Democrats Hound Biden To Pack The Supreme Court, Establish Term Limits After More Decisions They Don’t Like

[22lcidw]

No they won't. And they are extremists.

Give them a chance. We have to slow the agitating between ethnic and cultural backgrounds. These decisions are not eliminating as much as causing a conversation we never had on them. Our nation is in trouble. I have read a few time that over 60% of people in college are women. That is crazy. No insult to them. However, many males are becoming lost. Gangs and primal ways of living are returning and there are now women getting more brazen in this. If the economic ever tanks, we are all going to be stuck where we are at and then things get worse.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It shows how they continue wanting to abuse their power in any way that they can and accomplish a political coup of the government.

What is this whiny nonsense? None of it is against the rules.

 

[Independent thinker]

What is this whiny nonsense? None of it is against the rules.

When you abuse your power for political gain then you should pay the price for that. Still, it's good of you to acknowledge that that is indeed happening. Most of your side refuse to admit that. So, kudos to you for admitting the abuse of power for political reasons out loud.

 

[Lesh]

When you abuse your power for political gain then you should pay the price for that. Still, it's good of you to acknowledge that that is indeed happening. Most of your side refuse to admit that. So, kudos to you for admitting the abuse of power for political reasons out loud.

Ya mean like holding a SC seat open until you get a Republican President and then slamming another appointee in weeks before the next Presidential election?

Like that?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Agreed. Short & strict.

I agree with this pipe dream.

 

[toobfreak]

Yes, the founding intent was white male preference.

Look shitstain, since whites were the majoriity race comprising about 85% of the USA when AA was implemented, intended to introduce a greater DIVERSITY of ethnicity, IT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN GEARED TO FURTHER WHITES INSTEAD.
That is just such stupid BULLSHIT, one might as well argue that sunrises are really GREEN and occur in the west with a 4 year old.\

Are you a four year old?

Here is the opinion of a poll taken of about 1600 people in very white, very liberal BOSTON:

And here is the opinion of HARVARD UNIVERSITY on the matter:

Affirmative action was developed in the 1960s to address racial inequality and racial exclusion in American society. Colleges and universities wanted to be seen as forward-thinking on issues of race. Then, in the late 1970s, affirmative action went to the United States Supreme Court. There, the only justification accepted, by Justice Powell, was the compelling state interest in a diverse student body in which everyone benefits from a range of perspectives in the classroom.

The Case for Affirmative Action

As the federal stance on affirmative action changes, a look at what the policy has accomplished, and why it’s still relevant today.

www.gse.harvard.edu

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Still, it's good of you to acknowledge that that is indeed happening

No, I believe I called your claim "whiny nonsense". Are you okay? How many fingers am I holding up?

It's perfectly within the rules. So no abuse. Welcome to the world you and your cult created. Enjoy.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

No, I believe I called your claim "whiny nonsense". Are you okay? How many fingers am I holding up?

It's perfectly within the rules. So no abuse. Welcome to the world you and your cult created. Enjoy.

It is the trademark derpy way magaturd trolls communicate. Vague and stupid, just like their leaders.

 

[lantern2814]

~~~~~~
I partially agree with you.
Before term limits for the Judiciary, Let's impose term limits on both Congress and the Senate.

Perhaps age limits need to be looked at as well. I saw somewhere that if there was an age limit of 70 for Senate, then over 75% of the Senate at that time would have been ousted.

 

[Lesh]

Look shitstain, since whites were the majoriity race comprising about 85% of the USA when AA was implemented, intended to introduce a greater DIVERSITY of ethnicity, IT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN GEARED TO FURTHER WHITES INSTEAD.
That is just such stupid BULLSHIT, one might as well argue that sunrises are really GREEN and occur in the west with a 4 year old.\

Are you a four year old?

Here is the opinion of a poll taken of about 1600 people in very white, very liberal BOSTON:

View attachment 801156

And here is the opinion of HARVARD UNIVERSITY on the matter:

Affirmative action was developed in the 1960s to address racial inequality and racial exclusion in American society. Colleges and universities wanted to be seen as forward-thinking on issues of race. Then, in the late 1970s, affirmative action went to the United States Supreme Court. There, the only justification accepted, by Justice Powell, was the compelling state interest in a diverse student body in which everyone benefits from a range of perspectives in the classroom.

The Case for Affirmative Action

As the federal stance on affirmative action changes, a look at what the policy has accomplished, and why it’s still relevant today.

www.gse.harvard.edu

So now polls are how we judge SC decisions?

Know how Dobbs is polling??

 

[scruffy]

It is the trademark derpy way magaturd trolls communicate.

"Derpy" ^^^

Funny stuff.

Vague and stupid, just like their leaders.

"Derpy"

lmao

 

[toobfreak]

So now polls are how we judge SC decisions?

Why not? You douchebags use polling to justify and explain your every other position, when it SUITS YOU. Listening to the left, the greatest civil, legal and moral issues should all be left up to the polling of the "popular vote" no matter how unilluminated the masses are.

 

[lantern2814]

Oh bullshit. They held that seat open until the White House changed hands...and then did the opposite to slam Barett in

Just making you people follow your own rule. Remember the Biden Rule?

Joe Biden Argued for Delaying Supreme Court Picks in 1992 (Published 2016)

More than two decades ago, Mr. Biden, who was chairman of the Judiciary Committee, suggested a different standard for filling vacancies in election years.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Lesh]

Why not? You douchebags use polling to justify and explain your every other position, when it SUITS YOU. Listening to the left, the greatest civil, legal and moral issues should all be left up to the polling of the "popular vote" no matter how unilluminated the masses are.

So you use polls when it suits you

Got it hypocrite

 

[Lesh]

Just making you people follow your own rule. Remember the Biden Rule?

Joe Biden Argued for Delaying Supreme Court Picks in 1992 (Published 2016)

More than two decades ago, Mr. Biden, who was chairman of the Judiciary Committee, suggested a different standard for filling vacancies in election years.

www.nytimes.com

There was never a Biden rule.

It was the McConnell Excuse

 

[2aguy]

Ya mean like holding a SC seat open until you get a Republican President and then slamming another appointee in weeks before the next Presidential election?

Like that?

Yep....all according to the rules......

 

[Lesh]

Yep....all according to the rules......

And there are no rules against expanding the Court

 

[toobfreak]

So you use polls when it suits you

Show me one poll you used when it DIDN'T suit you.

Yeah. GOT IT.

 

[Lesh]

Show me one poll you used when it DIDN'T suit you.

Yeah. GOT IT.

You just admitted being a hypocrite.

What little credibility you had (and it wasn't much) has evaporated

 

[toobfreak]

You just admitted being a hypocrite.

Don't bother me with your errant imaginations and fantasies.

What little credibility you had (and it wasn't much) has evaporated

With you? Thanks for the warning! Meantime, I have TRIPLE the likes you have and mine are all mostly POSITIVE, little creep.