So if the people of January 6th were insurrectionists, then where are the charges of insurrection upon detaining them?

The Govt goes for the charges they have the best chance of making stick. There is a reason that Al Capone was charged with tax evasion even though he did far worse

 

[Godboy]

Sure, if you'd like. I just want you to be happy.

What kind of answer is that? Since when are definitions dictated by what someone likes? We also know that you dont want me to be happy, so i assume this is simply you copping out like a chump loser?

 

[forkup]

Insurrection Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

Insurrection refers to an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. It is a violent revolt against an oppressive authority. Insurrection is different from

definitions.uslegal.com

Insurrection refers to an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. It is a violent revolt against an oppressive authority. Insurrection is different from riots and offenses connected with mob violence. In insurrection there is an organized and armed uprising against authority or operations of government whereas riots and offenses connected with mob violence are simply unlawful acts in disturbance of the peace which do not threaten the stability of the government or the existence of political society.

So if the people of January 6th were insurrectionists, then where are the charges of insurrection upon detaining them?

Is it the first insurrection in world history that was conducted unarmed? Being armed is part of what makes it an insurrection.

And if it was organized, was it run by the Viking and the unarmed woman shot dead in the Capital?

Lastly, if these people murdered others, where are the murder charges?

Democrats are notorious for misusing terms, such as racist. When every political opponent is charged with being a racist, it tends to bastardize it's meaning.

Couple of things. One can be armed with other things than guns. Bear spray, clubs can be employed as weapons. Those things were evident. It was organised, their was a rally beforehand, flyers were distributed beforehand, organisations were present. They went to the place the organisers of the rally wanted them to go. Lastly it was an attempt to prevent the certification of the duly elected president wich most definetly threatens the stability of the government and the political society. POLITICAL SOCIETY LITERALLY HAD TO FIRST BARRICADE THEMSELVES AND THEN RUN.

Your whole premise is simply that they didn't succeed and as such can not be defined a certain way. Guess what an insurrection remains an insurrection whether it succeeds or not.

 

[elektra]

Technically, the reason they misuse all kinds of words, insurrection, marriage, etc., is because they are the least educated, dumbest people amongst us. We are trying to educate morons. Their replies are mostly anger and hate. That shows the democrats' intelligence.

 

[Mac1958]

What kind of answer is that? Since when are definitions dictated by what someone likes? We also know that you dont want me to be happy, so i assume this is simply you copping out like a chump loser?

You guys are very sensitive. I've explained this all above, as simply as I could.

I'd love to know why you guys are so triggered over the actual and clear dictionary definition of a word.

 

[Mac1958]

The Govt goes for the charges they have the best chance of making stick. There is a reason that Al Capone was charged with tax evasion even though he did far worse

Plus, the individual rubes aren't important. They have to be punished for breaking laws, but it's very clear that they were not the instigators here. I'd guess most of the rubes were well-meaning in their own way, just badly misguided. If they hadn't gone that far on J6, they'd be just this side of victims.

To me, and I'd bet to the DoJ, this is about the seditionists - those who stoked the fires - not the rubes.

 

[22lcidw]

The Govt goes for the charges they have the best chance of making stick. There is a reason that Al Capone was charged with tax evasion even though he did far worse

That day seems to be more and more of a quandry than we are being told by the government you love. Harris is good at reading the script she is given. Just like Kavanaugh and the pablum she spoke of yesterday with equating Jan. 6 to comparisons to real tragedies. Our freedom is over because to many government employees like the salaries and benefits they get with a percentage of them being sadists.

 

[Penelope]

Insurrection Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

Insurrection refers to an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. It is a violent revolt against an oppressive authority. Insurrection is different from

definitions.uslegal.com

Insurrection refers to an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. It is a violent revolt against an oppressive authority. Insurrection is different from riots and offenses connected with mob violence. In insurrection there is an organized and armed uprising against authority or operations of government whereas riots and offenses connected with mob violence are simply unlawful acts in disturbance of the peace which do not threaten the stability of the government or the existence of political society.

So if the people of January 6th were insurrectionists, then where are the charges of insurrection upon detaining them?

Is it the first insurrection in world history that was conducted unarmed? Being armed is part of what makes it an insurrection.

And if it was organized, was it run by the Viking and the unarmed woman shot dead in the Capital?

Lastly, if these people murdered others, where are the murder charges?

Democrats are notorious for misusing terms, such as racist. When every political opponent is charged with being a racist, it tends to bastardize it's meaning.

It was political , tramp was trying to do a coup and he sent a mob to the capital. Ask who it was violent for??

 

[Penelope]

That day seems to be more and more of a quandry than we are being told by the government you love. Harris is good at reading the script she is given. Just like Kavanaugh and the pablum she spoke of yesterday with equating Jan. 6 to comparisons to real tragedies. Our freedom is over because to many government employees like the salaries and benefits they get with a percentage of them being sadists.

The democracy is over due to republicans.

 

[Mac1958]

It was political , tramp was trying to do a coup and he sent a mob to the capital. Ask who it was violent for??

The DoJ knows that Jan6 wasn't about the misguided rubes. It was about the small cadre in the orange orbit and their political/media enablers.

 

[Mac1958]