Democrats Demanding Trump Break Numerous Laws and Regulations

[Marener]

I guess we supposed to just ignore all regulations and laws that you dimwits find to be “stupid”? You sound exactly like the snot nosed protestors on the streets.

As to this specific regulation, it acutally makes a lot of sense. We can’t start charging some people less than others. That opens a huge Pandora’s box.

Way too late for that.

Trump Directs IRS Not to Enforce the Little-Enforced ‘Johnson Amendment’

The president signed an executive order directing the Internal Revenue Service not to enforce the “Johnson Amendment” against religious organizations, but it’s unclear what effect the move will have.

www.philanthropy.com

 

[Blaster]

So what? It’s a stupid regulation. Don’t enforce it.

Or are you guys just that horny to make poor people suffer more?

Oh the humanity.

 

[hadit]

You guys have to be pretty ******* disgusting to threaten stores who want to help poor people have enough food to feed their families.

Just gross.

If the law states that, and the law was written by democrats, it would seem that democrats need to step up and end the shutdown immediately so people don't go hungry. The nation is waiting on democrats to stop the madness.

 

[Bootstraps]

What do I need to answer? Are you some sort of authority? Is that the way it’s going to be in Trump’s America?

So no intelligent response from you then. At least I know you're just a troll now and can focus on other people.

 

[SweetTea]

Way too late for that.

Trump Directs IRS Not to Enforce the Little-Enforced ‘Johnson Amendment’

The president signed an executive order directing the Internal Revenue Service not to enforce the “Johnson Amendment” against religious organizations, but it’s unclear what effect the move will have.

www.philanthropy.com

So it is ok then. Gotcha.

 

[Marener]

So it is ok then. Gotcha.

I mean, it was okay when Trump did it to cater to politically connected evangelicals.

But you are opposed to doing so to help poor people?

Like I said. It’s disgusting.

 

[SweetTea]

I mean, it was okay when Trump did it to cater to politically connected evangelicals.

But you are opposed to doing so to help poor people?

Like I said. It’s disgusting.

Like I have said before. A bleeding heart cuts off much needed blood supply to the brain.

 

[SweetSue92]

The insanity in the Democratic Party world continues.

There is no funding available to fully fund SNAP in November, only a contingency fund is available for a partial funding (and it will take states weeks at least to redo their computers to input partial payments). Duh!

Yet Democrats demand SNAP be fully funded. But only Congress can appropriate those funds.

Also, regulations do not allow special treatment for SNAP holders unless a store applies for a waiver. but Democrats are demanding such special treatment be allowed without waivers.




This and more.

"No one is above the law"--except when Dems want to be saved from the consequences of their own actions

 

[Marener]

Like I have said before. A bleeding heart cuts off much needed blood supply to the brain.

Partisanship turns people into uncritical zombies.

You’re okay with Trump ignoring the laws and rules about churches being political, but draw the line at stores offering discounts for poor people who lost SNAP benefits.

Explain that.

 

[martybegan]

Partisanship turns people into uncritical zombies.

You’re okay with Trump ignoring the laws and rules about churches being political, but draw the line at stores offering discounts for poor people who lost SNAP benefits.

Explain that.

The Johnson Amendment is blatantly Unconstitutional.

 

[Lockback]

You guys have to be pretty ******* disgusting to threaten stores who want to help poor people have enough food to feed their families.

Just gross.

WTF are you babbling about now??? What conspiracy theory is this?

 

[Marener]

The Johnson Amendment is blatantly Unconstitutional.

Of course it isn’t. There’s no constitutional right to tax exempt status.

Either repeal it or challenge it in court.

Should we also mention that Trump is ignoring the Tik Tok law? Congress was pretty clear it was to be shut down months ago.

 

[martybegan]

Of course it isn’t. There’s no constitutional right to tax exempt status.

Either repeal it or challenge it in court.

Should we also mention that Trump is ignoring the Tik Tok law? Congress was pretty clear it was to be shut down months ago.

There is a right to free exercise, and the Johnson amendment was designed to stop that.

Funny you defend a law passed originally to stifle black churches from working on Civil Rights issues.

He gave them extensions, and Congress didn't do anything to change those extensions.

 

[Marener]

There is a right to free exercise, and the Johnson amendment was designed to stop that.

This law does not stop the free exercise of religion.

Obviously.

 

[martybegan]

This law does not stop the free exercise of religion.

Obviously.

It sure as hell does, which was the point of it when the racists passed it.

 

[Marener]

It sure as hell does, which was the point of it when the racists passed it.

How does it limit the free exercise of religion?

 

[martybegan]

How does it limit the free exercise of religion?

By putting restrictions on political speech, it implies religion has to have extra restrictions on it.

Sorry, but where is the "free" in that?

But keep defending a law used by racists to punish black churches during the civil rights era... LOL

 

[Marener]

By putting restrictions on political speech, it implies religion has to have extra restrictions on it.

Sorry, but where is the "free" in that?

But keep defending a law used by racists to punish black churches during the civil rights era... LOL

What restrictions? Churches can say whatever they want. There’s no law stopping them.

 

[martybegan]

What restrictions? Churches can say whatever they want. There’s no law stopping them.

The Johnson amendment stops them. Why can other non profits work on politics and churches cannot?

 

[Marener]

The Johnson amendment stops them. Why can other non profits work on politics and churches cannot?

No it doesn’t. They can engage in as much politics as they want.

They just have to pay taxes.